腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合腹股沟疝修补术不同术式的研究

笔者4年间治疗的28例LC合并腹股沟疝患者；其中采用LC联合全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)10例，LC联合经腹腔疝修补术(TAPP)3例，LC联合常规切口行无张力疝修补术15例。全组手术均获成功。LC联合常规切口组有2例术后发生尿储留，LC联合TEP组有1例术后发生阴囊血清肿。手术后随访12~24(平均18)个月，无腹股沟疝复发， LC联合常规切口组6例(40.0%)腹股沟区有1~3个月的疼痛。全腹腔镜组(LC+TEP和LC+TAPP)的平均手术时间(104±31)min明显长于LC联合常规切口组的(80±28)min ( P <0.05)；LC联合常规切口组在术后24h和48h的疼痛感均比全腹腔镜组严重( P <0.05)；全腹腔镜组在术后恢复活动和住院时间均短于LC联合常规切口组(均为 P <0.01)；而术后平均肠功能恢复时间和平均手术总费用两组无明显差别。在手术总费用相当的情况下，采用全腹腔镜手术治疗腹股沟疝合并胆囊炎，其优点多于常规切口的无张力疝修补术。提示LC联合腹腔镜疝修补术，尤其TEP是较为理想的术式。     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术72例报告

目的 总结完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术(TEP)的临床经验及效果.方法 回顾性分析我院2005年3月至2011年2月采用腹腔镜下完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝72例共84侧的临床资料,其中单侧腹股沟斜疝42例,单侧腹股沟直疝18例,双侧腹股沟疝12例;初发疝64例,复发疝8例.结果 72例患者共行84次TEP术,3例中转行经腹腔腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术(TAPP).手术时间35～155 min,平均73 min,住院时间3～8 d,平均5.5 d.术后并发症5例(侧),占6.9%,均为腹股沟区或阴囊的血肿或血清肿,随访3～63个月,无复发.结论 TEP手术安全可靠,术后疼痛轻、恢复快、复发率低,且费用相对较低、易被患者接受,同其他腹腔镜疝修补术相比优势明显,应成为腹腔镜治疗腹股沟疝的主要术式.     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片植入术的临床体会

目的:总结腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片植入术在腹股沟疝修补术(totally extraperitoneal prosthesis,TEP)中的应用价值及经验。方法:回顾分析2008年2月至2010年4月22例患者行TEP的临床资料,其中斜疝17例,直疝5例;双侧疝4例。结果:21例手术获得成功,1例因游离腹膜前间隙时分破腹膜改行经腹腔腹膜前补片植入术。手术时间单侧平均52 min,双侧平均98 min,术后平均住院3.5 d5,例术后发生阴囊血肿。随访6～18个月,未见复发及慢性疼痛。结论:TEP安全可行,腹腔干扰少,较少分离即可完成双侧疝修补,值得推广应用。     

腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein疝修补术对比研究

目的比较腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)与Lichtenstein修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床应用价值。方法分别对46例接受TAPP手术与140例接受Lichtenstein修补术的腹股沟疝患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果两组在手术时间、术后下床活动时间、生活自理时间、住院天数、恢复日常工作天数方面,均无显著性差异(P0.05),两组术后均无复发。结论腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术均为腹股沟疝的良好修补法,但复发疝、双侧疝及腹腔联合手术的患者更适合选择腹腔镜手术。     

成人腹股沟疝腹腔镜修补术512例

目的 总结成人腹股沟疝腹腔镜修补术的经验,分析常见的手术并发症和术后复发原因.方法 回顾性分析2007年3月至2010年9月行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术512例患者的临床资料,单侧腹股沟疝437例(斜疝281例、直疝86例、股疝15例、复合疝16例,复发疝39例),双侧腹股沟疝75例(含复发疝3例),其中包括急性腹股沟嵌顿疝41例.术后平均随访时间(29±12)个月.结果 512例中,507例患者成功行腹腔镜修补,完成经腹腹膜前补片植入术( transabdominalpreperitoneal,TAPP)238例(292侧),完全腹膜外补片植入术(totally extraperitoneal,TEP) 269例(290侧);5例中转开放手术.平均手术时间TAPP(69±19)min、TEP (58±15) min;术后平均住院时间(5.0±1.5)d;术后2周和4周恢复非限制活动人数分别为95.7％( 485/507)、99.0％(502/507);术后并发症依次为血清肿9.7％ (49/507)、暂时性神经感觉异常4.1％ (21/507)、术后慢性疼痛0.8％(4/507).术后复发率0.6％ (3/507).结论 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术具有创伤小,恢复快,复发率低等优点.     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝

目的探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果。方法选取2016-01—2018-10间收治的121例成人腹股沟疝患者,按手术方式的不同分为2组。对照组(60例)行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP),观察组(61例)实施腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)。比较2组的疗效。结果观察组术中失血量少于对照组,手术时间、住院时间、术后肛门恢复排气时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);2组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。随访6个月,2组患者均未出现复发病例。结论 TAPP和TEP治疗成人腹股沟疝均有确切效果,其中TEP创伤小,有利于患者术后恢复。     

完全腹膜外腔镜疝修补技术和疝环充填式疝修补术的随机对照研究

目的 探讨腹股沟疝完全腹膜外腔镜术(total extraperitoneal hernia repair,TEP)和疝环充填式无张力疝修补手术(mesh-Plug)方法的优缺点.方法 2007年12月至2009年12月间,89例腹股沟疝患者行腹腔镜疝修补术(TEP组),80例行疝环充填式修补术(Plug组),就其手术时间、住院时间和恢复工作时间以及各种并发症进行比较.随访时间6～24个月.结果 TEP组住院时间短,恢复工作时间较Plug组快,术后疼痛较轻(P＜0.05),慢性疼痛出现较少.单侧手术时,TEP组比Plug组手术时间长(P＜0.001),但在双侧手术时两组差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).Plug组住院费用较TEP组低(P＜0.001).复发TEP组1例(1.1%),Plug组1例(1.3%),两者复发率差异无统计学意义.结论 腹腔镜疝修补术是一种安全而有效的微创疝修补手术,较疝环充填式无张力疝修补术后疼痛更轻,恢复时间短,术后并发症和复发率两者并无差别,且对双侧疝修补更具有优势.     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术64例的临床应用

目的 探讨腹腔镜在腹股沟疝修补术中应用的可行性和优缺点.方法 64例成人腹股沟疝采用不同的腹腔镜疝修补术式完成,随访观察临床疗效,对临床资料进行回顾性总结分析.结果 所有患者均成功完成腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术,包括腹腔镜腹股沟疝腹腔内网片植入术(intraperitoneal onlay mesh,IPOM)术式34例,腹腔镜经腹腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal prosthetic, TAPP)术式7例,腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(totally extraperitoneal prosthetic, TEP)术式20例,IPOM同时对侧行TAPP者2例,IPOM同时对侧行TEP者1例.单侧平均手术时间为25～160 min,平均66 min;双侧手术时间为60～187 min,平均76 min.术中出血量为 5～100 ml, ,术后平均住院时间4.8 d.总体疗效满意,并发症发生率14.06%,全组复发率为3.12% .结论 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术安全可行,具有微创优势,但仍需积极防治并发症.     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术 (附56例报告)

目的探讨腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的优点、可行性及近期疗效.方法2001年8月至2004年8月行腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前补片修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic mesh repair of hernia,TAPP)和完全经腹膜外补片修补术(totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic mesh repair of hernia,TEP)共56例,其中腹股沟斜疝45例,腹股沟直疝8例,复合疝3例.结果56例均成功完成手术,TAPP48例、56侧,TEP8例、9侧,术中发现对侧有隐性疝4例,复合疝3例.平均手术时间61.3±26.5min,术后平均住院4.3d.术后3例(5.4%)有残余疝囊积液.全部患者均获随访1～36个月,复发1例,复发率1.8%.结论腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术是安全可行的疝修补新方法,具有并发症少,术后患者疼痛轻,康复快、复发率低等优点,并可发现复合疝和隐性疝.     

完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术16例报告

目的　探讨完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的方法。　方法　 16例腹股沟疝行完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术 (TEP) ,其中斜疝 14例 ,直疝 2例。　结果　手术全部成功 ,手术时间 6 5 6 (40～12 0 )min ,术后平均住院 3 7(3～ 7)d。无并发症发生。术后无疝复发。　结论　TEP是一种有效的疝修补技术 ,且复发率低、并发症发生率低。     

A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare single-port endo-laparoscopic surgery versus conventional TEP inguinal hernia repair

Introduction

The success of laparoscopic surgery is due to the less surgical trauma, including less operative pain, complications and better cosmetics. Objective of our study was to compare in two blind randomized groups of patients, the surgical outcome of total extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair using either single-port or conventional surgical technique. We will report our interim results in the first group of 50 patients.

Materials and methods

Our study is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted from August 2011 to June 2013. Fifty patients aged between 21 and 80 years undergoing surgery for unilateral inguinal hernia were randomised into two groups: conventional laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair versus single-port TEP repair. Clinical data on patient demographics, surgical technique and findings, postoperative complications and pain scores were collected. Primary endpoint is the postoperative pain while secondary endpoints are recurrence, chronic pain, postoperative hospital stay and complications.

Results

Out of the 50 patients, 26 underwent single-port hernia TEP repair and 24 had conventional 3-port TEP hernia repair after randomization. Mean operative time was 51.7 (±13.4) min in the multiport group and 59.3 (±14.9) min in the single-port group, respectively (P = 0.064). Mean hospital stay was 19.7 (±4.8) h in the conventional group and 22.1 (±4.5) h in the single-port group (P = 0.079). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for postoperative complications, and no recurrence reported at 11 months follow-up. There was no significant difference in the pain scores (visual analog scale) between the two groups at regular intervals post surgery.

Discussion

The outcomes after laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair with a single-port device are comparable to the standard three-port technique.     

髂嵴上方入路在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的初步应用体会

目的:总结经髂嵴上方入路行腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(totally extraperitoneal prosthesis,TEP)的手术经验,探讨其安全性、可行性、有效性及手术方法。方法:回顾分析2007年3月至2012年10月为16例腹股沟疝患者经髂嵴上方入路行腹腔镜TEP的临床资料,其中直疝3例次,斜疝13例次;双侧疝1例;复发疝3例。结果:16例手术均获成功,手术时间平均(60±20)min,术中出血量平均(15±10)ml,术中未发生肠管及膀胱损伤,术后2例发生血清肿,无术后尿潴留、腹股沟区疼痛及膀胱损伤发生。术后随访1～60个月,无一例复发。结论:经髂嵴上方入路行腹腔镜TEP符合解剖特点,手术安全、有效、可行,成功率高,适应证范围广,切口进一步隐匿化;但术者需具备较丰富的TEP手术经验,更重要的是腹膜前层面正确入路的建立。     

腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前疝无张力修补术治疗隐匿性疝的临床研究

目的探讨腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前疝无张力修补术治疗隐匿性腹股沟疝的临床疗效,减少单侧腹股沟疝术后对侧假性复发的发生率。方法回顾性分析南昌大学第二附属医院胃肠外科2017年1月至2019年7月收治的单侧腹股沟疝行手术治疗的2155例病人,其中1105例病人行开放性疝修补术,927例病人行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair,TAPP),123例病人行腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(totally extraperitoneal hernia repair,TEP)。术后随访12~30个月,同时观察记录病人手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症以及疝复发率等情况。结果(1)1105例行开放疝修补术病人中,手术时间为(60.8±12.3)min,住院时间为(4.6±1.5)d,101例病人在随访期间复发(同侧复发14例,对侧假性复发87例),对侧假性复发率为7.87%(87/1105),29例病人术后出现伤口感染,36例病人术后出现慢性疼痛;(2)927例行TAPP病人中,手术时间为(45.9±10.1)min,住院时间为(3.1±0.9)d,22例病人在随访期间复发(同侧复发12例,对侧假性复发10例),对侧假性复发率为1.08%(10/927),2例病人出现观察孔感染,16例病人术后出现血肿或血清肿,15例病人术后出现慢性疼痛;(3)123例行TEP病人中,手术时间为(50.8±15.6)min,住院时间为(3.5±1.2)d,5例病人在随访期间复发(圴为对侧假性复发),对侧假性复发率为4.06%(5/123),3例病人中转TAPP,2例病人术后出现血肿或血清肿,3例病人术后出现慢性疼痛。所有病人术中均未出现损伤肠管、输尿管、精索血管等情况。结论TAPP手术应作为单侧腹股沟疝手术治疗的首选术式,该术式有手术时间短、术后恢复快、并发症少等优点。同时,TAPP手术方式能够明显增加隐匿性腹股沟疝的检出率,减少单侧腹股沟疝病人术后对侧腹股沟疝假性复发的风险。另外,对于隐匿性疝建议立即给予预防性的修补,避免病人再次手术。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与完全腹膜外疝修补术的疗效对比

目的比较分析腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP）与腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（totally extraperitoneal,TEP）的临床疗效。 方法回顾性分析2014年1月至2017年1月,涿鹿县医院188例腹腔镜疝修补手术患者的临床资料,按照术式不同分为TAPP组（102例）和TEP组（86例）,对比两种手术方式的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后疼痛、血肿或血清肿、尿潴留、补片感染、复发情况。 结果2组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间的比较,差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）;2组术后疼痛、血肿或血清肿、尿潴留、补片感染、复发比较,差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。 结论TAPP和TEP都是治疗腹股沟疝安全有效的手术方式,术式的选择应根据术者经验和腹股沟疝个体化治疗原则进行。     

Day-case endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males

Background Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP) is an accepted technique for the repair of recurrent and bilateral inguinal hernia, but its role in the management of unilateral primary inguinal hernia remains controversial. The current randomized trial was undertaken to compare the postoperative and 1-year outcomes of day-case TEP and open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males. Methods From January 2002 to January 2004, a total of 200 male patients were randomized to undergo either day-case unilateral TEP or open Lichtenstein hernioplasty under general anesthesia. The primary outcome measures included postoperative pain score, time until return to work, incidence of chronic groin pain, and recurrence rate 1 year after the operation. Results All TEP procedures were successfully performed without conversion. The mean operation time for TEP (50±13.2 min) was significantly shorter than for open Lichtenstein hernioplasty (58 ± 17.6 min) (p < 0.001). The pain score at rest was significantly lower in the TEP group than in the open group on postoperative days 0, 1, 4, 5, and 6. On the average, the patients returned to work 8.6 days after TEP and 14 days after Lichtenstein hernioplasty (p = 0.006). Postoperative recovery and morbidity rates were otherwise comparable between the two groups. The incidence of chronic groin pain 1 year after TEP (9.9%) was significantly lower than after open surgery (21.7%) (p = 0.032). None of the patients in either group showed recurrence at the last follow-up assessment. Conclusions Day-case TEP was superior to open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for the repair of unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males. The benefits of day-case TEP included less postoperative pain, a faster return to work, and a lower incidence of chronic groin pain.     

内环口定型在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用体会

目的：探讨内环口定型在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（totally extraperitoneal,TEP）中的安全性、有效性,总结TEP开展初期降低术后复发率的方法。方法：回顾分析2009年9月至2013年6月为100例患者行TEP的临床资料,将其分为两组,50例行常规TEP,50例行内环口修补定型加TEP,观察两组手术时间、住院时间、术后第2天疼痛评分、复发及其他术后并发症等情况。结果：两组手术均顺利完成。两组患者术后第2天疼痛分数、复发率、手术时间差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,住院时间及其他术后并发症差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论：腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中行内环口修补定型安全、可靠,可提高手术疗效。尤其TEP开展初期,内环口修补定型可防止疝复发。     

腹腔镜全腹膜外与经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的临床对比研究

目的比较腹腔镜全腹膜外（TEP）与经腹腹膜前（TAPP）腹股沟疝修补术的可行性、安全性及有效性。方法回顾性分析2010年3月至2013年10月期间于笔者所在医院行腹腔镜TEP疝修补术（TEP组）和腹腔镜TAPP疝修补术（TAPP组）的95例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料和手术资料,比较TEP组和TAPP组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、手术费用、术后并发症发生情况等。结果所有患者的手术均获成功,无中转开放手术病例。TEP组与TAPP组患者的手术时间[（65±16）min比（68±17）mini、术中出血量[（7．0±1．2）mL比（8．0±1．4）mL3、术后疼痛分数[（2．0±1．1）分比（1．8±1．1）分]、术后住院时间（（3．1±1．4）d比（3．3±1．2）d]及恢复正常活动时间[（4．2±1．0）d比（4．5±1．2）d]比较差异均无统计学意义∽〉0．05）;TEP组和TAPP组的手术费用分别为（8033＋536）元和（9632＋643）元,TAPP组较高（P=O．007）。术后发生并发症6例（6．3％,6／95）,2组各3例,包括阴囊血（清）肿3例、暂时性感觉神经障碍1例,尿潴留2例,2组并发症发生率比较差异也无统计学意义（P=1．000）。所有患者均获访,随访时间为1～35个月、（20．0±10．2）个月,无复发及慢性疼痛发生。结论TEP与TAPP疝修补术均是可行、安全及有效的术式,各有其优缺点,两者在手术并发症方面无明显差别。     

单侧复发性腹股沟疝腔镜下修补的临床分析

目的探讨单侧复发性腹股沟疝腔镜下修补术的临床体会。 方法回顾性分析2009年1月至2019年1月，福建医科大学附属第一医院收治的123例腔镜下修补单侧复发性腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。通过手术时间、有无中转手术、发生副损伤、术后第1天疼痛评分、术后住院时间、术后并发症发生情况，分析腔镜修补单侧复发性腹股沟疝的临床效果。 结果123例单侧复发性腹股沟疝患者，采用腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（TEP）患者54例，采用腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）患者59例，采用腹腔内修补术（IPOM）患者10例。平均手术时间（50.68±9.46）min，术后第1天视觉模拟疼痛评分（2.19±1.76）分，术后住院时间（2.25±1.40）d。术后累计并发症患者12例（9.76%），均治愈出院，随访时间内无复发。 结论腔镜修补手术（TEP、TAPP及IPOM）是治疗复发性腹股沟疝安全有效的方法，可以在有条件的单位开展。     

Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective,randomized, controlled clinical trial

Background

The advantage of single-port total extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair over the conventional technique is still debatable. Our objective was to compare the outcomes of TEP inguinal hernia repair using either a single-port or conventional surgical technique, in two blind randomized groups of patients.

Methods

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial, 100 patients undergoing surgery for unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized into two groups: One group underwent conventional laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair, while the other was selected for single-port TEP repair. Primary endpoint is postoperative pain (VAS), while secondary endpoints are recurrence, chronic pain and complications.

Results

From 100 patients, 49 underwent single-port hernia TEP repair, 50 had conventional three-port TEP hernia repair, and one patient declined to participate after randomization. The two groups were comparable in terms of patient demographics and operative findings. Mean operative time was 49.1(±13.8) min in the conventional group and 54.1(±14.4) min in the single-port group (p = 0.08). Mean hospital stay was 19.7(±5.8) h in the conventional group and 20.5(±6.4) h in the single-port group (p = 0.489). No major complications and no recurrence reported at 11-month follow-up. No statistically significant difference noted in postoperative pain between the two groups at regular intervals.

Conclusions

The outcomes after laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair with a single-port device are similar but not superior to the conventional technique.

     

First experience of junior surgeons with laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy: Comparison with experienced surgeons in a single institution

Background/objectiveLaparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphy is among the current leading inguinal hernia repair methods. This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of a junior surgeon's first experience with laparoscopic TEP herniorrhaphy.MethodsA retrospective review was performed between January 2017 and December 2019 to analyze the medical records of patients with inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic TEP herniorrhaphy. The operative outcomes and complications of patients undergoing surgery by an experienced surgeon (group A, n = 100) were compared with those undergoing surgery by a junior surgeon (group B, n = 100).ResultsThe mean operative time for group B was significantly longer than that for group A (52.0 ± 15.1 min vs 60.1 ± 17.4 min; P = 0.03). A statistical difference was also found in the mean postoperative stay (1.1 ± 0.3 d vs 1.4 ± 0.7 d; P = 0.02) between the two groups. There were 2 and 3 cases of recurrence in these two groups respectively (P = 0.72). Considering the operating time as a variable of learning curve, significant stabilization can be achieved after 30 cases (67.3 ± 17.8 min vs 53.1 ± 11.1 min; P = 0.02).ConclusionsThe surgical outcomes of laparoscopic TEP herniorrhaphy performed by a well-trained junior surgeon were similar to the outcomes of an experience surgeon.