非体外循环与常规冠状动脉旁路移植术后心肌酶的动态变化

目的通过观察非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)与常规冠状动脉旁路移植术(CCABG)患者术后心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)和肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)的动态变化,比较两种手术方式对心肌的损伤情况.方法102例不稳定型心绞痛患者,按不同的手术方式分为OPCAB组和CCABG组.OPCAB组:71例,行OPCAB;CCABG组:31例,行CCABG.两组分别于术前、术后4、12小时、1、3、5天测定cTnI和CK-MB.结果CCABG组行旁路血管移植2～5支(2.97±0.84支),OPCAB组1～5支(2.69±0.92支);两组均无围术期心肌梗死.两组术后早期cTnI和CK-MB均有升高,分别于术后5天和术后3天基本恢复至术前水平.术后4、12小时、术后1天OPCAB组cTnI值与CCABG组比较差别有显著性意义(P<0.01).结论有选择的施行OPCAB是一种安全和合理的手术方式,OPCAB的心肌损伤程度明显轻于CCABG.     

70岁以上病人非体外循环与常规冠状动脉旁路移植术比较

目的　探讨 70岁以上老年病人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 (OPCAB)的疗效。方法　比较 78例 70岁以上OPCAB和 32例 70岁以上常规体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CCABG)的临床资料。结果　两组术后桥通畅率均为 10 0 % ,OPCAB和CCABG两组平均住院时间 (9 2 5± 4 0 3)d对(13 18± 7 5 4)d ,平均ICU时间 (2 4 0± 8 5 )h对 (38 5± 2 5 5 )h ,房颤发生率为 8%对 15 %。结论　老年病人有选择的施行OPCAB是一种合理和安全的术式 ,如果可能的话应尽量考虑采用此术式。     

常规与非体外循环下冠状动脉3支病变旁路移植血管通畅性对比分析

目的　评价非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术 (OPCAB)与体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术 (CCABG)治疗冠状动脉三支病变术中旁路早期通畅性。方法　 6 0例 3支血管病变的病人分为OPCAB组和CCABG组 ,每组各 30例。行冠状动脉旁路移植术 ,OPCAB组胸骨正中切口 ,在非体外循环心脏不停跳下完成手术 ;CCABG组建立常规体外循环 ,心脏停跳下完成手术。术中应用即时血流测量技术对旁路血管进行流量测量。对比分析两组术前、术后的各项指标及各血管旁路流量、搏动指数和血流波形。结果　两组病人术前一般情况差异无统计学意义。OPCAB组与CCABG组移植旁路血管分别为 (3 6±0 6 )支与 (4 3± 0 9)支 (P <0 0 1) ;两组前降支及右冠状动脉旁路血流量、搏动指数差异无显著性。CCABG组回旋支序贯旁路和远端吻合口多 ,血流量较OPCAB组高。两组弥漫病变血管旁路血流量小。结论　OPCAB与CCABG治疗 3支病变 ,两组血管旁路早期通畅性差异无显著性。     

常规与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗冠状动脉多支病变的对比分析

目的　评价非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术 (OPCAB)与常规体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(CCABG)相比是否具有优越性。　方法　将 170例 2支以上血管病变行冠状动脉旁路移植术 (不包括瓣膜手术或室壁瘤切除等合并手术的病例 )患者分为 OPCAB组和 CCABG组 ,OPCAB组通过胸骨正中切口 ,在非体外循环心脏不停跳下完成冠状动脉旁路移植术 ;CCABG组建立常规体外循环 ,心脏停搏下完成冠状动脉旁路移植术。对两组病例的术前和术后各项指标进行对比分析。　结果　两组患者术前的一般情况无差异 ,OPCAB组与 CCABG组间曾行溶栓或经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术治疗和 3支病变的比例分别为 31.8%比 18.3%和 5 9%比 78% ,移植旁路血管分别为3.6± 0 .8支比 4.3± 1.0支 (P<0 .0 1) ,但所用的血管材料两组间无差异。OPCAB组术后呼吸机辅助时间和外科住院时间较短 ,住院费用较低 (P<0 .0 5 )。但术后并发症如二次开胸止血、伤口感染、心律失常、围术期心肌梗死、肺部并发症等的发生率 OPCAB组为 9.8% ,CCABG组为 14.6 % ;OPCAB组无手术死亡 ,CCABG组死亡 1例 (P>0 .0 5 )。　结论　 OPCAB治疗冠心病多支病变的初期结果显示可以减少患者术后辅助呼吸时间和外科住院时间 ,降低住院费用。但目前尚不能替代 CCABG,其近、远期效果仍     

冠状动脉旁路移植术非体外循环改为体外循环的原因

目的　分析非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植 (搭桥 )改为体外循环搭桥的原因和结果 ,以期提高手术成功率。方法　 2 0 0 0年 1月至 2 0 0 3年 12月 ,非体外循环搭桥 (OPCAB) 195 2例 ,2 9例 (1 4 .9% )围术期发生室颤 (5例 )、低血压 (2 4例 ) ,被迫改为体外循环下搭桥 (ONCAB)。 2 6例体外循环辅助下冠状动脉旁路移植术 ,其中 8例阻断升主动脉下搭桥 ;单纯辅助循环 3例。结果　 2 9例平均搭桥 (2. 9± 0. 6 )支。死亡 9例 (31. 0 3% )。术中血压≤ 80 / 4 .0mmHg(1mmHg =0 . 133kPa)者和大于此值者死亡率分别为4 7. 6 %和 8. 33% (P =0 .0 4 3) ;术中低血压持续时间 <15min者无死亡 ,≥ 15min死亡率 4 2 . 86 % (P =0 . 0 2 9)。死亡组病变血管均≥ 3支 ,且阻塞严重 ,女性死亡率高 ,死亡病例的术者行OPCAB例数均较少。结论　术中低血压的程度及持续时间与死亡密切相关。OPCAB术者经验少、病变血管 >3支者、冠脉阻塞程度严重者和女性的手术风险高 ,应严格掌握OPCAB适应证。OPCAB术中发生问题应及时处理。     

非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中转体外循环的经验与教训

目的总结分析非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)中转为体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(onpum p CABG)的原因及临床资料,以提高OPCAB的成功率。方法8例患者中转为on pum p CABG的原因为:2例术中发现心肌桥,处理时出血难以控制;6例因术中严重的低血压,其中3例是在搬动心脏时,另外3例在切开靶血管时。中转患者中2例在心脏不停跳下完成,其他均在低温体外循环下完成,体外循环时间为101.8±8.5 m in。结果8例中转患者中无住院死亡;1例发生轻度的中枢神经系统并发症,其他患者无严重并发症发生;1例中转后术中用主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)辅助完成手术。OPCAB患者与中转on pum p CABG患者比较左心室舒张期末压(13.5±4.5mmHg vs.19.1±6.7mmHg)差别有统计学意义(t=2.180,P=0.04)。结论左心室舒张期末压增高是OPCAB的高危风险因素,如果>20 mmHg应首选on pum p CABG;急诊手术、心肌桥亦是OPCAB的风险因素。     

非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术40例

目的探讨报告非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)的临床应用价值。方法40例患者均在全麻、常温下经胸骨正中切口行OPCAB术,其中单支病变1例,2支病变5例,3支病变16例,4支病变18例。结果全组无手术死亡,平均搭桥3.1支,术后平均呼吸机辅助时间为(8.0±2.5)h。结论对冠状动脉疾病,OPCAB是一种安全,有效的治疗方法。     

1198例非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的早期临床分析

目的　总结分析非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 (OPCAB)的早期临床结果和经验体会。方法　 1996年 10月至 2 0 0 2年 5月在国内 15个冠心病微创外科中心完成非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 1198例 ,占同期冠心病手术的 79 5 % ,OPCAB实施率 (即OPCAB占单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术的百分比 )为 85 2 %。年龄平均 (6 1 6± 9 0 )岁 ,男性占 77 3%。 18 7%为左主干病变 ,76 9%为 3支病变。左心室射血分数平均 0 5 6± 0 17。其中二次手术者占 1 5 % ,急诊手术占 9 9%。结果　 2 2例为小切口单支病变旁路移植手术 ,其余均为正中切口、多支病变的OPCAB手术。远端吻合口为 (3 1± 0 9)个 ,乳内动脉桥占 6 5 6 % ,桡动脉桥占 18 0 % ;5 2 %病人使用主动脉内球囊反搏。住院死亡 14例 ,病死率 1 2 %。其中术后心跳骤停或室颤 7例 ,大出血 2例 ,昏迷伴肾功能衰竭 2例 ,大面积脑梗塞 2例 ,呼吸衰竭 1例。并发症中 ,围术期心肌梗死占 0 4% ,急性左心功能衰竭占 0 3% ,严重心律失常占 1 2 % ,呼吸系统并发症占 2 0 % ,器质性神经系统并发症占 1 2 % ,新发或加重的肾功能不全占 0 7% ,出血二次开胸占1 0 % ,胸骨愈合不良占 0 6 %。结论　OPCAB手术安全可行 ,早期效果满意 ,远期效果有待进一步观察。OPCAB具备一     

老年人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的心肌保护作用

目的比较70岁以上老年人非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)和体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)围术期心肌损伤程度,探讨OPCAB的心肌保护效果。方法30例老年患者分为两组,A组15例,为CABG组,B组15例,为OPCAB组。分别于术前、术中30min、术中1h、术后6h、12h、24h、72h、120h取静脉血标本,分别测定心肌肌钙蛋白I(cTnI)水平和CKMB活性;另外记录围手术期各项临床指标。结果OPCAB组术后辅助呼吸时间较CABG组短(P<0.01),而且主动脉球囊反搏和输血例数较低(P<0.05)。CABG组与OPCAB组cTnI、CKMB的术前水平相,术后6hcTnI即有升高而后下降,术后30min至72h均较OPCAB组明显升高(P<0.05或0.01)。结论与CABG相比,OPCAB的心肌损伤较轻,心肌保护效果较好。     

心脏不停跳非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的进展

近年来，随着手术器械的发展，心脏不停跳非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)逐渐被广泛接受和应用。与常规冠状动脉旁路移植术(CCABG)比较，OPCAB的主要优势为血液中多种炎性介质浓度明显降低，避免了体外循环(CPB)带来的全身系统性炎性损害，减少了并发症，降低了手术死亡率。特别对那些不能采用CPB或采用CPB有风险的高危患者优势更明显。CCABG的手术适应证同样适用于OPCAB，但OPCAB具有相对的禁忌证。OPCAB多采用胸骨正中切口，左前外侧切口适用于左前降支单支病变。OPCAB术后早期结果类似CCABG，但中远期结果有待进一步观察。OPCAB大多数旁路移植血管数低于CCABG，有不能完全再血管化的可能，对OPCAB是否会影响吻合的精确性和旁路血管的长期通畅率有不同意见。OPCAB的优势明确，但仍不能完全替代CCABG，手术的同时应作好CPB准备，必要时改行CCABG。     

非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植血管中远期通畅率比较

目的 比较非体外循环不停跳与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植手术后中远期移植血管的通畅率.方法 对同一术者行冠状动脉旁路移植手术后5年以上病例50例.按手术方式分为两组.第1组采用传统体外循环下进行冠状动脉旁路移植(体外循环组,25例);第2组采用非体外循环不停跳技术进行冠状动脉旁路移植(非体外循环组,25例).对所有病例进行冠状动脉造影随访,比较两组移植血管的通畅情况.结果 两组均男21例,女4例.第1组手术年龄(55.4±8.9)岁;随访70～110个月,平均(86.52±12.48)个月;移植血管共83支,其中动脉移植血管41支,静脉移植血管42支,平均移植血管(3.32±0.63)支/例;随访移植血管通畅61支,狭窄6支,闭塞16支,动脉移植物通畅率为78.05%,静脉通畅率69.05%,总通畅率73.49%.第2组手术年龄(58.2±9.09)岁;移植血管共65支,其中动脉移植血管31支,静脉移植血管34支,平均移植血管(2.52±0.71)支/例,随访64～99个月,平均(82.68±12.48)个月;随访移植血管通畅47支,狭窄4支,闭塞14支,动脉移植物通畅率为74.19%,静脉通畅率70.59%,总通畅率72.31%.结论 非体外循环不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植手术移植血管中远期通畅率与传统体外循环手术一致,均可达到较好的中远期疗效.

Abstract：

Objective Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is used more widely in recent years in China. However, there is an argument on benefits and risks of off-pump surgery. Many studies shown that OPCAB had more benefits in short-term outcomes than conventional coronary artery bypass grafting(CCABG). But evidences from other studies suggested that OPCAB resulted in less long-term graft patency as compared with on-pump surgery. This study examined the longterm graft patency of OPCAB and CCABG performed by one surgeon. Methods 50 patients who had received surgical revascularization by a surgeon for more than 5 years were reviewed, 25 patients received conventional coronary artery bypass grafting ( group 1 ) and 25 patients received OPCAB ( group 2). All patients had angiograms for compareing the graft patency between the two groups. Results Among 25 patients in group 1,21 were male and 4 were female. The mean age of patients at surgery was (55.4 ±8.9) years. 15 cases had unstable angina, 16 patients had old myocardial infarction and 6 cases had diabetes.The ejection fraction (EF) was 0.58 ±0.14. The mean number of bypasses per patient was 3.32 ±0.63. Mean duration of operation was (3.58 ± 0. 82) hours. Mean follow-up duration was ( 86.52 ± 12.48) months. 83 grafts were evaluated for patency ( open vs. closed) and were graded by Fitzgibbon as grade A ( excellent graft), B ( impaired graft, with a stenosis of ≥50%, or a diameter less than 50% of the grafted artery), or O ( completely occluded). The graft patency was 73.49%, 61grafts were graded as Fitzgibbon A, 6 grafts as Fitzgibbon B and 16 grafts as Fitzgibbon 0. 25 patients were in group 2, 21males and 4 females. The mean age of patients at procedure was (58.2 ± 9.09) years, 11 patients had unstable angina, 13 patients had old myocardial infarction and 6 cases had diabetes. The ejection fraction (EF) was 0.59 ± 0. 14. Conclusion No 2011.03.013 difference in long-term graft patency was identified between on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Off-pump oronary artery bypass grafting preformed by an experienced surgeon may gain similar long-term graft patency to that of conventional bypass.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury,transfusion requirements,and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE: Retrospective comparisons of selected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting have yielded inconsistent results and raised concerns about completeness of revascularization in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Two hundred unselected patients referred for elective primary coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with an Octopus tissue stabilizer (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) or conventional coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass by a single surgeon. Revascularization intent determined before random assignment was compared with the revascularization performed. All management followed strict, unbiased, criteria-driven protocols. Patients and nonoperative care providers were blinded to surgical group. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar. The number of grafts performed per patient (mean +/- SD 3.39 +/- 1.04 for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 3.40 +/- 1.08 for conventional coronary artery bypass grafting) and the index of completeness of revascularization (number of grafts performed/number of grafts intended, 1.00 +/- 0.18 for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 1.01 +/- 0.09 for conventional coronary artery bypass grafting) were similar. Likewise, the index of completeness of revascularization was similar between groups for the lateral wall. Combined hospital and 30-day mortalities and stroke rates were similar. Postoperative myocardial serum enzyme measures were significantly lower after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, suggesting less myocardial injury. Adjusted postoperative thromboelastogram indices, fibrinogen, international normalized ratio, and platelet levels all showed significantly less coagulopathy after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting received fewer units of blood, were more likely to avoid transfusion altogether, and had a higher hematocrit at discharge. Cardiopulmonary bypass was an independent predictor of transfusion (odds ratio 2.42, P =.0073) by multivariate analysis. More patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting were extubated in the operating room and within 4 hours. Postoperative length of stay (in days) was shorter for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (5.1 +/- 6.5 for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 6.1 +/- 8.2 for conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, P =.005 by Wilcoxon test). One patient (in the conventional coronary artery bypass grafting group) required angioplasty for graft closure within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting achieved similar completeness of revascularization, similar in-hospital and 30-day outcomes, shorter length of stay, reduced transfusion requirement, and less myocardial injury.     

冠状动脉旁路移植术1018例临床分析

目的总结、探讨冠状动脉搭桥术的外科技术及临床治疗效果。方法回顾分析1997—2004年同一术者完成的冠状动脉搭桥术1018例患者的临床资料,其中非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)510例,体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术(CCABG)508例。≥60岁的患者582例(57.2%)。不稳定性心绞痛患者852例;术前同时合并其他疾病患者784例(77.0%),包括瓣膜病、高血压病、糖尿病、陈旧性心肌梗死、室壁瘤、室间隔穿孔、脑梗死、阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、慢性肾功能不全、恶性肿瘤术后等。左主干病变156例;三支病变671例,三支病变以下347例。结果死亡4例(0.39%),总体并发症(胸骨哆开、脑梗死、纵隔炎)发生率1.6%(16/1018)。OPCAB者平均搭桥(2.5±0.4)支,CCABG者平均搭桥(3.3±0.6)支。左乳内动脉使用率93.8%(955/1018),术后早期使用主动脉内气囊反搏29例。全组随访2个月～7年,随访1002例(98.4%)。结论科学的外科策略,精湛的手术技术及麻醉、体外循环技术的改进,可使CABG术的死亡率和并发症明显下降,冠状动脉旁路移植术安全、可靠,效果满意。     

Multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly patient is associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. The avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in this population is potentially beneficial. We examined our initial experience with off-pump multivessel coronary artery revascularization in patients aged 70 years and older. METHODS: In a consecutive series of 300 off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) operations performed by a single surgeon between 1996 and 1999, 98 patients were aged 70 years and older. These patients were compared with a consecutive cohort of 497 patients aged 70 years and older operated on with CPB in the same institution from 1995 to 1996, period where OPCAB surgery was not performed in our institution. RESULTS: Patients in the beating heart group were older (75+/-4 vs. 74+/-3 years; P=0.001). Gender distribution and other preoperative risk factors were comparable for the two groups. On average, 3.0+/-0.8 and 2.8+/-0.7 grafts per patient were completed in the OPCAB and the CPB groups, respectively (P=0.007). Perioperative mortality rates (OPCAB group, 3.1%; CPB group, 3.6%), perioperative myocardial infarction (OPCAB, 2.0%; CPB, 5.1%) and neurologic events (OPCAB, 1.0%; CPB, 3.2%) were comparable for the two groups. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was lower in the OPCAB group (42 vs. 54%; P=0.05). The need for allogenic blood transfusions was significantly less in the OPCAB group (53 vs. 82%; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged 70 years and older, multivessel OPCAB surgery is associated with lower rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation and reduced transfusion requirements. Multivessel OPCAB in the elderly patient is an acceptable alternative to procedures performed with CPB.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in early stage myocardial infarction treatment

We evaluated the surgical results of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) performed within the first 12 h of infarction in patients with acute myocardial infarction. From January 2005 to January 2007, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass was performed in 56 patients with acute coronary syndromes. The mean age was 62.9 (range, 51-86) years. All patients underwent OPCAB via sternotomy. An average of 2.5 +/- 1.1 grafts per patient were performed. The mortality rate was 7.1% (4 of 56 patients). One patient suffered from postoperative stroke (1.7%), and 3 (5.3%) needed hemofiltration for acute renal failure. Postsurgery elective coronary angiography (n = 21) showed no significant stenosis. These results indicate that emergency OPCAB can be applied to patients with acute myocardial infarction with low morbidity and mortality and excellent early results.     

70岁以上患者冠状动脉旁路移植术

目的 总结70岁以上患者冠状动脉旁路移植术的经验,就伴发疾病的处理、手术适应证、手术技术及效果进行分析. 方法 2004年3月至2008年3月,采用冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗70岁以上高龄患者91例,年龄70～83岁.75岁以上者22例.心肺转流冠状动脉旁路移植组(CCABG组)72例,非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植组(OPCAB组)19例.两组术前临床资料无明显差异.其中CCABG组术前植入颈动脉支架2例,肾动脉支架2例;OPCAB组植入颈动脉支架2例,肾动脉支架1例.全组左侧胸廓内动脉使用率为96.7%;CCABG组心肺转流时间(108±34)min;主动脉阻断时间(70±22)min;搭桥数(3.5±0.8)支.OPCAB组搭桥数(2.9±0.7)支. 结果 全组住院死亡2例,均为慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并肺感染.CCABG组有1例脑梗死,2例肺部感染,但与OPCAB组相比差异无统计学意义.两组在呼吸机辅助时间、ICU时间、呼吸衰竭、急性肾功能衰竭、二次开胸等方面无明显差异.但CCABG组搭桥支数高于OPCAB组(P<0.01).术后随访3～36个月,OPCAB组1例复发心绞痛,药物控制有效. 结论 处理好伴发疾病,充分再血管化,最大限度改善心肌供血,70岁以上CABG患者也可以取得满意疗效.是否在心肺转流下手术,预后并无明显差异.     

非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术

目的 总结110例非体外循环心脏跳动下冠状动脉旁路移植术经验，探讨其手术适应证、优缺点及手术方法。方法 常温、全身麻醉，胸正中切口，非体外循环心脏跳动下，应用特殊心表固定器行冠状动脉旁路移植术，平均搭桥3．9支，血管桥为乳内动脉、大隐静脉及桡动脉。结果 全组无手术死亡，术后心绞痛症状消失。手术时间平均为210min，术后气管插管时间平均为4．8h。术后住院时间平均为10d，住院费用平均为4．4万元。其中3例术中出现不可逆血压过低、室颤而转为体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术。结论 非体外循环心脏跳动下冠状动脉旁路移植术是一种安全、有效的治疗方法。特别适合于老年及心功能差的患者，可减少体外循环并发症，缩短术后住院时间，降低住院费用，但不能完全替代体外循环旁路移植术。