全文获取类型
| 收费全文 | 1475篇 |
| 免费 | 45篇 |
| 国内免费 | 3篇 |
专业分类
| 耳鼻咽喉 | 2篇 |
| 儿科学 | 13篇 |
| 妇产科学 | 34篇 |
| 基础医学 | 22篇 |
| 口腔科学 | 4篇 |
| 临床医学 | 243篇 |
| 内科学 | 8篇 |
| 皮肤病学 | 7篇 |
| 神经病学 | 9篇 |
| 特种医学 | 4篇 |
| 外科学 | 35篇 |
| 综合类 | 211篇 |
| 预防医学 | 48篇 |
| 眼科学 | 5篇 |
| 药学 | 67篇 |
| 2篇 | |
| 中国医学 | 806篇 |
| 肿瘤学 | 3篇 |
出版年
| 2024年 | 5篇 |
| 2023年 | 14篇 |
| 2022年 | 21篇 |
| 2021年 | 47篇 |
| 2020年 | 62篇 |
| 2019年 | 40篇 |
| 2018年 | 22篇 |
| 2017年 | 33篇 |
| 2016年 | 26篇 |
| 2015年 | 35篇 |
| 2014年 | 177篇 |
| 2013年 | 114篇 |
| 2012年 | 167篇 |
| 2011年 | 127篇 |
| 2010年 | 177篇 |
| 2009年 | 74篇 |
| 2008年 | 59篇 |
| 2007年 | 55篇 |
| 2006年 | 51篇 |
| 2005年 | 47篇 |
| 2004年 | 54篇 |
| 2003年 | 42篇 |
| 2002年 | 12篇 |
| 2001年 | 11篇 |
| 2000年 | 13篇 |
| 1999年 | 10篇 |
| 1998年 | 5篇 |
| 1997年 | 2篇 |
| 1996年 | 7篇 |
| 1995年 | 3篇 |
| 1994年 | 1篇 |
| 1993年 | 3篇 |
| 1991年 | 3篇 |
| 1990年 | 2篇 |
| 1989年 | 1篇 |
| 1988年 | 1篇 |
排序方式： 共有1523条查询结果，搜索用时 31 毫秒
31.
32.
33.
陈昕 《实用中医内科杂志》2013,(11):57-59
[目的]观察推拿治疗肩关节周围炎疗效。[方法]对264例住院患者根据病情，采取不同手法、部位和穴位，对症治疗。如患臂不能高举，应在三角肌、肱二头肌上端和肩谬穴点按，帮助患臂做抬肩运动，用力适当，逐步扩大范围，以患者忍受为宜。在肱二头肌上端触及至粘连、扭结、硬点，用拇指波动此处，接着分别牵拉每个手指，如患臂不能内收，用拇指在大圆肌和肩胛冈、天宗、肩贞穴进行揉、剥手法，另手拉上臂做运动，如患臂可能外展和后伸，用同法在肩俞、曲池穴和上臂内侧剥拿，同时向受限方向作外展、后伸运动，接着揉点大椎、合谷、后溪等穴。最后拍打推拿过的部位结束。1～2次／d，30min／次。连续治疗10d为1疗程。观测临床症状、不良反应。根据患者病情决定疗程，判定疗效。[结果]治愈189例，显效58例，1L~17例，但总有效率93．56％。[结论]推拿治疗肩关节周围炎效果显著，值得推广。 相似文献
34.
35.
目的：探讨采用针刀、手法、药物综合治疗冈下肌损伤。方法：在冈下窝找准2～3个痛点进针刀，刀口线与冈下肌纤维走向平行，深度达骨面，行纵行、横行剥离、粘连严重者作切开剥高，粘连广泛作通透剥离。术毕作患侧上肢外晨、内旋、上举、后伸、旋转、对肩等手法并辅以消炎镇痛舒筋活血中西药物后续治疗。结果：经1～3次治疗全部治愈。结论：针刀、手法、药物综合治疗冈下肌损伤治疗次数少，治愈率高，简单易行，适用基层推广使用。 相似文献
36.
目的：探讨针灸推拿治疗腰椎间盘突出临床效果。方法整群选取该院2013年1月—2015年1月对收治的164例腰椎间盘突出症患者治疗方法进行回顾性分析,随机分为2组各82例,观察组采用针灸推拿治疗,对照组采用单纯推拿治疗,比较两组疗效。结果观察组总有效率为95.3%,症状平均消失时间为（12.6±2.1）d,对照组总有效率为76.8%,症状平均消失时间为（23.4±3.5）d,两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论针灸推拿是治疗腰椎间盘突出症的有效方法,值得临床应用。 相似文献
37.
38.
Background
Massage is a common treatment in complementary and integrative medicine. Deep tissue massage, a form of therapeutic massage, has become more and more popular in recent years. Hence, the use of massage generally and deep tissue massage specifically, should be evaluated as any other modality of therapy to establish its efficacy and safety.Aim
To determine the definitions used for deep tissue massage in the scientific literature and to review the current scientific evidence for its efficacy and safety.Methods
Narrative review.Results
There is no commonly accepted definition of deep tissue massage in the literature. The definition most frequently used is the intention of the therapist. We suggest separating the definitions of deep massage and deep tissue massage as follows: deep massage should be used to describe the intention of the therapist to treat deep tissue by using any form of massage and deep tissue massage should be used to describe a specific and independent method of massage therapy, utilizing the specific set of principles and techniques as defined by Riggs: “The understanding of the layers of the body, and the ability to work with tissue in these layers to relax, lengthen, and release holding patterns in the most effective and energy efficient way possible within the client's parameters of comfort”.Heterogeneity of techniques and protocols used in published studies have made it difficult to draw any clear conclusions. Favorable outcomes may result from deep tissue massage in pain populations and patients with decreased range of motion. In addition, several rare serious adverse events were found related to deep tissue massage, probably as a result of the forceful application of massage therapy.Conclusions
Future research of deep tissue massage should be based on a common definition, classification system and the use of common comparators as controls. 相似文献39.
Zhuomao Mo Renwen Zhang Jinfeng Chen Xinnong Shu Tang Shujie 《Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics》2018,41(9):771-779
Objective
The purpose of this review was to compare oblique pulling spinal manipulation with other treatments for lumbar disc herniation.Methods
Randomized controlled trials of oblique pulling manipulation versus other treatment for lumbar disc herniation were identified using the following databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Biological Medicine, and Web of Science. Data extraction was carried out based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and meta-analysis were performed using RevMan 5.3 software.Results
Nine relevant randomized controlled trials with a total of 887 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that oblique pulling manipulation was superior in effective rate to lumbar traction (risk ratio = 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.19; P < .01) and acupuncture (risk ratio = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.06-1.39; P < .01) and more effective in Visual Analog Scale score (mean difference = - 1.03, 95% CI: -1.32 to -0.74; P < .01) when compared to lumbar traction. It also demonstrated a favorable effect of modified oblique pulling manipulation in Japanese Orthopedic Association scores when compared with lumbar traction (mean difference = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.89 to 2.43; P < .01).Conclusion
In the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, oblique pulling spinal manipulation presented with a higher effective rate than acupuncture and lumbar traction. Manipulation had a favorable effect in alleviating pain, and modified oblique pulling manipulation had significant superiority in improving lumbar function when compared with lumbar traction. However, considering the low methodological quality of included studies, more rigorously designed trials should be performed in the future. 相似文献40.