Robotic-assisted central pancreatectomy: A minimally invasive approach for benign and low-grade lesions

BackgroundCentrally located pancreatic lesions are often treated with extended pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy resulting in loss of healthy parenchyma and a high risk of diabetes and exocrine insufficiency. Robotic central pancreatectomy (RCP) is a parenchyma sparring alternative that has been shown safe and feasible [[1], [2]].MethodsIn this article, we describe our operative technique and the perioperative outcomes of a series of RCP for low-grade or benign pancreatic tumors.ResultsSix patients (5 female and 1 man) with a median age of 51.5 (44–68) years underwent a RCP for 2 serous cystadenomas, 2 mucinous cystic tumors, 1 neuroendocrine tumor, and 1 autoimmune pancreatitis. There were no conversions, intraoperative complications, or perioperative transfusions. Median operative time and was 240 (230–291) minutes and median blood loss was 100 (100–400) ml. The median hospital stay was 8 (5–27) days. There were no mortalities, reoperations, or readmissions. One patient developed a grade B pancreatic fistula which was successfully managed conservatively. All resections had free margins and the median tumor size was 2.5 (1.5–3.5) cm. After a mean follow-up of 46 months, no patients presented new-onset diabetes or exocrine insufficiency.ConclusionsRCP represents the least invasive option for both the patient and the pancreatic parenchyma. With a standardized technique, RCP results in low postoperative morbidity and excellent long-term pancreatic function. Although our results are excellent, POPF still represents the main complication of central pancreatectomy with an incidence ranging from 0 to 80% depending on multiple factors such as the surgeon, technique, and pancreatic texture.     

慢性疼痛中枢调控网络的研究现状与思考＊

慢性疼痛是一种复杂的身心疾病，包括躯体痛觉异常、认知障碍、负性情绪等多个方面的改变，同时伴随着神经系统的功能以及结构的改变。本文将对慢性疼痛与下行疼痛调节通路、疼痛情感-认知调控网络以及中脑边缘奖赏网络的相关性，以及针刺镇痛的中枢机制相关研究文献进行综述，旨在探讨下行疼痛调节通路、疼痛情感-认知调控网络以及中脑边缘奖赏网络在慢痛发生机制中的作用，为临床治疗慢性疼痛类疾病提供更优势的治疗方案。     

Genetically predicted childhood obesity and adult atrial fibrillation: A mendelian randomization study

Background and aimsIt is unclear whether the association of childhood obesity with adult atrial fibrillation observed in observational studies reflects causal effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of childhood obesity with adult atrial fibrillation using genetic instruments.Methods and resultsWe used a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design to evaluate the association between childhood obesity and adult atrial fibrillation. Two sets of genetic variants (15 single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] for childhood body mass index [BMI] and 12 SNPs for dichotomous childhood obesity) were selected as instruments. Summary data on SNP-childhood obesity and SNP-atrial fibrillation associations were obtained from recently published genome-wide association studies. Effect estimates were evaluated using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) methods. Other MR analyses, including MR-Egger, simple and weighted median, weighted MBE and MR-PRESSO methods were performed in sensitivity analyses.The IVW models showed that both a genetically predicted one-standard deviation increase in childhood BMI (kg/m²) and higher log-odds of childhood obesity were associated with a substantial increase in the risk of atrial fibrillation (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.11–1.34, P < 0.001; OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04–1.14, P < 0.001). MR-Egger regression showed no evidence of genetic pleiotropy for childhood BMI (intercept = 0.000, 95% CI: ?0.024 to 0.023), but for childhood obesity (intercept = ?0.036, 95% CI: ?0.057 to ?0.015). Similar results were observed using leave-one-out and other MR methods in sensitivity analyses.ConclusionsThis MR analysis found a consistent association between genetically predicted childhood obesity and an increased risk of adult atrial fibrillation. Further research is warranted to validate our findings.     

婚姻状态对原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤患者预后的影响：一项倾向性评分匹配研究

背景 原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤（PCNSL）的预后较差，明确其预后危险因素是改善其预后的关键。生物-心理-社会医学模式提示社会心理因素的重要性。婚姻是重要的社会心理因素之一，但婚姻状态对PNSCL患者预后的影响尚不明确。 目的 探究婚姻状态对PCNSL患者总生存（OS）和癌因生存（CSS）的影响。 方法 于2020年，提取2000—2016年美国"监测、流行病学和结果"数据库的3 993例PCNSL患者的病例资料，包括社会人口学资料（婚姻状态、确诊年龄、种族、性别和确诊年份）、临床病理资料（病理类型、肿瘤位置）、治疗资料（手术、放疗和化疗）及结局资料（生存信息和随访时间）。依据婚姻状态将患者分为已婚和非已婚两组，其中非已婚包括单身、离异和丧偶。采用倾向性评分匹配均衡基线资料，采用Kaplan-Meier分析（Log-rank检验）、Cox回归评估婚姻状态对患者OS和CSS的影响。 结果 倾向性评分匹配后，已婚组和非已婚组患者基线资料比较，差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。将患者按婚姻状态分为已婚和非已婚组：Log-rank检验结果显示，与已婚患者相比，非已婚患者的OS和CSS更差（P<0.05）；倾向性评分匹配后，校正确诊年龄、种族、性别、确诊年份、病理类型、肿瘤位置、手术、放疗和化疗因素后，多因素Cox回归分析结果显示，非已婚患者的OS风险是已婚患者的1.24倍〔95%CI（1.14，1.36），P<0.001〕，非已婚患者的CSS风险是已婚患者的1.22倍〔95%CI（1.11，1.33），P<0.001〕。将患者按婚姻状态分为已婚、单身、离异、丧偶组：Log-rank检验结果显示，与已婚患者相比，丧偶患者的OS和CSS预后更差（P<0.05）；校正确诊年龄、种族、性别、确诊年份、病理类型、肿瘤位置、手术、放疗和化疗因素后，多因素Cox回归结果显示，单身患者OS和CSS风险分别是已婚患者的1.14倍〔95%CI（1.03，1.27），P=0.013〕和1.15倍〔95%CI（1.03，1.29），P=0.012〕，离异患者OS和CSS风险分别是已婚患者的1.23倍〔95%CI（1.07，1.41），P=0.004〕和1.22倍〔95%CI（1.05，1.41），P=0.009〕，丧偶患者OS和CSS风险分别是已婚患者的1.37倍〔95%CI（1.21，1.54），P<0.001〕和1.28倍〔95%CI（1.12，1.46），P=0.013〕。 结论 婚姻状态影响PCNSL患者OS和CSS，与已婚相比，单身、离异和丧偶患者的预后更差，这提示在临床管理和决策中，除了传统的肿瘤生物学特征，还应关注婚姻状态对PCNSL患者预后的影响。     

American Cancer Society nutrition and physical activity guideline for cancer survivors

The overall 5-year relative survival rate for all cancers combined is now 68%, and there are over 16.9 million survivors in the United States. Evidence from laboratory and observational studies suggests that factors such as diet, physical activity, and obesity may affect risk for recurrence and overall survival after a cancer diagnosis. The purpose of this American Cancer Society guideline is to provide evidence-based, cancer-specific recommendations for anthropometric parameters, physical activity, diet, and alcohol intake for reducing recurrence and cancer-specific and overall mortality. The audiences for this guideline are health care providers caring for cancer survivors as well as cancer survivors and their families. The guideline is intended to serve as a resource for informing American Cancer Society programs, health policy, and the media. Sources of evidence that form the basis of this guideline are systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, pooled analyses of cohort studies, and large randomized clinical trials published since 2012. Recommendations for nutrition and physical activity during cancer treatment, informed by current practice, large cancer care organizations, and reviews of other expert bodies, are also presented. To provide additional context for the guidelines, the authors also include information on the relationship between health-related behaviors and comorbidities, long-term sequelae and patient-reported outcomes, and health disparities, with attention to enabling survivors' ability to adhere to recommendations. Approaches to meet survivors' needs are addressed as well as clinical care coordination and resources for nutrition and physical activity counseling after a cancer diagnosis.     

Patient characteristics,anaesthetic workload and techniques in the UK: an analysis from the 7th National Audit Project (NAP7) activity survey

Detailed contemporary knowledge of the characteristics of the surgical population, national anaesthetic workload, anaesthetic techniques and behaviours are essential to monitor productivity, inform policy and direct research themes. Every 3–4 years, the Royal College of Anaesthetists, as part of its National Audit Projects (NAP), performs a snapshot activity survey in all UK hospitals delivering anaesthesia, collecting patient-level encounter data from all cases under the care of an anaesthetist. During November 2021, as part of NAP7, anaesthetists recorded details of all cases undertaken over 4 days at their site through an online survey capturing anonymous patient characteristics and anaesthetic details. Of 416 hospital sites invited to participate, 352 (85%) completed the activity survey. From these, 24,177 reports were returned, of which 24,172 (99%) were included in the final dataset. The work patterns by day of the week, time of day and surgical specialty were similar to previous NAP activity surveys. However, in non-obstetric patients, between NAP5 (2013) and NAP7 (2021) activity surveys, the estimated median age of patients increased by 2.3 years from median (IQR) of 50.5 (28.4–69.1) to 52.8 (32.1–69.2) years. The median (IQR) BMI increased from 24.9 (21.5–29.5) to 26.7 (22.3–31.7) kg.m^–2. The proportion of patients who scored as ASA physical status 1 decreased from 37% in NAP5 to 24% in NAP7. The use of total intravenous anaesthesia increased from 8% of general anaesthesia cases to 26% between NAP5 and NAP7. Some changes may reflect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the anaesthetic population, though patients with confirmed COVID-19 accounted for only 149 (1%) cases. These data show a rising burden of age, obesity and comorbidity in patients requiring anaesthesia care, likely to impact UK peri-operative services significantly.