关节镜下GⅡ锚钉固定治疗肩关节Bankart损伤

目的探讨关节镜下GⅡ锚钉固定治疗肩关节Bankart损伤的疗效。方法对3例肩关节不同类型Bankart损伤的患者行关节镜下GⅡ锚钉固定、缝合关节囊重建撕裂的盂唇。术后按常规康复治疗。结果 3例均获随访,时间分别为9、11、8个月,无复发脱位。UCLA评分由术前23.4、21.8、24.7分提高至术后32.8、32.5、40.2分,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）。结论关节镜下GⅡ锚钉固定治疗肩关节Bankart损伤切口小,愈合快,疗效好。     

Anchor钉在肩关节脱位并肩袖损伤中应用的疗效观察

目的 探讨Anchor钉在肩关节脱位并肱骨大结节撕脱性骨折及肩袖损伤中应用的疗效.方法 13例肩关节脱位并肱骨大结节撕脱性骨折及肩袖损伤患者行经三角肌-胸大肌入路显露骨折端,以Anchor钉行Krackow缝合方法结合钛钉内固定进行治疗.随访评价其肩关节稳定性、活动范围、上肢肌力、影像学改变.结果 所有患者得到随访,随访时间10～16个月,平均12个月,骨折均愈合良好.肩关节功能按Neer评分法,优11例,良2例.结论 Anchor钉结合钛钉修复肱骨大结节撕脱性骨折及肩袖损伤固定牢固、术后可早期功能锻炼,肩关节功能恢复良好,是一种较理想的手术方法.     

锚钉修复Bankart损伤后关节软骨损伤1例报告

<正>随着关节镜技术的发展，关节镜下采用缝合锚钉修复肩关节盂唇损伤治疗肩关节Bankart损伤已经成为临床常规的手术方式^[1,2]。缝合锚钉可分为可吸收锚钉、金属锚钉或PEEK材料锚钉。本文报告1例肩关节镜下金属锚钉修复Bankart损伤导致肩关节软骨损伤合并骨关节炎。1病例资料患者，男，30岁，篮球运动员。在篮球比赛中不慎被队员绊倒在地，致右肩关节脱位。急诊X线片检查显示右肩关节前脱位(图1a)，肩关节MRI显示Bankart损伤，肱骨头骨水肿，为Hill-sachs损伤。诊断：右肩关节脱位，Bankart损伤，Hill-sachs     

关节镜下缝合锚钉加骨隧道缝合方法修复肩袖损伤

目的 探讨肩关节镜下缝合锚钉加骨隧道缝合方法治疗肩袖损伤的手术方法、技巧和疗效.方法 2007年2月-2009年2月,对32例不同类型的肩袖损伤患者,采用关节镜下缝合锚钉加肱骨大结节骨隧道缝合的方法修复肩袖.其中25例全层撕裂,5例滑囊侧部分撕裂,2例关节侧部分撕裂.16例发生于优势侧.术前均拍摄肩关节正位、肩袖出口位X线片,其中11例行MRI检查,21例行MRA检查.全部患者均行肩峰成形与肩峰下滑囊切除,肩袖修复采用单排锚钉固定加经骨隧道穿线缝合18例、双排锚钉加经骨隧道穿线固定14例.按照UCLA肩关节评分标准进行术前和术后功能评估.结果 32例患者获得3～23个月的随访,平均13.4个月.按照UCLA肩关节评分:术前平均为13.3分,术后为33.1分;其中优23例,良9例.术后21例疼痛完全消失,5例偶感轻微疼痛或不适,6例剧烈运动或特殊动作疼痛.24例肩关节活动完全正常.主动前屈及外展角度>150°26例,90°～120°6例.术后前屈及外展肌力M_5 25例,M_47例.所有患者最终对手术效果满意.结论 缝合锚钉加骨隧道穿线缝合是修复肩袖撕裂较好的方法,该技术固定牢靠、保证了肩袖-骨的正常愈合,特别适用于骨质疏松或翻修的病例,值得推广.     

40岁以后肩关节脱位伴肩袖撕裂治疗

目的：对40岁以后中年肩关节脱位和合并肩袖撕裂观察各种手术治疗结果。对象及方法：选肩关节脱位而入院后发现合并肩袖撕裂患者12例，患者年龄为42—67岁，其中2例有腋神经损伤伴大结节骨折。12例均有肩袖撕裂，其中8例广泛撕裂，3例中等撕裂，1例轻度撕裂。结果：肩关节脱位伴肩袖撕裂行肩袖缝合术除伴2例腋神经损伤者外，10例用UCLA肩关节功能评定，评价时术后肩关节功能良好。结论：中年以上肩关节脱位时需用关节镜明确诊断，有腋神经损伤合并肩袖撕裂者需合适的肩袖缝合及腋神经康复治疗。     

关节镜下生物骨锚钉修复肩关节Bankart损伤

目的：探讨关节镜下采用生物骨锚钉固定缝合治疗肩关节Bankart损伤的方法及疗效。方法：自2010年1月至2017年6月收治23例肩关节复发性脱位患者,诊断为单纯肩关节Bankart损伤,男20例,女3例;年龄19~34（23.4±3.9）岁;右肩14例,左肩9例;军事训练伤17例,运动损伤5例,摔伤1例。受伤至手术时间3~36（10.9±5.8）个月。使用双线生物骨锚钉行关节盂前方肩关节囊-韧带-盂唇复合体提拉紧缩缝合术。采用肩关节Rowe评分评价临床疗效。结果：23例均获随访,时间18~39（24.5±3.7）个月,末次随访时,患侧肩关节无再发脱位,均恢复正常运动及工作。肩关节Rowes评分术前（53.91±11.67）分,术后（91.74±12.30）分,评价分级术前优0例、良0例、可9例、差14例,术后优16例、良4例、可3例、差0例（P<0.01）。结论：关节镜下生物骨锚钉缝合修复肩关节Bankart损伤是一种可靠有效、性价比高的治疗方法,适用于Bankart损伤翻修手术。     

全关节镜下手术治疗骨性Bankart损伤的术后疗效分析

目的 探讨肩关节镜下金属缝合锚钉固定治疗骨性Bankart损伤的术后疗效.方法 2004年5月至2008年5月共收治45例存在肩关节骨性Bankart损伤的患者,均应用全关节镜下复位,金属缝合锚钉固定术治疗.其中男性40例,女性5例.手术时平均年龄27.6岁(16.5～50.1岁),平均随访时间29.7个月(24.8～...     

关节镜辅助下治疗习惯性肩关节脱位合并肩袖损伤4例报道

习惯性肩关节脱位合并肩袖损伤在临床上并不多见，多因经常性的肩关节脱位反复牵拉肩袖，造成合并肩袖的多次积累性的损伤。我们首先采用关节镜检查，微创检查清理关节腔，然后小切口修补肩袖，收到了较好的疗效，总结如下。     

关节镜辅助下小切口修复肩袖损伤

目的　探讨关节镜辅助下小切口修复肩袖损伤的方法与疗效。方法　 1999年 5月至 2 0 0 3年 10月 ,采用关节镜辅助下小切口修复肩袖损伤 3 2例。术前 3 2例行肩关节X线片和肩关节MRI检查 ,其中 15例行肩关节造影检查 ,结果均证实为肩袖损伤。关节镜下发现肩袖附着处撕脱伤 5例 ,肩袖损伤2 7例。关节镜下行肩峰成形术 3 0例 ,小切口作肩峰成形术 2例。肩袖全层损伤在关节镜辅助下小切口行肩袖缝合术 2 2例 ,肩袖不完全性损伤在关节镜下作射频清理术 10例。结果　 3 2例术后随访 6～ 3 2个月 ,平均 10个月。根据美国UCLA肩关节评分标准评估 ,优 2 2例 ,良 5例 ,可 5例 ,优良率达 84.3 7%。结论　关节镜辅助下肩峰成形和小切口修复肩袖损伤具有操作安全简便、创伤小、有利于早期功能练习和康复。     

开放性肩峰成形术治疗肩峰撞击征合并肩袖损伤

目的 探讨开放性肩峰成形术治疗肩峰撞击征合并肩袖损伤的疗效.方法 2004年3月至2007年8月,对收治的20例术前明确诊断为肩峰撞击征合并肩袖损伤的患者采用开放性肩峰成形术治疗,同时修复肩袖,对肩袖全层撕裂患者以锚钉固定的方法行止点重建.术后进行系统功能康复.按照ASES评分评价功能恢复情况.结果 18例患者术后获6～13个月(平均11个月)随访.患者ASES评分术前平均为36.5分,术后为90.5分,差异有统计学意义(t=13.865,P<0.01).4例行因上肌腱直接修复患者术前ASES评分平均为53.4分,术后平均为93.2分,差异有统计学意义(t=1.387,P<0.05).14例行止点重建锚钉固定术患者术前ASES评分平均为33.4分,术后为86.2分,差异有统计学意义(t=2.962,P<0.05).结论 开放性肩峰成形术治疗肩峰撞击征合并肩袖损伤可获得满意的疗效,易于在基层医院开展.     

Stumpfe Schultergelenkverletzungen und ihre Begutachtung

It is difficult to assess blunt injuries in the region of the shoulder girdle because of the overlying acute and chronic processes. In assessments of rotator cuff ruptures in particular, in over 50% of cases the rupture could be explained by a degenerative process. This makes the assessment difficult, and also the decision as to whether or not the injury is due to an occupational accident. The diagnostic procedures applied should exclude a degenerative aetiology immediately after an accident in all cases. Rupture of the rotator cuff is often associated with an impingement syndrome and leads to corresponding symptoms in the subacromial space. Treatment of a rotator cuff rupture always involves a diagnostic arthroscopy as the first step, after which a reconstruction can be undertaken, either by way of the anterolateral approach after Neer or, in many cases, arthroscopically. Reconstruction of the rotator cuff must include outward mobilization of the muscles and a secure, mostly transosseous suture. Transference of a pedunculated tendon is indicated for large defects in the rotator cuff. In the case of dislocation of the shoulder with subsequent shoulder instability degenerative change and any possible multidirectional instability should be defined. Unidirectional instability with a demonstrable Bankart lesion has a good prognosis when surgery is performed without delay. In view of the high recurrence rate early treatment is indicated especially in young persons and in patients with a high activity level. Following detection of the Bankart lesion an arthroscopic procedure with refixation of the capsule–labrum complex is the method of choice.     

Arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction with a bioabsorbable anchor

This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of a poly-l-lactic acid biodegradable suture anchor for arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction with a prospective multicenter study. Inclusion criteria were one or more episodes of traumatic dislocation or multiple posttraumatic subluxations as a manifestation of unidirectional anterior instability. Exclusion criteria were significant glenoid bone deficiency, large Hill-Sachs lesions, rotator cuff tears, multidirectional instability, posterior labrum tears, or biceps ruptures. Fifty-seven patients were followed up for a mean of 24 months. Postoperative apprehension tests were negative in all but two. Motion improved from 155 degrees preoperatively to a mean of 175 degrees postoperatively. Four patients had postoperative instability symptoms (two dislocators and two with subluxations). Postoperative radiographs demonstrated no lytic or resorptive bone changes from the suture anchors. The mean postoperative Rowe score was 93. The biodegradable suture anchor achieved good clinical results when used for arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction with no material-related adverse events.     

关节镜下单排带线锚钉修补结合大结节骨髓刺激治疗大到巨大肩袖撕裂

目的研究关节镜下单排带线锚钉修补结合大结节骨髓刺激技术治疗大到巨大肩袖撕裂的临床效果。 方法对24例大到巨大肩袖撕裂患者,在关节镜下采用肩袖止点内移单排带线锚钉修补,并在修补肌腱外侧大结节裸露足印区打孔。术后按照康复计划渐进性康复训练。手术前和术后12个月对患肩采用VAS、UCLA、ASES评分系统进行疼痛和功能评估;并在术后第3天、3个月和12个月进行肩关节磁共振检查,观察肩袖修补和大结节足印区软组织覆盖情况。 结果所有患者随访12个月,术前和术后12个月VAS评分分别为（6.3±1.9）分和（0.4±0.1）分（P<0.05）,UCLA评分分别为（10.1±4.5）分和（30.4±4.2）分（P<0.05）,ASES评分分别为（27.9±17.8）分和（77.6±17.5）分（P<0.05）,所有手术肩关节疼痛和运动能力均较术前明显改善。术后12个月磁共振随访发现2例肩袖再撕裂发生,矢状位显示撕裂宽度均<1 cm;冠状位盂上切迹平面大结节足印区组织覆盖率在术后第3天、3个月、12个月平均分别为34.3%、89.1%和88.7%。 结论关节镜下肩袖单排带线锚钉修补结合大结节骨髓刺激技术治疗大到巨大肩袖撕裂能够提供可靠的修补,显著缓解疼痛,恢复肩关节功能并促进术后大结节足印区软组织覆盖。     

Arthroscopic Bankart revision using all suture anchor in recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation: A case report

IntroductionArthroscopic Bankart revision after recurrent shoulder dislocation is still a matter of discussion. Several factors are contributing to this injury. Recently the development of all suture anchors has grown in popularity in arthroscopic stabilization. It was proven to preserve bone stock, smaller in size thus more anchors can be made.Presentation of caseWe presented a case of 27-year-old woman with recurrent anterior dislocation after seven years of arthroscopic Bankart repair. Seven years before, we performed Bankart repair using three 2.8 mm fiber-wire anchor (FASTak® (Arthrex, Karsfield Germany)). For the revision surgery we performed arthroscopic revision using four all suture anchor technique (Y-Knot® Flex All-Suture Anchor, 1.3 mm – One strand of #2 Hi-Fi® (Conmed, New York)).DiscussionFrom preoperative and intraoperative assessment, we found no anchor failure and no massive bony lesion. To preserve the bone stock we insert four all suture anchors between the old anchor. One year post-operative follow up showed that patient could gain normal range of movement. No early or late complications were observed.ConclusionCompared to the conventional metallic anchor, all suture anchor has the same biomechanical strength. Moreover due to its relatively small size, it can reserve bone stock and more anchors can be made thus adding more stability to the shoulder.     

关节镜下单排带线锚钉固定治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ型骨性Bankart损伤

目的 探讨关节镜下单排带线锚钉固定治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ型肩关节骨性Bankart损伤的临床效果.方法 在关节镜下采用单排带线锚钉对11例肩关节前向不稳伴Ⅰ、Ⅱ型骨性Bankart损伤患者进行复位固定.术后行渐进性康复训练.手术前后采用Rowes评分和UCLA评分系统进行评估,并了解术后肩关节稳定性和活动度.结果 患者均获24个月随访.Rowes评分：术前和术后24个月分别为20分±7.07分和90分±2.74分（P〈0.05）;UCLA评分：术前和术后24个月分别为6.20分±1.30分和29.20分±1.10分（P〈0.05）;患者肩关节运动能力均较术前改善.结论 关节镜下单排带线锚钉固定治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ型骨性Bankart损伤具有创伤小、固定可靠的优点,能够很好地恢复肩关节稳定性和运动功能.     

Arthroscopic Repair of Combined Bankart and SLAP Lesions: Operative Techniques and Clinical Results

Background

To evaluate the clinical results and operation technique of arthroscopic repair of combined Bankart and superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions, all of which had an anterior-inferior Bankart lesion that continued superiorly to include separation of the biceps anchor in the patients presenting recurrent shoulder dislocations.

Methods

From May 2003 to January 2006, we reviewed 15 cases with combined Bankart and SLAP lesions among 62 patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations who underwent arthroscopic repair. The average age at surgery was 24.2 years (range, 16 to 38 years), with an average follow-up period of 15 months (range, 13 to 28 months). During the operation, we repaired the unstable SLAP lesion first with absorbable suture anchors and then also repaired Bankart lesion from the inferior to superior fashion. We analyzed the preoperative and postoperative results by visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) and Rowe shoulder scoring systems. We compared the results with the isolated Bankart lesion.

Results

VAS for pain was decreased from preoperative 4.9 to postoperative 1.9. Mean ASES and Rowe shoulder scores were improved from preoperative 56.4 and 33.7 to postoperative 91.8 and 94.1, respectively. There were no specific complication and no significant limitation of motion more than 10 degree at final follow-up. We found the range of motions after the arthroscopic repair in combined lesions were gained more slowly than in patients with isolated Bankart lesions.

Conclusions

In recurrent dislocation of the shoulder with combined Bankart and SLAP lesion, arthroscopic repair using absorbable suture anchors produced favorable clinical results. Although it has technical difficulty, the concomitant unstable SLAP lesion should be repaired in a manner that stabilizes the glenohumeral joint, as the Bankart lesion can be repaired if the unstable SLAP lesion is repaired first.     

Arthroscopic bone tunnel augmentation for rotator cuff repair

Transosseous repair of the rotator cuff has been shown to recreate the anatomic rotator cuff footprint in a secure and cost-efficient manner. However, the potential for sutures cutting through bone remains a concern with this strategy. Devices have been used successfully during open transosseous rotator cuff repair to augment the bone tunnels, potentially avoiding suture cut-out through the weak bone of the greater tuberosity. Recently, arthroscopic transosseous fixation of rotator cuff tears has become an alternative to arthroscopic suture anchor and open transosseous techniques. This method is expected to have the same potential pitfalls at the bone-suture interface as the open technique. The authors describe a technique for rotator cuff repair using a secure method of arthroscopic bone tunnel augmentation.