Worldwide Prevalence of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Meta-Analyses of 11 Million Subjects

BackgroundDespite the greater prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in subjects with ischemic heart disease (IHD), premature IHD, and severe hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein ≥190 mg/dl), overall prevalence estimates are not available.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to provide worldwide estimates of FH prevalence in subjects with IHD, premature IHD, and severe hypercholesterolemia compared with those in the general population.MethodsIn this systematic review and meta-analyses, Embase, PubMed, and the Web of Science were searched until June 3, 2019, for peer-reviewed papers and conference abstracts reporting heterozygous FH prevalence in nonfounder populations, revealing 104 studies eligible for inclusion.ResultsEstimates of FH prevalence were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses and were 0.32% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26% to 0.39% [corresponding to 1:313]) among 10,921,310 unique subjects in the general population (33,036 patients with FH) on the basis of 44 studies, 3.2% (95% CI: 2.2% to 4.3% [1:31]) among 84,479 unique subjects with IHD (2,103 patients with FH) on the basis of 28 studies, 6.7% (95% CI: 4.9% to 8.7% [1:15]) among 31,316 unique subjects with premature IHD (1,471 patients with FH) on the basis of 32 studies, and 7.2% (95% CI: 4.6% to 10.8% [1:14]) among 17,728 unique subjects with severe hypercholesterolemia (920 patients with FH) on the basis of 7 studies. FH prevalence in the general population was similar using genetic versus clinical diagnoses. Seventeen of 195 countries (9%) in the world have reported FH prevalence for the general population, leaving 178 (91%) countries in the world with unknown prevalence.ConclusionsCompared with 1:313 among subjects in the general population, FH prevalence is 10-fold higher among those with IHD, 20-fold higher among those with premature IHD, and 23-fold higher among those with severe hypercholesterolemia. The prevalence of FH is unknown in 90% of countries in the world.     

Incidence,Characteristics, and Outcome of COVID-19 in Adults on Kidney Replacement Therapy: A Regionwide Registry Study

Open in a separate window     

糖尿病视网膜病变的流行病学、病因学与发病机制研究现状北大核心

糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是全球工作年龄人群视力丧失的主要原因,根据国际糖尿病地图研究预测,2045年中国糖尿病患者将达1.74亿,DR正在成为全球公共卫生问题。本文就DR的流行病学、病因学、发病机制作一阐述,从DR的流行病学推测疾病将来会波及的人群数量,提醒我们要高度重视本病的预防。从糖尿病的病程发展推测可能的病因学,从氧化应激等反应来研究DR的发病机制,以便开发可靠和有力的手段识别高风险患者,并在视力丧失发生之前进行有效干预。     

The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors,Coverage and Access to Health on Heart Ischemic Disease Mortality in a Brazilian Southern State: A Geospatial Analysis

Background:No other disease has killed more than ischemic heart disease (IHD) for the past few years globally. Despite the advances in cardiology, the response time for starting treatment still leads patients to death because of the lack of healthcare coverage and access to referral centers.Objectives:To analyze the spatial disparities related to IHD mortality in the Parana state, Brazil.Methods:An ecological study using secondary data from Brazilian Health Informatics Department between 2013–2017 was performed to verify the IHD mortality. An spatial analysis was performed using the Global Moran and Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) to verify the spatial dependency of IHD mortality. Lastly, multivariate spatial regression models were also developed using Ordinary Least Squares and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) to identify socioeconomic indicators (aging, income, and illiteracy rates), exam coverage (catheterization, angioplasty, and revascularization rates), and access to health (access index to cardiologists and chemical reperfusion centers) significantly correlated with IHD mortality. The chosen model was based on p < 0.05, highest adjusted R² and lowest Akaike Information Criterion.Results:A total of 22,920 individuals died from IHD between 2013–2017. The spatial analysis confirmed a positive spatial autocorrelation global between IDH mortality rates (Moran’s I: 0.633, p < 0.01). The LISA analysis identified six high-high pattern clusters composed by 66 municipalities (16.5%). GWR presented the best model (Adjusted R²: 0.72) showing that accessibility to cardiologists and chemical reperfusion centers, and revascularization and angioplasty rates differentially affect the IHD mortality rates geographically. Aging and illiteracy rate presented positive correlation with IHD mortality rate, while income ratio presented negative correlation (p < 0.05).Conclusion:Regions of vulnerability were unveiled by the spatial analysis where sociodemographic, exam coverage and accessibility to health variables impacted differently the IHD mortality rates in Paraná state, Brazil.Highlights

• The increase in ischemic heart disease mortality rates is related to geographical disparities.
• The IHD mortality is differentially associated to socioeconomic factors, exam coverage, and access to health.
• Higher accessibility to chemical reperfusion centers did not necessarily improve patient outcomes in some regions of the state.
• Clusters of high mortality rate are placed in regions with low amount of cardiologists, income and schooling.

     

AKI Treated with Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19

Open in a separate window