腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中补片钉合固定与医用胶固定的对照研究

目的 比较完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TEP)中补片钉合固定与医用胶固定的临床效果.方法 采集本院2010年7月至2011年12月施行完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的患者105例,随机分为补片钉合固定组(55 例)和医用胶固定组(50 例).观察比较二组患者术后血清肿发生率、疼痛评分、近期疝复发率.结果 二组患者均手术顺利,均无近期复发.医用胶组术后疼痛评分比钉合固定组低,但是二组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);二组间术后血清肿发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中使用医用胶固定补片安全可行.     

不同补片植入方法在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的疗效

目的探讨腹腔镜下腹腔内补片植入（intraperitoneal onlay mesh,IPOM）与腹膜前间隙补片植入[腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair,TAPP）和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal,TEP）]治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果。比较TAPP和TEP术式的治疗费用和卫生资源利用率。 方法回顾性分析2014年6月至2015年12月,徐州市中心医院收治的153例腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术（laparascopic inguinal hernia repair,LIHR）患者的临床资料,其中IPOM 102例,TAPP 30例,TEP 21例。比较腹腔镜下IPOM与腹膜前间隙补片植入患者的基本信息与术后临床症状等资料。 结果IPOM组和腹膜前间隙补片植入组慢性疼痛患者分别为18例和1例,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;IPOM组血清肿患者8例,腹膜前间隙补片植入组2例,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;2组患者在感觉障碍、术后感染、住院时间和复发率等方面差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。2组患者治疗后其血清基质金属蛋白酶2（matrix metalloproteinase,MMP）-2（97.55±10.26、98.34±11.06）、MMP-9（128.57±10.26、130.94±10.71）水平均有明显降低,与治疗前对比（201.51±14.61、203.61±16.84）、（198.64±12.64、199.07±11.57）,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,组间对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。TAPP和TEP在检查费用、手术费用、药品费用、护理费用、间接成本和总成本上差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。TAPP和TEP治疗腹股沟疝的疗效相同,但TEP通过减少材料费用提高了资源利用率。 结论腹腔镜下IPOM与腹膜前间隙补片植入都是治疗腹股沟疝的有效手术方式,腹膜前间隙补片植入术治疗效果优于腹腔镜下IPOM。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中腹腔内三点缝合法固定补片的疗效研究

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)中腹腔内三点缝合法固定补片的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2013年8月至2015年7月,清华大学第一附属医院120例初发单侧腹股沟疝患者行TAPP手术治疗的临床资料,对术中所采用的腹腔内三点缝合法和医用胶两种补片固定方式进行随机对照试验,术后随访12~14个月。结果 2组患者在复发率、术后慢性疼痛及血清肿发生率、手术时间、术后住院天数的比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05),医用胶组的住院费用显著高于缝合组,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。2组患者于术后1、3、5、7、14 d的疼痛评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。结论 TAPP术中使用腹腔内三点缝合法固定补片安全可靠,经济实用,术后并发症少,复发率低。     

Lichtenstein和腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术在腹股沟阴囊疝患者中的临床应用

目的比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）与开放Lichtenstein手术,在腹股沟阴囊疝治疗中的疗效,并探讨其可行性及术后并发症的发生率。 方法选择2016年1月至2018年12月,南京市高淳人民医院阴囊疝患者48例。按照术式不同分为TAPP组（20例）和Lichtenstein组（28例）。比较2组术中及术后并发症,包括手术时间、术中出血、术后疼痛、伤口及网片感染和术后复发等。 结果本组患者均顺利完成手术。Lichtenstein组手术时间（59±12）min,TAPP组手术时间（56±9）min,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;Lichtenstein组术中出血量（30.0±10.5）ml,TAPP组为（10.0±5.1）ml,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。Lichtenstein组住院时间（9.0±5.2）d,TAPP组（3.0±2.4）d,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。Lichtenstein组术后疼痛VAS评分（术后1周）为（4.0±1.4）分,TAPP组（2.0±1.2）分,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。2组患者在随访期间均无补片感染、复发及慢性疼痛发生。Lichtenstein组切口并发症（浅表感染及血肿,渗血,渗液）6例,阴囊积液6例;TAPP组切口并发症0例,阴囊积液7例。均经过换药或者保守治疗,均治愈出院。 结论TAPP可以进行腹股沟阴囊疝修补术,其疗效与腹股沟疝开放修补术相当,TAPP具有术后疼痛轻、伤口并发症少,住院时间较短的优点。     

自固定补片与聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用效果比较

目的比较自固定补片与聚丙烯补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）中的应用效果。 方法收集2016年2月至2020年2月于中南大学湘雅二医院治疗腹股沟疝的164例患者的临床资料。按照TAPP术中使用补片不同分为试验组和对照组,各82例。试验组术中应用自固定补片,对照组术中应用聚丙烯补片,2组均平均随访1年。比较2组手术临床指标及术后并发症的发生率。 结果试验组补片放置时间明显长于对照组（P<0.05）,且试验组手术时间明显长于对照组（P<0.05）,试验组花费高于对照组（P<0.05）。2组患者的术后的住院时间、术中并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。2组术后1 d至3个月视觉模拟评分量表（VAS）的评分均呈下降趋势,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,且术后各个随访时间点试验组VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。试验组总并发症的发生率（24.39%）低于对照组（32.93%）,异物感（1.22%）低于对照组（4.88%）,差异均无统计学意义;2组在随访期内均未的复发。 结论TAPP术中应用自固定补片较聚丙烯补片增加了患者的经济费用,但利于其术后恢复,疼痛较轻,且未增加术后复发的风险。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的术后疼痛分析

目的:探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝术后疼痛的原因及治疗方法。方法:回顾分析2009年5月至2015年2月为1 036例患者行TAPP的临床资料,总结分析患者年龄、手术时期、钉枪固定等指标。结果:1 036例均顺利完成TAPP,无一例中转开腹。术后发生疼痛89例,发生率8.6%。不同手术时期、应用钉枪钉合与免钉合术后疼痛差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。不同年龄、U形钉与螺旋钉固定TAPP术后疼痛差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:手术标准化是减少或避免TAPP术后疼痛的根本方法,必要的心理安慰、合适的治疗方式是治疗的关键。     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效

目的比较腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（TEP）与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）在腹股沟疝中的应用效果。 方法回顾性分析2015年2月至2018年1月，新津县人民医院收治的80例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料，根据手术方式不同将其分为试验组及对照组，每组40例。试验组行TEP，对照组行TAPP，2组均行为期1年的随访。比较2组手术临床指标、术后疼痛情况，并统计2组术后并发症发生率。 结果试验组手术时间及铺片耗时分别为（60.27±4.23）min及（25.31± 4.86）min显著短于对照组（73.18±5.62）min及（28.73±5.12）min，差异有统计学意义（t=11.608、3.064，P<0.001、P=0.003）；试验组住院时间及胃肠功能恢复时间分别为（3.38±0.78）d及（15.08±0.91）min与对照组（3.14±0.71）d及（14.79±0.83）min比较，差异无统计学意义（t=1.439、1.489，P=0.154、0.140）。自术前至术后5个月试验组及对照组VAS评分均呈下降趋势，差异有统计学意义（F=252.345、181.841，P均<0.001），且术后2及5个月各时间点VAS评分试验组显著低于对照组（t=4.135、4.711，P均<0.001），术前及术后1 d时间点试验组VAS评分与对照组比较，差异均无统计学意义（t=1.645、1.444，P=0.869、0.153）。试验组并发症发生情况2（5%）与对照组8（20%）比较，差异无统计学意义（χ²=2.857，P=0.091）。 结论腹腔镜全腹膜外自固定补片植入术较经腹股沟腹膜前补片植入术可有效缩短手术时间及铺片时间，且术后疼痛较轻、并发症发生率较低。     

Ⅰ、Ⅱ型腹股沟疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中不固定补片与缝合固定补片的比较研究

目的:比较Ⅰ、Ⅱ型腹股沟疝行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)中缝合固定补片与不固定补片的临床疗效。方法:回顾分析2015年9月至2016年10月为123例成年初发单侧Ⅰ、Ⅱ型腹股沟疝患者行TAPP的临床资料,其中71例术中采用3-0可吸收线缝合补片于耻骨梳韧带、联合肌腱与腹直肌(缝合组),52例未固定补片(未固定组),对比两组患者相关临床指标。结果:两组患者性别构成、年龄、腹股沟疝的类型与分型等差异无统计学意义,手术均成功完成。与未固定组相比,缝合组术中出血量[(14.5±0.8)ml vs.(7.7±0.7)ml]较多(P<0.001),手术时间、疝囊处理(横断vs.剥离)、术后住院时间、血清肿、慢性疼痛与复发率等差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:TAPP术中缝合固定补片会增加术中出血的风险,不固定补片同样可取得满意持久的修补效果。同时缝合固定补片不会延长术后住院时间、增加慢性疼痛,是值得考虑的补片固定方式。     

负压引流在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后减少血清肿的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP）中放置负压引流管在减少术后血清肿发生的临床应用价值。 方法将2016年2月至2017年2月,上海中医药大学附属普陀医院连续收治的68例成人单侧Ⅱ、Ⅲ型腹股沟斜疝患者随机分为2组,均接受TAPP术。其中引流组38例,在关腹膜前将十字形负压引流管放置于疝补片与腹膜之间,引流管从同侧戳卡孔引出接负压吸球。对照组30例,未放置负压引流。将2组患者的手术时间、术后住院时间、术后血清肿发生率进行比较。 结果68例患者均顺利出院,引流组平均手术时间较对照组长[（52.50±12.06）min比（48.83±15.23）min],但差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。引流组术后平均住院时间较对照组长[（3.29±0.98）d比（1.93±0.69）d],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。引流组血清肿发生率明显低于对照组[2.6%（1/38）比26.7%（8/30）],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论负压引流可观察术后积液或出血情况,降低血清肿发生;负压管还可有效减少死腔,防止补片移动。十字形负压引流无侧孔洞,引流效果佳,不易堵塞,拔除便捷,不易使补片移位。     

"对位对线"补片固定法在腹腔镜造口旁疝Sugarbaker修补术中的应用

目的腹腔镜下Sugarbaker修补手术是造口旁疝的主要手术方式，补片固定是手术的关键技术环节，本研究介绍一种新式补片固定方法，并探讨其在临床上的应用效果。 方法回顾性分析2017年6月至2019年6月在中山大学附属第六医院住院的66例造口旁疝患者临床资料，患者均行腹腔镜造口旁疝修补手术（Sugarbaker术式），根据补片固定方式的不同分为试验组（41例，采用"对位对线"补片固定法）和对照组（25例，采用传统疝钉双圈补片固定方法）。比较两组患者相关指标和治疗效果。 结果两组患者性别、年龄、体质指数、病程以及造口旁疝分型比较，差异均无统计学意义。试验组补片固定时间短于对照组[（32.6±9.0）min vs（38.7±11.0）min，P<0.05]，两组在疝钉固定数量、血清肿、补片感染、术后住院时间指标方面，差异无统计学意义。试验组和对照组的平均随访时间差异无统计学意义[（37.6±14.8）个月vs（38.8±15.2）个月，P=0.687]，试验组的造口旁疝复发率低于对照组（2.4% vs 20.0%，P<0.05），而两组术后慢性疼痛发生率差异无统计学意义（24.2% vs 24.0%，P=0.971）。 结论在腹腔镜造口旁疝Sugarbaker修补术中应用"对位对线"补片固定法，可以缩短补片固定时间并减少术后复发，值得临床上推广使用。     

��ǻ������ǻ��Ĥǰ�޲����;��ڻ���·Kugel�������Ƹ��ɹ�����Ч�Ƚ��о�

??Comparison of aparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair and herniorrhaphy via internal ring approach (Kugel patch) for inguinal hernias WANG Qi, HUANG He-guang, CHEN Yan-chang, et al. Department of General Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China
Corresponding author??HUANG He-guang, E-mail:heguanghuang2@163.com
Abstract Objective To compare the effect between transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair(TAPP) and herniorrhaphy via internal ring approach (Kugel patch)in treating adult inguinal hernia??Methods Patients(458 cases,594 sides) who were admitted to Department of General Surgery from Jan. 2015 to Oct. 2016 were divided into two groups depending on the surgical style. TAPP group included 203 patients (275 sides) and Kugel group included 255 patients(319 sides). The data of patients were analyzed retrospectively to compare the clinical effect between two groups. Results For unilateral inguinal hernia, the operation time of TAPP group was longer than that of Kugel group (65.5±14.5)min vs.(57.5±18.1)min??P<0.05, while the operation time of bilateral inguinal hernia was not significant statistically between two groups(107.4±25.3)min vs (112.1±29.1)min??P>0.05. TAPP group is superior to Kugel group in postoperative VAS score??unilateral (2.0±0.5) vs. (2.5±0.5)??bilateral (2.4±0.6) vs. (2.8±0.7), P<0.01. Total hospitalization costs in Kugel group was lower than that in TAPP group,unilateral (9882.9±1112.1) yuan vs. (12177.1±1701.3) yuan, bilateral (14706.6±4706.5)yuan vs. (16952.4±2245.6) yuan, P<0.01. In addition, there were 31 cases (43% of its bilateral inguinal hernia patients) in TAPP group found the lateral occlusion hernia on the other side by intraoperative examination, which were repaired at the same time. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 24 months (median 13 months).Follow-up rate was 96.6% (TAPP group, 196 cases) and 97.3% (Kugel group, 248 cases),each group missed 7 patients.All patients were cured, recurrent case was not found within the follow-up period . Kugel grouphad lower incidence of postoperative seroma??0.8% vs 6.1%, P<0.01??.No significant difference was found between the two groups in the rate of returning to daily activities within 2 weeks ,chronic pain, foreign body sensation and total postoperative complications(P>0.05). Conclusion Both TAPP and Kugel are safe and effective. TAPP has the advantage of reducing postoperative pain, minimizing scarring and discovering occult hernia. The Kugel is more economical and suitable for all types of anesthesia.     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与完全腹膜外修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效及术后血清肿情况分析

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair,TAPP）及腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal,TEP）治疗腹股沟疝的疗效及术后血清肿发生率,并分析血清肿发生原因及预防治疗措施。 方法回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年6月,北京市顺义区医院腹股沟疝75例患者的临床资料,按照术式不同分为TAPP组（45例）及TEP组（30例）。分别监测2组的手术时间、术后住院时间、住院费用等围术期指标及术后血清肿发生情况。 结果相对于TEP组,TAPP组手术时间明显缩短,差异有统计学意义[（55.50±4.25）min比（65.36±6.52）min,P<0.05]。但TAPP组住院费用高于TEP组,差异有统计学意义[（1.45±0.07）万元比（1.25±0.05）万元,P<0.05]。TAPP组和TEP组术后住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义[（3.25±1.34）d比（3.55±1.20）d,P>0.05]。TAPP组术后血清肿发生率低于TEP组,差异有统计学意义[2.22%（1/45）比13.33%（4/30）,P<0.05]。 结论相对于传统腹股沟疝修补术,TAPP与TEP均具有显著的治疗效果,但TAPP住院费用相对较高。TAPP相对于TEP可降低术后血清肿发生概率。合理的术式选择,准确的术中操作可能是减少术后血清肿发生率的关键。     

Effectiveness and safety of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate medical adhesive for noninvasive patch fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Background

Our purpose was to compare the recurrence rate and other clinical outcomes of laparoscopic (LS) transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair using n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) for mesh fixation with those of no mesh fixation and mesh fixation with titanium spiral tacks (ST).

Methods

The medical records of patients who received LS TAPP inguinal hernia repair between 2009 and 2012 at our institution were reviewed. Patients were included if the received LS TAPP with either no mesh fixation, mesh fixation with NBCA only, fixation with ST only, or fixation with NBCA + ST. Outcome measures were operation time, postoperative length of stay, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score 24 h after surgery, postoperative complications, and hernia recurrence.

Results

A total of 1,027 TAPP cases were included. In 552 cases, meshes were fixed with NBCA only, in 89 cases only ST were used, in 47 cases ST and NBCA were used, and in 339 cases meshes were not fixed. The groups were comparable with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics. No surgical complications occurred in any group. VAS pain scores were significantly lower in the nonfixation and NBCA only groups (1.4 ± 0.6 and 1.3 ± 0.6, respectively) than in the ST and NBCA + ST groups (2.2 ± 0.9 and 2.2 ± 0.7, respectively; P = 0.001). The mean follow-up duration was ~19 months. At the final follow-up, no wound infections or hernia recurrences had occurred in any of the groups. No occurrence of chronic pain was noted in the nonfixation and NBCA only groups, whereas two cases (2.2%) were noted in the ST group and one case (2.1%) in the NBCA + ST group (P = 0.005).

Conclusions

The use of NBCA medical adhesive for noninvasive patch fixation in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP) is effective and safe.     

关节镜下两种方法治疗胫骨髁间嵴骨折的疗效对比

目的比较关节镜下缝线套扎方法和可吸收带线锚钉方法治疗前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折的临床疗效。 方法选取2012年6月至2018年2月解放军总医院第一医学中心骨科收治的62例损伤3周以内、伤前患肢功能正常的前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折患者为研究对象,同时排除伴有开放性骨折、多发骨折或胫骨平台、半月板及韧带损伤的患者。根据手术方法不同将其分为两组,其中关节镜下应用缝线套扎方法治疗30例患者,关节镜下应用可吸收锚钉方法治疗32例患者。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量;通过前抽屉试验、Lachman试验(屈膝30°前抽屉试验)、轴移试验检查比较两组患者膝关节稳定性;通过Lysholm评分、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)2000膝关节功能主观评分比较两组患者膝关节功能情况。计量资料组间比较采用独立样本t检验,组内比较采用配对t检验,计数资料组间比较采用卡方检验。 结果两组患者手术切口均一期愈合,术后3个月X线检查示髁间嵴撕脱骨折均愈合。缝线套扎组随访13～42个月,平均(22±8)个月;可吸收锚钉组随访12～39个月,平均(19±7)个月。可吸收锚组手术时间低于缝线套扎组,差异有统计学意义(t＝2.491,P <0.05),两组术中出血量差异无统计学意义(t＝1.506,P>0.05)。两组患者术后6个月Lysholm评分较术前提高,差异有统计学意义(缝线套扎组：t＝26.265,P<0.05;可吸收锚钉组：t＝29.857,P<0.05),两组患者术后IKDC 2000膝关节功能主观评分较术前提高,差异有统计学意义(缝线套扎组：t＝35.619,P <0.05;可吸收锚钉组：t＝37.004,P<0.05),术后6个月两组患者膝关节前抽屉试验、Lachman试验、轴移试验及Lysholm评分、IKDC 2000评分差别无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论关节镜下缝线套扎方法与可吸收锚钉方法治疗胫骨髁间嵴撕脱性骨折各有其特点,但临床治疗效果相同,均能够实现骨折块有效复位、牢固固定以及骨折愈合,有效恢复患肢功能,获得良好疗效。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放式腹膜前间隙疝修补术的临床疗效

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（transabdominalpreperitoneal,TAPP）及开放式腹膜前间隙疝修补术的治疗效果。 方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年8月,山西医科大学附属晋中第一人民医院102例腹沟股疝患者的临床资料,根据治疗方法不同分为试验组与对照组,每组51例。对照组采用开放式腹膜前间隙修补术治疗,试验组采用TAPP术修补质量。对2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间,以及术后复发、疼痛、血肿、感染等不良事件的发生情况进行比较。 结果试验组患者住院时间为（4.65±0.78）d,明显短于对照组的（6.08±2.23）d,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。术后随访4～18个月,试验组未见复发及术后血肿、感染,术后慢性疼痛2例、术后阴囊积液1例;对照组中复发3例、术后血肿5例、感染3例、慢性疼痛6例、术后阴囊积液7例;2组并发症发生率比较,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。2组患者在手术时间、术中出血量方面对比,差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。 结论TAPP对于腹股沟疝的治疗效果优于开放式腹膜前间隙疝修补术,具有显著临床优势。     

Suture Versus Tack Fixation of Mesh in Laparoscopic Umbilical Hernia Repair

Background and Objectives:

Mesh fixation in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair is poorly studied. We compared postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair in suture versus tack mesh fixation.

Methods:

Patients who underwent laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair were separated by method of mesh fixation: sutures versus primarily tacks. Medical history and follow-up data were collected through medical records. The primary outcome of this study was the recurrence rates of hernias. Postoperative major and minor complications, such as surgical site infection, small-bowel obstruction, and seroma formation, were regarded as secondary outcomes. Additionally, a telephone interview was conducted to assess postoperative pain, recovery time, and overall patient satisfaction.

Results:

Eighty-six patients were identified: 33 in the suture group and 53 in the tacks group. The number of emergent cases was increased in the tacks group (6 vs 0; P = .022). Mean follow-up time was 2.7 years for both groups. Documented postoperative follow-up was obtained in 29 (90%) suture group and 31 (58%) tacks group patients. Hernia recurrence occurred in 3 and 2 patients in the sutures and tacks groups, respectively (P was not significant). No differences were found in secondary outcomes, including subjective outcomes from telephone interviews, between groups.

Conclusions:

There are no differences in postoperative complication rates in suture versus tack mesh fixation in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair.     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效比较

目的比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）与开放无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效。 方法选取2016年11月至2019年11月,包头医学院第一附属医院普外科一病区腹股沟疝住院患者209例,按照术式不同分为2组。试验组患者102例,行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术;对照组患者107例,行开放式无张力疝修补术。观察记录2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间及术后使用镇痛药物情况等指标,并进行对比分析。 结果2组手术均获成功,试验组无中转开放手术。试验组与对照组比较,手术时间延长（46.87±4.94）min vs（38.40±4.29）min,术中出血量降低（5.40±1.64）ml vs（11.12±2.09）ml,术后住院时间减少（4.18±1.09）d vs（5.08± 1.58）d,术后使用镇痛药和疼痛评分均减少,差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。术后随访均恢复良好,随访时间为6～42个月,2组患者均未复发,无明显术后并发症发生。 结论TAPP治疗腹股沟疝与开放式无张力疝修补术相比,具有微创、安全有效、无明显瘢痕等特点,是临床上可靠的治疗腹股沟疝选择之一。     

����ֱ����β���������TAPP��Ĥ��ϵ�Ӧ���о�

??Application of straight needle three-tail non-kontting suture in peritoneal closure in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair ZHOU Tai-cheng, YU Hong-yan, JIANG Zhi-peng, et al. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Hernia Center, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou 510655??China
Corresponding author??CHEN Shuang??E-mail??sysusc@126.com
Abstract Objective To investigate efficiency of straight needle three-tail non-kontting suture in peritoneal closure in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP). Methods A total of 238 patients with inguinal hernia performed TAPP in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between December, 2013 and December, 2015 were enrolled into the study, including 120 patients in control group with traditional suture and 118 patients in experiment group with straight needle three-tail non-kontting suture. All the patients received TAPP operation under general anaesthesia. The difference between tow groups were compared in age, gender, BMI, hernia type, defective area, hernia sac handling, operative time, peritoneal closure time, hospitalization cost, postoperative complications, VAS score and recurrence rate. Results The mean operative time was ??44.8±2.7??min for experimental group and??50.3±3.1??min for control group??t =7.243??P=0.025??. The mean peritoneal closure time was ??4.2±0.7??min for experimental group and??9.8±1.1??min for control group??t =9.833??P=0.010??. The mean cost was ??8927.4±135.2??yuan for experimental group and??9232.5±159.8??yuan for control group??t =4.782??P=0.041??. There was no difference in mesh infection??P=0.759??, recurrence ??P=0.759??, seroma??P=0.899??and VAS score??P=0.375?? between two groups. Conclusion Compared with traditional method, straight needle three-tail non-kontting suture could reduce operative cost as well as shorten operative and peritoneal closure time, without increasing postoperative complications, pain and recurrence.