中医移动医疗App信息服务现状研究

以“七麦数据”网站收录的中医移动医疗App作为研究对象，采用网络调查法和文献分析法，根据“七麦数据”对移动医疗App的分类，结合中医移动医疗App的信息服务内容和特点，将筛选出的中医移动医疗App划分为医疗健康类、中医养生类、知识传播类、全面综合类，并根据“七麦数据”网站中对各类中医移动医疗App的打分及累计下载量筛选出最具代表性的12款中医移动医疗App，从全面性、人性化、安全性、实用性4个一级指标和40个二级指标对其信息服务现状进行评价，指出当前中医移动医疗App信息服务存在的问题并提出建议。     

Clinical therapeutic effects of probiotics in combination with antibiotics on periodontitis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Dental pain can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. Symptomatic apical periodontitis is the most common cause of dental pain and arise from an inflamed or necrotic dental pulp. There is growing evidence to support the effectiveness of probiotics in combination with antibiotics on periodontitis. We therefor will conduct this study to evaluate the clinical therapeutic effects of probiotics in combination with antibiotics on periodontitis.Methods:We will systematically search the following databases: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), and WanFang database. A grey literature search will be conducted using ZETOC Conference Proceedings and Open Grey. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to research on probiotics in combination with antibiotics to treatment patients with periodontitis will be included. All sources have to be searched from their inception to October 2020. Two authors will independently select studies, extract study data, and evaluate the quality of the included studies. We will use Review Manager Software (RevMan 5.3) to analyze data.Results:This study will systematically evaluate the clinical therapeutic effects of probiotics in combination with antibiotics on periodontitis.Conclusions:This study will generate evidence for a better clinical decision of patients with periodontitis.Registration number:DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/QZ6SB (https://osf.io/qz6sb/).     

基于信息化的社区骨关节炎患者多学科管理模式构建及应用研究

背景 骨关节炎致残、致畸率高，可合并多种身心疾病，但早期症状不明显。当前社区骨关节炎的管理存在管治不协调、方法不健全、制度不完善等问题。 目的 构建并评价基于信息化的社区骨关节炎多学科管理模式，以促进对社区骨关节炎患者的管理，改善患者疾病预后。 方法 首先构建社区骨关节炎患者的多学科管理模式，包含基于危险因素分层的患者分级管理流程、多学科管理团队及其诊治分工，然后构建基于信息化的多学科管理流程，并完成信息软件开发。选取2019年7月至2020年7月在上海市定海、大桥社区卫生服务中心全科门诊，以及杨浦区中心医院骨科门诊就诊的膝骨关节炎患者80例为研究对象，采用随机数表法将其分为普通组和多学科组，各40例。普通组采用常规治疗模式，多学科组在此基础上进行基于信息化的多学科管理。分别于治疗前和治疗12周后评估两组患者的视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分、西安大略麦克马斯特大学（WOMAC）骨关节炎指数、关节炎生活质量测量量表（AIMS2）评分、健康素养管理量表（HeLMS）评分、体质指数（BMI）。 结果 治疗前，多学科组和普通组膝骨关节炎患者的VAS评分、WOMAC骨关节炎指数、AIMS2评分、HeLMS评分、BMI比较，差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）；治疗12周后，多学科组和普通组膝骨关节炎患者的VAS评分、WOMAC骨关节炎指数低于治疗前，AIMS2总分、HeLMS总分高于治疗前，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；治疗12周后，多学科组患者AIMS2总分、HeLMS总分高于普通组，VAS评分、WOMAC骨关节炎指数、BMI均低于普通组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论 对膝骨关节炎患者实施基于信息化的社区骨关节炎患者多学科管理模式，可有效减轻患者的关节疼痛和体质量，提高患者的日常生活能力和健康素养，改善患者的生活质量，延缓患者的病情进展。     

Applications of geospatial analyses in health research among homeless people: A systematic scoping review of available evidence

BackgroundUnequal housing access resulted in more than 150 million homeless people worldwide, with millions more expected to be added every year due to the ongoing climate-related crises. Homeless population has a counterproductive effect on the social, psychological integration efforts by the community and exposure to other severe health-related issues. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have long been applied in urban planning and policy, housing and homelessness, and health-related research.MethodsWe used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method to systematically review 24 articles collected from multiple databases (n = 10) that focused on health-related issues among homeless people and used geospatial analysis techniques in their research.ResultsOur findings indicated a geographic clustering of case study locations– 26 out of the 31 case study sites are from the USA and Canada. Studies used spatial analysis techniques to identify hotspots, clusters and patterns of patient location and population distribution. Studies also reported relationships among the location of homeless shelters and substance use, discarded needles, different infectious and non-infectious disease clusters.ConclusionMost studies were restricted in analyzing and visualizing the patterns and disease clusters; however, geospatial analyses techniques are useful and offer diverse techniques for a more sophisticated understanding of the spatial characteristics of the health issues among homeless people. Better integration of GIS in health research among the homeless would help formulate sensible policies to counter health inequities among this vulnerable population group.     

Radiation-Shielding Devices: The Best Combination for Spine Interventional Procedures

PurposeAlthough many studies have examined the efficiency of various protective devices for reducing the dose of radiation exposure to physicians during interventional pain procedures, no study has compared the protective effect of these devices when they are used in combination. The purpose of this prospective experimental study was to determine the best combination of radiation-shielding devices.Materials and MethodsUsing anthropomorphic phantoms of a physician and patient, we measured the radiation protection efficiency (RPE) of each of the following protection methods and in combination during C-arm–guided simulated lumbar epidural injection: (a) personal protective equipment (PPE), (b) bedside curtain shield (Curtain), (c) x-ray tube filter (Filter), and (d) fluoroscopic collimation method (Collimation). We measured exposure doses using personal electronic dosimeters at the eye, thyroid, and gonad levels for 1 minute. Each experiment was repeated 15 times.ResultsThe radiation exposure dose and RPE with the best single-, double-, and triple-protection methods were as follows: PPE for the single-protection method (11.82 μSv/min, 80.04%), PPE + Collimation for the double-combination method (4.68 μSv/min, 92.09%), and PPE + Collimation + Curtain for the triple-combination method (3.08 μSv/min, 93.39%). Additionally, PPE + Collimation + Curtain + Filter for the quadruple-combination method resulted in a radiation exposure and RPE of 2.91 μSv/min and 93.61%, respectively, compared with nonprotection.ConclusionsThe best single-, double-, and triple-protection method was PPE, PPE + Collimation, and PPE + Collimation + Curtain, respectively. While preparing protective equipment, we recommend prioritizing equipment in this order.     

Moving Knowledge to Action: Aware,Adopt, Adapt (A3)

This article begins with an overview of the knowledge translation (KT) process, introduces commonly used KT terms and the Aware-Adopt-Adapt (A³) KT map. The A³ was created by a nurse practitioner (NP) for practitioners and NP students to provide a map for those who wish to move existing knowledge to practice, yet do not know where to start or do not have the time to take a deeper dive into specific KT theories.