The structuring of an allergy index based on IgE-mediated skin sensitivity to common environmental allergens

We computed skin-test sensitivity levels in 485 adults puncture-tested with eight standardized, high-quality inhalant allergens tested at single concentrations. In order to quantitate the "average" IgE-mediated skin sensitivity of each subject, we used both nonparametric and parametric statistical methods to generate two "allergy indices" (Allergy Index I and Allergy Index II) based on sensitivity end-point data from the subpopulations of individuals positive to six of the eight allergens. For the 192 skin test-positive subjects, Allergy Index I and Allergy Index II were significantly correlated with each other (rs = 0.98, p less than 0.001) and with the number of positive skin-test reactions (rs congruent to 0.9, p less than 0.001) as well as with log[total serum IgE] (r congruent to 0.4, p less than 0.01). In 102 ragweed-positive subjects, log[specific IgE to ragweed] was significantly correlated with ragweed-specific "ragweed indices I and II" (r congruent to 0.6, p less than 0.01). Furthermore, the average daily symptom scores reported by 14 ragweed-positive subjects during the ragweed pollination season were significantly correlated with ragweed indices I and II (p less than 0.05). We propose the use of Allergy Index II in epidemiologic and genetic studies of allergic phenotypes as well as in clinical decisions for diagnosis and immunotherapeutic intervention.     

基于熵权-TOPSIS结合RSR法的山东省卫生资源 配置地区性差异研究

目的 分析山东省卫生资源配置地区差异性,为优化区域卫生资源配置提供参考。方法 采用熵权-TOPSIS(Entropy weight TOPSIS)法与秩和比(RSR)法综合评价2015—2019年山东省卫生资源配置情况。结果 根据熵权-TOPSIS法可得2015—2019年鲁东、鲁中、鲁西南地区卫生资源配置综合评价平均水平分别为0.403、0.520、0.264;RSR法分档结果为好（ Ci >0.542）、中（0.092< Ci <0.542）、差（ Ci <0.092）三类,其中鲁东地区在三档中占比为2/3、4/12、0;鲁中地区占比为1/3、3/12、1/2;鲁西南地区占比为0、5/12、1/2。方差分析结果显示 F =18.755, P ＜0.001,说明分档结果具有统计学意义。结论 山东省卫生资源配置存在明显地区差异,鲁东、鲁中地区卫生资源配置情况较好,鲁西南地区较差。政府应发挥主导作用,完善人才激励机制,缩小卫生资源区域配置差异,提高人群健康水平。     

伤病比在医院维权中的运用

为了保证民法的公平原则,避免医疗纠纷赔偿案件审理中忽视患者本身病情所致的不良后果的情况,对损伤与疾病对患者预后的影响进行了研究.介绍了伤病比的来源,论述了伤病比在医疗纠纷处理中的适用 范围,伤病比的级别与医院承担的赔偿额度.指出应增强伤病比意识,促进医与法的完美结合.     

基于秩和比法评价粤港澳大湾区卫生资源配置现状

目的 评价粤港澳大湾区卫生资源配置情况。方法 基于每千人口床位数、每千人口执业（助理）医师数、每千人口注册护士数和医护比四项指标,利用秩和比法综合评价2018年粤港澳大湾区11个区域的卫生资源配置现状,并比较综合评价结果。结果 2018年粤港澳大湾区各区域在四项指标上存在一定差异,变异系数范围为0.2Symbol~A@0.6;RSR回归方程为[AKY^5]=0.182x-0.405,相关系数r=0.993;卫生资源配置情况按Probit值分为三级,Probit<5（相对较少）:东莞、肇庆、深圳、佛山和惠州;5<6（中等）:江门、澳门、中山和珠海;probit>6（相对较多）:香港和广州。结论 粤港澳大湾区整体卫生资源配置较好,区域内部卫生资源配置差异性较大。undefined/html>     

基于加权秩和比法评价广东省公共卫生资源配置

目的 评价2019年广东省不同地市（除中山市）的公共卫生资源配置状况。方法 从《2019年广东省卫生健康统计年鉴》中选取专业公共卫生机构数、专业公共卫生机构床位数、专业公共卫生机构执业(助理) 医师数、专业公共卫生机构注册护士数和每万人口公共卫生人数五个评价指标,利用加权秩和比法综合评价广东省不同地市的公共卫生资源配置差异。结果 WRSR与Probit的回归方程为[AKY^5]=0.250Probit-0.745（F=362.461,P<0.05,R=0.980）;将不同地市公共卫生资源配置分为四档,肇庆市、广州市、佛山市、深圳市四市公共卫生资源配置处于较高水平,则汕尾市、潮州市则较为落后。结论 广东省公共卫生资源整体上逐年提升,但每万人口公共卫生人数与目标相比还具有差距;不同地区间公共卫生资源配置差异大,人均获得资源不均衡。     

食管癌调强放疗靶区与肺体积比和处方剂量的关系

目的 研究食管癌调强放射治疗中能够做出既定目标的放疗计划时,靶区体积与肺体积比值和处方剂量的关系,从而帮助临床医生根据靶区情况,选择适合的处方剂量。方法 随机选取临床上已进行放射治疗的食管癌患者80例;其中病变范围包括全部食管癌类型,靶区根据ICRU（International Commission Radiological Units）50、62号文件进行勾画;设定统计参数及计划目标。根据参数的统计结果进行统计学分析;通过拟合计算求出满足既定目标的体积比临界值。结果 体积比与肺V₅、V₂₀、V₃₀以及肺平均受量具有线性正相关关系。给予60 Gy的处方剂量时,体积比的临界值为10%;给予50 Gy的处方剂量时,体积比的临界值为13%。结论 根据研究结果可以预见：食管癌调强放疗中当靶区体积与肺体积比值超过10%时,考虑给予的处方剂量不高于60 Gy;当靶区体积与肺体积比值超过13%时,给予处方剂量时应谨慎选择,但对于各段食管癌靶区超出肺段的患者可适当放宽。这为临床医生勾画靶区期间在处方剂量和靶区范围的选择上提供了参照。     

秩和的分布,区间估计和假设检验的探讨

目的 探讨秩和比的分布理论及建立区间估计和假设检验方法。方法 假设各变量相互独立,观察单位某变量取值是随机的,则其秩的分布为均匀分布,秩和的分布是m个独立同分布变量之秩的和。结果 当m和n较小时,如m<3,秩和的分布呈单峰对称分布;m和n不太小时,秩和的分布迅速逼近正态分布。结论 对秩和与秩和比可以应用正态分布理论作区间估计和假设检验。     

Changes in patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and regurgitation with St. Jude Medical cardiac valves

In this study, we analyzed the extent and pattern of regression of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and compared the results with those of another group of patients with aortic regurgitation (AR). Seventy patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 was comprised of 29 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, and Group 2 of 41 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation. A third group of 10 healthy subjects served as a healthy control group. Echocardiographic studies were done before the operation and 5 years postoperatively. At follow-up, a significant reduction in the left ventricular mass was found in both groups, but it remained significantly greater than in the healthy control group. The ratio of LV wall thickness to radius (th/r) in Group 1 decreased significantly, and at follow-up it was within the normal value. In Group 2, the th/r ratio increased, and at follow-up it was within the normal value. After aortic valve replacement, the wall thickness remained significantly greater than normal for patients with AS, and the chamber radius remained significantly greater than normal for patients with AR. For these reasons, LV hypertrophy still existed in both groups at postoperative follow-up. The actuarial survival rate was 85.3% at 16 years for Group 1 and 83.4% at 18 years for Group 2. There was no significant difference in the long-term survival rates between the 2 groups. Actuarial freedom from valve-related events was 91.9% at 16 years for Group 1 and 82% at 18 years for Group 2. There was no significant difference in the valve-related event free curves between groups. After 5 years of follow-up, th/r reached normal for both groups, indicating remodeling of the LV geometry after aortic valve replacement.     

医疗保险风险因素的相对风险度分析

目的 :探讨医疗保险风险因素的相对风险度及其分析方法。方法 :借鉴流行病学研究方法 ,用 logistic回归模型产生比值比 (OR)来刻画风险因素与医疗保险赔付 (损失 )之间的定量关系。结果 :实例拟合单因素及多元 logistic回归模型 ,得到各风险因素的 OR值并能合理地解释。结论 :相对风险度分析为医疗保险风险控制提供了新的分析思路和定量依据     

An Analysis for the Comprehensive Evaluation of Health Resources Allocation in Shenzhen

INCREASING HEALTH COSTS are a dilemmafaced by the health administration. In order to en-hance the productivity, we must invest in healthservices. Meanwhile, limited health resources shouldbe properly allocated to obtain maximal socioeco-nomic benefits at lowest input. Thus, it is especiallyimportant to comprehensively assess the allocationof health resources from the perspectives of theInput and Output. The comprehensive evaluation ofhealth resources is a topic of interest for multi-objective assessment, wh...