首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   265篇
  免费   39篇
  国内免费   3篇
耳鼻咽喉   1篇
儿科学   4篇
妇产科学   12篇
基础医学   18篇
口腔科学   15篇
临床医学   46篇
内科学   76篇
皮肤病学   3篇
神经病学   7篇
特种医学   2篇
外科学   16篇
综合类   14篇
预防医学   32篇
眼科学   1篇
药学   19篇
中国医学   37篇
肿瘤学   4篇
  2024年   3篇
  2023年   12篇
  2022年   37篇
  2021年   31篇
  2020年   21篇
  2019年   35篇
  2018年   40篇
  2017年   31篇
  2016年   19篇
  2015年   7篇
  2014年   25篇
  2013年   17篇
  2012年   8篇
  2011年   17篇
  2009年   1篇
  2008年   2篇
  2005年   1篇
排序方式: 共有307条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
21.
22.
目的 系统评价低压复苏治疗创伤失血性休克的有效性.方法 计算机检索Pubmed、Embase和The Corchrane Library等数据库,纳入低压复苏治疗创伤失血性休克的随机对照试验或半随机对照试验,检索时间均为从建库至2015年8月.由2位研究者独立进行资料提取和质量评价,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析,计数资料使用相对危险度(risk ratio,RR)及其95%可信区间(confidence interval,CI)进行评估,并采用GRADE 3.6.1软件对证据质量进行分级.结果 纳入4项研究,Meta分析及GRADE评级结果显示:与常规复苏比较,低压复苏有较低的总病死率[RR =0.77,95% CI:0.62~0.95,P=0.01;n=984,GRADE评级:中]及24 h病死率[RR=0.47,95%CI:0.24~0.91,P=0.03;n=281,GRADE评级:中];但总病死率的亚组分析结果显示:在钝挫伤或穿透伤亚组以及穿透伤亚组,两组差异无统计学意义.结论 低压复苏能够降低创伤失血性休克患者的总病死率及24h病死率,证据质量为中级.未来研究应该着力于低压复苏对于不同创伤类型患者的疗效进行进一步探索.  相似文献   
23.
目的系统评价药物治疗初始耐药较非耐药肺结核的有效性。方法计算机检索Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMbase、VIP、CNKI和CBMdisc电子资料库,查找药物治疗初始耐药与非耐药肺结核的队列研究,然后由两位研究者独立进行资料提取和质量评价,采用RevMan 5.1软件进行Meta分析,并采用GRADEpro 3.6系统对证据质量和等级推荐进行分级。结果共将10个研究纳入Meta分析,初始耐药与非耐药肺结核病人相比,6个月末痰菌阴转率为91%[RR=0.91,95%CI(0.86,0.96),P〈0.001],肺空洞闭合率为70%[RR=0.7,95%CI(0.60,0.82),P〈0.001],2年后细菌学复发率为4.98倍[RR=4.98,95%CI(3.07,8.07),P〈0.001]。GRADE系统评价结果显示,2年后细菌学复发率和肺空洞闭合率证据质量为中等,6个月末痰菌阴转率与肺部病灶吸收有效率证据质量为极低。结论初始耐药与非耐药肺结核相比,在6个月末痰菌阴转率、肺空洞闭合率等方面均低,2年后细菌学复发率较高。初始耐药是化疗失败的一个重要原因。鉴于系统评价为二次研究,受纳入分析的原始文献质量影响较大,且评价过程可能存在偏倚等局限性,上述结论尚需进一步通过开展大规模、高质量的基础和临床研究来验证。  相似文献   
24.
目的:为我国基本药物遴选和评价提供参考。方法:查阅文献,分析世界卫生组织(WHO)基本药物的评价程序和评价方法,与我国基本药物的评价方法进行对比研究,找出差异,进而提供参考。结果与结论:与我国基本药物评价相比,WHO基本药物评价程序透明化、方法科学化,充分运用了循证医学的方法,值得我国借鉴吸收。  相似文献   
25.
杨悦  何畔  邹韵  王贺  武志昂 《中国药房》2011,(32):2977-2981
目的:研究推荐分级的评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法以及WHO在基本药物遴选中的应用情况,为我国基本药物遴选提供借鉴。方法:采用文献研究方法,搜集所有介绍GRADE方法的文献以及使用GRADE方法对基本药物调入调出证据进行评价的参考文献。结果与结论:GRADE方法是WHO保证基本药物遴选科学性的重要方法,满足了其遴选标准规定的对安全性、有效性、经济性方面的要求。我国应充分利用WHO与国内外相关技术和信息资源,学习并且借鉴GRADE方法,使我国基本药物遴选更加科学、客观。  相似文献   
26.
ObjectiveRecently, the effects of Baduanjin (a traditional Chinese mind-body exercise) on diabetes have attracted increasing attention, and relevant systematic reviews (SRs) have emerged. However, the qualities of these SRs vary markedly, and their conclusions are inconsistent, which is not conducive to guiding decision-making. We sought to assess the quality of these SRs and provide more evidence for diabetes treatment.MethodsA literature search was conducted in 7 databases from inception to December 1st, 2021. SRs of randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of Baduanjin were identified. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) checklist, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system were applied to evaluate the quality of the SRs.ResultsTen SRs were identified. All SRs were judged as critically low methodological quality by the AMSTAR-2 checklist. The total PRISMA score of the included SRs ranged from 15 to 21, and the mean score was 18.60 (1.90), indicating that all SRs had partial reporting deficits. Sixty outcomes were reported in the included studies, of which 25 (41.67%) were judged as low quality, and 34 (56.67%) as very low quality according to the GRADE system, indicating that the overall evidence quality of outcomes was not high.ConclusionBaduanjin seems to be an effective therapy for diabetes in improving glucose and lipid metabolism, mental health, quality of life, and waist-hip ratio (WHR). The overall quality of the SRs was less than optimal. This conclusion should be treated with caution, and researchers should conduct higher-quality clinical studies following AMSTAR-2checklist, PRISMA statement, and GRADE system in the future.  相似文献   
27.
28.

Background

Oral squamous cell carcinoma is the most common manifestation of malignancy in the oral cavity. Adjuncts are available for clinicians to evaluate lesions that seem potentially malignant. In this systematic review, the authors summarized the available evidence on patient-important outcomes, diagnostic test accuracy (DTA), and patients’ values and preferences (PVPs) when using adjuncts for the evaluation of clinically evident lesions in the oral cavity.

Types of Studies Reviewed

The authors searched for preexisting systematic reviews and assessed their quality using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews tool. The authors updated the selected reviews and searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials and DTA and PVPs studies. Pairs of reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and assessment of the certainty in the evidence by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

Results

The authors identified 4 existing reviews. DTA reviews included 37 studies. The authors retrieved 7,534 records, of which 9 DTA and 10 PVPs studies were eligible. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of adjuncts ranged from 0.39 to 0.96 for the evaluation of innocuous lesions and from 0.31 to 0.95 for the evaluation of suspicious lesions. Cytologic testing used in suspicious lesions appears to have the highest accuracy among adjuncts (sensitivity, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 0.98; specificity, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 0.99; low-quality evidence).

Conclusions and Practical Implications

Cytologic testing appears to be the most accurate adjunct among those included in this review. The main concerns are the high rate of false-positive results and serious issues of risk of bias and indirectness of the evidence. Clinicians should remain skeptical about the potential benefit of any adjunct in clinical practice.  相似文献   
29.

Background

The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether arthrocentesis or arthroscopy combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or platelet-rich growth factor (PRGF) injection compared with no injection or saline injection (control group) or hyaluronic acid (HA) injection reduced pain and increased maximum mouth opening (MMO) in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis (OA).

Types of Studies Reviewed

The authors used the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar databases and hand searched reference lists through May 4, 2018, to identify randomized controlled trials and controlled trials including patients with TMJ OA receiving injections (PRP or PRGF versus other). The authors assessed the risk of bias according to the Cochrane guidelines.

Results

The authors screened 36 abstracts. They included 5 studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 2 controlled trials) with a total of 285 patients with TMJ OA in this review. The authors assessed all 5 studies as being at high risk of bias. The quality of evidence was very low owing to statistical heterogeneity, small sample size, or high risk of bias. Meta-analyses with 2 studies showed a visual analog scale pain improvement from baseline of ?2.778 units (0-10 scale, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain) favorable to PRP or PRGF compared with findings in control groups (95% confidence interval [CI], ?3.504 to ?2.052; P < .001) and an improvement of ?0.968 favorable to PRP or PRGF compared with findings in HA groups (95% CI, ?1.854 to ?0.082; P = .032). The authors found no significant increase in MMO in those receiving PRP or PRGF compared with that in the control or HA groups.

Conclusions and Practical Implications

Although the results of the included studies showed that arthrocentesis or arthroscopy with PRP or PRGF, saline, or HA injections all reduced pain and increased mouth opening, the evidence was of very low quality. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results showing that PRP or PRGF with arthrocentesis or arthroscopy significantly improved pain but did not increase MMO compared with findings in the control or HA groups.  相似文献   
30.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号