Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and tyrosine kinase receptor TrkB in rat brain are significantly altered after haloperidol and risperidone administration

The antipsychotics haloperidol and risperidone are widely used in the therapy of schizophrenia. The former drug mainly acts on the dopamine (DA) D(2) receptor whereas risperidone binds to both DA and serotonin (5HT) receptors, particularly in the neurons of striatal and limbic structures. Recent evidence suggests that neurotrophins might also be involved in antipsychotic action in the central nervous system (CNS). We have previously reported that haloperidol and risperidone significantly affect brain nerve growth factor (NGF) level suggesting that these drugs influence the turnover of endogenous growth factors. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) supports survival and differentiation of developing and mature brain DA neurons. We hypothesized that treatments with haloperidol or risperidone will affect synthesis/release of brain BDNF and tested this hypothesis by measuring BDNF and TrkB in rat brain regions after a 29-day-treatment with haloperidol or risperidone added to chow. Drug treatments had no effects on weight of brain regions. Chronic administration of these drugs, however, altered BDNF synthesis or release and expression of TrkB-immunoreactivity within the brain. Both haloperidol and risperidone significantly decreased BDNF concentrations in frontal cortex, occipital cortex and hippocampus and decreased or increased TrkB receptors in selected brain structures. Because BDNF can act on a variety of CNS neurons, it is reasonable to hypothesize that alteration of brain level of this neurotrophin could constitute one of the mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs. These observations also support the possibility that neurotrophic factors play a role in altered brain function in schizophrenic disorders.     

利培酮治疗儿童精神分裂症对照研究

目的：比较利培酮和氟哌啶醇治疗儿童精神分裂症的疗效和不良反应。方法：42例儿童精神分裂症患者随机分为利培酮组和氟哌啶醇组，治疗6周。用简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)和副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。结果：利培酮组和氟哌啶醇组BPRS总分在治疗末均显著下降，两组间BPRS总分差异无显著性；两组间疗效差异亦无显著性；利培团组不良反应发生率比氟哌啶醇组明显为低。结论：利培酮治疗儿童精神分裂症安全有效，可作为治疗儿童精神分裂症的首选药物。     

Reversal of schizophrenia-like symptoms and immune alterations in mice by immunomodulatory drugs

Immune dysregulation observed in schizophrenia alters tryptophan metabolism. Tryptophan metabolism is triggered by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO). Tryptophan is converted to quinolinic acid, a potent neurotoxin, and to kynurenic acid, an NMDA antagonist. 1-Methyl-D-tryptophan (MDT) inhibits IDO. Melatonin is metabolized by IDO while inhibiting TDO. We evaluated the reversal of ketamine-induced schizophrenia-like behavioral and neurochemical alterations in mice by the administration of MDT (20 or 40 mg/kg, i.p.) or melatonin (15 mg/kg, per os). Oxidative stress and inflammatory alterations, i.e. myeloperoxidase activity (MPO), reduced glutathione (GSH), lipid peroxidation (LPO) and interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-6 were measured in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), hippocampus and striatum. Risperidone was used as standard antipsychotic. Ketamine triggered positive- (PPI deficits and hyperlocomotion), cognitive- (working memory deficits) and negative (social interaction deficits) schizophrenia-like symptoms. These symptoms were accompanied by increased MPO activity, decreased GSH and increased LPO in all brain areas and increments in hippocampal IL-4 and IL-6. MDT and melatonin reversed all ketamine-induced behavioral alterations. Risperidone did not reverse working memory deficits. MDT and melatonin reversed alterations in MPO activity and GSH levels. LP was reversed only by melatonin and risperidone. Risperidone could not reverse MPO alterations in the PFC and striatum. All drugs reversed the alterations in IL-4 and IL-6. The hippocampus and striatum of ketamine+melatonin-treated animals had lower levels of IL-6. Our findings provide further preclinical evidence that immune-inflammatory and oxidative pathways are involved in schizophrenia and that targeting these pathways is a valid treatment option in schizophrenia.     

Baicalin Attenuates Ketamine-Induced Neurotoxicity in the Developing Rats: Involvement of PI3K/Akt and CREB/BDNF/Bcl-2 Pathways

Ketamine is widely used as an anesthetic in pediatric clinical practice. However, numerous studies have reported that exposure to ketamine during the developmental period induces neurotoxicity. Here we investigate the neuroprotective effects of baicalin, a natural flavonoid compound, against ketamine-induced apoptotic neurotoxicity in the cortex and hippocampus of the Sprague–Dawley postnatal day 7 (PND7) rat pups. Our results revealed that five continuous injections of ketamine (20 mg/kg) at 90-min intervals over 6 h induced obvious morphological damages of neuron by Nissl staining and apoptosis by TUNEL assays in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of PND7 rat pups. Baicalin (100 mg/kg) pretreatment alleviated ketamine-induced morphological change and apoptosis. Caspase-3 activity and caspase-3 mRNA expression increase induced by ketamine were also inhibited by baicalin treatment. LY294002, an inhibitor of PI3K, abrogated the effect of baicalin against ketamine-induced caspase-3 activity and caspase-3 mRNA expression increase. In addition, Western blot studies indicated that baicalin not only inhibited ketamine-induced p-Akt and p-GSK-3β decrease, but also relieved ketamine-induced p-CREB and BDNF expression decrease. Baicalin also attenuated ketamine-induced Bcl-2/Bax decrease and caspase-3 expression increase. Further in vitro experiments proved that baicalin mitigated ketamine-induced cell viability decrease in the MTT assay, morphological change by Rosenfeld’s staining, and caspase-3 expression increase by Western blot in the primary neuron–glia mixed cultures. LY294002 abrogated the protective effect of baicalin. These data demonstrate that baicalin exerts neuroprotective effect against ketamine-induced neuronal apoptosis by activating the PI3K/Akt and its downstream CREB/BDNF/Bcl-2 signaling pathways. Therefore, baicalin appears to be a promising agent in preventing or reversing ketamine’s apoptotic neurotoxicity at an early developmental stage.     

Risperidone in treatment-refractory schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of risperidone compared to haloperidol in patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia. METHOD: Sixty-seven medication-unresponsive subjects were randomly assigned to treatment with risperidone (N = 34) or haloperidol (N = 33). After a 3-7 day-placebo washout period, there was a 4-week, double-blind, fixed-dose comparison trial that was followed by a 4-week, flexible-dose phase. Measures of clinical change were quantified by standard psychopathologic and neuromotor instruments. RESULTS: Risperidone demonstrated clinical efficacy superior to that of haloperidol on the total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) after the first 4 weeks of treatment. Risperidone did not show any advantage over haloperidol after an additional 4 weeks. Overall improvement on the BPRS at 4 weeks was significantly better for the risperidone group (24%) than for the haloperidol group (11%). Risperidone-treated subjects were significantly less likely than haloperidol-treated subjects to require concomitant anticholinergic medication after 4 weeks (20% versus 63%); they also had significantly les observable akathisia (24% versus 53%) and significantly less severe tardive dyskinesia. Baseline characteristics that correlated significantly with risperidone response were positive symptoms, conceptual disorganization, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone was better tolerated and more effective in a subset of patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia. Positive psychotic symptoms and extrapyramidal side effects at baseline appear to be powerful predictors of subsequent response to risperidone.     

利培酮合并氯硝西泮治疗精神分裂症急性兴奋的研究

目的 与氯氮平和氟哌啶醇相对照,观察利培酮合并氯硝西泮治疗精神分裂症急性兴奋的疗效及不良反应特点。方法 254例精神分裂症急性期中度兴奋患者,随机分为口服利培酮合并肌内注射氯硝西泮组(88例,以下简称利培酮组)、口服氯氮平组(84例,氯氮平组)和肌内注射氟哌啶醇组(82例,氟哌啶醇组)治疗,疗程均为7 d。治疗期间每日评估阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)兴奋因子(PANSS-EC)和治疗中需处理的不良反应量表。结果 利培酮组的疗效与氯氮平组、氟哌啶醇组比较,经重复测量分析显示PANSS-EC分,差异无显著性(F=1.65,P=0.194)。3组精神分裂症患者的急性兴奋症状均获明显改善(各组组内治疗前后比较,F=415.35,P<0.01)。氟哌啶醇组锥体外系副反应发生率高于利培酮组和氯氮平组(P<0.01);氯氮平组嗜睡、便秘、流涎和心动过速的发生率高于利培酮组和氟哌啶醇组(P<0.05-0.01)。结论 利培酮合并氯硝西泮可有效治疗精神分裂症急性期中度兴奋患者,疗效与氯氮平和氟哌啶醇的疗效相当;安全性优于氯氮平和氟哌啶醇。     

利培酮治疗精神分裂症临床观察

目的：研究利培酮治疗精神分裂症的疗效与副反应。方法：7所医院共计收集精神分裂症患者904例其中以利培酮治疗者405例,其余为以氯氮平、氟哌啶醇、氯丙嗪或舒必利治疗的对照病例,使用阳性症状与阴性症状量表（PANSS）,简明精神病评定量表（BPRS）,阴性症状评定量表（SANS）,阳性症状评定量表（SAPS）,临床疗效总评量表（CGI）和副反应量表（TESS）等量表进行观察。结果：利培酮治疗精神分裂症有肯定疗效,有的与对照组相仿,有的超过对照组。副反应一般较轻。对睡眠影响较少,小剂量（4mg/d左右）疗效并不降低,而副反应更少。结论：利培酮可作为治疗精神分裂症的一线药物,可用于首发、难治病例、预防复发和青少年病例等,对维护和提高患者的生活质量较好。     

Reduced serum BDNF levels in patients with chronic schizophrenic disorder in relapse,who were treated with typical or atypical antipsychotics

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor signals and dopaminergic function in the brain are strongly associated, and research on BDNF in schizophrenia may enhance our insights on the pathophysiological mechanisms of this disease. In the present study we aimed to investigate the possible association between serum BDNF levels and schizophrenic relapses and the possible differential effects of treatment with typical and atypical antipsychotics on serum BDNF levels in the same group of patients. We measured serum BDNF levels in 47 patients with schizophrenia during a relapse and again 6 weeks after administration of antipsychotic treatment (14 on risperidone, 18 on haloperidol, 10 on olanzapine and five on amisulpride) and in 44 healthy volunteers. Patients with schizophrenia showed reduced serum BDNF levels in relation to healthy volunteers at study entry. No significant differences were revealed in BDNF serum levels after 6 weeks of antipsychotic treatment in the patients compared to their own levels at study entry. However, serum BDNF was significantly increased in the subgroup receiving olanzapine compared to the other antipsychotics. Our findings may indicate a differential effect of olanzapine on BDNF levels compared to haloperidol, risperidone, and amisulpride.     

Neurotoxic/neuroprotective activity of haloperidol, risperidone and paliperidone in neuroblastoma cells

The neurotoxicity of antipsychotic (AP) drugs seems to be linked with neurological side effects like extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). On the other hand, neuroprotective effects can mitigate or slow the progressive degenerative structural changes in the brain leading to improved outcome of schizophrenia. First and second-generation antipsychotics may differ in their neurotoxic and neuroprotective properties. The aim of this study was to compare the neurotoxic/neuroprotective activity of haloperidol, a first-generation antipsychotic, and risperidone, a second-generation one, with paliperidone, a relatively new second-generation antipsychotic, in SK-N-SH cells. Haloperidol, risperidone and paliperidone (10, 50, 100 μM) were administered, either alone or in combination with dopamine (100 μM), to human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH. We examined the effects of the drugs on cell viability (measured by alamarBlue®), caspase-3 activity (measured by fluorimetric assay) and cell death (by measuring the externalization of phosphatidylserine). Haloperidol significantly decreased cell viability and increased caspase-3 activity and cell death. Risperidone and paliperidone did not affect cell viability or cell death. Both second-generation APs decreased caspase-3 activity, especially paliperidone. In cells treated with dopamine in combination with antipsychotics, only paliperidone (10 μM) induced a slight improvement in cell viability. While haloperidol potentiated the dopamine-induced increase in caspase-3 activity, risperidone and paliperidone reduced this effect. The results indicate that haloperidol induces apoptosis, whereas risperidone and paliperidone may afford protection against it. Of the APs tested, paliperidone always showed the strongest neuroprotective effect. The different antipsychotic effects on survival and cell death might be related to differences in their capacity to induce EPS.     

Comparison of the effects of risperidone and haloperidol on regional cerebral blood flow in schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Atypical antipsychotics, such as risperidone, have been shown to be more effective for the treatment of the symptoms of schizophrenia and have a greater beneficial effect on neurocognition compared to the conventional antipsychotics. The present study used [(15)O]H(2)O positron emission tomography imaging of regional cerebral blood flow to examine and compare the effects of haloperidol and risperidone on brain function. METHODS: Thirty-two subjects with schizophrenia participated in the study. Each subject was scanned in a medication-free state, and after being on a stable clinically assigned dose of either risperidone or haloperidol for 3 weeks. The off-medication scan was subtracted from the on-medication scan, using a within-subjects design. A randomization analysis was used to determine differences between the effects of haloperidol and risperidone on regional cerebral blood flow. RESULTS: Haloperidol was associated with a significantly greater increase in regional cerebral blood flow in the left putamen and posterior cingulate, and a significantly greater decrease in regional cerebral blood flow in frontal regions compared to risperidone. Risperidone was associated with a significantly greater decrease in regional cerebral blood flow in the cerebellum bilaterally compared to haloperidol. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that risperidone and haloperidol have significantly different effects on brain function, which may be related to their differences in efficacy and side effects. Further work is required to more precisely determine the mechanisms by which different antipsychotic medications exert their therapeutic effects on the clinical symptoms and cognition in schizophrenia. These findings emphasize the importance of controlling for both medication status and the individual antipsychotic in neuroimaging studies.     

Synergetic effects of quetiapine and venlafaxine in preventing the chronic restraint stress-induced decrease in cell proliferation and BDNF expression in rat hippocampus

Clinical studies show better response rates of patients with depression and schizophrenia to combinations of atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants, compared to responses to either type of drugs alone. Animal studies demonstrate that some antipsychotics and antidepressants increase neurogenesis and BDNF expression in the hippocampus, which is reduced in volume in patients with depression or schizophrenia. We hypothesized that the better therapeutic effects of combined treatment seen in schizophrenia and depression patients are related to the additive or synergistic effects of combined treatment on hippocampal neurogenesis and BDNF expression. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effects of chronic administration of quetiapine, venlafaxine, and their combination, on hippocampal cell proliferation and BDNF expression in rats, when subjected to chronic restraint stress (CRS) during the last 2 weeks of a 3-week drug administration period. We found (1) CRS decreased hippocampal cell proliferation and BDNF expression; (2) chronic administration of quetiapine or venlafaxine dose-dependently prevented these decreases in hippocampal cell proliferation and BDNF expression caused by CRS (6 h/day for 14 days); (3) the combination of lower doses of quetiapine (5 mg/kg) and venlafaxine (2.5 mg/kg) increased hippocampal cell proliferation and prevented BDNF decrease in stressed rats, whereas each of the drugs exerted mild or no effects; (4) individual higher doses of quetiapine (10 mg/kg) or venlafaxine (5 mg/kg) exerted effects comparable to those produced by their combination. These results support our hypothesis and can lead to future studies to develop new therapeutic approaches for treatment-resistant depression and the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.     

利培酮治疗老年期精神分裂症双盲对照研究

目的：探讨利培酮治疗老年期精神分裂症的有效性及安全性。方法：分别用利培酮和氟哌啶醇对62例老年期精神分裂症患者进行8周治疗。疗效评定采用阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)，不良反应评定用副反应量表(TESS)和Sampson锥体外系反应量表。结果：两组治疗前后比较PANSS总分和各因子分均具有显著差异、两组在治疗第1、2、4、6、8周PANSS总分及各因子分比较差异均无显著性，但利培酮组较氟哌啶醇组在治疗阴性症状方面起效早2周。不良反应震颤、肌强直、活动减退发生率利培酮组显著低于氟哌啶醇组。结论：利培酮和氟哌啶醇均为治疗老年期精神分裂症有效、安全的药物。利培酮治疗阴性症状起效较早，氟哌啶醇锥体外系反应较显著。     

Antipsychotic and anticholinergic effects on two types of spatial memory in schizophrenia

Spatial memory is of interest in schizophrenia because of widespread impairments in adaptive functioning, including independent living skills. Short-term spatial memory is impaired in this disease, whereas spatial reference memory, a longer-term spatial memory, has not been evaluated. Animal studies have demonstrated that anticholinergics impair short-term spatial memory but not spatial reference memory. The effects of haloperidol and risperidone on these two types of spatial memory were evaluated in a double-blind randomized comparison in inpatients with schizophrenia. It was predicted that risperidone would have a greater beneficial effect on spatial working memory than haloperidol. Computerized measures of spatial working memory and spatial reference memory were developed based on animal assessment of these functions. Subjects with schizophrenia were assessed during a medication-free period and again following 4 weeks of fixed-dose treatment. Risperidone, compared to haloperidol, improved spatial working memory performance, an effect that became nonsignificant when benztropine co-treatment was controlled. There were no treatment effects on spatial reference memory performance. Consistent with animal studies, benztropine impaired spatial working memory but not spatial reference memory. The relative benefits of risperidone on spatial working memory performance were largely explained by differential benztropine treatment for the haloperidol-treated subjects.     

Effect of risperidone on sleep in schizophrenia: a comparison with haloperidol

The aim of the present study is to determine the effect of the atypical antipsychotic drug, risperidone on sleep measures in patients with schizophrenia by polysomnography. Sleep measures were compared in five schizophrenic patients who were receiving risperidone alone and five schizophrenic patients who were receiving haloperidol alone. There were no differences between these two groups in their demographic characteristics or doses of antipsychotic medication. The slow wave sleep period was significantly longer in the risperidone-treated group than in the haloperidol-treated group. There were, however, no other significant differences in sleep variables between these groups. This difference in the effect on sleep between risperidone and haloperidol may be due to their differential actions on serotonin (5-HT2) receptors. Risperidone, which is known to be a serotonin-dopamine antagonist, has the potential to improve the quality of sleep in schizophrenic patients.     

Neurotoxic potential of haloperidol in comparison with risperidone: implication of Akt-mediated signal changes by haloperidol

Summary. The neurotoxicity of conventional antipsychotic drugs has emerged as a potential pathogenic event in extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) and in their limited efficacy for negative-cognitive symptoms in schizophrenic patients. The atypical antipsychotics, recently developed, have superior therapeutic efficacy to treat not only positive symptoms but negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunctions with much lower potentials of side effects, although the influence of atypical antipsychotics on the regulation of neuronal survival has been less investigated. It is important to clarify the effects of typical and atypical antipsychotics on neuronal survival and their contributions to the therapeutic development and understanding of the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. We measured the neurotoxicity of two antipsychotic drug treatments, haloperidol and risperidone, in primary cultured rat cortical neurons. Immunoblotting and pharmacological agent analyses were used to determine the signal transduction changes implicated in the mechanisms of the neurotoxicity. Haloperidol induced apoptotic injury in cultured cortical neurons, but risperidone showed weak potential to injure the neurons. Treatment with haloperidol also led the reduction of phosphorylation levels of Akt, and activated caspase-3. The D2 agonist bromocriptine and 5-HT_2A antagonist, ketanserin attenuated the haloperidol-induced neuronal toxicity. Moreover, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) reduced the caspase-3 activity and protected neurons from haloperidol-induced apoptosis. BDNF also reversed the reduced levels of phosphorylation of Akt caused by treatment with haloperidol. Haloperidol but not risperidone induces caspase-dependent apoptosis by reducing cellular survival signaling, which possibly contributes to the differential clinical therapeutic efficacy and expression of side effects in schizophrenia.     

Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in rat hippocampus after treatment with antipsychotic drugs

Typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs, though both effective, act on different neurotransmitter receptors and are dissimilar in some clinical effects and side effects. The typical antipsychotic drug haloperidol has been shown to cause a decrease in the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which plays an important role in neuronal cell survival, differentiation, and neuronal connectivity. However, it is still unknown whether atypical antipsychotic drugs similarly regulate BDNF expression. We examined the effects of chronic (28 days) administration of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs on BDNF mRNA expression in the rat hippocampus using in situ hybridization. Quantitative analysis revealed that the typical antipsychotic drug haloperidol (1 mg/kg) down-regulated BDNF mRNA expression in both CA1 (P < 0.05) and dentate gyrus (P < 0.01) regions compared with vehicle control. In contrast, the atypical antipsychotic agents clozapine (10 mg/kg) and olanzapine (2.7 mg/kg) up-regulated BDNF mRNA expression in CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus regions of the rat hippocampus compared with their respective controls (P < 0.01). These findings demonstrate that the typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs differentially regulate BDNF mRNA expression in rat hippocampus.     

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of risperidone for untreated and treated cases of schizophrenia from various aspects

The present study used a diversified approach to the evaluation of the clinical efficacy of the atypical antipsychotic risperidone, and the most appropriate method of switching the medication of patients undergoing alternative therapies; particularly, the widely used typical antipsychotic haloperidol. A study group of 120 patients with CYP2D6*1/*1 was subdivided into an untreated group of 20 (group A) and two groups of 50 previously treated patients (groups B and C) with haloperidol only, for more than 5 years. All patients began risperidone therapy at 2 mg/day b.i.d., increasing in increments of 2 mg to a maximum of 8 mg/day b.i.d., according to their respective PANSS score after each psychiatric evaluation. Group B underwent a tapered changeover in treatment, while group C was abruptly transferred to the new regimen. The results demonstrated that risperidone was effective in 81% of patients, regardless of previous treatment or the method of switching. Twenty patients interrupted their switch treatment for reasons of symptom aggravation. Risperidone was immediately effective against positive and negative symptoms in untreated patients; however, in the previously treated groups, it was initially effective against negative symptoms only; after a 2-week interval, positive symptoms also improved. The previously treated patients required the concomitant administration of an anticholinergic drug. The results of this study provide evidence that risperidone has a favorable profile with regard to efficacy and safety, which makes it a suitable treatment for schizophrenia. Risperidone therapy at the earliest possible stage shows optimal improvement in schizophrenia.     

Neurologic side effects in neuroleptic-naive patients treated with haloperidol or risperidone

OBJECTIVE: To compare the side effect profile of risperidone with that of oral haloperidol in patients with no previous exposure to antipsychotic drugs (APDs). BACKGROUND: Early studies suggested that the APD risperidone may have a side effect profile comparable with that of placebo. These early studies involved patients with chronic schizophrenia and a long history of APD use. Very little information is available regarding the neurologic side effects of risperidone in patients without previous APD exposure. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied 350 consecutive neuroleptic-naive patients admitted to their acute-care psychiatry service; 34 of these were treated with risperidone (mean dose, 3.2 mg/d) and 212 were treated with low-dose haloperidol (mean dose 3.7 mg/d). All patients were assessed on admission and twice weekly thereafter using rating scales for dystonia, parkinsonism, akathisia, and dyskinesia. RESULTS: The incidence and severity of dystonic reactions, akathisia, parkinsonism, and dyskinesia were comparable in the risperidone- and haloperidol-treated groups. CONCLUSIONS: The neurologic side effect profile of low-dose risperidone is comparable with that of haloperidol in patients receiving APDs for the first time. Risperidone may not be a useful alternative to typical APDs for patients with PD and psychosis.     

BDNF mRNA expression in rat hippocampus and prefrontal cortex: effects of neonatal ventral hippocampal damage and antipsychotic drugs

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays an important role in development, synapse remodelling and responses to stress and injury. Its abnormal expression has been implicated in schizophrenia, a neuropsychiatric disorder in which abnormal neural development of the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex has been postulated. To clarify the effects of antipsychotic drugs used in the therapy of schizophrenia on BDNF mRNA, we studied its expression in rats treated with clozapine and haloperidol and in rats with neonatal lesions of the ventral hippocampus, used as an animal model of schizophrenia. Both antipsychotic drugs reduced BDNF expression in the hippocampus of control rats, but did not significantly lower its expression in the prefrontal cortex. The neonatal hippocampal lesion itself suppressed BDNF mRNA expression in the dentate gyrus and tended to reduce its expression in the prefrontal cortex. These results indicate that, unlike antidepressants, antipsychotics down-regulate BDNF mRNA, and suggest that their therapeutic properties are not mediated by stimulation of this neurotrophin. To the extent that the lesioned rat models some pathophysiological aspects of schizophrenia, our data suggest that a neurodevelopmental insult might suppress expression of the neurotrophin in certain brain regions.     

The effects of ketamine and risperidone on eye movement control in healthy volunteers

The non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine leads to transient psychosis-like symptoms and impairments in oculomotor performance in healthy volunteers. This study examined whether the adverse effects of ketamine on oculomotor performance can be reversed by the atypical antipsychotic risperidone. In this randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 72 healthy participants performed smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM), prosaccades (PS) and antisaccades (AS) while being randomly assigned to one of four drug groups (intravenous 100 ng ml⁻¹ ketamine, 2 mg oral risperidone, 100 ng ml⁻¹ ketamine plus 2 mg oral risperidone, placebo). Drug administration did not lead to harmful adverse events. Ketamine increased saccadic frequency and decreased velocity gain of SPEM (all P<0.01) but had no significant effects on PS or AS (all P⩾0.07). An effect of risperidone was observed for amplitude gain and peak velocity of PS and AS, indicating hypometric gain and slower velocities compared with placebo (both P⩽0.04). No ketamine by risperidone interactions were found (all P⩾0.26). The results confirm that the administration of ketamine produces oculomotor performance deficits similar in part to those seen in schizophrenia. The atypical antipsychotic risperidone did not reverse ketamine-induced deteriorations. These findings do not support the cognitive enhancing potential of risperidone on oculomotor biomarkers in this model system of schizophrenia and point towards the importance of developing alternative performance-enhancing compounds to optimise pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia.