中文版自我表露预期结果量表的修订

目的 编制适合中国人使用的自我表露预期结果量表,并进行信效度检验.方法 在研究国外相关问卷和预备测试的基础上,分别选取了天津市不同年级、不同专业的在校大学生进行问卷测试,验证中文版的信、效度.结果 量表的内部一致性信度分别为0.741和0.742.量表的重测信度分别为0.753和0.766.预期风险维度与自我隐藏量表总分之间存在显著的正相关(r=0.6554,P<0.01);预期效用维度与自我隐藏量表总分之间存在显著的负相关(r=-0.6752,P<0.01).验证性因素分析验证了2维度模型.结论 修订的自我表露预期结果量表具有良好的信度和效度,可以满足我国有关研究和应用的需要.

Abstract：

Objective To revise the disclosure expectations scale and to exam its reliability and validity.Methods Based on researching foreign related questionnaire and preparing test,university students from different grades and majors were chosen as subjects to exam the reliability and validity of questionnaire of stigma for seeking professional psychological help.Results The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the questionnaire were 0.7412 and 0.7423.The retest reliability of the questionnaire were 0.7527 and 0.7662.There was a significantly positive correlation between risk factor and the self-concealment scale(r=0.6554,P<0.01).There was a significantly negative correlation between benefit factor and the self-concealment scale(r=-0.6752,P<0.01).Confirmatory factor analysis verified the 2 dimensional models.Conclusion The revised disclosure expectations scale has good reliability and validity,and Can satisfy the domestic relevant research and applied demand.     

精神障碍患者社会功能缺损评定量表的信效度分析

Objective To test the reliability and validity of the rating scale of social function deficit due to mental disorders (SSFD-MD). Methods 1003 cases with mental disability evaluation were tested by SSFDMD. At sametime, 100 cases of 1003 cases were test-retested and back to back tested by two examiners. 300 cases of 1003 cases also were tested by social disability screening schedule( SDSS),scale of social function for psychosis inpatients(SSPI),global assessment function(GAF) ,the brief psychiatric rating scale(BPRS) ,WH0 disability assessment scale Ⅱ (WHO-DASⅡ ), adult rating scale of mentally disabled ( ARSMD) and rating scale for extrapyramidal side effects (RSESE). Results ①The Cronbach's α coefficients of the total score and all dimensions of SSFD-MD were more than 0.90. The test-retest reliability ranged from 0.67～0. 83 ,and the scorer reliability were 0. 87～0.97. ②The correlations between item scores ranged from 0.46 ～0.74(P＜0.01). The correlations between the factor scores and the total scores ranged from 0.73～0.87(P＜0.01). To extract five full-scale principal components after orthogonal rotation to maximize variance,the cumulative total variance explained was 82.25%.There were highly correlations between SSFD-MD and SDSS.SSPI and GAF,respectively ( r = 0. 71,0.72 and 0. 78). There were moderate correlations between SSFD-MD and BPRS WHO-DAS II ARSMD,respectively(0.62,0. 50 and 0.46). There was a low correlations between SSFD-MD and RSESE ( r = 0.22) ,but all correlations were significant(P＜0.01). Conclusion SSFD-MD has acceptable psychometrics properties on reliability and validity.     

创伤后应激障碍检查表-平民版在地震灾区初中生中的信效度

Objective To test psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist-civilian version(PCL-C) among junior school students from earthquake-hit region.Methods PC L-C Chinese Version, Rosenberg self-esteem scale and SCL-90 were utilized to assess 560 junior school students from earthquake-hit region.Results Firstly,the internal consistency of the total scale and three subscales were qualified, the coefficient alphas were 0.890,0.734,0.789 and 0.722, respectively; 307 participants, from the first samples, engaged in the second test two months after the first assessment.The test-retest stability was re-experiencing 0.40(P ＜ 0.01 ) ,avoidance 0.45 (P＜ 0.01 ), hyper-arousal 0.448 (P ＜ 0.01 ), total scale 0.535 (P ＜ 0.01 ), respectively.Secondly, the results of criteria validity showed PCL-C and its three subscales had negative correlation with self-esteem (r =-0.192 ～-0.299, P ＜ 0.01 ), and had positive-related with SCL-90 and its subscales of depression, anxiety, and psychotic (r=0.563 ～0.775, P＜0.01 ).Finally,the results of empirical validity revealed that based on the score on PCL-Ccould differentiate those people who have significant different scores on SCL-90.Conclusions The PCL-C hadgood reliabilities and validities,which could be used to assess the severity of PTSD.     

创伤后应激障碍检查表-平民版在地震灾区初中生中的信效度

Objective To test psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist-civilian version(PCL-C) among junior school students from earthquake-hit region.Methods PC L-C Chinese Version, Rosenberg self-esteem scale and SCL-90 were utilized to assess 560 junior school students from earthquake-hit region.Results Firstly,the internal consistency of the total scale and three subscales were qualified, the coefficient alphas were 0.890,0.734,0.789 and 0.722, respectively; 307 participants, from the first samples, engaged in the second test two months after the first assessment.The test-retest stability was re-experiencing 0.40(P ＜ 0.01 ) ,avoidance 0.45 (P＜ 0.01 ), hyper-arousal 0.448 (P ＜ 0.01 ), total scale 0.535 (P ＜ 0.01 ), respectively.Secondly, the results of criteria validity showed PCL-C and its three subscales had negative correlation with self-esteem (r =-0.192 ～-0.299, P ＜ 0.01 ), and had positive-related with SCL-90 and its subscales of depression, anxiety, and psychotic (r=0.563 ～0.775, P＜0.01 ).Finally,the results of empirical validity revealed that based on the score on PCL-Ccould differentiate those people who have significant different scores on SCL-90.Conclusions The PCL-C hadgood reliabilities and validities,which could be used to assess the severity of PTSD.     

Development and evaluation of a Traditional Chinese Medicine syndrome questionnaire for measuring sub-optimal health status in China

OBJECTIVE:Sub-optimal health status(SHS),in which a person’s mind and body exists in a low-quality state of being between disease and health,has become a public health problem that cannot be ignored in China.SHS measurement presents a challenge to the academic fields.We developed and evaluated a questionnaire from the perspective of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) that embodies the features of TCM syndrome diagnosis for measuring SHS in China.METHODS:The construction of the theoretical framework of the questionnaire was based on a literature review,an expert questionnaire survey and group interviews.The subscales and questionnaire items were screened through a pilot study using statistical means and qualitative analysis.Reliability tests that were used included test-retest reliability,Cronbach’s α coefficient,split-half reliability;validity tests included content validity,criterion validity,discrimination validity and construct validity.RESULTS:The final questionnaire,the SHSQ-50,included 50 five-class quantifiable items that encompassed nine subscales:liver stagnation syndrome,liver-Qi deficiency syndrome,spleen-Qi deficiency syndrome,liver-fire syndrome,heart-fire syndrome,stomach-fire syndrome,heart-Qi deficiency syndrome,lung-Qi deficiency syndrome and dampness syndrome.Questionnaires were completed by 268 of the 288 SHS subjects(93.0%) and by 86 of the 94 healthy subjects(91.5%).The Cronbach α coefficients,split-half coefficients and stability coefficients ranged from 0.70 to 0.95,0.67 to 0.87 and 0.88 to 0.98,respectively,for the overall scores and subscales.The Wilcoxon rank test showed statistically significant differences in the subscales and overall scores between the SHS group and the healthy group(P<0.01).Twelve factors with an eigenvalue greater than one were extracted by factor analysis and merged into nine factors,for which the cumulative contribution rate was 63.63%.The nine factors were corresponded to the overall structure of the questionnaire.CONCLUSION:The SHSQ-50 is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring TCM syndrome diagnosis of SHS in China.     

Development and Validation of A Patient Reported Outcome Instrument for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases

Objective:To develop and validate a specific patient reported outcome(PRO)for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)patients(COPD-PRO)at a set of standardized procedures.Methods:Literature analysis,interview and group discussion were performed to draft an initial model of COPD-PRO.Thereafter,65 clinicians and experts throughout China reviewed the draft scale.Then cognitive debriefing interviews with 40 patients were conducted to assess respondent comprehension of the scale.After that,the revised scale was validated through pre-testing and field-testing.Finally,the psychometric properties of the COPD-PRO were evaluated by indicators such as validity,reliability and responsiveness based on the data from 230 patients.Results:The COPD-PRO contained 17 items in 3 domains:amelioration of clinical symptoms,satisfaction of health condition and satisfaction of treatment effect.The Cronbach'sα,Split-half coefficient and test-retest coefficient were 0.806,0.744,0.703,respectively;the correlation coefficients between domains and overall scale were 0.835-0.963;5 factors were extracted according to the conceptual model.The differences of the scale scores before and after treatment were statistically significant(P=0.000).Conclusions:The COPDPRO has good validity,reliability and responsiveness.The COPD-PRO could provide patients'response to the treatments and then evaluate the effect of treatment in a standardized way.     

精神障碍患者社会功能缺损评定量表的信效度分析

目的 检测精神障碍患者社会功能缺损评定量表(SSFD-MD)的信度和效度.方法 对1003例精神残疾鉴定患者施测,其中100例患者相隔1个月进行重测,并由2名熟悉SSFD-MD评分细则的评定人背对背测评.对其中300例同时实测社会功能缺陷筛选量表(SDSS)、住院精神病人社会功能评定量表(SSPI)、精神功能大体评定昔表(GAF)、简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、世界卫生组织残疾评定量表Ⅱ(WHO-DASⅡ)、成人智残评定量表(ARSMD)及锥体外系副反应量表(RSESE).结果 ①信度:全量表总分及各分量表的Cronbach's α系数均大于0.90;各分量表及总分重测一致性在0.67～0.83之间;评分者信度在0.87～0.97之间.②效度:各分量表间的相关系数在0.46～0.74之间,各分量表与总分的相关系数在0.73～0.87之间,均具有显著性(P＜0.01);经方差最大化正交旋转后全量表提取5个主成分,累计解释的总变异为82.25%.SSFD-MD与SDSS、SSPI及GAF呈高度相关,分别为0.71,0.72和0.78;与BPRS、WHO-DASⅡ及成人智残评定量表呈中度相关,r分别为0.62,0.50与0.46;与锥体外系副反应量表(RSE-SE)呈低度相关(0.22),均差异具有显著性(P＜0.01).结论 SSFD-MD编制符合心理测量学的基本要求,具有良好的信度和效度.

Abstract：

Objective To test the reliability and validity of the rating scale of social function deficit due to mental disorders (SSFD-MD). Methods 1003 cases with mental disability evaluation were tested by SSFDMD. At sametime, 100 cases of 1003 cases were test-retested and back to back tested by two examiners. 300 cases of 1003 cases also were tested by social disability screening schedule( SDSS),scale of social function for psychosis inpatients(SSPI),global assessment function(GAF) ,the brief psychiatric rating scale(BPRS) ,WH0 disability assessment scale Ⅱ (WHO-DASⅡ ), adult rating scale of mentally disabled ( ARSMD) and rating scale for extrapyramidal side effects (RSESE). Results ①The Cronbach's α coefficients of the total score and all dimensions of SSFD-MD were more than 0.90. The test-retest reliability ranged from 0.67～0. 83 ,and the scorer reliability were 0. 87～0.97. ②The correlations between item scores ranged from 0.46 ～0.74(P＜0.01). The correlations between the factor scores and the total scores ranged from 0.73～0.87(P＜0.01). To extract five full-scale principal components after orthogonal rotation to maximize variance,the cumulative total variance explained was 82.25%.There were highly correlations between SSFD-MD and SDSS.SSPI and GAF,respectively ( r = 0. 71,0.72 and 0. 78). There were moderate correlations between SSFD-MD and BPRS WHO-DAS II ARSMD,respectively(0.62,0. 50 and 0.46). There was a low correlations between SSFD-MD and RSESE ( r = 0.22) ,but all correlations were significant(P＜0.01). Conclusion SSFD-MD has acceptable psychometrics properties on reliability and validity.     

中文版攻击行为-教师核查表在学龄前儿童中的初步应用

目的 检验中文版攻击行为-教师核查表在我国学龄前儿童中应用的效度、信度及可行性.方法 翻译并修订攻击行为-教师核查表,并采用修订的中文版教师核查表量表、儿童行为量表(CBCI)攻击分量表对上海市148名学龄前儿童进行评估,并进行量表的效度和信度分析.结果 中文版攻击行为-教师核查表的各条目得分与其所属分量表得分均存在显著相关性(P<0.01);分量表效标关联效度范围为0.491～0.733;结构效度方面,因子分析得到特征值>1的2个公因子,方差累计贡献率为78.489%.教师核查表及其反应性和主动性攻击分母表的内部一致性Cronbaeh's α系数分别为0.891,0.814和0.880;反应性和主动性攻击分量表的2周重测信度系数和评定者信度系数均超过0.7.结论 中文版攻击行为-教师核查表在上海市学龄前儿童样本中具有较好的效度和信度,可用于在幼儿园和学校等机构对儿童进行攻击性行为的评估和防治.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the validity, reliability and feasibility of Chinese version of Aggressive Behavior-Teacher' s Checklist (TCL) among preschool children. Methods TCL was translated and administered with Child Behavior Checklist (CBCI)-aggressive subscale to 148 preschool children in Shanghai. Validity and reliability of TCL was evaluated using standard psychometric analyses. Results Each item of Chinese version of TCL was significantly correlated with the subscale it belonged to(P<0. 01). The criterion validities of reactive aggressive subscale and proactive aggressive subscale among boys and girls were from 0.491 to 0. 733. The construct validity was also confirmed by factor analysis with 78.489% variance explained by two factors. Cronbach's alpha of TCL and its two subscales were 0. 891,0. 814, and 0. 880 respectively. The test-retest reliability and the inter-rater reliability coefficients of reactive aggressive subscale and proactive aggressive subscale were all above 0. 7. Conclusion Chinese version of Aggressive Behavior-Teachers Checklist has good validity and reliability among preschool children in Shanghai, and can be applied in kindergartens and schools to evaluate and deal with aggressive behavior among these children.     

核心自我评价量表在企业员工和大学生中的信效度研究

目的 在企业员工和大学生中修订核心自我评价量表(Core Self-Evaluation Scale,CSES),考察其信度和效度.方法 对原量表进行翻译和回译;对400名企业员工和272名大学生2个样本进行测试,检验中文版核心自我评价量表的信度与效度.结果 量表在企业员工和大学生2个群体中,内在一致性信度分别为0.71和0.81,重测信度分别为0.81和0.84;验证性因素分析显示在两群体中单因素模型均拟合较好,且在两个群体中都具有良好的会聚效度和增益效度.结论 表明核心自我评价量表在企业员工和大学生两个群体中具有较好的信、效度,可以在实际研究中作为测量核心自我评价概念的工具.

Abstract：

Objective To revise Core Self-Evaluation Scale (CSES) and examine its reliability and validity in employees and undergraduates in China. Methods The adaptation of the scale was gotten by way of translation and back-translation. 400 employees and 272 undergraduates were tested by questionnaires, and their data were used to evaluate reliability and validity of the scale. Results In employees and undergraduates, the Cronbach' s coefficient of the CSES was respectively 0.71,0.81, and the test-retest reliability was respectively 0.81,0.84. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the single factor model was more fit for the revised CSES. The scale had good convergent validity and incremental validity in the samples. Conclusion The CSES has good reliability and validity in employees and undergraduates, which can be used for measuring the core self-evaluation in practical research.     

武警基层干部压力源问卷的编制

目的 编制符合武警部队基层干部压力源的问卷.方法 编制武警基层干部压力源问卷,以802名基层干部为研究对象,数据使用项目分析、因素分析、信度分析、效度分析等统计学方法验证其结构.结果 因素分析结果表明,19个题目可以分为4个因素:职业压力、经济压力、人际压力和发展压力.问卷总体一致性信度为0.893,分半信度系数为0.812,重测信度为0.813.该问卷总压力与症状自评量表中的躯体化、焦虑、抑郁、人际关系敏感等因子有较高程度的正相关,相关系数分别为0.376,0.383,0.396,0.387(P＜0.05).结论 武警基层干部压力问卷具有良好的信、效度,可以作为压力源测量的使用工具.

Abstract：

Objective To develop cadres' stress scale for the Chinese people' s armed police forces.Methods Based on the stress theory and principles of the psychometrics,combined with characteristics of armed police forces. The cadres' stress scale was developed by ourselves. 802 cadres were evaluated as samples and statistic the data by item analysis ,factor analysis, reliability and valid analysis. Results The scale included four dimensions: task stress, economy stress, interpersonal stress and development stress. The internal consistency reliability was 0.893 ,the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.812. Retest reliability coefficient was 0.813. The criterion related validity to the stress scale and SCL-90 was good and the correlation coefficient with somatization, anxiety,depression, interpersonal sensitivity was 0. 376,0. 383,0. 396,0. 387 individually (P ＜ 0.05 ). Conclusion Cadres stress scale for cadres of Chinese people's armed police forces has good reliability and validity.     

军人心理承受力量表的研制

目的 研制中国军人心理承受力量表,检验其信度和效度.方法 对基层连队官兵进行开放式问卷调查,据此编制初始问卷.量表的有效样本 860人,间隔2周重测样本50人,并同时对另外80人使用中国军人心理健康量表(CMMHS)进行测试.对收集到的数据进行因素分析和相关分析,考察量表的信度和效度.结果 根据因素分析结果,最终形成5个因子.另含一个掩饰因子,止式量表有32个条目.总量表的Cronbach'α系数为0.925,各分量表为0.597～0.810(P<0.01);量表的分半信度为0.895,各分量表为0.384～0.739(P<0.01);总量表的重测信度为0.447,各分量表为0.494～0.658,P<0.01或P<0.05;本量表与CMMHS的大部分凶子具有关联性.结论 研制的车人心理承受力量表有良好的信度、效度,可作为测最军人心理承受力的有效工具.     

抗震救灾官兵心身健康状况及影响因素

目的 探讨参加四川抗震救灾官兵的心身健康特点及其影响因素.方法 采用随机整群抽样法,对3064名参加救灾官兵和343名非救灾官兵使用简易心身健康调查表进行测试.结果 救灾官兵的骨骼肌肉症状、神经症状、消化症状、生殖泌尿症状、睡眠状态、情绪状态、行为状态因子分及躯体总分、心理总分、心身总分显著高于对照组( P <0.01～0.05).一线救援官兵心身健康各因子分明显高于二线救援官兵( P <0.01).救灾官兵心身症状总的发生率为89.98%,其中躯体症状发生率为82.51%,心理症状发生率为67.10%,躯体症状和心理症状同时发生率为59.63%,无症状者为10.02%.躯体症状与心理症状密切相关,相关系数为0.200～0.409( P <0.01);心理症状各因子、骨骼肌肉和神经症状与社会支持呈明显正相关,相关系数在0.180～0.405之间( P <0.01～0.05).救援类别、社会支持、受教育程度、民族是影响救灾官兵心身健康的主要因素.结论 参加救灾官兵心身健康状况受到明显损害.     

驾驶员应对方式问卷中文版的初步修订

目的 考察驾驶员应对方式问卷(DCQ)中文版的信度、效度.方法 采用驾驶员应对方式问卷(DCQ)和正负性情绪量表(PANAS),随机对340名汽车驾驶员进行调查.结果 因素分析表明问卷有积极评估应对、对抗性应对、情绪性应对和回避性应对四个因素;各因素与问卷总分相关为0.317～0.813(P＜0.01),各因素相关为0.057～0.294;正性情绪与积极评估及应对呈正相关(r=0.171,P＜0.01),负性情绪与积极评估及应对呈负相关(r=-0.349,P＜0.01),与其他三个消极应对方式则呈正相关(r=0.242～0.262,P＜0.0 1);分半信度为0.734,总问卷和各因素的Cronbach α系数分别为0.807,0.890,0.621,0.571和0.687.结论 驾驶员应对方式问卷有较好的信度和效度,是测试驾驶员应对方式的有效工具.     

军人职业倦怠量表的信效度检验

目的 研制军人职业倦怠量表,并对其信度、效度进行检验.方法 采用随机整群抽样方法 ,选取1000名健康官兵,并分为A(500名)、B(500名)两组.用研制的军人职业倦怠量表对两组被试进行测试.对其中的280人同时使用本量表和工作倦怠问卷进行施测;对收集的A组数据进行探索性因素分析和相关分析,B组数据进行验证性因素分析.结果 经相关分析发现:总量表的Cronbach'α系数为0.917,各因子的Cronbach'α系数为0.719～0.847;总量表的分半信度为0.920,各个因子的分半信度为0.723～0.867.总量表与各分量表之间的相关系数为0.731～0.808(P＜0.01),各分量表之间的相关系数为0.386～0.627(P＜0.01).经探索性及验证性因素分析发现:所测数据与理论模型(成就感、躯体化、自我评价、人际关系、消极怠工);相一致,拟合指标的卡方值为771.914,自由度(DF)为395,相对卡方值为1.954,P=0.000,近似误差均方根为0.044,拟合优度指数、比较拟合指数、增值拟合指数分别为0.904,0.919,0.920.军人职业倦怠量表总分及各因子分与工作倦怠问卷的总分及各因子分之间具有显著的相关性.结论 自行研制的军人职业倦怠量表具有较好的信度和效度.     

大学生自杀倾向量表的初步编制

目的 编制一个中国大学牛自杀倾向量表,为高校开展健康教育和自杀预防提供参考工具.方法 以Mann等提出的自杀应激-易感模型为理论依据,在文献复习和个案访谈的基础上构建大学生自杀倾向量表的理论因子及条目,并通过德尔菲法和预调查进行条目筛选.利用条目分析、信效度检验全面考察量表的心理测量学特征.结果 经条目筛选,最终保留23个条目.探索性因子分析将量表划分为5个维度,与预想的因素结构基本一致.在此结构下进行信效度分析,条目与其分鬣表的相关性较高(r=0.586～0.852),各分量表与总量表相关密切(r=0.534,0.830),而各分量表间呈低中度相关(r=0.073～0.619),均表明量表的内容效度较好.总量表及各分量苗表与CES-D和BHS相关均达到0.001显著水平,表明聚合效度较好;总量表及各分量表均能区分大学生和抑郁症患者2组人群(P＜0.01),表明量表的区分效度较好.总量表的Cronbach's 系数、分半信度和重测信度分别为0.872,0.740,0.784.结论 大学生自杀倾向量表信效度指标基本达到了心理测量学要求,可以作为大学生自杀倾向的测评工具.     

成人心理弹性量表在军校大学生中的信效度研究

目的 研究成人心理弹性量表(RSA)在军校大学生中的信效度.方法 采用成人心理弹性量表(RSA)和症状自评量表(SCL-90)中的抑郁、焦虑、躯体化3个因子对某军校616名学生进行整群抽样调查.结果 ①对RSA采用探索性因素分析.共提取5个因子.各项目在因子上的负荷在0.423～0.834之间,累计方差解释率为58.439%;②RSA各因子之间相关显著.相关系数在0.228～0.580之间;各因子与总分相关显著,相关系数在0.565～0.789之间;③效标SCL-90的抑郁、焦虑和躯体化三个因子的均分与RSA均分之间呈显著负相关,相关系数为-0.437(n=593,P=0.000);④RSA各个因子的同质性信度在0.52～0.86之间,RSA问卷信度为0.91.结论 RSA量表在军校学生中信效度较好.     

中文版青少年久坐行为量表在初中生应用的信度和效度研究

目的 评价中文版青少年久坐行为量表在初中生应用的信度和效度.方法 采用多阶段抽样的方法 ,对782名初中生进行问卷调查.用Cronbach's α系数和分半信度考核其信度,用条目-维度相关系数(IIC)、维度间相关系数、总分与维度间的相关系数考核其内容效度,用证实性因子分析考核其结构效度.结果 中文版青少年久坐行为量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.822,改变策略、决策平衡正面效应维度、决策平衡负面效应、自我效能四个维度的Cronbach's α系数分别为0.882,0.478,0.631,0.645;总量表分半信度为0.857,各维度分半信度在0.488～0.896;条目与维度间平均相关系数0.226～0.768,除决策平衡负面效应得分与改变策略、决策平衡正面效应得分间的相关系数分别为-0.052,0.090(P＜0.05)外,其他各维度得分间有较弱到中度的相关关系(r=-0.210～0.394,P＜0.01),4个维度得分与总分间均有中度到较强的相关关系(r=0.365～0.554,P＜0.01).结论 中文版青少年久坐行为量表在初中生中具有较好的信度和效度,在整体上适用于国内初中生久坐行为的测量.     

症状自评量表在外迁移民中的信效度检验

目的 研究中文版症状自评量表(SCL-90)量表应用于重庆市三峡库区外迁移民的信度和效度.方法 采用整群随机抽样方法,用SCL-90量表对符合条件的外迁移民进行面对面调查,并计算量表得分.采用信度分析,验证性因素分析和Pearson相关分析等方法对量表进行信度和效度评价.结果 ①10个分量表的Cronbach's α系数在0.763～0.891之间,折半系数在0.771～0.869之间;②各分量表分与总量表分的相关系数在0.754～0.921之间,且对10个相关系数的检验均有统计学意义(P＜0.01);③验证性因素分析发现,一阶和二阶模型中x2/d f＞5,RMSEA≤0.08,IFI、CFI、NNFI等相对拟合指数＞0.90,SRMR＜0.1;④10个分量表之间的相关系数在0.462～0.895之间,除强迫症状、焦虑和精神性症状3个分量表外,其余分量表与总量表的相关均超过分量表间的相关;⑤心理问题阳性症状组10个因子的得分均高于心理健康组,且2组t值的差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.01).结论 SCL-90应用于外迁移民的内部一致性信度、内容效度和区分效度较好,但结构效度并不理想.     

坚毅量表修订及其在军校大学生中的信效度检验

目的 在军校大学生中进行中文版坚毅量表(Grit-12)的信度、效度检验,为研究大学生坚毅水平提供可靠的测量工具.方法 对原版Grit-12的条目进行翻译和回译,初测调查337人,采用SPSS 21.0软件对条目进行验证,形成正式的中文版坚毅量表.正式施测调查997人,其中201人采用SPSS 21.0软件进行探索性因素分析和信度检验,796人采用Amos 17.0软件进行验证性因素分析且同时施测心理资本量表(PCQ-24)进行效标效度检验.此外,随机从正式施测的796人中抽取47人在2周后进行重测.结果 中文版坚毅量表由12个条目组成,12个条目的因子载荷均不低于o.56,累积方差贡献率为47.54％.验证性因素分析结果表明模型拟合较好,x2/df =2.31,比较拟合指数(CFI)为0.97,Tucker-Lewis指数(TLI)为0.94,拟合优度指数(GFI)为0.97,增值拟合指数(IFI)为0.97,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)为0.05,均方根残差(SRMR)为0.06;中文版坚毅量表总分及2个分量表得分与心理资本总分及分量表得分均呈正相关(P均＜0.001).总量表的Cronbach's a系数为0.83,2个分量表的a系数分别为0.76和0.82.总量表的重测信度(相关系数)为0.80.结论 修订后的中文版坚毅量表具有良好的效度和信度,可以作为测量军校大学生坚毅水平的适宜工具.     

地震救援官兵心身健康与社会支持的相关性及其干预研究

目的 探讨汶川抗震救援官兵心身健康与社会支持及相关因素的关系,并进行心理干预效果的评价.方法 采用随机整群取样法,抽取152名参加汶川救援官兵和139名非救援官兵进行简易心身健康调查表和社会支持量表测查,并对有明显心身问题者进行相应的心理干预或药物治疗.结果 抗震救援官兵与未参加救援军人在躯体症状、心理症状、心身健康和社会支持各总分的得分为(4.09±4.70)分,(2.18±3.16)分,(6.27±7.08)分,(6.14±4.20)分和(2.11±4.16)分,(1.37±3.09)分,(3.47±6.55)分,(4.57±4.17)分,均差异有显著性(P＜0.05).救援官兵的躯体症状与心理症状呈明显的正相关,r为0.17～0.52(P＜0.01或P＜0.05).社会支持缺乏与心理症状呈正相关,r为0.18～0.40(P＜0.01或P＜0.05).影响救援官兵心身健康的主要因素是社会支持缺乏;救援官兵躯体症状发生率较心理症状发生率高,经心理及药物干预可收到较好的效果.结论 抗震救援官兵心身健康受到不同程度的损害;支持性心理干预及药物治疗可获好的效果.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the relationship between the anti-earthquake military rescuers' psychosomatic health and social support, and observe the effect of intervention to the army men who suffered troubles.Methods By cluster random sampling, 152 military rescuers and 139 army men not taking part in the rescues were investigated by Facility Psychosomatic Health Scale and Social Support Rating Scale. Mental intervention or medication was performed to those produced psychosomatic health. Results The scores of somatic symptoms,mental status,psychosomatic health and social support of military rescuers and the control group were (4.09±4.70) ,(2.18 ±3.16) ,(6.27 ±7.08) ,(6.14 ±4.20) and (2.11 ±4.16) ,(1.37 ±3.09),(3.47 ±6.55),(4.57 ± 4.17 )respectively, the difference was significant(P＜0.05). The somatic symptoms had significantly positive correlation with mental status in military rescuers (r=0.17～0.52, P＜ 0.05 or 0.01 ). Failure of social support had positive correlation with mental disorders (r=0.18～0.40, P＜0.05 or 0.01). The degree of social support was the main factor which had affected on the psychosomatic health of military rescuers. The somatic symptoms of military rescuers were apparently higher than their mental symptoms. Mental and pharmaceutical intervention showed good effect on them. Conclusion There is an apparent effect for military rescuers injured seriously psychosomatic health through medication or mental intervention.