Postoperative long-term evaluation of interposition reconstruction compared with Roux-en-Y after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer: prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

The postoperative clinical superiority of the interposition of jejunum reconstruction (INT) to Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RY) after total gastrectomy has not been clarified. Postoperative quality of life (QOL) was evaluated between the 2 methods by a multi-institutional prospective randomized trial.

Methods

A total of 103 patients with gastric cancer were prospectively randomly divided into groups for RY (n = 51) or INT reconstruction (n = 52) after total gastrectomy. They were stratified by sex, age, institute, histology, and degree of lymph node dissection. Postoperatively, body mass index (BMI) and nutritional conditions were measured serially, and QOL and postoperative squalor scores were evaluated at 3, 12, and 60 months and compared between the 2 groups.

Results

After removing patients who did not complete the follow-up survey or censured cases, 24 patients in the RY group and 18 patients in the INT group were clinically available and their postoperative status was assessed. QOL scores were increased and complication scores were improved in the postoperative periods (P < .01). Postoperative BMI significantly deteriorated compared with preoperative BMI in each group. The postoperative QOL and complication scores at 60 months after surgery were significantly better than those at 3 months after surgery in each group (P < .01). However, there was no significant difference of QOL scores and postoperative complication scores between the 2 reconstruction groups. The nutritional condition in the INT group was nearly the same as that in the RY group.

Conclusions

Although our patient sample was small and patients who did not complete the follow-up survey were present, we could not identify any clinical difference between INT and RY after total gastrectomy 60 months after surgery. The safer and simpler RY method may be a more suitable reconstruction method than INT after total gastrectomy.     

Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y Reconstruction After Distal Gastrectomy Based on an Assessment of Biliary Kinetics

Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency of Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RY) after distal gastrectomy we compared postoperative physiological functions and disorders among patients who underwent RY, conventional Billroth I reconstruction (BI), or Billroth II reconstruction (BII). Methods: The subjects were 91 patients who had undergone distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer more than 1 month earlier. To examine the severity of gastroesophageal reflux, acid reflux and alkali reflux were assessed, and to examine the severity of duodenal reflux into the remnant stomach, biliary scintigraphy was performed. The degree of inflammation in the esophagus and remnant stomach was examined by endoscopy. Questionnaires on postoperative complaints were sent out to the patients to determine how serious their reflux symptoms were. Results: Both acid and alkali reflux were mild in the RY group. Biliary reflux into the remnant stomach, as assessed by biliary scintigraphy, was significantly less severe in the RY group than in the BI and BII groups. Endoscopy showed that inflammation of the lower esophagus and remnant stomach was much less severe in the RY group than in the BI and BII groups. According to the questionnaire survey, none of the patients in the RY group reported any reflux symptoms. Conclusions: In this series, RY was found to be a superior reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy since it was rarely accompanied by the reflux of duodenal juice into the remnant stomach or gastric reflux into the lower esophagus. Received: May 9, 2001 / Accepted: January 8, 2002 Reprint requests to: K. Shinoto     

Extreme dilatation of the interposed jejunal pouch after proximal gastrectomy associated with portal venous gas: A case report

IntroductionThe jejunal pouch interposition (JPI) after proximal gastrectomy (PG) was proposed as a reconstructive procedure to provide a gastric reservoir substitute and prevent postgastrectomy syndrome. However, food residue remaining in some of the pouches resulted in the adverse effect of abdominal bloating, thereby body weight loss. Here, we report a rare case with an extreme dilation of the interposed jejunal pouch (JP) 8 years after PG, requiring pouch resection.Presentation of caseA 65-year-old-man who had undergone PG with an inverted U-shaped JPI for early gastric cancer 8 years previously, suffered from shock after right hip joint implantation. Abdominal enhanced CT scan revealed an extremely dilated JP accompanied by portal venous gas. After 5 months of conservative therapy, he underwent resection of the JP and gastric remnant with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy reconstruction. After the operation, the patient has remained in good health for over 3 years.Discussion and conclusionLong-term operative outcome following pouch operation for gastric cancer still remains controversial. Surgical intervention should be considered when we encounter patients who have refractory pouch dilatation after surgery for gastric cancer.     

���ÿճ���θ��Roux-en-Y�ǺϷ��������ؽ��Բ�����������Ӱ����о�

目的评估全胃切除术后,间置空肠代胃术(jejunalpouchreconstruction,JIP)和RouxenY吻合法消化道重建对病人生存质量的影响,以选择最佳的重建方法。方法回顾性分析1990年1月至2002年10月168例病人行全胃切除术后,分别行JIP和RouxenY吻合消化道重建病人术后1年的进食量、体重、血浆营养参数变化、代胃肠管的储存及排空功能、食管下段胆酸及pH值等术后生存质量指标。结果JIP组间置空肠扩张,术后营养状态及生存质量优于RouxenY吻合组,且消化道不良症状及胆汁反流发生率明显低于后者。结论全胃切除后,采用间置空肠消化道重建简单易行,并可明显提高病人术后的生活质量。     

Improved quality of life with jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that the effect of jejunal pouch reconstruction is satisfactory for reservoir function in several randomized control studies. However, these studies were performed in patients with advanced gastric cancer, where significant numbers of the patients died of disease recurrence. In order to exclude the influence of disease recurrence, we performed jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer in a randomized controlled study and investigated whether or not an improved quality of life (QOL) was observed with jejunal pouch reconstruction. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients receiving total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer were prospectively divided into the Roux-en-Y reconstruction group without pouch (RY group) or the jejunal pouch reconstruction group (pouch group). Body weight, eating capacity, QOL assessment by gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS), nutritional parameters, endoscopical examination, 24-hour pH monitoring and Bilitec monitoring were evaluated at 3, 12, and 48 months after surgery. RESULTS: Jejunal pouch reconstruction provided the better QOL than Roux-en-Y reconstruction without pouch both at short-term and long-term periods in a randomized control study. Moreover, as a new finding, pouch reconstruction provided less bile reflux into the esophagus compared with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Jejunal pouch reconstruction provided improvement of QOL in patients receiving total gastrectomy.     

Esophagogastrostomy Plus Gastrojejunostomy: A Novel Reconstruction Procedure after Curative Resection for Proximal Gastric Cancer

Objective

The choice of surgical strategy for patients with proximal gastric cancer remains controversial. In this study, we recommend that a new reconstruction procedure be performed following proximal gastrectomy.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study involving 71 patients who underwent gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer. Clinicopathological features, postoperative complications, nutritional status, and overall survival (OS) rate were compared among three different reconstruction approaches.

Results

There were 34 cases of proximal gastrectomy followed by esophagogastrostomy reconstruction (EG), 16 cases of total gastrectomy and Roux-en Y reconstruction (RY) and 21 cases of proximal gastrectomy followed by esophagogastrostomy plus gastrojejunostomy reconstruction (EGJ). Though the clinicopathological features, the nutritional status and OS rate were similar among the three groups of patients, the incidence of reflux esophagitis was significantly higher in the EG group (35.3 %) than the RY (6.2 %) and EGJ (9.6 %) groups(P?<?0.05). Few EGJ patients suffered from either reflux esophagitis or anastomotic stenosis.

Conclusions

The EGJ reconstruction method helps to resolve the syndrome of reflux esophagitis. Our data indicates that it is a simple, safe, and effective reconstruction procedure for PGC.     

Ideal Reconstruction after Total Gastrectomy by the Interposition of a Jejunal Pouch Considered by Emptying Time

To establish the ideal form of the pouch for jejunal pouch interposition reconstruction (JPI) after total gastrectomy, the postoperative gastrointestinal function and symptoms were investigated in comparison with jejunal interposition reconstruction (JI). A total of 20 patients who underwent curative surgery for gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. In the JI group (n = 9), an isoperistaltic jejunum about 40 cm in length was interposed between the esophagus and the duodenum. In the JPI group (n = 11), a proximal pouch about 15 cm in length with a 10-cm conduit was also interposed between the esophagus and the duodenum. At follow-up 6 months postoperatively, food transit was evaluated using a radiolabeled semisolid test meal. The half-emptying time was 6.9 minutes in the JI group and 46 minutes in the JPI group. The reservoir function influenced the recovery of the patients body weight and development of the serum total protein in the early postoperative period. An early half-emptying time caused dumping symptoms in JI group. In the JPI group, there were no dumping symptoms; however, extended food clearance of pouch causes postprandial symptoms such as reflux (1 patient), vomiting (2 patients), and discomfort (2 patients). In those patients with symptoms, half-emptying times were longer than 60 minutes. There was a statistically significant correlation between the pouch length and the half-emptying time of the gastric substitute in JPI group (p = 0.0039, r = 0.789). If we estimate that the appropriate half-emptying time is 20 to 60 minutes, correlation of the pouch length and the half-emptying time shows that the ideal pouch length is about 12–15 cm in JPI. In jejunal pouch interposition reconstruction after total gastrectomy, an adequate procedure leads to nutritional advantage and prevents postoperative symptoms.     

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y Procedures after Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma

To determine the clinical efficacy of Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RY) after distal gastrectomy, we compared postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent RY or conventional Billroth I reconstruction (B-I). A total of 50 patients were prospectively randomized to either B-I or RY reconstruction, and complications, postoperative course, and nutritional status were compared. Bile reflux and inflammation in the remnant stomach and lower esophagus were evaluated by postoperative follow-up endoscopy at 6 months. Operative time and blood loss as well as postoperative nutrition did not show significant differences between the two groups. As anticipated, 5 of 24 patients with RY reconstruction developed gastrojejunal stasis in the early postoperative period, which led to a longer postoperative hospital stay as compared with the B-I group (mean ± S.D; B-I; 19.0 ± 6.2, RY; 31.8 ± 21.7 days) (P < 0.05). Endoscopic examination revealed that the frequency of bile reflux (P < 0.01) and degree of inflammation in the remnant stomach (P < 0.05) were less in the RY group than in the B-I group. However, inflammatory findings in the lower esophagus were observed in 7 (27%) of B-I, and 8 (35%) of the RY group, suggesting that late phase esophagitis was not improved in the RY group. Roux-en-Y reconstruction was effective in preventing duodenogastric reflux and resulting gastritis, but it did not prevent esophagitis. Because RY reconstruction induces the frequent complication of Roux-en-Y stasis, causing longer postoperative hospital stay, this method has limited advantages over B-I anastomosis after distal gastrectomy.     

胃癌切除后三种重建方式术后患者生活质量的比较

目的 探讨胃癌不同切除和重建方式对患者术后生活质量的影响。方法 随访我科4年间所行胃癌切除手术的患者，选择其中生存2年以上的61例（近端胃大部切除食管胃吻合13例、全胃切除空肠P型重建l8例、空肠双Braun重建30例）作为观察对象。通过对患者14项随访内容的反馈，对其生活质量进行评价。同时对l2例不同重建方式的患者，进行贮袋^99mTc核素排空功能检测。结果手术后6个月，各指标3组之间的差异无统计学意义；手术后12个月，双Braun重建比P型重建和食管胃吻合在进食时间（P〈0．05）、进食次数（P〈0．05）、体重（P〈0．01）方面有明显的优势；手术后24个月，双Braun重建在体重改善方面优于P型重建和食管胃吻合（P〈0．01）。食物在双Bmum重建的贮袋中存留的时间比其他2种重建方式延长（分别为P=0．001；P=0．002）。结论 全胃切除双Braun重建手术术后患者近期生活质量优于P型重建和食管胃吻合术；双Braun重建的贮袋具有良好的食物存储功能。     

Comparison of Billroth I and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction after Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: One-year Postoperative Effects Assessed by a Multi-institutional RCT

Purpose

This randomized, controlled trial evaluated the clinical efficacy of Billroth I (BI) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction at 1 year after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Methods

The primary end point was the amount of body weight lost at 1 postoperative year, and secondary end points included other items related to nutritional status such as serum albumin and lymphocyte count, as well as endoscopic examination findings of the remnant stomach and esophagus. Of the 332 patients enrolled, 163 were assigned to the BI group and 169 were randomized to the RY group.

Results

The loss in body weight 1 year after surgery did not differ significantly between the BI and RY groups (9.1 % and 9.7 %, respectively, p = 0.39). There were no significant differences in other aspects of nutritional status between the 2 groups. Endoscopic examination 1 year after gastrectomy showed reflux esophagitis in 26 patients (17 %) in the BI group versus 10 patients (6 %) in the RY group (p = 0.0037), while remnant gastritis was observed in 71 patients (46 %) in the BI group versus 44 patients (28 %) in the RY group (p = 0.0013); differences were significant for both conditions. Multivariable analysis showed that the only reconstruction was the independently associated factor with the incidence of reflux esophagitis.

Conclusions

RY reconstruction was not superior to BI in terms of body weight change or other aspects of nutritional status at 1 year after surgery, although RY more effectively prevented reflux esophagitis and remnant gastritis after distal gastrectomy.     

Quality of Life after Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: Controlled Study of Reconstructive Procedures

n = 64) eligible for curative gastric cancer surgery were randomized to have either a total ( n = 31) or subtotal ( n = 13) gastrectomy or a jejunal S-shaped pouch ( n = 20) implanted as a gastric substitute. The quality-of-life evaluation was based on a battery of questionnaires covering both general and specific aspects of life. The patients were rated by one of two psychiatrists who were blinded to the patients’ group affiliation. Assessments were made on three occasions: during the week prior to surgery and 3 and 12 months after the surgical intervention. The postoperative complication and mortality rates were similar in all treatment groups, with few serious complications recorded. Irrespective of type of treatment, the patients suffered from alimentary symptoms and functional limitations in everyday life, whereas their mental well-being improved after surgery. Patients who underwent subtotal gastrectomy had the best outcome, especially with respect to complaints of diarrhea. Patients given a gastric substitute after gastrectomy showed no difference from those who had only a total gastrectomy. We conclude that despite significant unfavorable consequences that follow gastrectomy, patients recover with an improved mental status. A pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy does not improve quality of life, but a subtotal gastrectomy has advantages that must be considered when the procedure is clinically feasible.     

Evaluation of salvage surgery for type 4 gastric cancer

Patients with type 4 gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis respond better to chemotherapy than surgery. In particular, patients without gastric stenosis who can consume a meal usually experience better quality of life (QOL). However, some patients with unsuccessful chemotherapy are unable to consume a meal because of gastric stenosis and obstruction. These patients ultimately require salvage surgery to enable them to consume food normally. We evaluated the outcomes of salvage total gastrectomy after chemotherapy in four patients with gastric stenosis. We determined clinical outcomes of four patients who underwent total gastrectomy as salvage surgery. Outcomes were time from chemotherapy to death and QOL, which was assessed using the Support Team Assessment Schedule-Japanese version (STAS-J). Three of the patients received combination chemotherapy [tegafur, gimestat and otastat potassium (TS-1); cisplatin]. Two of these patients underwent salvage chemotherapy after 12 and 4 mo of chemotherapy. Following surgery, they could consume food adequately and their STAS-J scores improved, so their treatments were continued. The third patient underwent salvage surgery after 7 mo of chemotherapy. This patient was unable to consume food adequately after surgery and developed surgical complications. His clinical outcomes at 3 mo were very poor. The fourth patient received combination chemotherapy (TS-1 and irinotecan hydrochloride) for 6 mo and then underwent received salvage surgery. After surgery, he could consume food adequately and his STAS-J score improved, so his treatment was continued. After the surgery, he enjoyed his life for 16 mo. Of four patients who received salvage total gastrectomy after unsuccessful chemotherapy, the QOL improved in three patients, but not in the other patient. Salvage surgery improves QOL in most patients, but some patients develop surgical complications that prevent improvements in QOL. If salvage surgery is indicated, the surgeon and/or oncologist must provide the patient with a clear explanation of the purpose of surgery, as well as the possible risks and benefits to allow the patient to reach an informed decision on whether to consent to the procedure.     

Medium- and Long-Term Results of Jejunal Pouch Reconstruction After a Total and Proximal Gastrectomy

Purpose We developed several kinds of jejunal (J)-pouch reconstruction after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the advantages of these methods. Methods As for the treatment of malignant gastric diseases at stage II or earlier, we employed the J-pouch reconstruction (Roux-en-Y method: JPRY, or J-pouch interposing: JPI) following a total gastrectomy. We also used JPI after a proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach. Results Out of a total of 80 patients, JPRY was performed in 40 patients and JPI in 40. No anastomotic leaks were associated with the use of an automatic stapler. The stapler (Endo GIA; U.S. Surgical, Norwalk, CT, USA) with a 60-mm-long white cartridge minimized bleeding from the anastomotic site and reduced the operative time. While two patients died of recurrence, all other patients are alive and well for a maximum of 15 years after surgery. The motility of the J pouch was satisfactory after both surgical procedures, as measured by the bile regurgitation test or the transit test employing radiopaque markers. The mean percentage of the radiopaque markers eliminated from the J pouch 1 h after breakfast was 7.5% in the JPRY group and 0%–33% in the JPI group. After another hour, the corresponding percentage was 19.5% in the JPRY group and 14%–60% in the JPI group. Conclusion Our procedures for J-pouch reconstruction are considered to result in a favorable postoperative quality of life and prognosis. J-pouch reconstruction is therefore advantageous in terms of operative morbidity, postoperative clinical signs, symptoms, and dietary status.     

Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis

Background

Various methods of reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) have been developed and published, whereas only a limited number of reports are available on the utility of the delta-shaped anastomosis (Delta). This study compared Delta and Roux-en-Y anastomoses (RY), with the aim to clarify the utility of Delta.

Methods

Stage 1 gastric cancer patients who had undergone LDG with Delta (group D, n = 68) and those who had undergone LDG with RY (group RY, n = 60) were compared in terms of operative outcomes, postoperative clinical symptoms, gastrointestinal fiberscopic findings, and changes in body weight.

Results

Both the operative and anastomotic times were significantly shorter in group D (230 and 13 min, respectively) than in group RY (258 and 38 min, respectively) (p < 0.001). Among the complications observed at the anastomotic site, obstruction was seen in one group D patient and two group RY patients but was relieved with conservative management. Postoperative clinical symptoms were reported for 26.4 % of the group D patients but had decreased to 5.9 % 1 year later. Group RY yielded similar results. Upper gastrointestinal fiberscopy performed 1 year postoperatively showed no intergroup differences in the incidence of gastritis or residual retention and a significantly more frequent occurrence of bile reflux in group D. Postoperative weight changes did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusions

Delta reconstruction after LDG is a safe and effective procedure that is totally laparoscopic, less time consuming, and associated with a favorable postoperative course and a better quality of life.     

A 5?Year Analysis of Readmissions after Radical Subtotal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer

Background

Many patients and surgeons have become interested in the quality of life after surgery for early gastric cancer. However, no reports on readmission rates for gastrectomy patients have been published, even if readmission greatly affects the patient??s quality of life.

Methods

In 530 consecutive early gastric cancer patients who underwent radical subtotal gastrectomy, we determined the incidence, cause, timing, type of treatment, and risk factors for readmission after discharge, and compared the readmission and nonreadmission groups with respect to clinicopathologic features and postoperative outcomes.

Results

Overall, the 5?year and 1?month readmission rates after radical subtotal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer were 13.0% (69 of 530) and 7.5% (40 of 530), respectively. The most common cause for readmission was delayed gastric emptying (17 cases). Among a total of 82 readmissions, 34 patients (41.5%) were readmitted within 2?weeks of surgery. The type of treatment for 82 readmissions included 55 conservative therapies, 15 radiologic or endoscopic interventions, and 12 repeat laparotomies. No significant differences were detected in the clinicopathologic feature and postoperative outcomes between the two groups. The initial hospital stay remained significantly associated with readmission based on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Readmission rate at 1?month after radical subtotal gastrectomy is lower than that after major bowel surgery. Unusual postoperative recovery in a patient with vague symptoms should be managed with greater care before discharge. After subtotal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer, prevention of readmission can improve the patient??s quality of life.     

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a case-control study

Background

The aim of this study was to clarify the technical feasibility and oncological efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) for gastric cancer compared with open gastrectomy (OG).

Methods

Between April 2002 and March 2008, a series of 623 patients with gastric cancer underwent R0 gastrectomy (314 LAG patients and 309 OG patients). Age, gender, lymph node dissection, and pathological stage were matched by propensity scoring, and 212 patients (106 LAG and 106 OG) were selected for analysis after the exclusion of 40 patients who had proximal gastrectomy. Intraoperative factors, postoperative morbidity, long-term quality of life (QOL), and survival were evaluated. Moreover, these outcomes were also compared between the laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) and the open total gastrectomy (OTG).

Results

There was no significant difference in preoperative characteristics between the two patient groups. Regarding intraoperative characteristics, blood loss was significantly lower in the LAG group (143?ml) than in the OG group (288?ml), while operation time was significantly longer in the LAG group (273?min) than the OG group (231?min). The degree of lymph node dissection and number of retrieved lymph nodes did not differ between the two groups. There were no significant differences in postoperative courses or overall and disease-specific survival (89.8% vs. 83.6%, P?=?0.0886; 100% vs. 95.2%, P?=?0.1073) except time to first flatus and time to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory derivatives between the two groups. Significantly fewer patients felt wound pain in the LAG group 1?year after surgery. Analyses between the LATG and OTG groups showed similar results.

Conclusions

LAG for gastric cancer may be both feasible and safe. However, it will be necessary to conduct a well-designed randomized controlled trial comparing short-term and long-term outcomes between LAG and OG in a larger number of patients.     

近端胃切除术与全胃切除术对食管胃结合部腺癌患者生活质量的影响

目的探索食管胃结合部腺癌（AEG）患者行经腹近端胃切除与全胃切除术后生活质量的差异。方法选择2011年1月至2012年3月期间于四川大学华西医院胃肠外科中心行经腹近端胃切除术（近端胃切除组）或全胃切除术（全胃切除组）的85例AEG患者作为研究对象,于术后12个月,采用生活质量核心问卷30（QLQ-C30）和胃癌特异性评价量表（QLQ-ST022）测量其生活质量,并进行组间比较。结果2组患者的年龄、性别等临床病理特征的差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）,具有可比性。近端胃切除组患者在饮食受限、腹泻及气促方面的得分低于全胃切除组（P〈0．05）,而在味觉改变和反流方面的得分高于全胃切除组患者（P〈0．05）。2组患者的其他项目得分比较差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型AEG患者行近端胃切除＋管状胃重建和全胃切除＋Roux—en-Y吻合术后都有不同程度的并发症发生。近端胃切除术在饮食受限、腹泻以及气促方面的效果更优;而全胃切除术在反流和味觉改变方面的效果更优。     

Comparison of effects of six main gastrectomy procedures on patients’ quality of life assessed by Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45

BACKGROUNDThe effects of various gastrectomy procedures on the patient’s quality of life (QOL) are not well understood. Thus, this nationwide multi-institutional cross-sectional study using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45), a well-established questionnaire designed to clarify the severity and characteristics of the postgastrectomy syndrome, was conducted.AIMTo compare the effects of six main gastrectomy procedures on the postoperative QOL.METHODSEligible questionnaires retrieved from 2368 patients who underwent either of six gastrectomy procedures [total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (TGRY; n = 393), proximal gastrectomy (PG; n = 193), distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (DGRY; n = 475), distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction (DGBI; n = 909), pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG; n = 313), and local resection of the stomach (LR; n = 85)] were analyzed. Among the 19 main outcome measures of PGSAS-45, the severity and characteristics of postgastrectomy syndrome were compared for the aforementioned six gastrectomy procedures using analysis of means.RESULTSTGRY and PG significantly impaired the QOL of postoperative patients. Postoperative QOL was excellent in LR (cardia and pylorus were preserved with minimal resection). In procedures removing the distal stomach, diarrhea subscale (SS) and dumping SS were less frequent in PPG than in DGBI and DGRY. However, there was no difference in the postoperative QOL between DGBI and DGRY. The most noticeable adverse effects caused by gastrectomy were meal-related distress SS, dissatisfaction at the meal, and weight loss, with significant differences among the surgical procedures.CONCLUSIONPostoperative QOL greatly differed among six gastrectomy procedures. The severity and characteristics of postgastrectomy syndrome should be considered to select gastrectomy procedures, overcome surgical shortcomings, and enhance postoperative care.     

Long-term Outcome after Proximal Gastrectomy with Jejunal Interposition for Gastric Cancer Compared with Total Gastrectomy

Background

Proximal gastrectomy (PG) has been widely accepted as treatment for early gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach. Reconstruction by jejunal interposition has been known to reduce reflux esophagitis for PG patients. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent PG with jejunal interposition with those treated by total gastrectomy (TG).

Methods

Data on 102 cases of PG with jejunal interposition and 49 cases of TG with Roux-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer were analyzed retrospectively in terms of overall survival, weight maintenance, anemia and nutritional status, and endoscopic findings.

Results

Median follow-up time was 59 months in the both groups. There was no significant difference in the overall 5-year survival rate between the PG group (94 %) and the TG group (84 %). The PG group showed significantly better body weight maintenance at the first year. The laboratory blood tests showed that the PG group had a significantly better red blood cell count and hemoglobin and hematocrit levels at the second and third year. However, postoperative endoscopic surveillance detected reflux esophagitis (3 %), peptic ulcer (9 %), and metachronous gastric cancer (5 %) in the PG group.

Conclusions

Proximal gastrectomy maintains comparable oncological radicality to TG and is preferred over TG in terms of preventing postoperative anemia. However, periodic endoscopic follow-up is necessary to monitor the upper gastrointestinal tract.     

不同胃癌根治性切除术及重建术式临床效果分析

目的：探讨不同近端胃癌根治性切除术及重建术式的临床效果与术后生存情况。方法：分析2006年1月—2011年10月82例行近端胃癌根治切除术患者资料,其中22例行近端胃切除术后食管残胃吻合重建（食管胃吻合组）,40例行全胃切除术后Roux-en-Y食管空肠吻合重建（食管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合组）,20例行近端胃切除术后功能性空肠间置重建（空肠间置组）,比较三组患者手术指标、术后并发症、营养状态以及术后生存率。结果：食管胃吻合组手术时间、出血量均明显少于另两组（均P<0.05）;食管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合组淋巴结清扫数明显多于另两组,但营养指标方面不如另两组（均P<0.05）;三组并发症总发生率均无统计学差异（P>0.05）,但食管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合组腹泻、倾倒综合征发生率明显高于另两组（均P<0.05）;三组患者1、3年生存率差异均无统计学意义（χ2=0.891,P=0.554;χ2=0.419,P=0.831）。结论：三种近端胃癌手术生存率相似,近端胃切除术加食管残胃吻合创伤性小,近端胃切除术加功能性空肠间置术后生活质量更高,临床应根据患者实际情况选择方案。