腹腔镜下切口疝补片修补术的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术的手术方法、安全性等问题。方法对我院2004年3月至2005年7月间收治的42例腹壁切口疝患者,采用腹腔镜下修补术。结果41例（97.6%）手术成功,1例（2.4%）因腹腔内广泛粘连而中转为剖腹修补。平均手术时间为96 min,平均术后住院4.8 d,9例（21.4%）患者术中发现有一个以上的隐匿性缺损。术后并发症：术后短期内修补区腹壁明显疼痛36例（85.7%）,腹壁缝合点较长时间疼痛6例（14.3%）,浆液肿8例（19%）,无修补区感染,未发现早期复发的病例。结论对腹壁切口疝,多数患者是可以经腹腔镜进行粘连松解及补片修补术的,并可在术中发现其他隐性缺损。对腹腔内广泛粘连而影响操作器械的进入及粘连分离者,应及时中转剖腹手术。     

老年腹壁切口疝的腹腔镜下修补术

目的 探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行老年腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法 2004年11月至2006年6月对17例老年切口疝患者行腹腔镜下应用补片切口疝修补术。结果 16例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间65～132min,平均95min。术后恢复排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：疼痛3个月以上者3例,浆液肿5例,穿刺口感染1例,均经保守治疗后好转,无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访7～26个月（平均13个月）,未见切口疝复发。结论 腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解,采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片修补老年腹壁切口疝安全、有效。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝补片修补术的初步经验

目的:探讨腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术的手术方法、安全性等问题。方法:对我院2004年3月～11月间收治的25例腹壁切口疝病人,进行腹腔镜下修补术。结果:24例(96%)手术成功,1例(4%)因腹腔内广泛粘连而中转为剖腹修补。平均手术时间为110min,平均术后住院6d,6例(24%)病人术中发现有一个以上的隐匿性缺损。术后并发症有:术后短期内修补区腹壁明显疼痛21例(84%),腹壁缝合点较长时间疼痛6例(24%),浆液肿3例(12%);无修补区感染,也未发现早期复发的病例。结论:对腹壁切口疝,多数病人是可以经腹腔镜进行粘连松解及补片修补术的,还可在术中发现其他隐性缺损。对腹腔内广泛粘连而影响操作器械的进入及分离者,应及时中转剖腹手术。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法2004年9月至2007年6月对56例切口疝（腹壁缺损长径7～19cm,宽径4～12cm）的患者行腹腔镜下应用补片行切口疝修补术。结果55例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间60～135min,平均92min。肠功能恢复早,术后排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：术后疼痛达3个月以上者有9例,浆液肿8例。无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访16～28个月,平均19个月,未见切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解、采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片来修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的微创方法,值得临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜技术在切口疝修补术中的应用体会

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片修补切口疝的手术方法和II缶床效果。方法回顾性分析我科2006年1月至2008年12月对腹壁切口疝23例施行腹腔镜修补术的临床资料。结果本组成功施行腹腔镜下切口疝补片修补22例,因腹腔内严重粘连中转剖腹手术1例,术中发现多发切口疝3例。本组无手术死亡和肠瘘病例。术后出现疼痛4例,补片周围积液3例。全组获随访4～24个月,平均13．8个月,未见切口疝复发。结论腹壁切口疝病人行腹腔镜下补片修补大多是安全地,还可在术中发现隐性缺损。对腹腔内广泛粘连分离困难者,应及时中转剖腹手术。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术(附41例报告)

目的探讨腹腔镜下采用聚丙烯和膨化聚四氟乙烯复合补片（Bard Composix Mesh）修补腹壁切口疝的效果。方法2004年10月～2005年8月，对41例切口疝（腹壁缺损长径3～25cm，宽径3～18cm）腹腔镜下用超声刀进行腹腔内粘连松解和采用强生疝修补用缝合器行补片固定修补术。结果41例均顺利完成，无中转开腹。手术时间60～182min，平均85min。术后疼痛轻微，术后排便、排气时间25～41h，平均32h。术后第2天进食。术后住院5～7d，平均6d。41例随访6～16个月，平均9个月，未见切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下采用复合补片修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法，值得临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术15例

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床疗效。方法2008年5月至2009年5月,对15例腹壁切口疝进行腹腔镜下补片修补术。结果14例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术;1例因肠管与腹壁及疝环致密粘连而中转开放切口疝修补术。术后腹壁修补区域疼痛10例(71.4%),疝环和补片间出现浆液肿4例(28.6%),无肠瘘和死亡病例,未发生手术相关的感染。术后随访3～12个月,平均7.5个月,未见复发。结论在腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解,采用疝钉合器与缝线贯穿腹壁全层固定补片可以修补大多数腹壁切口疝,同时还可以发现其他的隐匿性疝,是一种安全、有效的微创手术方法,值得临床推广。     

腹腔镜下切口疝修补术并发症的处理

目的探讨腹腔镜下切口疝补片修补术后并发症发生的原因及处理方法。方法回顾性分析2004年3月～2007年5月采用腹腔镜补片修补术治疗的110例切口疝的临床资料。男42例，女68例，年龄33～89岁（平均65岁）。结果1例因腹腔内广泛粘连而中转开放修补，余109例手术成功。术后并发症：术后腹胀15例（13．6％），修补区腹壁疼痛86例（78．2％）（其中2例持续时间≥6周），血清肿23例（20．9％），尿潴留6例（5．4％），急性胃扩张2例（1．8％），肠管损伤2例（1．8％），呼吸功能障碍2例（1．8％），复发2例（1．8％）。结论术前准备不足，腹腔内的粘连，视野暴露困难，盲目电凝操作，补片偏小及固定不恰当等是导致手术并发症的关键。     

腹腔镜下经腹腔腹壁切口疝修补术16例体会

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前网片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的特点及疗效。方法回顾分析2005年11月至2008年8月16例患者腹壁切口疝采用腹腔镜手术治疗的临床资料。结果14例手术均在腹腔镜下完成，两例因粘连中转手术，手术时间65～85min，平均73min；术后2～48h患者下床活动，住院4—6d，无并发症发生，术后随访2～24个月，1例复发（6．25％）。结论腹腔镜治疗腹壁切口疝是安全可行的疝修补方法，遵循疝修补无张力的原则，具有患者痛苦轻、康复快等特点，是治疗腹壁切口疝的有效手段。     

腹腔镜下腹壁巨大切口疝修补术的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝的手术方法及临床效果。方法分析25例应用腹腔镜下补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝(腹壁缺损长径为12~25cm,宽9~18cm,缺损面积108~451cm2)患者的临床资料。结果21例(84.0%)顺利完成腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术,4例(16.0%)因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹。手术时间78~186(平均95)min。术后住院5~8d,平均6.5d。术后疼痛达3个月以上8例(32.0%),经治疗后缓解;浆液肿9例(36%)。无切口感染和肠瘘发生;无手术死亡。全组患者随访6~25(平均11)个月,无切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下修补腹壁巨大切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法,对腹腔粘连重分离困难者应及时中转开腹。     

����оƬ��������Һ�����������ٴ��о�

??Objective:To investigate the security and the operative experiences of laparoscopic ventral incisional herniorrhaphy. Methods:The laparoscopic mesh repair was performed for 79 patients with abdominal ventral incisional hernias from March 2004 to May 2006 in Hua Shan Affiliated Hospital of Fu Dan University. Results:Laparoscopic incisional herniorrhaphy with meshes was successfully performed in 98.7% (78/79) of patients.One case (1.3%) was converted to an open procedure because of extensive adhesion intraperitoneally. The mean operating time was 88 minutes and postoperative hospital stay averaged 4.6 days.Eighteen (22.8%) patients were found to have more than one hernial defect intraoperatively.Postoperative complications included severe pain in operative area temporary (n=58,73.4%),prolonged pain in suture site (n=6,7.6%),seroma (n=14,17.7%),intestinal fistula (n=1,1.3%) and recurrence (n=1,1.3%). Conclusion:Laparoscopic ventral incisional herniorrhaphy with meshes can be performed in most of incisional hernias after complete dissection of adhesions,through the laparoscopy it may find others defects.But the postoperative pain is severe in repair area.If extensive dense adhesion will interfere with the manipulation and lysis,the patients should be converted to open operation.     

腔镜修复术治疗结肠造口旁疝

目的总结腔镜下补片修补造口旁疝的手术技术要点。方法回顾性分析2004年9月至2006年11月复旦大学附属华山医院外科收治的16例行腔镜修补术治疗结肠造口旁疝病人的临床资料。结果16例造口旁疝病人中,14例修补成功,2例中转为开放缝合修补（1例因腹腔内广泛致密粘连,1例因小肠损伤）。手术时间平均116min（45～180min）。疝环直径平均5.4cm（4～6cm）。术后出现暂时性腹胀4例,修补区域腹壁疼痛12例（最长持续3周后明显缓解）,1例出现呼吸功能减退（经使用无创呼吸机辅助治疗后缓解）,7例出现浆液肿（经2～4次穿刺抽液并加压包扎后治愈,无血肿发生,未发生与手术相关的感染）。术后住院时间平均5.4d（3～8d）。术后随访平均7个月（1～17个月）,未见早期复发,疝囊较小和发病初期就行修补术者外观优于疝囊较大和发病时间较长者。结论腹腔镜造口旁疝补片修补术从技术上讲是安全、可行的,从早期的临床结果来看,效果亦较理想。     

腹腔镜下造口旁疝补片修补术可行性、安全性探讨

目的：就所开展的腹腔镜下造口旁疝补片修补术的临床资料，进行该手术可行性和安全性的探讨。方法：自2004年9月至2006年4月，我院为10例造口旁疝病人进行了腹腔镜下补片修补术。结果：10例造口旁疝病人中9例修补成功，1例因腹腔内广泛致密粘连而中转为开腹缝合修补；手术时间平均113（45～180）min：疝环大小平均5．6（4～6）cm；术后2例出现暂时性腹胀；7例修补区域腹壁疼痛，持续2周后均明显缓解：1例出现呼吸功能减退，经使用无创呼吸机辅助治疗后缓解；5例出现浆液肿，经2～4次穿刺抽液并加压包扎后治愈，无血肿发生．也未发生与手术相关的感染。术后住院时间平均5．7（3-9）d；术后随访平均9．1（2～19）个月，未见早期复发。结论：腹腔镜造口旁疝补片修补术从技术上讲是安全、可行的，从早期的临床结果来看．效果较理想。     

Laparoscopic tension-free repair of anterior abdominal wall incisional and ventral hernias with an intraperitoneal Gore-Tex mesh: prospective study and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Recurrence rates after repair of incisional and ventral hernias range from 18% to 52%. Prosthetic open repair has decreased this rate, but the wide fascial dissection it requires increases the complication rate. Laparoscopic repair is a safe and effective alternative. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed including 86 patients (63 women and 23 men) with a mean age of 54 years (range 29-79 years) having incisional or ventral hernias who underwent laparoscopic repair in our institution between July 1994 and October 2001. The majority of the patients were obese with a mean body mass index of 31.7 kg/m2. The abdominal wall defect size ranged from 2 X 1 cm to 20 X 13 cm. In all cases, a Gore-Tex mesh (Dual Mesh, W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) was used in sizes ranging from 10 X 15 cm to 20 X 30 cm. RESULTS: Nineteen repairs were performed for recurrent hernias (12 incisional and 7 ventral). The mean operative time was 110.3 minutes (range 50-240 minutes). There was one open conversion (1.2%), one intraoperative complication (1.2%), and no deaths. There were no wound or mesh infections. Immediate postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients (10.6%) and late complications occurred in 16 patients (18.8%). The average hospital stay was 4.8 days (range 2-19 days). During a mean follow-up of 37 months (range 6-73 months), there were 6 hernia recurrences (7%). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia and ventral hernia appears to be safe, especially with the use of Gore-Tex mesh, and is proving to be effective as it decreases pain, complications, hospital stay, and recurrences.     

腹腔镜复合补片无张力修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床体会

目的:探讨腹腔镜复合补片无张力修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的应用价值及可靠性。方法:回顾分析2007年1月至2012年1月为56例患者行腹腔镜复合补片修补术的临床资料。结果:3例因广泛粘连中转开腹,53例成功完成手术。手术时间70～320 min,中位手术时间110 min。术中发现隐匿性疝2例。术后Ⅰ级护理时间1天,术后24 h即恢复进食并下床活动。术后发生较长时间疼痛1例、感染1例。随访至今均未发现复发。结论:术后并发切口疝的患者于腹腔镜下分离粘连、采用复合补片修补是安全可行的。     

Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients

Background: Recurrence rates after primary repair of ventral and incisional hernias range from 25% to 52%. Recurrence after open surgery is less likely if mesh is used, but the wide fascial dissection and required flap creation increase complication rates. Laparoscopic techniques offer an alternative.

Study Design: To assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic ventral and incisional herniorrhaphy, we reviewed the records of all our patients who underwent such a procedure from November 1993 to August 1999. A laparoscopic approach was attempted in all patients considered to require a mesh repair. Patient demographic characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were recorded.

Results: Of 415 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic ventral or incisional herniorrhaphy, conversion to an open procedure was necessary in 8. All the remaining 407 patients (205 men and 202 women; mean age 53.2 years; range 13 to 88 years) were included in the study. Mean fascial defect size was 100.1 cm² (range 1 to 480 cm²). In 97% of patients, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh was used. Mean operating time was 97 minutes (range 11 to 270 minutes). Mean estimated blood loss was 35 mL (range 10 to 150 mL). Average hospital stay was 1.8 days (range 0 to 17 days). There were 53 complications (13.0%), including cellulitis of a trocar site, infection requiring mesh removal, prolonged suture pain, persistent seroma, intestinal injury, hematoma or postoperative bleeding, prolonged ileus, urinary retention, respiratory distress, fever, intraabdominal abscess, and trocar site herniation. There were no deaths. During a mean followup time of 23 months (range 1 to 60 months), there were 14 hernia recurrences (3.4%), 6 in patients in whom only a stapling device (no sutures) had been used to secure the mesh to the abdominal wall.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair was completed in 98.1% of patients in whom it was attempted. The complication rate was acceptable. A short hospital stay and minimal blood loss were documented. The recurrence rate was 3.4%. Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair appear to be safe and effective.     

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a two (5-mm) port technique.

OBJECTIVE: High recurrence rates have been documented after primary repair of incisional hernias. Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repairs have been performed with very low rates of recurrence. We have modified the standard technique of laparoscopic repair in patients with small incisional and ventral hernias. The purpose of this study was to document the technique utilizing only two 5-mm ports and demonstrate that it is safe, effective, and feasible. METHODS: Three patients with small incisional or ventral hernias were examined. The standard laparoscopic ventral hernia repair technique was modified as follows: two 5-mm ports were inserted on opposite sides of the defect. The defects ranged from 2.5 cm to 4 cm in size. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (DualMesh, WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) was used to cover the hernia defect, overlapping the defect margins circumferentially by 3 cm. The mesh diameter ranged from 8.5 cm to 10 cm. The mesh was inserted through a 5-mm skin incision site and affixed into position with transfascial sutures and spiral tacks. RESULTS: The operative time ranged from 53 minutes to 57 minutes. All patients were discharged home the day of surgery and reported minimal postoperative pain. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 1 year; all patients were doing well without recurrence. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of ventral or incisional hernias can be performed using only two 5-mm ports. This technique can be done on an outpatient basis in a safe, timely fashion.     

Laparoscopic ePTFE mesh repair of incisional and ventral hernias

Incisional hernia is a relatively frequent complication of abdominal surgery. The use of mesh to repair incisional and ventral hernias results in lower recurrence rates compared with primary suture techniques. The laparoscopic approach may be associated with lower postoperative morbidity compared with open procedures. Long-term recurrence rates after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernias are not well defined. A prospective study of the initial experience of a standardized technique of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair carried out in a tertiary referral hospital was undertaken between January 2003 and February 2007. Laparoscopic hernia repair was attempted in 71 patients and was successful in 68 (conversion rate 4%). The mean age of the patients identified was 63.1 years (39 men and 31 women). Multiple hernial defects were identified in 38 patients (56%), and the mean overall size of the fascial defects was 166 cm(2). The mean mesh size used was 403 cm(2). The mean operative time was 121 minutes. There were six (9%) major complications in this series, but there were no deaths. Hernia recurrence was noted in four patients (6%) at a mean follow up of 20 months. Our preliminary experience indicates that laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair is technically feasible and has acceptable postoperative morbidity and low early recurrence rates.