中文版衰弱量表在老年衰弱评价中的信效度研究

目的评价中文版衰弱(FRAIL)量表在老年衰弱评价中的信效度。方法于2018年1月-2019年6月,将中文版FRAIL量表应用于210例老年患者并评估其信效度。使用Cronbach′sα系数表示显表的内部一致性信度。分析量表各条目与总分的相关性作为其结构效度。使用Spearman相关分析检验FRAIL量表与简明健康测量量表(SF-36)、工具性日常生活活动量表(IADL)及住院次数的相关性作为该量表的预测效度;使用ROC曲线计算量表的老年患者的衰弱状况的最佳临界值、灵敏度及特异性等值。结果回收问卷210例,中文版FRAIL量表Cronbach′sα系数为0.705;FRAIL量表总分与各分条目呈中度正相关,r=0.538～0.656,P0.001;FRAIL量表总分与SF-36量表及其分维度均呈负相关关系,r=-0.407～-0.721(P0.001),FRAIL分条目与SF-36的总分及其他分维度均呈负相关性,r=-0.149～-0.475(P0.05);MBI分组不同时,自理能力低下组的FRAIL要高于生活完全自理组,H=90.809(P0.001),中文版FRAIL量表可以区分不同程度自理能力老年患者衰弱状况。结论中文版衰弱(FRAIL)量表具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为老年衰弱的评估工具,初步筛选出有衰弱的老年高危人群。     

中文版癌症患者功能评估-认知功能量表在胃肠肿瘤患者中的信效度检验和最佳界值研究

目的 验证中文版癌症患者功能评估-认知功能量表(functional assessment of cancer therapy-cognitive function FACT-Cog)在胃肠肿瘤人群中的信效度，并探讨其最佳界值。方法 采用随机抽样方法选取311位胃肠肿瘤患者进行调查，评价问卷的信效度，应用受试者工作特性曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve, ROC)以确定量表的最佳界值。结果 中文版FACT-Cog量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.876,4个维度的Cronbach’s α系数分别为0.851、0.946、0.838和0.969,重测信度为0.975;探索性因子分析共提取4个公因子，累积方差贡献率为76.515%;验证性因子结果显示模型拟合良好；效标效度与蒙特利尔认知评估量表呈正相关(r=0.291);量表最佳界值为75分，此时ROC曲线下面积为0.967、敏感度为84.6%、特异度为90.7%。结论 中文版FACT-Cog量表在我国胃肠肿瘤患者人群中具有较好的信效度，推荐最佳界值为75分，可用于评价我国胃肠肿瘤患者...     

SF-36量表应用于下肢深静脉血栓形成患者的信度和效度研究

目的评价SF-36量表用于测量下肢深静脉血栓形成患者生存质量的信度和效度。方法采用SF-36生存质量量表,对130例下肢深静脉血栓患者进行调查,对测量结果进行信度和效度分析。信度指标包括内部一致性、折半信度、重测信度,效度指标包括内容效度和结构效度。结果整个量表的Cronbach’sα系数以及去掉一项内容后得到的Cronbach’sα系数均高于0．8;总量表和各个维度的折半信度均高于0．8;各个维度的组内相关系数高于0．6;总量表及各维度的Pearson相关系数均高于0．6;因子分析所产生的2个主成分可解释总变异的65．704％;经最大方差旋转后产生2个公共因子与量表的理论结构假设基本一致。结论SF-36量表具有较好的信度和效度,适用于下肢深静脉血栓形成患者的生存质量评价。     

ICF康复量表应用于创伤性脊髓损伤恢复期患者的信效度研究

目的：检验ICF康复量表在创伤性脊髓损伤（TSCI）人群的信效度情况。方法：采用ICF康复量表、改良Barthel指数、Berg平衡能力、SDS抑郁量表等常用量表对45个TSCI恢复期患者进行综合评估。Cronbachα系数和Spearman相关系数分别检验ICF康复量表的内部一致性信度和与其他量表的校标关联效度。结果：采用ICF康复量表评估TSCI患者最主要障碍表现在：b640性功能、b280G痛觉、b455运动和耐受能力、b710关节活动能力、b620排尿功能，S610泌尿系统的结构、S430呼吸系统的结构，d660帮助别人、d450G步行、d470利用交通工具、d230进行日常事务、d540穿着、d850有报酬的就业，e115个人日常生活用的用品和技术、e580卫生的服务、体制和政策。ICF康复量表及4个子领域Cronbachα系数分别为0.870、0.560、0.368、0.896、0.717，如删除一些条目可提升整体的内部一致性。患者在身体功能（BF）与抑郁量表分数呈高度正相关（P＜0.05），活动与参与（AP）和改良Barthel指数呈高度负相关（P＜0.05）。环境因素（EF）与其他量表的相关性低(P＞0.05)。结论：ICF康复量表可用于评估TSCI恢复期患者的功能状况，具有可靠的内部一致性信度和较好的校标关联效度。     

乳腺癌患者心理弹性量表的汉化及信效度检验

目的翻译乳腺癌患者心理弹性量表并检验其信效度。方法遵循Brislin模型对量表进行翻译,经过两轮德尔菲专家咨询形成最终量表。用中文版乳腺癌患者心理弹性量表对200名乳腺癌患者进行测试,以检验其信度和效度。结果中文版乳腺癌患者心理弹性量表经过因子分析最大方差正交旋转法,共提取2个因子、16个条目,累计贡献率为73.666%。量表共有个体保护(11个条目)和社会保护(5个条目)2个维度。总量表Cronbach’sα系数为0.948,个体保护维度Cronbach’sα系数0.931,社会保护维度Cronbach’sα系数0.943;总量表的折半信度为0.918;重测信度为0.905。量表各条目I-CVI为0.858～1.00,总量表S-CVI/Ave为0.947。结论中文版乳腺癌患者心理弹性量表的信度、效度良好,可作为衡量我国乳腺癌患者心理弹性的有效量表。     

SF-36量表应用于老年轻度认知功能障碍病人的信效度研究

[目的]评价简明健康状况调查量表(SF-36)应用于老年轻度认知功能障碍(MCI)病人中的信度与效度。[方法]应用SF-36量表,由同一调查员对方便抽样的74例MCI病人进行面对面访谈以调查其健康相关生活质量,采用SPSS软件对测量结果进行信度与效度分析。[结果]SF-36量表8个维度的重测相关系数除RP、BP和VT外均大于0.5(P0.01),总量表SpearmanBrown分半信度系数为0.910,内部一致性Cronbach’sα系数除SF和VT为0.6~0.7外,其余各维度及两个总评均大于0.7,整个量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.890;各维度与总量表的相关系数为0.448~0.813(P0.01),除PF、RP和RE外其他各维度间相关系数为0.500~0.828(P0.01);因子分析所产生的3个公因子可解释总变异的78.30%,并在相应项目上有较强的因子载荷。[结论]SF-36量表应用于老年MCI病人有较好的信度和效度,适用于评价老年MCI病人的生活质量。     

七情评定量表的条目筛选与统计分析

目的编制七情评定量表的具体条目。方法设立研究工作核心小组,在核心小组讨论和专家咨询基础上拟定定性研究调查提纲,通过预试-分析筛选-测试-项目分析修订-再次测试等环节,运用SPSS 19.0进行Cronbach’sα系数、Pearson相关系数及t检验等多种方法对再次测试数据进行分析。结果编制喜、怒、忧、思、悲、恐、惊7个维度共42条目的七情评定量表,量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.912,各维度与量表的Cronbach’sα系数在0.693~0.804之间,各条目与量表的校正后相关系数在0.202~0.634之间。结论七情评定量表的维度和条目都达到了心理学测量标准的要求,具有较高的信效度和实用价值。     

CIHD简明ICF核心要素量表的信度与效度的研究

目的：对慢性缺血性心脏病（CIHD）的国际功能、残疾与健康分类（ICF）核心要素表进行信度、效度评价,为中国冠心病患者的全面的功能评价提供特异性测量工具。方法：100例经冠状动脉造影检查证实为冠心病的患者,按照中国CIHD简明ICF核心要素量表、MacNew心脏病特异性问卷和医学结局研究简明调查表（SF-36）的评分规则进行评定。结果：中国CIHD简明ICF核心要素量表的4个成份中,Cronbachα系数在身体功能和活动与参与两方面的结果为0.834～0.839,具有较高的内部一致性;Kendall’sW值达到0.818,且P=0.000,评测者间结果具有很好的一致性。CIHD简明ICF核心要素表与SF-36和MacNew表之间的spearson系数为0.567与0.552（P〈0.01）;表示有较好相关性。结论：采用中国CIHD简明ICF核心要素量表评定CIHD患者的功能是可靠和有效的,建议进一步推广使用。     

约翰霍普金斯跌倒风险评估量表应用于住院患者的信效度分析

目的对约翰霍普金斯跌倒风险评估量表汉化并进行信效度分析,确定其应用价值,为我国住院患者提供有效的跌倒评估工具。方法采用分层随机抽样方法抽取浙江省1所三级甲等综合医院成年住院患者400例,由2名研究者运用中文版约翰霍普金斯跌倒风险量表独立对同一例患者进行测定并进行信效度分析。结果中文版约翰霍普金斯跌倒风险评估量表总的Cronbach’sα系数为0.791,剔除当前条目后量表Cronbach’sα系数在0.649~0.703,评定者间信度r=0.949,探索性因素分析提取的4个公因子累积方差贡献率为62.437%。结论中文版约翰霍普金斯跌倒风险评估量表具有较好的信度和效度,可用于我国住院患者的跌倒风险评估。     

糖尿病简明ICF核心要素量表在糖尿病肾病血液透析患者中应用的信效度分析

目的:检验糖尿病简明ICF核心要素量表在糖尿病肾病血液透析患者中应用的信度和效度。方法:将该量表应用于165例糖尿病肾病血液透析患者中,采用项目分析、结构效度、效标关联效度、内部一致性信度、重测信度以及评定者间信度对量表的信效度进行分析。结果:除"身体结构"维度中的条目"s550胰的结构"相关系数较低(r0.2),其余各条目得分与量表总分均相关(r=0.367~0.745,P0.01);探索性因子分析提取4个公因子,共解释了62.45%的总方差;效标关联效度为0.615(P0.01)。量表总的Cronbach’sα系数为0.838;重测信度为0.885;评定者间信度为0.905。结论:糖尿病简明ICF核心要素量表具有良好的信效度,适合在国内糖尿病肾病血液透析患者中进行临床应用。     

Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in a Chronic Heart Failure population.

BACKGROUND: Valid assessments of health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) are increasingly important in chronic, incurable conditions, such as chronic heart failure (CHF). AIMS: To evaluate the psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) in hospitalized patients with decompensated CHF. METHOD AND RESULTS: The KCCQ and SF-36 were administered to patients (n=118) with CHF at baseline and then 1 (n=51) and 4 months (n=83) after admission. The Swedish version of the KCCQ appears to have acceptable convergent and discriminant validity for all suggested health domains. Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability met for most of the scales the minimum of 0.70. Known-groups comparison indicated that the KCCQ discriminated between patients differing in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (criterion validity). The KCCQ was also more responsive to changes in the NYHA classification as compared with the SF-36. However, KCCQ has some weakness in the response distributions for two questions and the convergent validity in one question. CONCLUSION: Overall, the KCCQ is a valid and reliable instrument in a Swedish CHF population. It yields reliable and valid scores and is quite responsive to clinical change.     

健康调查简表用于库欣综合征患者生活质量评价的信效度检验

目的评价健康调查简表(36-item short form,SF-36)用于测量库欣综合征患者生活质量的信度和效度。方法 2011年1月至2012年4月便利选取上海市瑞金医院内分泌科的73例库欣综合征患者,采用SF-36对研究对象进行调查,信度检验包括内部一致性信度和折半信度,结构效度检验采用因子分析法。结果 SF-36内部一致性信度的Cronbachα系数为0.822,折半信度Spearman-Brown系数为0.771;将8个维度的得分进行因子分析,提取2个公因子,累计方差贡献率为64.587%。结论中文版SF-36用于评价国内库欣综合征患者的生活质量具有较好的信度和效度,接受性好;在目前国内库欣综合征患者的生活质量研究尚处于初级阶段的前提下,可推广应用。     

SF-36量表测量伤残人员生存质量的信度与效度

目的 评价SF-36量表在测量地震伤残人员生存质量中的信度和效度.方法 利用自填法及访谈相结合的方式调查201例绵竹市某镇地震伤残人员,用重测信度和Cronbach's a系数分析SF-36信度;因子分析方法分析效度.结果 SF-36各领域的重测信度分别为:生理功能(PF)0.78、生理问题对功能的限制(RP)0.85...     

EORTC QLQ-LC43量表在中国肺癌患者中的有效性验证

目的 验证EORTC QLQ-LC43量表在中国肺癌患者中应用的有效性.方法 以2012年11月至2013年4月在天津肿瘤医院接受门诊治疗的214例肺癌患者作为调查对象,同时完成量表EORTC QLQ-LC43和SF-36的测评,并进行KPS评分,对结果采用Cronbach α系数、Pearson 相关检验及Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计分析.结果 除认知功能（Cronbach α=0.401）外,其余各维度信度均较好（Cronbach α＞0.7）;EORTC QLQ-LC43与SF-36中相同或相似的维度具有较好的相关性,共性量表C30中与功能相关的维度除情绪功能（EF）外,各维度与KPS得分相关性均较好,而与症状相关的维度相关性则较低,在肺癌症状子量表中,呼吸困难（LC-DY）与KPS的相关性较好,其余条目均相关性一般;按照KPS评分高低将患者分为3组,组间LC43评分比较,除DY、LC-HA维度外,差异均有统计学意义.结论 EORTC QLQ-LC43量表应用于中国肺癌患者,具有良好的信度和效度.     

颅脑损伤ICF评定量表信效度的初步研究

目的：研究颅脑损伤（TBI）国际功能、残疾和健康分类（ICF）评定量表的信度与效度。方法：TBI患者100例,均采用TBI的ICF评定量表、Fugl-Meyer肢体运动功能评定表和改良Barthel指数（MBI）进行评定。效度研究采用结构效度和效标效度的方法,信度研究采用评定员问信度和内部一致性的分析方法。评定员间的信度检验用Kendall＇sW值相关;内容一致性检验用Cronbach＇sAlpha值分析;效标效度用Pearson相关,判断3个量表间的相关性。结果：ICF评定量表4个维度中,活动与参与方面Cronbach’SAlpha系数为0．927,身体功能方面Cronbach’SAlpha系数为0．739,Kendall＇sW值为0．700（均P〈O．05）。ICF评定量表身体功能方面与Fugl—Meyer肢体运动功能评定表间的Pearson系数为0．754,呈现负相关性（P〈0．05）;ICF评定量表活动与参与方面与MBI评定表间Pearson系数为0．785,呈现负相关性（P-〈0．05）。结论：TBI的ICF评定量表具有一定的可靠性和有效性,能更好地反映肢体运动功能和日常生活活动能力。     

Patients' experience post-lumbar fusion regarding back problems,recovery and expectations in terms of the international classification of functioning,disability and health

Purpose.?To describe within the context of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health ((ICF)), patient's experiences post-lumber fusion regarding back problems, recovery and expectations of rehabilitation and to contrast with the content of outcome measures and the ICF low back pain ((LBP)) core sets.

Methods.?The study has a cross-sectional and retrospective design and involves 20 lumbar fusion patients. Using the ICF, qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews 3–6 months post-surgery was performed. This was compared with the ICF related content of the Oswestry Disability Index ((ODI)), Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 ((SF-36)), European Quality of Life Questionnaire ((EQ5D)) and the ICF LBP core sets.

Results.?Patient's experiences were most frequently linked to psychological, sensory, neuromusculoskeletal and movement related body function chapters of the ICF. The most frequently linked categories of activity and participation were mobility, domestic activities, family relationships, work, recreation and leisure. Environmental factors frequently linked were the use of analgesics, walking aids, family support, social security systems, health care systems and labour market employment services.

Conclusions.?This study highlights important ICF related aspects of patient's experiences post-lumber fusion. The use of the comprehensive ICF core sets is recommended in conjunction with ODI, SF-36 and the EQ5D for a broader analysis of patient outcomes post-lumbar fusion.     

Psychometric properties of an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-oriented, adaptive questionnaire for the assessment of mobility, self-care and domestic life.

OBJECTIVE: Development of an adaptive, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-oriented patient questionnaire on mobility and self-care based on an item response theory model (MOSES questionnaire). METHODS: Using item reconstruction rules, items were developed for the ICF chapters "mobility", "self-care" and "domestic life". The resulting instrument, together with other instruments (SF-36, Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA), MacNew, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Barthel) was presented to 549 patients with musculoskeletal disease, 212 patients with cardiac disease and 258 neurological rehabilitation patients in rehabilitation clinics in Germany. RESULTS: The MOSES questionnaire includes 58 items on 12 scales and fulfills the requirements of the 1-parameter item response theory model (Rasch model). The results indicate good reliability and high construct validity and sensitivity to change of the instrument. In the construction and selection of items, ICF contents that include complex processes of evaluation, and which presuppose skills that are not acquired prior to the individual learning process, were omitted due to a lack of unidimensionality. CONCLUSION: The successful implementation of the concept of applying rules to ICF categories in formulating the items of a patient questionnaire showed that the goal of a theory-driven measurement of activities using the ICF is feasible. The results of the project also raise questions as to the homogeneity of the contents of some ICF categories.     

System-wide Clinical Assessment of Functioning Based on the International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health in China: Interrater Reliability,Convergent, Known Group,and Predictive Validity of the ICF Generic-6

ObjectiveTo validate the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Generic-6 in daily routine clinical practice in Mainland China. Specific objectives were to analyze (1) interrater reliability, (2) convergent validity, (3) known group validity, and (4) predictive validity of the ICF Generic-6.DesignMulticenter prospective cohort study.SettingFifty hospitals from 20 provinces of Mainland China.ParticipantsA total of 4510 patients from departments of rehabilitation, orthopedics, neurology, cardiology, pneumology, and cerebral surgery of the participating hospitals with different health conditions were included in this study.InterventionNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresThe assessment was undertaken by nurses with ICF Generic-6 in combination with a numeric rating scale. Interrater reliability was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Convergent validity was evaluated with Spearman correlation coefficients between ICF Generic-6 and Medical Outcomes Short Form (SF)-12 items. Known group validity was examined by comparing discharge scores between different discharge destinations. Predictive validity was determined by using ICF Generic-6 baseline scores for estimating length of hospital stay with a loglogistic survival model with gamma shared frailty and cost of in-hospital treatment with a mixed effects generalized linear regression model of the gamma family.ResultsThe interrater reliability of items and score of ICF Generic-6 was good with ICCs ranging from 0.67-0.87. ICF Generic-6 items were further correlated with respective SF-12 items. Discharge scores of patients differed significantly by discharge destination. The ICF Generic-6 admission score was a significant predictor of length of stay and treatment cost.ConclusionsThe ICF Generic-6 administered in combination with a 0-10 numeric rating scale is a reliable and valid tool for the collection of minimal information on functioning across various clinical settings.