特发性肺纤维化急性加重期证候与血清生物标志物的相关性研究＊

目的 通过分析特发性肺纤维化急性加重期（AE-IPF）患者证候与血清生物标志物的关系，为中医辨证治疗提供参考。方法 采用观察性研究设计，收集2019年3月至2019年11月三个中心的AE-IPF患者76例，其中痰热壅肺证26例、痰浊阻肺证50例，并纳入健康志愿者10例作为对照。采用ELISA测定患者血清CCL18、HMGB1、KL-6、MMP-7、SP-A和SP-D水平，分析与中医证候的相关性。结果 AE-IPF患者血清CCL18、HMGB1、KL-6、MMP-7、SP-A和SP-D水平均显著高于健康对照组。血清CCL18、HMGB1、KL-6、MMP-7和SP-D水平在痰热壅肺证和痰浊阻肺证患者间无显著性差异（P＞0.05），而血清SP-A水平存在显著性差异（P＜0.05）。结论 血清SP-A与AE-IPF证候存在一定的相关性，血清SP-A的浓度升高，与痰热壅肺证关系越密切，反之，血清SP-A浓度降低，则与痰浊阻肺证关系越密切。AE-IPF痰热壅肺证患者的预后可能较痰浊阻肺证患者更差。     

577 nm激光光凝联合玻璃体内注射康柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的效果观察

目的　探讨577 nm激光光凝联合玻璃体内注射康柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的效果。方法　选取2016年1月至2017年3月在我院治疗的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者81例81眼，根据患者最终选取的治疗方案分为观察组43例43眼和对照组38例38眼，观察组给予577 nm激光光凝联合玻璃体内注射康柏西普治疗，对照组仅给予577 nm激光光凝，观察两组治疗前后最佳矫正视力（best corrected visual acuity，BCVA）和黄斑中心凹厚度（central fovea of macula thickness，CMT），分析观察组BCVA和CMT变化值与初始因素的相关性。结果　随治疗时间延长，观察组和对照组BCVA、CMT相应改善（均为P＜0.05）；观察组治疗后1个月、3个月和6个月BCVA分别为0.37±0.09、0.44±0.10和0.52±0.13，均明显高于对照组（均为P＜0.05）；观察组治疗后1个月、3个月和6个月CMT分别为（351.03±41.43）μm、（270.32±40.03）μm和（220.01±32.91）μm，均明显低于对照组（均为P＜0.05）；BCVA变化值与糖尿病性黄斑水肿病程、治疗前BCVA呈负相关（r=-0.422、-0.410，均为P＜0.05）；CMT变化值与糖尿病性黄斑水肿病程、治疗前CMT呈负相关（r=-0.430、-0.415，均为P＜0.05）。结论　577 nm激光光凝联合玻璃体内注射康柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿效果较好，其效果与患者基线BCVA、糖尿病性黄斑水肿病程有一定相关性。     

糖尿病黄斑水肿患者病变程度与脉络膜厚度的关系

目的　利用频域光学相干断层扫描深度增强（enhanced depth imaging spectral domain optical coherence tomography，EDI SD-OCT）观察糖尿病黄斑水肿（diabetic macular edema，DME）患者脉络膜厚度（choroidal thickness，CT）的变化及结构特点，探讨DME病变程度与CT的关系。方法　纳入2型糖尿病患者共123例204眼，其中69眼诊断为DME（DME组），135眼无黄斑水肿为对照组。DME眼依据OCT形态学特点进一步分为视网膜弥漫性增厚（diffuse retinal thickness，DRT）型（34眼）、黄斑囊样水肿（cystoid macular edema，CME）型（19眼）和浆液性视网膜脱离（serous retinal detachment，SRD）型（16眼），利用EDI-OCT分别测量黄斑中心凹下CT和以黄斑为中心上、下、鼻、颞500 μm、1000 μm、1500 μm、2000 μm处CT。结果　DME组黄斑中心凹下CT为（326.72±90.15）μm，对照组为（320.17±106.46）μm，两组之间无统计学差异，但黄斑中心凹下CT与视网膜厚度间具有明显正相关关系（r=0.270，P=0.025）。DME亚型CT分别为:DRT型（303.94±81.47）μm、CME型（304.42±73.98）μm和SRD型（401.63±88.80）μm，SRD型CT明显高于其他亚型（P<0.05），此外，SRD型的周边CT同样呈现均匀一致的增厚；鼻侧CT从500 μm至2000 μm呈距离敏感性降低（P<0.05），但SRD型鼻侧CT降低幅度明显变缓（P=0.195）。结论　SRD型黄斑水肿患者CT在中心凹下及周边部均显著增厚，CT与DME病变程度之间有一定相关性。     

郭军教授治疗特发性男性不育症的经验

男性不育症中,精液分析多种参数异常且无法找到明确病因的称为特发性男性不育症,其发病率不断提高,给国内甚至全球范围内家庭带来精神及经济负担。由于病因不明确,目前现代医学尚无有效治疗方法。传统中医药通过辨证论治在治疗特发性男性不育症时具有优势,郭军教授认为该病以肾脾两虚为本,为体内湿热形成奠定基础,患者久病无子嗣,肝气不畅则郁结,气血津液运行不通则夹血瘀湿热等有形实邪,另外怪病多痰。故对于特发性男性不育症,治法注重补泻兼施,扶正祛邪,补益脾肾为主,对于湿热、痰湿、瘀血则清热祛湿化痰,活血化瘀等,并举验案1例。     

OCTA对青少年近视人群视网膜微血管密度的观察

目的：基于光学相干断层扫描血管成像（OCTA）技术探讨青少年儿童近视与视网膜表层微血管密度 及视网膜厚度的相关性。方法：横断面研究。共纳入2018年5─11月于四川大学华西医院眼科门 诊就诊的7～14岁青少年近视患者105例（193眼）。对所有受检者进行光学相干断层扫描（OCT）和 OCTA检查，量化分析黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度和各部位视网膜表层微血管密度。单因素方差分析比 较低、中、高度近视组各部位视网膜微血管密度及视网膜厚度的差异。采用Pearson相关系数探讨视 网膜厚度与各部位视网膜表层微血管密度的相关性。Spearman相关系数用于探讨等效球镜与中心凹、 旁中心凹视网膜表层微血管密度以及视网膜厚度的关系；分段多项式函数分析等效球镜度与外环及 直径6 mm完整视网膜表层微血管密度的关系。结果：旁中心凹、外环、直径6 mm完整区域视网膜 表层微血管密度在低、中、高度近视组间比较差异均具有统计学意义（F=11.651、14.499、14.232， 均P<0.001）。年龄与中心凹视网膜厚度之间有较弱正相关关系（r=0.187，P=0.011），与各部位微血管 密度均无相关性。等效球镜度与旁中心凹视网膜微血管密度有相关性（r=-0.301，P<0.001），与外环、 直径6 mm完整区域视网膜表层微血管密度呈曲线相关（r=-0.319，P<0.001；r=-0.307，P<0.001）。 但与中心凹视网膜表层微血管密度及视网膜厚度无显著相关性。此外，中心凹处视网膜厚度与微血 管密度呈正相关（r=0.691，P<0.001），与其余部位微血管密度无相关性。结论：青少年近视程度数 与旁中心凹、外环及直径6 mm完整区域视网膜表层微血管密度呈负相关；中心凹处视网膜厚度与年 龄、微血管密度呈正相关。     

Comparative study of the substantia nigra echogenicity and 123I-Ioflupane SPECT in patients with synucleinopathies with and without REM sleep behavior disorder

ObjectivesHyperechogenicity of the substantia nigra (SN) and abnormal dopamine transporter-single-photon emission computed tomography (DAT-SPECT) are biomarkers commonly used in the assessment of prodromal synucleinopathy. Our goals were as follows: (1) to compare echogenicity of SN in idiopathic rapid eye movement (REM) behavior disorder (iRBD), Parkinson's disease (PD) without RBD (PD-noRBD), PD with RBD (PD + RBD), and control subjects; and (2) to examine association between SN degeneration assessed by DAT-SPECT and SN echogenicity.Patients/methodsA total of 61 subjects with confirmed iRBD were examined using Movement Disorders Society-unified PD rating scale (MDS-UPDRS), TCS (transcranial sonography) and DAT-SPECT. The results were compared with 44 patients with PD (25% PD + RBD) and with 120 age-matched healthy subjects.Results and conclusionThe abnormal SN area was found in 75.5% PD, 23% iRBD and 7.3% controls. Median SN echogenicity area in PD (0.27 ± 0.22 cm²) was higher compared to iRBD (0.07 ± 0.07 cm²; p < 0.0001) and controls (0.05 ± 0.03 cm²; p < 0.0001). SN echogenicity in PD + RBD was not significantly different from PD-noRBD (0.30 vs. 0.22, p = 0.15).Abnormal DAT-SPECT was found in 16 iRBD (25.4%) and 44 PD subjects (100%). No correlation between the larger SN area and corresponding putaminal binding index was found in iRBD (r = −0.13, p = 0.29), nor in PD (r = −0.19, p = 0.22).The results of our study showed that: (1) SN echogenicity area in iRBD was higher compared to controls, but the hyperechogenicity was present only in a minority of iRBD patients; (2) SN echogenicity and DAT-SPECT binding index did not correlate in either group; and (3) SN echogenicity does not differ between PD with/without RBD.     

Diabetic macular ischaemia- a new therapeutic target?

Diabetic macular ischaemia (DMI) is traditionally defined and graded based on the angiographic evidence of an enlarged and irregular foveal avascular zone. However, these anatomical changes are not surrogate markers for visual impairment. We postulate that there are vascular phenotypes of DMI based on the relative perfusion deficits of various retinal capillary plexuses and choriocapillaris. This review highlights several mechanistic pathways, including the role of hypoxia and the complex relation between neurons, glia, and microvasculature. The current animal models are reviewed, with shortcomings noted. Therefore, utilising the advancing technology of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) to identify the reversible DMI phenotypes may be the key to successful therapeutic interventions for DMI. However, there is a need to standardise the nomenclature of OCTA perfusion status. Visual acuity is not an ideal endpoint for DMI clinical trials. New trial endpoints that represent disease progression need to be developed before irreversible vision loss in patients with DMI. Natural history studies are required to determine the course of each vascular and neuronal parameter to define the DMI phenotypes. These DMI phenotypes may also partly explain the development and recurrence of diabetic macular oedema. It is also currently unclear where and how DMI fits into the diabetic retinopathy severity scales, further highlighting the need to better define the progression of diabetic retinopathy and DMI based on both multimodal imaging and visual function. Finally, we discuss a complete set of proposed therapeutic pathways for DMI, including cell-based therapies that may provide restorative potential.