经脐单套管三通道与经脐腹壁内三通道单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比研究

目的:探讨经脐腹壁内三通道单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)的手术经验及临床价值。方法:回顾分析2010年6月至2011年12月为11例患者行经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床资料。11例患者分别行经脐单套管三通道单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(对照组)及经脐腹壁内三通道单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(改良组)。对比分析两组患者手术时间、手术并发症、术后24 h使用镇痛剂例数及术后住院时间等。结果:11例手术均获成功,无并发症发生,均于4 d出院。两组患者术后住院时间及使用镇痛剂例数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组手术时间95～145 min,平均(120.25±18.95)min;改良组手术时间40～70 min,平均(55.71±9.74)min;两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:经脐单套管三通道单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术器械平行置入,前端狭小术野内腹腔镜、抓钳及主操作器械运动时相互干扰,难以相互配合,多顾此失彼,且易漏气,造成手术困难、时间延长。经脐腹壁内三通道单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术器械间的距离相对增加,相互干扰减少,操作空间亦相对增加,腹壁组织相对柔软,操作较灵活、漏气少,安全可行。相对传统LC而言,单孔手术操作困难,对术者技术要求较高;但术后腹壁无明显可见疤痕,美容效果极佳,具有临床推广价值。     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术68例临床体会

目的:探讨总结经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy,SILC)的可行性、临床疗效及应用价值。方法:回顾分析2011年7月至2014年8月为68例良性胆囊疾病患者行SILC的临床资料,其中胆囊结石45例,胆囊息肉23例。结果:68例患者中64例成功完成手术,4例因胆囊三角暴露不清改为传统四孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术。无一例中转开腹。手术时间30~135 min,平均(57.6±18.5)min;术中出血量5~40 ml,平均(10.0±2.7)ml;术后住院2~3 d,平均(2.3±0.2)d。术后均未出现出血、胆漏等并发症发生。结论:在严格掌握适应证的基础上行SILC是安全、可靠的。SILC具有患者创伤小、术后康复快、美容效果佳等优点,更加符合微创手术的目的,满足了患者的心理需求,具有广阔的应用前景。     

急性胆囊炎单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜手术的对比研究

目的:探讨"三点法"经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy,SILC)治疗急性胆囊炎的可行性。方法:回顾分析2016年3月至2017年3月因急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)(LC组,n=46)与SILC(SILC组,n=38)患者的临床资料,比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术中置管率及留置时间、术后6 h疼痛指数、术后体温变化、术后切口感染及脂肪液化率、肠蠕动恢复时间、术后住院时间、手术相关并发症等指标。结果:SILC组中32例成功完成手术,LC组中44例成功完成手术,术后两组均发生1例胆漏。两组术后留置腹腔引流管率及置管时间、术后体温大于37.5℃的患者例数差异无统计学意义。LC组手术时间优于SILC组(P0.05),SILC组术后疼痛评分、肠道蠕动恢复时间、术后切口感染及脂肪液化率、术后住院时间优于LC组(P0.05)。结论:急性胆囊炎发作时间小于72 h者可作为SILC的手术适应证。与LC相比,SILC具有创伤小、美容效果好、术后康复快及住院时间短等优点。     

微型腹腔镜行胆囊切除术的临床应用价值

目的:探讨微型腹腔镜行胆囊切除(MLC)术的难度及对患者的影响。方法:随机把60例胆囊结石、慢性胆囊炎、胆囊息肉患者分为腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)组和微型腹腔镜胆囊切除术(MLC)组各30例。对比其手术时间、术后疼痛程度及术后住院天数。结果:MLC组手术时间平均75±23min,术后平均住院3.5±1.6d,用视觉模拟评分法测定疼痛程度,术后8h和24h分别为8.8±5.6分和4.0±3.0分。LC组手术时间平均70±15min,术后平均住院4.6±2.5d。术后8h和24h疼痛程度分别为30.5±10.7和11.5±6.6。结论:MLC的切口疼痛程度显著低于LC(P<0.05),更有效地减少了患者痛苦,体现了微创优势,腹壁外观改善。MLC难度不比LC大。     

完全经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术17例报告

目的:探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)的应用价值,并总结手术经验。方法:回顾分析2011年7～12月有选择性地为17例患者行经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床资料,纵行切开脐部,经三通道套管置入可弯曲及常规腹腔镜器械切除胆囊,术后恢复脐孔形态。结果:17例手术均获成功。手术时间40～100 min,平均75 min。无并发症发生。术后平均3 d出院,脐部瘢痕隐蔽。患者对治疗及美容效果满意。结论:经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全可行,但较传统LC操作困难,对术者技术要求较高。术后腹壁无疤痕,美容效果极好,具有临床推广价值。     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术

目的:探讨采用标准多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术分离与显露技术施行经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy,SILC)的安全性、可行性及应用价值.方法:回顾分析为20例慢性结石性胆囊炎患者施行SILC的临床资料.通过脐部1.8...     

完全经脐单孔与三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比研究

目的:对比分析经脐单孔与三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)的手术方法及临床效果,探讨单孔法LC的应用价值。方法:回顾分析105例LC患者的临床资料,其中40例行单孔法LC6,5例行三孔法LC。结果:38例顺利完成经脐单孔LC,手术时间40～96 min,平均57.7 min;2例中转三孔法LC(归入三孔法)。均无并发症发生。两组患者在手术时间、取胆囊时间、术后满意度与疼痛程度方面均有显著差异(P<0.05),术中出血、术后下床活动时间、术后进食时间、住院时间、住院费用及术后并发症方面两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:选择合适的病例,单孔法LC是安全可行的,可取得满意疗效。     

胆囊结石并肝硬化患者行腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术的对比研究

目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)治疗胆囊结石合并肝硬化患者的优点、可行性和疗效。方法:胆囊结石合并肝硬化患者72例,随机分成LC组39例和开腹胆囊切除术(open cholecystectomy,OC)组33例,同组按编号、年龄、性别、肝功能分级等收集和分析数据。结果:LC组和OC组平均手术时间分别为(56.0±4.1)min和(70.8±5.2)min(P<0.05),术中平均出血量分别为(97.7±4.03)ml和(133.9±8.64)ml(P<0.05),平均住院时间分别为(6.2±1.9)d和(9.11±2.3)d(P<0.05),手术并发症发生率分别为10.2%(4例)和27.3%(9例)(P<0.05)。结论:胆囊结石合并肝硬化的患者用LC治疗优势明显,与OC相比更加安全可靠。     

单切口与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机对比研究

目的:对比分析单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy,SILC)与传统四孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)的近期疗效。方法:2011年6月至8月将40例胆囊结石和胆囊息肉患者随机分为SILC组(n=20)和LC组(n=20)。对比分析两组患者一般资料、手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、并发症、切口长度、疼痛程度和C反应蛋白量(C-reactive protein,CRP)。结果:两组患者年龄、性别、ASA分期、体重指数和术前CRP无明显差别,手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、并发症、术后CRP差异无统计学意义,但SILC组切口更小,术后疼痛更轻微。结论:适当把握手术适应证,SILC安全可行,具有切口长度小、术后疼痛轻等优点。     

经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发症的预防

目的:探讨预防经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)并发症发生的措施。方法:总结分析100例单孔LC患者的临床资料。结果:本组患者均完成经脐单孔腹腔镜手术,手术时间15～60min,平均25min,创面出血0～5ml,术后患者痛苦轻,康复快,无并发症发生,术后3～5d出院。结论:经脐单孔LC操作易掌握,但技术难度较大,能取得更加微创及美容的效果,值得临床推广。     

2mm无鞘针形器械在隐瘢痕腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用:一种无瘢痕手术新思路

目的:探讨隐瘢痕腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术方法及应用价值。方法:选择2011年1月至2011年6月60例无严重胆囊炎症的胆囊息肉或胆囊结石患者,随机分为2组,新方法组行隐瘢痕腹腔镜胆囊切除术,单孔组行常规单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,对比分析两组患者手术时间、术后切口疼痛程度、术后切口满意程度及中转率。结果:新方法组均顺利完成手术;单孔组28例顺利完成手术,2例中转常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术。新方法组与单孔组手术时间平均(14.17±3.51)min和(24.67±4.12)min,新方法组明显优于单孔组(P<0.01);术后切口疼痛程度轻于单孔组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后患者对切口满意程度优于单孔组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组均无出血、胆漏、胆管损伤等并发症发生。结论:隐瘢痕腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全、可行,术后瘢痕不明显且隐蔽,相对单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,手术时间缩短,手术难度及中转率降低,术后患者切口满意度高,为腹腔镜手术的更微创化发展提供了新的可行途径及思路。     

单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的病例对照研究

目的回顾性分析单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术（SILC）与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）的优劣性。方法19例SILC及46例LC患者的临床资料,比较两者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症、中转率、术后疼痛、住院时间、切口长度的差异。结果SILC手术耗时（49．00±8．34）min长于LC（P=0．000）。术中出血量差异无统计学意义。两组均无中转、术后无并发症;SILC与Lc术后患者第一天疼痛评分、术后第三天疼痛评分、总疼痛天数差异均无统计学意义。两者住院时间差异无统计学意义。SILC切口长度（22．5±3．5）mm短于LC切口长度（P=0．000）。结论SILC总切口长度短于LC总切口长度,切口效果更美观。SILC能安全地用于单纯胆囊结石、胆囊息肉。同时对于没有严重合并症和腹部手术史的胆囊疾病患者SILC也是一种理想的手术选择。     

经脐单孔腹腔镜下胆囊切除术应用体会（附80例报告）

目的了解胆囊良性疾病行经脐单孔腹腔镜下胆囊切除术（SILC）的学习曲线。方法80例胆囊良性疾病患者按常规手术步骤行SILC,记录并分析围手术期相关资料,以手术时间定义学习曲线。结果80例患者成功接受SILC,其中胆囊结石56例,胆固醇性息肉16例,腺瘤性息肉3例,胆囊腺肌症1例和胆囊复杂病例4例,无患者中转为传统腹腔镜下胆囊切除术或开放手术。平均手术时间为（46．9±14．6）min,平均术后住院时间为（1．8±1．3）d。无围手术期并发症。学习曲线显示有经验的腹腔镜医师需要积累40例左右的手术经验才能度过学习期。结论SILC对于有经验的外科医生是一个简单而安全的手术,对于患者具有疼痛更轻微、更低的戳孔并发症、更好的美观度及更快的恢复等优点。SILC可能会成为良性胆囊疾病的另一种手术选择。     

单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术对缺血修饰白蛋白水平的影响

目的:评估单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术对缺血修饰白蛋白水平的影响。方法:对140例良性胆囊病变患者进行前瞻性研究,其中42例行单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术,98例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,两组均按标准麻醉方案施术。分别于术前、术后45 min、术后24 h分析患者血清缺血修饰白蛋白水平。结果:两组手术时间分别为(36.2±12.1)min与(44.2±14.1)min,两组患者手术时间、中转率、术后45 min、术后24 h缺血修饰白蛋白水平差异无统计学意义。手术时间延长(>30 min)时,可导致患者缺血修饰白蛋白水平的早期增加。结论:单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术是良性胆囊疾病有效、安全的手术方法。手术时间延长可能增加组织缺血,但其与胆囊切除术操作本身无关。     

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy--initial experience with different multichannel ports

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a relatively new minimally invasive surgical technique in treatment of benign gallbladder diseases. It is considered a bridge technique between conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and NOTES. We are presenting our initial experiences in SILC (single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Seventeen patients underwent SILC (11 women and 6 men) with an average age of 43 years. Mean BMI score was 29,4 kg/m2. The mean operative time was 93,5 minutes. There were conversions to conventional LC in two cases (11,6%). Average pain score measured on visual-analogue scale (VAS) 8 h after the operation was 2,00. All patients expressed satisfaction with achieved cosmetic effect. We conclude that SILC is safe and feasible procedure, with excellent cosmetic effect, but further prospective studies are required before SILC can be generally accepted.     

Learning Curve of Transumbilical Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILS): A Preliminary Study of 80 Selected Patients with Benign Gallbladder Diseases

Background

Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new laparoscopic procedure in which only one transumbilical incision is made, demonstrated as a scarless procedure. Here we report a single-center preliminary experience of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) in the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases, defining a single surgeon’s learning curve.

Methods

A total of 80 patients underwent SILC successfully by a single experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The operation was performed following the routine LC procedure. Then the perioperative demographics were recorded and the operative time was used to define the learning curve.

Results

The study group included 27 male and 53 female patients with gallstones (56 cases), cholesterol polyps (16 cases), an adenomatous polyp (3 cases), adenomyomatosis (1 case), or complex diseases (4 cases), and all consented to undergo SILC. No patient was converted to normal LC or open surgery. There were no perioperative port-related or surgical complications. The average operative time was 46.9 ± 14.6 min. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.8 ± 1.3 days. The learning curve of the SILC procedures for this series of selected patients confirmed that SILC is a feasible, safe, and effective approach to the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases.

Conclusions

For experienced laparoscopic surgeons, SILC is an easy and safe procedure. Patients benefit from milder pain, a lower incidence of port-related complications, better cosmesis, and fast recovery. The SILC procedure may become another option for the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases for selected patients.     

Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

From November 2009 to August 2010, 51 patients with symptomatic gallstone or gallbladder polyps were randomized to SILC (n = 24) or 4-port LC (n = 27).

Results

Mean surgical time (43.5 vs 46.5 min), median blood loss (1 vs 1 mL) and mean hospital stay (1.5 vs 1.8 d) were similar for both the SILC and 4-port LC group. There were no open conversions and no major complications. The mean total wound length of the SILC group was significantly shorter (1.76 vs 2.25 cm). The median visual analogue pain score at 6 hours after surgery was similar (4.5 vs 4.0) but the SILC group had a significantly worse pain score on day 7 (1 vs 0). There was no difference in time to resume usual activity (mean, 5.6 vs 5.0 d). The median cosmetic score of SILC was significantly higher than at 3 months after surgery (7 vs 6).

Conclusions

SILC was feasible and safe for properly selected patients in experienced hands.     

单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜手术治疗小儿卵巢囊肿的对比研究

目的:比较经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统多孔腹腔镜小儿卵巢囊肿剥除术的临床疗效。方法:选取收治的48例卵巢囊肿剥除手术的患儿,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组24例,观察组行经脐单孔腹腔镜手术,对照组行传统多孔腹腔镜手术,对比两组患儿手术效果及美观满意度。结果:手术均顺利完成,两组患儿术后住院时间、术中出血量差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组与对照组手术时间平均为(26.8±7.2)min与(40.6±9.4)min(P0.05);术后排气时间平均(19.8±5.6)h与(25.7±6.9)h(P0.05);术后美容满意度评分为(4.2±0.8)分与(3.3±0.7)分(P0.05)。结论:单孔腹腔镜手术治疗小儿卵巢良性囊肿安全、可行,手术时间短,胃肠功能恢复快,并能达到更好的美容效果,值得临床推广。     

单切口免钛夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术

目的 探讨单切口免钛夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊良性疾病的可行性及安全性.方法 按患者意愿对1890例胆囊良性疾病患者中的1016例采用脐部单切口免钛夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术(单切口组),实际完成1001例,与同期完成的874例两孔法免钛夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者进行比较,采用t检验和x2比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后恢复等情况.结果 单切口组1016例仅15例因胆囊壶腹部炎症严重改为传统的四孔法切除,其余1001例均顺利完成单切口下LC术.两孔法组完成腹腔镜胆囊切除术874例.两组均无胆漏、胆道损伤及手术死亡等严重的手术并发症.单切口组与两孔法组的手术时间无差异[(34.5±5.2)min与(32.0±7.4)min,t=0.063,P=0.526]、术中出血量无差异[(56.5±17.8) ml与(55.2±15.9)ml,t=0.812,P=0.425]、术后住院时间无差异[(3.1±0.8)d与(3.2±O.7)d,t=1.073,P=0.326],而单切口组切口疼痛轻于两孔法组(P=0.000).结论 单切口免钛夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全性好,创伤更小,更美观.[关健词]胆囊切除术,腹腔镜;单切口;钛夹