关节镜下Bankart修复与骨性Bankart修复治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的疗效观察

目的 观察关节镜下Bankart修复与骨性Bankart修复治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析自2016-01—2019-12诊治的110例军事训练伤致复发性肩关节前脱位,术前进行肩关节三维CT扫描,并根据有无骨折块分为单纯Bankart损伤组与骨性Bankart损伤组,以此为依据设计关节镜下Bankart修复术与骨性Bankart修复术。比较两组术前与术后肩关节功能Constant评分、肩关节功能Rowe评分、疼痛VAS评分。结果 两组均获得随访,随访时间24～48个月,平均36.4个月。手术均顺利完成,术后切口均一期愈合,无感染、神经血管损伤等并发症。术后24个月X线片及CT结果显示骨性Bankart损伤组肩关节骨折愈合良好,骨质内锚钉固定牢固,无松动、脱出。两组术前、末次随访时的肩关节功能Constant评分、肩关节功能Rowe评分、疼痛VAS评分组间比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论采用关节镜下Bankart修复术及骨性Bankart修复术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位具有创伤小、恢复快以及术后肩关节稳定性好的特点,术后无再脱位病例;特别是对于骨性Ban...     

创伤性复发性肩关节前脱位全关节镜下与切开术式治疗的临床疗效对比

[目的]比较关节镜和开放两种手术方式治疗创伤性复发性肩关节前脱位的临床疗效。[方法]自2012年5月~2014年2月,对84例确诊为肩关节前下盂唇损伤(Bankart损伤)导致的复发性肩关节前脱位的患者进行分组随机对照研究。其中关节镜手术组42例,开放手术组42例,关节镜手术组采用关节镜下带线锚钉Bankart修复术,开放手术组则行MontgomeryJobe切开术式置入带线锚钉进行治疗。术后按标准进行肩关节康复训练。并按Bigliani肩关节评分系统、Rowe肩关节评分系统和视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)进行评估,并比较两组间差异。[结果]术后1例患者失访,其余83例获得了13~33个月(平均25.5个月)随访。其中术后1年时Bigliani评分为关节镜手术组(6.5±0.7)分和开放手术组(4.4±1.9)分,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);Rowe评分为关节镜手术组(75.7±1.7)分和开放手术组(54.4±2.1)分,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。另外,关节镜手术在减轻肩关节疼痛(VAS评分,P0.05)和增加肩关节活动范围(ROM)(P0.05)方面明显优于开放手术组。[结论]关节镜Bankart修复术治疗创伤性复发性肩关节前脱位临床疗效明显优于开放Bankart修复术,关节镜手术在减轻术后疼痛和增加肩关节ROM方面效果更好。     

小切口联合术式治疗复发性肩关节前下脱位

[目的]观察经小切口改良Bristow手术联合锚钉修复前关节囊-盂唇治疗复发性肩关节前下脱位的临床疗效。[方法]自2011年1月~2014年4月治疗复发性肩关节前下脱位13例。取喙突下约5 cm纵行切口,暴露喙突并予以截骨,在肩胛下肌上缘将喙突骨块连带联合腱用1枚空心钉固定于肩胛颈上下中线稍下方距关节骨性盂缘0.5cm处。另外加用2枚铆钉固定在肩胛盂前方,行前方关节囊-盂唇的修补。术后采用Rowe肩关节修正评分进行随访,平均随访16个月(9~48个月)。[结果]手术时间平均55 min(50~75 min),未发生严重并发症。随访期间所有患者均无再脱位,末次随访时Rowe肩关节修正评分平均91.5分,结果全为优。[结论]小切口改良Bristow手术联合锚钉修复关节囊手术创伤小,临床疗效确切。     

关节镜下带线锚钉垂直褥式缝合修复Bankart损伤

目的介绍关节镜下带线锚钉垂直褥式缝合修复Bankart损伤技术,并评价其临床疗效。方法关节镜下带线锚钉垂直褥式缝合修复Bankart损伤技术操作步骤：于肩胛盂缘3点和5点钟位置分别植入2枚带线锚钉,分别在盂唇2点、4点和6点位置将盂唇韧带复合体进行垂直褥式缝合,并将其前下方关节囊向上转移。2004年4月至2006年8月收治的9例盂肱关节前向不稳定患者均无严重的肩胛盂骨性缺损,手术时平均年龄28岁（21—46岁）。采用Rowe肩关节修正评分进行临床随访,平均随访时间14个月（6—26个月）。Rowe肩关节修正评分术前（40±16）分。结果手术时间平均为51min（40—75min）。术后Rowe肩关节修正评分上升至（92±19）分（75—94分）。随访期间无复发,也未发生并发症,0°外展时外旋平均减少5°,90°外展时外旋平均减少3°。结论关节镜下带线锚钉垂直褥式缝合修复Bankart损伤治疗盂肱关节前下不稳定手术技术相对简单、手术时间短、近期临床效果较好。     

肩关节镜下Bankart损伤的治疗体会

目的探讨肩关节镜下金属缝合锚钉固定治疗Bankart损伤的术后疗效及治疗体会。方法 2010年3月至2014年3月共收治38例Bankart损伤的患者,均应用全关节镜下锚定缝合技术进行Bankart修复术。其中男31例,女7例,患者手术时平均年龄29.5岁(20~39岁),其中12例患者为初次脱位,26例患者为反复多次脱位。所有患者术前均有肩关节脱位病史。术前患者采用美国肩肘外科协会评分系统(American shoulder and elbow surgeons evaluation form,ASES)肩关节评分,平均(83.7±12.8)分,Rowe评分(36.2±7.8)分,Constant-Murley评分(85.4±8.8)分。术中所有患者均采用3~4枚金属缝合锚钉进行Bankart修复术。结果 38例患者均获随访,随访时间13~40个月,平均23个月。术后肩关节前屈上举、体侧外旋及内旋活动度较术前无明显改变,外展位外旋活动度较术前明显改变,术后ASES评分平均(96.8±4.6)分,与术前相比差异具有统计学意义;术后Rowe评分平均(90.2±11.7)分,Constant-Murley评分(97.9±7.7)分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义。术后2例患者出现再次脱位,手术失败率5.3%(2/38)。结论应用全关节镜下锚定缝合技术进行Bankart修复术是治疗Bankart损伤的有效方法。合适的手术时机,充分的松解及关节囊及韧带复合体的提拉缝合、锚钉的合理分布是手术成功的保障。     

肩关节脱位合并肩袖与Bankart损伤的诊治

目的 探讨关节镜下修复肩关节前脱位合并肩袖与Bankart损伤的疗效.方法 1999年9月至2007年7月收治16例肩关节脱位合并肩袖与Bankart损伤患者,男14例,女2例;左肩6例,右肩10例.交通伤8例,运动伤4例,牵拉伤4例.受伤至手术时间平均4.5个月(1.5～11.0个月).肩关节x线片显示肩盂撕脱骨折3例.16例患者肩关节核磁共振造影显示肩袖与Bankart损伤.关节镜探查发现肩袖于肱骨大结节处撕脱伴肩袖挛缩12例.采用关节镜下松解、缝合锚钉和骨锚钉同定缝合9例;因肩袖挛缩明显,进行关节镜与小切口辅助下肩袖缝合固定术3例;肩衲组织因牵拉松弛抬肩无力,采用等离子刀皱缩和肩袖缝合紧缩术4例.Bankart损伤采用关节镜下可吸收Bankart钉固定3例,钛合金缝合锚钉固定3例,关节镜下直接缝合修补盂唇3例,骨锚钉加会属锚钉固定7例.结果 16例患者术后获平均16.5个月(7～34个月)随访.肩关节稳定,肩外展和上举功能恢复正常12例,术后肩关节外展、抬举活动轻度受限2例,前伸活动疼痛2例.金属锚钉拔出再手术2例.采用美国加州洛杉矶大学UCLA肩关节功能评分:术前平均(21.5±5.5)分;术后平均(32.4±5.6)分,优12例,良4例.结论 肩关节脱位合并肩袖与Bankart损伤核磁共振造影有助于诊断;肩袖挛缩者应进行充分松解,无张力缝合固定有利于肩袖愈合;异体骨锚钉修复肩袖与Bankart损伤,生物固定、费用低廉,具有重要的价值.     

关节镜下单排带线锚钉固定治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ型骨性Bankart损伤

目的 探讨关节镜下单排带线锚钉固定治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ型肩关节骨性Bankart损伤的临床效果.方法 在关节镜下采用单排带线锚钉对11例肩关节前向不稳伴Ⅰ、Ⅱ型骨性Bankart损伤患者进行复位固定.术后行渐进性康复训练.手术前后采用Rowes评分和UCLA评分系统进行评估,并了解术后肩关节稳定性和活动度.结果 患者均获24个月随访.Rowes评分：术前和术后24个月分别为20分±7.07分和90分±2.74分（P〈0.05）;UCLA评分：术前和术后24个月分别为6.20分±1.30分和29.20分±1.10分（P〈0.05）;患者肩关节运动能力均较术前改善.结论 关节镜下单排带线锚钉固定治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ型骨性Bankart损伤具有创伤小、固定可靠的优点,能够很好地恢复肩关节稳定性和运动功能.     

关节镜下GⅡ锚钉固定治疗肩关节Bankart损伤

目的探讨关节镜下GⅡ锚钉固定治疗肩关节Bankart损伤的疗效。方法对3例肩关节不同类型Bankart损伤的患者行关节镜下GⅡ锚钉固定、缝合关节囊重建撕裂的盂唇。术后按常规康复治疗。结果 3例均获随访,时间分别为9、11、8个月,无复发脱位。UCLA评分由术前23.4、21.8、24.7分提高至术后32.8、32.5、40.2分,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）。结论关节镜下GⅡ锚钉固定治疗肩关节Bankart损伤切口小,愈合快,疗效好。     

关节镜治疗肩关节脱位合并肱骨大结节骨折近期疗效

目的 探讨关节镜治疗肩关节脱位合并肱骨大结节骨折的手术方法及近期临床效果.方法 2006年2月-2008年6月,收治12例肩关节脱位合并肱骨大结节骨折患者.男4例,女8例:年龄34～79岁,平均58.8岁;左、右肩各6例;摔伤11例,钝器砸伤1例.受伤至就诊时间为30 min～24 h,平均2.1 h.X线片检查肱骨大结节骨折移位5～12 mm,平均5.8 mm,MRI诊断Bankart损伤2例.于急诊手法复位肩关节后3～14 d行关节镜检术.镜下诊断Bankart损伤3例,SLAP损伤1例,以钛金属锚钉固定修复;大结节骨折采用空心钉内固定3例,可吸收螺钉固定2例,钛金属锚钉固定7例.3例为关节镜下修复,9例为关节镜辅助小切口修复.结果 术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无感染等相关并发症发生.12例患者均获随访,随访时间6～32个月,平均16个月.患者肩关节稳定,未出现再次脱位.术后6个月随访时3例出现肩关节外展活动轻度受限;1例前屈时疼痛,考虑与肩关节撞击相关.X线片示术后2～6个月肱骨大结节骨折愈合,平均3.2个月.术后6个月根据美国肩肘外科医师评分标准评分为(16.03±1.03)分;美国加州大学洛杉矶分校评分标准评分为(32.65±4.83)分;优8例,良3例,可1例,优良率91.7%.结论 肩关节镜下治疗肩关节脱位合并肱骨大结节骨折手术安全、微创,术中诊断全面准确,近期疗效满意,功能恢复好,疼痛缓解明显.     

关节镜下Bankart修复术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的中期疗效

目的 探讨关节镜下Bankart修复术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的中期疗效。方法 回顾性分析2017年1月—2021年6月符合选择标准的107例复发性肩关节前脱位患者临床资料，均接受关节镜下Bankart修复术。男88例，女19例；患者初次脱位年龄13～48岁，平均23.3岁；脱位次数2～160次，中位次数7次；病程0.2～240.0个月，中位病程36.0个月。手术时年龄16～61岁，平均28.2岁。左肩43例，右肩64例。63例合并关节盂骨缺损，骨缺损达1.7%～16.1%，平均8.1%。MRI检查示均不合并肩袖撕裂和肩关节僵硬。术后1 d行CT三维重建检查，评估植入锚钉分布以及锚钉植入处有无关节盂劈裂骨折和拔钉等情况发生。观察术后并发症发生情况，采用疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）、Rowe评分、Constant-Murley评分、美国肩肘外科医师协会（ASES）评分评估患肩疼痛及功能。记录术后患者肩关节不稳复发情况、恐惧试验结果、恢复至术前运动水平患者例数以及患者自评满意度。结果 手术均顺利完成。患者均获随访，随访时间20～73个月，平均41.5个月。术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合。术后1 d CT三...     

Arthroscopic Repair of Combined Bankart and SLAP Lesions: Operative Techniques and Clinical Results

Background

To evaluate the clinical results and operation technique of arthroscopic repair of combined Bankart and superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions, all of which had an anterior-inferior Bankart lesion that continued superiorly to include separation of the biceps anchor in the patients presenting recurrent shoulder dislocations.

Methods

From May 2003 to January 2006, we reviewed 15 cases with combined Bankart and SLAP lesions among 62 patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations who underwent arthroscopic repair. The average age at surgery was 24.2 years (range, 16 to 38 years), with an average follow-up period of 15 months (range, 13 to 28 months). During the operation, we repaired the unstable SLAP lesion first with absorbable suture anchors and then also repaired Bankart lesion from the inferior to superior fashion. We analyzed the preoperative and postoperative results by visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) and Rowe shoulder scoring systems. We compared the results with the isolated Bankart lesion.

Results

VAS for pain was decreased from preoperative 4.9 to postoperative 1.9. Mean ASES and Rowe shoulder scores were improved from preoperative 56.4 and 33.7 to postoperative 91.8 and 94.1, respectively. There were no specific complication and no significant limitation of motion more than 10 degree at final follow-up. We found the range of motions after the arthroscopic repair in combined lesions were gained more slowly than in patients with isolated Bankart lesions.

Conclusions

In recurrent dislocation of the shoulder with combined Bankart and SLAP lesion, arthroscopic repair using absorbable suture anchors produced favorable clinical results. Although it has technical difficulty, the concomitant unstable SLAP lesion should be repaired in a manner that stabilizes the glenohumeral joint, as the Bankart lesion can be repaired if the unstable SLAP lesion is repaired first.     

Arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesion in traumatic anterior-inferior shoulder instability using the two-portal method: A preliminary report

BackgroundIn this report, we describe our preliminary clinical results of arthroscopic Bankart repair in traumatic anterior-inferior shoulder instability using the two-portal method.MethodFrom August 2009 to December 2011, arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesion using this method was performed in 16 consecutive patients who were prospectively enrolled. Fifteen shoulders were treated with two-anchor sutures and one was treated with three-anchor sutures. Twelve patients received metallic anchor screws and four patients received bioanchor screws. The assessments were performed using the Rowe score, the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and the shoulder range of motion (ROM) deficit.ResultsWith an average follow-up period of 22.9 months, all shoulder scores improved after surgery (p < 0.001). The average ROM deficit of the operated shoulders was not significant as compared with the healthy side in forward elevation (p > 0.05), but was significant in external rotation (p < 0.05). All of the 16 shoulders remained stable (100%) after the arthroscopic repair surgery. All patients returned to their preinjury levels of daily activity without recurrent problems.ConclusionIn patients with traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability, arthroscopic Bankart repair with the two portal method can provide good results. It can be an alternative method of treating patients with Bankart lesion without associated major glenoid defect or rotator cuff lesion in traumatic anterior-inferior instability.     

Similar functional outcome using single anterior portal and standard two portalstechnique in recurrent dislocation of shoulder

Purpose:Recurrent dislocation of shoulder(RDS)is a common injury in high demand professionals,like athletes and military personnel.The treatment for the patients with Bankart lesion is the arthroscopic repair.This present study compares the outcomes of two different techniques of arthroscopic Bankart repair i.e.a standard two anterior portals technique and a single anterior portal technique in patients with RDS.Methods:Patients with traumatic RDS met the inclusion criteria were managed with Bankart repair using either two anterior portals(Group A)or a single anterior portal(Group B)technique.Patients were evaluated before the intervention and at the mean follow-up of approximately two years using Rowe score,Oxford shoulder score and Tegner activity scale.Results:The mean age of the patients in Groups A(n=34)and B(n=37)was 29.64 years and 29.05 years respectively(p=0.66).The dominant shoulder was involved in 27 patients in Group A and 22 patients in Group B(p=0.069).The operative time in Group A and B was 68.52 min and 46.35 min,respectively(p<0.001).The complications at follow-up,the mean Rowe score and Oxford score improved significantly in both groups compared with the pre-operative values.However,the final outcome scores were not significantly different between the both groups.The median Tegner's score preoperatively and at follow-up was 7 and 6,respectively in Groups A and B.Conclusions:Single anterior portal technique is an effective treatment modality,yielding a similar outcome as two anterior portals technique in the management of RDS.     

Hill-Sachs Remplissage手术治疗骨缺损性复发性肩关节前脱位

目的 探讨关节镜下Bankart重建术辅助Hill-Sachs Remplissage手术治疗存在明显骨缺损的复发性肩关节前脱位的疗效.方法 回顾性分析随访2年以上的应用关节镜下Bankart重建术辅助Hill-Sachs Remplissage手术治疗的复发性肩关节前脱位49例患者的病例资料,男42例,女7例;接受手术时年龄16.7～54.7岁,平均28.4岁.49例均为单向不稳定,合并明显的肩盂骨性损伤及巨大的Hill-Sachs损伤.术中采用金属缝合锚钉行Bankart修补,辅助后方冈下肌腱固定填充Hill-Sachs损伤.全部病例随访24～35个月,平均29.0个月,随访时采用ASES评分、Constant-Murley评分、Rowe评分进行功能评估,观察肩关节活动度变化.结果 术前及终末随访时肩关节平均前屈上举162.9°±17.1°和170.9°±7.4°(P=0.007),平均体侧外旋56.0°±17.6°和54.1°±17.1°(P=0.511);ASES评分为(84.7±11.3)分和(96.0±3.4)分(P=0.000),Constant-Murley评分为(93.3±8.7)分和(97.8±3.6)分(P=0.005),Rowe评分为(36.8±8.5)分和(89.8±12.5)分(P=0.000).终末随访时1例患者出现复发脱位,3例患者出现半脱位,失效率8.2%(4/49).此4例患者恐惧试验阳性.结论 肩关节镜下Bankart重建术辅助Hill-Sachs Remplissage手术是治疗存在明显骨缺损的复发性肩关节前脱位的有效方法之一.手术适应证的正确选择、熟练的关节镜下操作技术以及术后长期、严格的功能康复锻炼是手术成功的关键.

Abstract：

Objective The purpose of our study was to report the results of using arthroscopic Remplissage and Bankart repair in patients who had an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion with significant glenoid bone loss. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 49 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic Remplissage and Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability with a mean duration of follow-up of 29.0 months (24-35 months). At the time of surgery the mean age of 42 men and 7 women was 28.4 years. All patients were diagnosed as recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with a bony lesion of glenoid and an engaging HillSachs lesion. An arthroscopic Remplissage and Bankart repair using metal anchor was performed in all cases.ASES score, Constant-Murley score and Rowe score were used to evaluate the stability and the function of the shoulder. Results Patients' active forward elevation significantly(P=0.007) improved from 162.9°±17.1°preoperatively to 170.9°±7.4° at final follow-up. The external rotation was 56.0°±17.6° before the surgery compared with the 54.1°±17.1° postoperatively(P=0.511 ). The ASES score, Constant-Murley score and Rowe score was 84.7±11.3, 93.3±8.7 and 36.8±8.5 preoperatively compared with 96.0±3.4, 97.8±3.6 and 89.8±12.5 postoperatively. Significant difference could be found with regard to ASES score (P=0.000), ConstantMurley score (P=0.005) and Rowe score (P=0.000). One redislocation happened and a subluxation was noticed in three patients (8.3%). Conclusion Arthroscopic Remplissage combined with Bankart repair can achieve satisfactory for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation accompany with engaging Hill-Sachs lesion.     

关节镜下Bankart修复术治疗肩关节复发性前脱位:手术效果及复发危险因素分析

目的 探讨关节镜下Bankart修复术(缝合锚钉技术)治疗肩关节复发性前脱位的临床效果,并对术后复发不稳的可能危险因素进行分析.方法 2002年3月至2010年3月连续收治肩关节复发性前脱位患者259例,均采用关节镜下缝合锚钉技术进行Bankart修复手术,其中188例患者获得随访.患者手术时平均年龄25.3岁(13～58岁);其中男性143例、女性45例;运动员50名、非运动员138名.随访时采用美国肩肘关节外科协会评分系统(ASES)肩关节评分、Rowe评分以及患者满意度评价手术效果.术前肩关节ASES评分平均72.6分,Rowe评分平均33.4分.对于肩关节术后不稳的复发率、关节活动范围以及术后复发不稳的危险因素进行评估.结果 188例患者术后平均随访38.6个月(12～110个月).术后肩关节ASES评分平均91.9分,与术前比较差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.001);术后Rowe评分平均81.9分,与术前比较差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.001).患者手术满意度调查显示,满意152例、基本满意16例、不满意20例,满意率为89.4%.术后有24例患者复发脱位,总体复发率为12.8%;运动员患者复发率为28.0%,非运动员复发率为7.2%.术后患者平均肩关节外展外旋为75.2°,与术前比较无明显丧失(P＞0.05).关节镜Bankart修复术后复发不稳与患者年龄及是否为运动员明显相关(P＜0.05);而与术前病程长短、锚钉类型、锚钉数目、骨性Bankart损伤、合并肩关节上盂唇撕裂损伤、合并后或下方盂唇损伤、合并肩袖撕裂、关节松弛以及肩袖间隙闭合等因素无明显相关(P＞0.05).结论 关节镜下采用缝合锚钉进行Bankart修复术是治疗肩关节复发性前脱位的有效方法,临床效果比较满意.年轻患者(≤20岁)和运动员患者是术后肩关节复发不稳的高危因素,必要时选择切开手术.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate retrospectively the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with a minimum 1-year follow-up and to assess risk factors for recurrence.Methods From March 2002 to March 2010,259 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors.And 188 patients(50 athletes,138 nonathletes)were available for follow-up.The mean age at the time of surgery was 25.3 years (range,13-58 years).The mean follow-up was 38.6 months(range,12-110 months).All of the 188 patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES)shoulder score and Rowe score system.The rate of recurrent instability,range of motion,and risk factors for postoperative recurrence were evaluated.The ASES score was 72.6 preoperatively,and Rowe score was 33.4.Results The ASES scores improved significantly to 91.9 postoperatively(P＜0.001).The Rowe scores improved to 81.9 postoperatively(P＜0.001).And 152 patients were greatly satisfied with the results,16 satisfied and 20 unsatisfied.The satisfactory rate was 89.4%.24 patients(12.8%)suffered a recurrence after surgery,14 athletes and 10 nonathletes.The recurrence rates were 28.0% in the athlete group and 7.2% in the nonathlete group.On average there was no significant loss of external rotation postoperatively(average,75.2° preoperatively and 67.2° postoperatively).Patients under age 20,and athlete patients were associated with recurrence(P＜ 0.05).Other factors including length of time until surgery,type of anchors,number of anchors,presence of bony Bankart lesion,presence of a superior labrum,anterior and posterior tear,presence of posterior or inferior labrum lesion,presence of rotator cuff tear,ligamentous laxity and rotator interval closure did not influence the recurrence rate(P＞0.05).Conclusions Arthroscopic Bankart repair is a good option for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation.Identification of risk factors for recurrence allows for consideration of open stabilization.In the series,patients under age 20 and athlete patients are the most important risk factors for recurrence.     

Can capsular plication compensate the lack of one suture anchor in an arthroscopic three suture anchor Bankart repair? A comparative study

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the complication rates and clinical results of labral repair with two suture anchors and capsular plication, and labral repair with three suture anchor fixation in artroscopic Bankart surgery.MethodsSixty-nine patients (60 males, 9 females; mean age: 28.2 ± 7.8 years (range: 16–50)) who had undergone arthroscopic repair of a labral Bankart lesion were evaluated. Group A underwent an arthroscopic Bankart repair with three knotless suture anchors, while group B underwent a modified arthroscopic Bankart repair with two knotless suture anchors and an additional capsular plication procedure. The mean follow-up was 52.5 months. Constant Shoulder Score (CSS), Rowe Score (RS), modified UCLA Shoulder Score (mUSS) and range of motion (ROM) were used as outcome measures.ResultsIn both groups, a significant improvement was detected in functional outcomes at postoperative last follow-up compared to the preoperative period. No statistically significant difference was found (p > 0.05) in clinical scores (CSS; Group A: 89.7, Group B: 80.2) (RS; Group A: 88.2, Group B: 80.2) (mUSS; Group A: 26.3, Group B: 25.7) external rotation loss (At neutral; Group A: 4.5°, Group B: 5.2°. At abduction; Group A: 4.3°, Group B: 5.7°) and recurrence rates (Group A: 13.3%, Group B: 20.8%). Although the difference was not statistically significant, the recurrence rate was higher in group B (20.8%), compared to group A (13.3%), despite the shorter average follow-up time of group B (p = 0.417).ConclusionsArthroscopic repair of labral Bankart lesions with both techniques showed good functional outcomes and stability at the latest follow-up. Higher recurrence rate despite the shorter average follow-up of group B suggests that two anchor usage might not be sufficient for Bankart repair in terms of better stability and less recurrence risk.Level of evidenceLevel III, Therapeutic Study.     

Comparison of outcomes of two different surgeries in regarding to complications for chronic anterior shoulder instability

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to compare the early clinical results of two techniques in regarding to complications in the patients who suffered from chronic anterior traumatic isolated shoulder instability. METHOD: Eighty-five patients underwent reconstructive procedures due to chronic isolated traumatic shoulder instability in our clinic between 1990 and 2002. Sixty-four patients in whom preoperatively Bankart lesion were detected with MRI and who participated in the regular follow-up were included in the study. Thirty-four patients were treated with Bankart repair (Group I) and 30 patients were treated with Modified Bristow procedure (Group II). Mean follow-up period was 25 (24-39) months for group I and 28 (24-96) months for group II. All cases were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively according to Rowe scoring system. RESULTS: Mean Rowe scores were 90 and 88.1 for group I and II, respectively. Due to recurrent dislocation, four revision surgeries (one in group I, three in group II) were performed. Surgical complications were encountered in group II, just as fracture at the bone block in four cases, nonunion in five cases and removal of loose screw in one case. DISCUSSION: According to clinical outcomes, both the techniques are useful and feasible for the treatment of the chronic traumatic isolated anterior shoulder instability; however, complication rate is higher in the Modified Bristow technique and, Bankart repair is directed to the anatomic repair of the original pathology.     

全关节镜下手术治疗骨性Bankart损伤的术后疗效分析

目的 探讨肩关节镜下金属缝合锚钉固定治疗骨性Bankart损伤的术后疗效.方法 2004年5月至2008年5月共收治45例存在肩关节骨性Bankart损伤的患者,均应用全关节镜下复位,金属缝合锚钉固定术治疗.其中男性40例,女性5例.手术时平均年龄27.6岁(16.5～50.1岁),平均随访时间29.7个月(24.8～...     

Arthroscopic osseous Bankart repair for chronic recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability

BACKGROUND: A chronic osseous Bankart lesion has traditionally been treated with soft-tissue repair and/or open bone-grafting for a large glenoid defect. We developed an arthroscopic method of osseous reconstruction of the glenoid without bone-grafting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of our technique for chronic recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. METHODS: A consecutive series of forty-two shoulders in forty-one patients with chronic recurrent traumatic glenohumeral instability underwent an arthroscopic osseous Bankart repair. All shoulders were evaluated preoperatively with three-dimensionally reconstructed computed tomography, which confirmed an osseous fragment at the anteroinferior portion of the glenoid. The average bone loss in the glenoid was 24.8% (range, 11.4% to 38.6%), and the average fragment size was 9.2% (range, 2.1% to 20.9%) of the glenoid fossa. In all shoulders, a displaced osseous fragment, firmly attached to the labroligamentous complex, was separated from the glenoid neck before reduction and fixation in the optimal position with use of suture anchors. All patients were assessed with use of the scoring systems of Rowe et al. and the University of California at Los Angeles preoperatively and at the final evaluation. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was thirty-four months. At that time, thirty-nine of the forty-two shoulders were rated as having a good or excellent result. The mean Rowe score improved from 33.6 points preoperatively to 94.3 points postoperatively (p < 0.01). The mean score on the University of California at Los Angeles system improved from 20.5 points preoperatively to 33.6 points at the final evaluation (p < 0.01). The average passive external rotation was 75 degrees with the arm at the side and 93 degrees with the arm at 90 degrees of abduction. Two patients had a reinjury. Eventually, thirty-five of thirty-seven patients who were active participants in sports returned to the sport they had played before the injury. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic osseous Bankart repair with use of suture anchors yields a successful outcome even in shoulders with a chronic large glenoid defect.