关节镜下应用FasT-Fix缝合器治疗半月板桶柄样撕裂损伤

目的探讨关节镜下应用Fas T-Fix缝合器在半月板桶柄样撕裂损伤修复中的临床疗效。方法采用Fas T-Fix缝合器在关节镜下对28例半月板桶柄样撕裂损伤患者进行全内半月板缝合手术。结果患者均获得随访,时间3～12个月。根据Barrett et al临床愈合标准评价:25例临床愈合;3例未愈合,二期行半月板切除术。末次随访时,28例患者Lysholm评分由术前43～65(57. 8±6. 3)分提高到87～96(93. 2±2. 7)分(P 0. 01)。结论关节镜下应用Fas T-Fix缝合器缝合修复半月板桶柄样撕裂损伤临床疗效较好。     

桶柄样撕裂半月板缝合的临床及影像效果

[目的]分析半月板桶柄样撕裂行关节镜下半月板缝合患者临床及MRI表现,评估术后效果。[方法]回顾性分析本院2012年8月～2015年8月关节镜下桶柄样撕裂半月板行复位缝合,伴前交叉韧带断裂者同时行前交叉韧带重建手术的25例患者,男21例,女4例,平均年龄(28.07±7.08)岁。采用Lysholm、IKDC评分和MRI检查评价治疗效果。[结果]所有患者均顺利完成手术,镜下证实内侧半月板损伤21例,外侧半月板损伤4例;撕裂部位位于红区17例,位于红白区8例;合并前交叉韧带断裂18例,未合并前交叉韧带断裂7例。所有患者随访13～24个月,平均(17.04±2.23)个月。随访过程中,2例单纯半月板缝合患者术后再次出现症状,再次行关节镜下部分切除未愈合的撕裂部分半月板。其余23例患者Lysholm评分由术前的(21.32±5.09)分提高到末次随访时(91.52±4.05)分(P0.05),IKDC膝关节功能主观评分由术前(25.00±4.59)分提高到末次随访时(91.32±4.26)分。MRI复查见半月板撕裂处T2质子相信号较术前明显降低,半月板形态恢复,未见明显新发撕裂,半月板愈合良好。[结论]半月板桶柄样撕裂经关节镜下缝合修复术临床效果满意,合并前交叉韧带损伤者同时进行前交叉韧带重建的效果优于单纯半月板缝合。     

关节镜下半月板成形缝合术治疗盘状半月板损伤的近期疗效研究

目的评价关节镜下半月板成形缝合术治疗盘状半月板损伤的近期疗效。方法回顾性研究本组行单侧膝关节镜下半月板成形缝合术的盘状半月板患者,47例随访超过12个月,评价半月板撕裂类型和稳定性,其中稳定型34例、不稳型13例,根据撕裂、不稳部位使用Fas T-Fix、MM-Ⅱ缝合器缝合,比较术前、术后和稳定型、不稳型盘状半月板的膝关节活动度、Lysholm评分和IKDC评分。结果盘状半月板损伤关节镜下半月板成形缝合术患者膝关节活动度由术前(121±11)°提高到术后(133±7)°,Lysholm评分由术前(72±7)分提高到术后(93±4)分、IKDC评分由术前(65±5)分提高到术后(86±7)分,稳定型和不稳型的术后活动度、Lysholm评分、IKDC评分无统计学差异。结论关节镜下半月板成形缝合术能够有效治疗盘状半月板损伤,取得满意的近期疗效;合理缝合治疗不稳型盘状半月板早期临床效果与稳定型盘状半月板相同。     

成形联合修补术在盘状半月板损伤治疗中的应用

目的:观察半月板成形联合修补技术在治疗盘状半月板损伤的疗效。方法:2005年6月至2009年12月,28例行关节镜下盘状半月板成形术联合修补缝合技术,年龄6～42岁,平均32岁;男23例,女5例。关节镜下判定半月板的性质和撕裂的类型与范围,采用成形联合修补缝合技术治疗盘状半月板边缘撕裂,术后支具保护8周,6个月内避免剧烈运动。术后采用Lysholm关节功能评分标准进行疗效评定。结果:术后随访3～36个月,平均8个月。Lysholm关节功能评分:术前62～74分,平均(67.23±5.24)分;术后80～96分,平均(87.24±5.26)分。未出现再撕裂或因为症状复发再手术的病例。结论:盘状半月板成形术联合边缘破裂修补缝合技术对于盘状半月板撕裂的治疗具有较好的临床效果,可以作为其手术选择方案之一。     

关节镜下双面立体缝合修复半月板桶柄状撕裂的中期疗效

目的探讨关节镜下应用双面立体缝合修复半月板桶柄状撕裂的中期疗效。方法 2009年1月-2012年12月,收治38例半月板桶柄状撕裂患者。男26例,女12例;年龄19~42岁,平均32岁。致伤原因:运动伤21例,交通事故伤11例,其他伤6例。左膝15例,右膝23例。伤后至手术时间为2 d~6个月,平均2.5个月。MRI提示半月板Ⅲ度损伤,内侧半月板22例、外侧半月板16例。于关节镜下采用上层面和下层面水平褥式缝合修复治疗。结果患者术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合,未出现切口感染、不愈合等并发症。38例均获随访,随访时间18~36个月,平均24.5个月。按照Barrett等的标准,半月板均成功修复。术后6个月、12个月及末次随访时,患者膝关节Lysholm评分及膝关节活动度均显著优于术前,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论关节镜下双面立体缝合修复半月板桶柄状撕裂,具有缝合牢固、愈合率高等特点,可取得满意的中期疗效。     

关节镜下全内联合外-内“环抱”式缝合法治疗半月板桶柄样撕裂疗效观察

目的观察并探讨关节镜下全内联合外-内"环抱"式缝合法治疗半月板桶柄样撕裂(buckethandle tear,BHT)的疗效。方法 2016年8月—2019年5月,采用关节镜下全内联合外-内"环抱"式缝合法治疗44例膝关节半月板BHT患者,其中男29例,女15例;年龄18～42岁,平均26.6岁。致伤原因:运动损伤31例,高处坠落伤7例,扭伤6例。内侧半月板后角损伤32例,外侧半月板后角损伤12例。病程6周～3个月。合并前交叉韧带断裂33例。所有患者下肢力线均正常。患者术前Lysholm评分为(42.1±9.1)分。根据术后MRI及Barrett等的评价标准评估半月板愈合情况,采用Lysholm评分评价疗效。结果术后44例患者均获随访,随访时间8～36个月,平均16.8个月。末次随访时,根据Barrett等的评价标准获临床愈合39例、未愈合5例,临床愈合率88.6%;MRI评估完全愈合32例、部分愈合7例、未愈合5例,总愈合率88.6%,完全愈合率72.7%。Lysholm评分为(87.8±4.8)分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(t=31.060,P=0.000)。结论关节镜下全内联合外-内"环抱"式缝合法是治疗半月板BHT可靠、有效的方法,能获得良好的关节功能。     

前交叉韧带合并内侧半月板桶柄样撕裂同期修复12例分析

目的探讨前交叉韧带(Anterior cruciate ligament,ACL)合并内侧半月板桶柄样撕裂同期修复的临床疗效。方法对2013年10月至2015年12月,本院经治的ACL合并内侧半月板桶柄样撕裂患者12例,进行随访。男7例,女5例;年龄19~55岁,平均29.2岁。左膝5例,右膝7例,病程2天~1.6年。临床主要表现为膝关节不稳,疼痛,弹响,绞锁。本组均采用同期ACL重建联合内侧半月板缝合术,术前、术后采用Lysholm评分及IKDC评分评价膝关节功能,根据Barrett标准评判半月板愈合情况。结果本组12例,12例均获随访6个月~1年,平均7.8个月,术后3个月和6个月随访Lysholm评分为:(76.5±2.2),(94.8±1.4),较术前(36.6±4.3)明显提高,术后3个月和6个月随访IKDC评分依次为:(79.5±0.8),(94.4±0.9),较术前(39.8±3.3)明显改善。MRI示半月板愈合9例,1例因再次撕裂行手术治疗,愈合率75.0%。结论 ACL合并内侧半月板桶柄样撕裂应早期、同期修复,愈合率高,临床效果满意。     

关节镜下修补半月板桶柄样撕裂的临床疗效分析

目的 探讨关节镜下修补半月板桶柄样撕裂的临床疗效.方法 关节镜下对61例63个桶柄样撕裂的半月板行修补手术,男38例,女23例;年龄16～47岁,平均27岁.内侧半月板后体部至前体部区域撕裂及外侧半月板胴肌腱前方区域撕裂采用标准的白内向外缝合技术;内侧半月板后角区域撕裂采用经两个后内侧入路的全关节内缝合技术;外侧半月板后角区域撕裂采用经前方关节镜入路的全关节内缝合技术.结果 61例63个半月板随访时间24～66个月,平均38个月.其中51例(53个半月板)行二次关节镜检.44个半月板(83%)完全愈合,5个半月板(9.4%)部分愈合,4个半月板(7.5%)不愈合.61例患者均进行临床评估,其中53例(87%)无临床症状,4例(6.5%)有部分临床症状,4例(6.5%)绞锁复发.总体评估:失效率为7.9%(5/63),成功率92.1%(包括完全愈合、部分愈合、无临床症状及部分临床症状者).结论 对于发生在红一红区或红一白区的半月板桶柄样撕裂,采用多种缝合技术进行牢靠的修补缝合,并且与前十字韧带重建同期进行,可以获得约92%的成功率.     

膝关节镜下中心成形联合边缘稳定术治疗外侧盘状半月板损伤

目的探讨关节镜下中心成形联合边缘稳定术治疗外侧盘状半月板损伤的疗效。方法收集自2009-01—2013-08诊治的盘状半月板损伤68例(72膝),经MRI和关节镜下确诊后,随机分成2组。A组给予保留边缘6~8 mm成形联合半月板稳定术,进行体部、肌腱裂口周围垂直缝合固定,前、后角经胫骨骨道固定;B组行盘状半月板全切或次全切除术。观察2组术后3、6、12膝关节功能Lysholm评分,术后12个月MRI半月板板台比。结果 A组34例获得随访,B组34例获得随访,随访时间平均12.3(12~14)个月。患者术后关节活动度恢复满意,关节交锁及弹响症状消失,无再撕裂或因症状复发需要二次手术者。2组术后3、6个月Lysholm评分差异无统计学意义(t=1.826,P=0.077;t=0.442,P=0.661);术后12个月A组Lysholm评分较B组高,差异有统计学意义(t=3.718,P=0.001)。A组术后12个月MRI半月板板台比为(9.2±2.6)%,B组为(5.0±2.7)%,A组残存半月板板台比较B组高,差异有统计学意义(t=3.475,P=0.001);但比同侧正常的(12.3%)低。结论对于不稳定盘状软骨损伤,在半月板成形的基础上,给予周边缝合固定及前后角重建固定,能最大程度地保留外侧半月板周缘并保持其稳定性,具有良好的短期疗效。     

关节镜下可吸收性半月板箭治疗半月板损伤的初步报告

目的关节镜下应用可吸收性半月板箭治疗半月板损伤并评价其近期疗效。方法2002年2～10月,关节镜下采用半月板箭缝合固定12例12侧半月板损伤,男5例,女7例;年龄18～58岁,平均33.2岁。左膝4例,右膝8例。内侧半月板损伤4例,外侧半月板损伤8例;前角损伤2例,体部损伤3例,后角损伤7例。红区损伤10例,红-白区损伤2例。病程3d～5个月,平均2.3个月,其中急性损伤(病程<1个月)9例。关节镜下采用新型全内半月板箭技术固定,共使用25枚半月板箭(平均每例2.1枚)。5例同时施行其它类型手术。结果所有病例术后均无早期并发症发生。全部患者均获得随访,随访时间7～13个月,平均10.2个月。随访时所有患者膝关节稳定,无疼痛、绞锁等症状,6周后关节活动度全面恢复。Lysholm评分由术前的平均(45.6±13.4)分增加到术后平均(82.4±16.3)分,差异有显著性(P< 0.05)。2例分别于术后8个月和9个月出现关节积液,考虑为滑膜炎,经治疗后消失。结论对于半月板损伤,如撕裂类型和部位适当,可选择可吸收性半月板箭治疗。半月板箭技术是一种简便快捷、安全有效的半月板缝合方法。     

关节镜下全内缝合法修补半月板59例疗效观察

目的探讨关节镜下全内缝合法在半月板修补中的应用及临床疗效。方法自2006年1月至2009年5月,我院对59例半月板损伤的患者采用全内缝合法进行了半月板修补。其中采用可吸收半月板箭3例,Fast-Fix全内半月板缝合系统56例。结果 59例全部得到随访,随访时间3～30个月,平均16.2个月。随访采用电话问卷、主观症状及临床检查等方式进行。主观症状和临床查体57例正常,2例在12及14个月后再次膝关节扭伤,出现症状。术前HSS评分37～62分,平均47.6分;术后HSS评分86～96分,平均93.9分。结论关节镜下全内缝合法是修补半月板损伤的理想方法,Fast-Fix系统操作简单,并发症少,疗效确切,治愈率高。     

Clinical results of arthroscopic all-inside lateral meniscal repair using the Meniscal Viper Repair System

Purpose

This study examined the postoperative outcome of the all-inside arthroscopic meniscal suture repair technique using the Meniscal Viper Repair System for lateral meniscus tears.

Methods

Between January 2006 and December 2008, 57 patients (27 males and 30 females) with lateral meniscus tears who underwent meniscal repair using the Meniscal Viper Repair System were evaluated prospectively. Among them, 52 cases were tears involving the posterior third of the lateral meniscus, and most were longitudinal tears or bucket handle tears. The postoperative follow-up period ranged from 12 months to 4 years and 2 months, and averaged 19 months.

Results

Both Lysholm and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score were significantly improved after surgery. Forty-nine of 57 patients (86.0 %) had no locking or catching, no joint line tenderness, and a negative McMurray test at the last follow-up. Of 32 patients who underwent second-look arthroscopy, 24 achieved complete healing, while four showed partial healing and required repeat repair, and four showed no healing and meniscectomy was conducted. The failure rate in all patients was thus 14.0 % (8 of 57 repairs). No major complications associated with the use of the Meniscal Viper Repair System were observed.

Conclusion

The Meniscal Viper System is a convenient and effective device for all- inside lateral meniscal suture, with high success rate and no major complications.     

外侧半月板桶柄样撕裂联合缝合技术的应用

 目的 探讨关节镜下自内向外联合全内缝合技术修复外侧半月板桶柄样撕裂的临床效果。方法 2004年11月至2009年11月,应用关节镜下联合缝 合技术修复外侧半月板桶柄样撕裂17例,男10例,女7例;年龄17~42岁,平均27.8岁。使用自内向外缝合技术对外侧半月板腘肌腱前方区域的撕裂进行缝合,使 用全内缝合技术对半月板后角区域的撕裂进行缝合。随访时进行体格检查、MR检查和二次关节镜探查,评估半月板愈合情况。结果 13例患者获得随访,随访时 间1~5年,平均23.7个月。随访期间症状消失者12例（92.3％,12/13）,绞锁复发1例（7.7％,1/13）。MRI证实半月板完全愈合11例（84.6％,11/13）,部分 愈合1例（7.7％,1/13）,不愈合1例（7.7％,1/13）。12例患者行二次关节镜探查,其中完全愈合10例（83.3％,10/12）,部分愈合1例（8.3％,1/12）, 未愈合1例（8.3％,1/12）。结论 应用自内向外联合全内缝合技术修复外侧半月板桶柄样撕裂,经术后MRI和二次关节镜探查证实半月板愈合率超过90%。     

Meniscus Tear Management: Indications,Technique, and Outcomes

Meniscus tears are commonly encountered in the clinical and operative setting and vary in presentation, including bucket-handle, radial, and horizontal cleavage tears. Historically, tears were treated with benign neglect or partial meniscectomy. However, a great deal of subsequent research has highlighted the biomechanical consequences of tears and meniscectomy, including increased peak local contact forces, progressive postmeniscectomy arthritis, and subsequent arthroplasty. With the advent and evolution of repair devices, increasing attention is being turned to the ideal restorative treatment of meniscus tears. Successful meniscus repair is centered about the ABCs of repair: Anatomic reduction, Biologic preparation and augmentation, and Circumferential compression. Recent advances in repair techniques have included microfracture of the intercondylar notch to provide healing factors and marrow cells for augmented healing, all-inside suture devices enabling the reduction and fixation tears without the need for additional assistants and the morbidity of inside-out exposure, and circumferential compression combined with clot augmentation to reduce and fix horizontal cleavage tears and recreate biomechanics to within 15% of baseline contact forces. Clinical outcomes of meniscus repair using modern techniques have been promising, with reapproximation of native joint biomechanics, substantial improvements in patient subjective outcome scores, and satisfactory reoperation rates. With implementation of the ABCs of meniscus repair as well as the continued expansion of the orthopedic surgeons' meniscus repair toolbox, restoration and preservation of the meniscus are increasingly possible across the spectrum of tear types.     

FasT-fix技术联合外-内缝合系统治疗膝半月板损伤疗效评估

【摘要】〓目的〓评价内缝合FasT-fix技术联合外-内缝合系统治疗膝关节半月板损伤的有效性。方法〓回顾性分析我院2011年2月至2014年2月利用关节镜下FasT-fix技术联合外-内缝合系统治疗膝半月板损伤83例。术后跟踪随访,通过MRI检查评估愈合情况,术前-术后Lysholm评分评估关节功能,探讨手术方式有效性。结果〓83例均获得随访并进行MRI复查,最长26个月,最短6个月(平均16个月),术后复查MRI提示59例完全愈合,16例部分愈合,8例未愈合。所有患膝关节活动度正常,平均Lysholm评分由术前46.3±20.8提高到93.5±4.6分(t=19.28, P<0.01),差异有统计学意义。结论〓关节镜下全内缝合FasT-fix技术联合外-内缝合系统治疗膝关节半月板损伤疗效肯定。     

关节镜下复位缝合富血小板血浆注射治疗陈旧性半月板桶柄样撕裂

[目的]介绍陈旧性内侧半月板桶柄样撕裂镜下复位缝合修复,结合富血小板血浆注射的手术技术与初步结果。[方法]对1例28岁陈旧性内侧半月板桶柄样撕裂23年的患者行镜下复位缝合,同时行富血小板血浆注射。镜下全面探查关节内病变,将半月板撕裂部和关节囊残缘打磨出新鲜创面,采用由内向外"U"形缝合半月板2针,牵拉关节外侧缝线,在关节镜直视下松解半月板前、后角挛缩部分,使半月板桶柄撕裂缘与关节囊缘逐渐靠拢,将缝线打结固定。再采用Fast-fix 360将半月板体部至后角撕裂部分全内缝合。探查半月板缝合后撕裂部分复位满意,稳定性良好。将制备好的PRP共4 ml沿内侧膝关节间隙半月板的体部及后角等部位,多点穿刺注射。[结果]术后患者疼痛和关节交锁等症状消失,逐步恢复伤膝活动。术后2个月,患者恢复运动能力,无明显不适,复查MRI显示左膝内侧半月板形态完整、均质,无明显异常信号。[结论]对陈旧性内侧半月板桶柄样撕裂进行适当松解仍可缝合修复,富血小板血浆注射有利于陈旧性半月板缝合修复后愈合。     

Medial meniscus posterior root repairs: A comparison among three surgical techniques in short-term clinical outcomes and arthroscopic meniscal healing scores

BackgroundMedial meniscus (MM) posterior root repairs lead to favorable clinical outcomes in patients with MM posterior root tears (MMPRTs). However, there are few comparative studies in evaluating the superiority among several pullout repair techniques such as modified Mason–Allen suture, simple stitch, and concomitant posteromedial pullout repair. We hypothesized that an additional pullout suture at the MM posteromedial part would have clinical advantages in transtibial pullout repairs of the MMPRTs. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical usefulness among several types of pullout repair techniques in patients with MMPRTs.MethodsEighty-three patients who underwent arthroscopic pullout repairs of the MMPRTs were investigated. Patients were divided into three groups using different pullout repair techniques: a modified Mason–Allen suture using FasT-Fix all-inside meniscal repair device (F-MMA, n = 28), two simple stitches (TSS, n = 30), and TSS concomitant with posteromedial pullout repair using all-inside meniscal repair device (TSS-PM, n = 25). Postoperative clinical outcomes and semi-quantitative arthroscopic meniscal healing scores (0–10 points) were evaluated at second-look arthroscopies.ResultsNo significant differences among the three groups were observed in patient demographics and preoperative clinical scores, except for preoperative Lysholm scores. At second-look arthroscopies, there were no significant differences among the three techniques in postoperative clinical outcomes and meniscal healing scores.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that the TSS-PM pullout repair technique did not show better scores in postoperative clinical outcomes and meniscal healings compared with the F-MMA and TSS techniques. Our results suggest that the concomitant posteromedial pullout suture may have no clinical advantage in the conventional pullout repairs for the patients with MMPRTs.     

关节镜下两种手术方式治疗盘状半月板损伤的临床疗效对比

目的对比关节镜下半月板成形术及半月板全切除术治疗盘状半月板损伤的临床效果。 方法选取2014年8月至2016年8月广东医科大学附属医院收治半月板损伤患者68例为研究对象,患者确诊为盘状半月板损伤不伴韧带松弛或损伤,单侧膝关节发病,无关节畸形及严重骨质疏松。依据术式的不同将其分为A组(25例)和B组(43例),A组施行关节镜下全切除术,B组施行关节镜下半月板成形术。采用配对t检验和χ²检验比较两组患者Lysholm评分情况、术后3个月美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分、MRI复查情况和并发症发生情况。 结果两组患者术后切口均Ⅰ级愈合。A组半月板的优良率(64.00%)显著低于B组(79.06%),差异有统计学意义(χ²＝12.84,P<0.05)。术前两组患者Lysholm评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后3个月,A组和B组患者的Lysholm评分[(77±16)分、(93±19)分]均较术前[(56±12)分、(66±14)分]显著提高(t＝4.541、5.231,P<0.05),且B组的Lysholm评分显著高于A组,差异有统计学意义(t＝5.132,P<0.01)。B组的术后3个月膝关节评分(HSS)总分(88.0±2.3)分均明显高于对照组的(71.2±2.0)分,差异有统计学意义(t＝3.707,P<0.05),但两组患者疼痛、肌力评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。MRI评估显示B组的完全愈合率高于A组,且A组发现2例有关节退行性病变。 结论半月板成形术及全切除术术式均具有良好的近期疗效。但半月板成形术能最大程度地恢复膝关节功能,减少膝关节退行性病变等并发症的发生,疗效优于全切除术。     

Stage-based treatment by partial meniscectomy, meniscal refixation and transplantation

Clinical and experimental studies have demonstrated that the meniscus is important for normal knee function. Loss of meniscus results in abnormal load transmission across the knee and may lead to degenerative joint disease. Preservation of meniscal tissue is therefore important. About 10 % of all meniscal tears are repairable. The most successful repairs occur in younger patients who have an acute, vertical tear in the vascular portion of the meniscus. Currently, arthroscopic meniscal repair procedures include the inside-out, the outside-in and the all-inside technique. Vertical suture techniques are superior to horizontally placed sutures. From a biomechanical point of view, 2-0 to 1 sutures are recommended for suture repair. Various meniscus implants are also available for meniscal repair. The initial fixation strength of the implants is lower compared to vertical sutures. A combination of suture techniques and implants might be a treatment option in posterior meniscal lesions. The collagen meniscus implant has been designed to support tissue ingrowth after segmental medial meniscectomy. Although fibrocartilage matrix formation has been shown, long-term clinical follow-ups are still required. Meniscal allograft transplantation may be indicated in limited situations. Younger patients with meniscal deficiency due to previous meniscectomy who have only early arthrosis, normal axial alignment, and a stable knee may currently considered appropriate candidates for meniscal transplantation.