驾驶员应对方式问卷中文版的初步修订

目的 考察驾驶员应对方式问卷(DCQ)中文版的信度、效度.方法 采用驾驶员应对方式问卷(DCQ)和正负性情绪量表(PANAS),随机对340名汽车驾驶员进行调查.结果 因素分析表明问卷有积极评估应对、对抗性应对、情绪性应对和回避性应对四个因素;各因素与问卷总分相关为0.317～0.813(P＜0.01),各因素相关为0.057～0.294;正性情绪与积极评估及应对呈正相关(r=0.171,P＜0.01),负性情绪与积极评估及应对呈负相关(r=-0.349,P＜0.01),与其他三个消极应对方式则呈正相关(r=0.242～0.262,P＜0.0 1);分半信度为0.734,总问卷和各因素的Cronbach α系数分别为0.807,0.890,0.621,0.571和0.687.结论 驾驶员应对方式问卷有较好的信度和效度,是测试驾驶员应对方式的有效工具.

The preliminary revision of Chinese version of driver coping questionnaire

Objective To explore the reliability and validity of driver coping questionnaire (DCQ) Chinese version. Methods Three hundred and forty drivers were investigated at random by DCQ and positive affect nagative affect scale (PANAS). Results Four factors were extracted, namely active appraisal and coping, confrontive coping, emotion-focused coping and avoidance coping. The correlation coefficients between the questionnaire and the four factors were 0.317 ～ 0. 813 (P ＜ 0.01 ), and the correlation coefficients among the four factors were 0.057 ～0.294. Positive appraisal and coping were correlated with PA positively( r=0. 171, P＜0. 01 ) ,and with NA negatively( r= -0. 349, P＜0.01 ),and the other three coping styles were positively correlated with NA( r=0. 242 ～0.262, P＜0.01 ). The split-half reliability was 0.734,the Cronbach α coefficients of the total questionnaire and four factors were 0. 807,0. 890,0. 621,0. 571and 0. 687 respectively. Conclusion DCQ Chinese version has good reliability and validity, and is an effective instrument to test drivers' coping behavior.