男孩体表“自燃”烧伤一例报告

人体“自燃”现象是人体特异现象的一种,临床上极为罕见,本院发现1例,报道如下。 患儿唐江,男,4岁半,因3小时内发生四次“自燃”烧伤入院。患儿母亲代诉,1990年4月15日上午,患儿坐在家里客厅沙发上,约8时孩子惊叫蹦跳起来,坐在他身旁的奶奶和客人见其会阴部冒烟燃烧,即脱下他的裤子,发现三条裤子都被烧烂有洞。至11时先后4次体表燃烧,其中1次有可见的蓝色“火球”.于当日下午5时入院,体检:发育正常、营养良好,心肺肝脾检查未见异常。烧伤情况:左前臂、左大腿有Ⅱ度烧伤3处,右大腿有Ⅲ度烧伤1处,会阴部及阴囊有Ⅱ～Ⅲ度烧伤,并有散在水疱6个(见封3图),右手食指和中指尖端烧有水疱,伤面均为圆形或椭圆形,表面高低不平,干燥无分泌物。心电图和脑电图检查均正常,血清钾、钠、镁、     

组织多普勒评价阵发性心房颤动患者环肺静脉左心房线性消融术后左心房功能变化

目的 利用组织多普勒超声评价阵发性心房颤动(房颤)患者环肺静脉左房线性消融术后左房功能的动态变化.方法 阵发性房颤患者108例,CARTO系统下行环肺静脉左房线性消融术,术前48 h及术后48 h、1个月、3个月、6个月分别行组织多普勒及常规超声心动图检查.结果 106例阵发性房颤患者成功施行环肺静脉左房线性消融术.与术前相比,左房前后径和左房容积减小,但术后48 h、1个月差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),术后3个月和6个月差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);左室舒张末内径、左室收缩末内径、左室射血分数差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);二尖瓣舒张早期峰速差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),二尖瓣舒张晚期峰速术后48 h较术前降低(P＜0.05),术后1个月、3个月、6个月逐渐增高,3个月时恢复到术前水平.与术前相比,二尖瓣环左室侧壁收缩期峰速、舒张早期峰速差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),舒张晚期峰速术后48 h较术前降低(P＜0.05),术后1个月、3个月、6个月逐渐增高,1个月时恢复到术前水平.结论 环肺静脉左房线性消融术后左房内径和容积减小;环肺静脉左房线性消融术后可出现左房主动收缩功能降低(左房顿抑),经过一段时间可自行恢复.     

无左心房和肺静脉三维重建的阵发性心房颤动导管消融术

Objective To investigate the differences between modeling and non-modeling left atrium in Carto XP system guided catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Methods Thirty-one cases of par-oxysmal atrial fibrillation treated by the same electrophysiologist with guidance of Carto XP during Jan to Dec in 2008 were enrolled. Catheter ablation was accomplished without left atrium and pulmonary veins modeling in 17 patients (non-modeling group) and with left atrium modeling in 14 patients (modeling group). The detailed ablation method was based on circumferential pulmonary veins isolation (CPVI). And linear ablation of tricus-pid valvular isthmus was selectively proceeded individually. The ablation endpoint was set to complete isolation of pulmonary vein potential from left atrium and no continuous fast atrial arrhythmia including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia could be induced. Comparisons for each step during procedure and the fol-low-up outcomes had been done. Results The male: female ratio of the 2 groups were 10:4 and 11 : 6 (P >0.05). The average age were (54.64 ± 15.58) and (59.41 ± 10.59) (P >0.05) ,the diseased courses were (5.05 ±10.4) years and (7.34±7.74)years(P >0.05),the left atrial sizes were (35.29±4.73) mm and (36.47 ±6.15)mm (P > 0.05), the total procedure time was (107.23±28.92) rain and (93.47 ±26.09) win (P>0.05). The X-ray exposure time was (21.09 ±6.49)min (modeling group) and (14.16±5.35)min (non-modeling group,P < 0.05). The CPVI time of fight pulmonary veins was (27.29±18.53) rain (model-ing group) and 18.00 ±4.51 min (non-modeling group, P < 0.05). The CPVI time of left pulmonary veins was (28.14 ±9.26) rain (modeling group) and (23.94±7.10) rain (non-modeling group, P < 0.05). The successful rates was 85.7% (modeling group) and 82.4% (non-modeling group, P > 0.05) over follow-up for 2 to 13 months. Conclusion Carto system guided catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation without modeling of left atrium and pulmonary veins could take less time in X-ray exposure and ablation steps, compa-ring with left atrium modeling one.     

Lasso电极导管指导下标测与射频消融局灶性房性心动过速

目的 探讨10极Lasso电极导管对局灶性房性心动过速(房速)标测及射频消融的指导作用.方法 局灶性房速病人5例,接受电生理检查,初步判断房速起源于左心房或右心房;应用Lasso电极标测心房,指导消融导管寻找局灶性房速最早心房激动(A波)点,于最早心房激动点处消融.结果 局灶性房速病人5例均在房速持续发作时进行Lasso电极标测;消融导管在Lasso电极指导下分别于左心房耳部(2例)、左上肺静脉口部(1例)、上腔静脉(1例)、右心房侧壁(1例)标测到最早A波;较P波提早30～40 ms;Lasso电极记录的A波顺序均呈离心性;在上述最早激动点处消融,均成功终止房速,放电次数为1～3次;未出现并发症;随访2～20个月,无复发;手术时间40～60 min,X线照射时间8～12 min.结论 应用Lasso电极指导标测与射频消融局灶性房速,快速、准确,可提高消融成功率,减少X线照射时间,缩短手术时间,特别对病灶位于心内大静脉、心房耳部病例尤有帮助.     

导管射频消融治疗持续性心房颤动的体会

目的研究持续性心房颤动(房颤)导管射频消融最佳手术方式及复发心律失常的处理策略。方法2005年3月~2007年8月共40例持续性房颤患者接受导管射频消融治疗,三维电解剖标测系统指导下行环同侧肺静脉左心房线性消融;2005年的12例患者部分附加左心房峡部、右心房峡部、左心房顶部线性消融;2006年的12例患者常规进行左心房峡部、右心房峡部射频消融,部分患者附加碎裂电位、左心耳或根据术中的房性心律失常附加其他部位射频消融;2007年的16例患者则在上述基础上进行冠状窦左心房心内膜面射频消融。结果2005年复发8例(66.7%),2006年复发3例(25.0%),2007年复发4例(25.0%)。复发的患者中8例接受第二次导管射频消融术,其中5例维持窦性心律。平均随访(17.6±10.4)个月,总治疗成功率82.5%。结论持续性房颤患者在以肺静脉口为核心的导管射频消融前提下,适当改进导管射频消融策略,可以显著提高成功率。     

二磷酸腺苷诱导血小板聚集率与急性冠状动脉综合征患者支架置入预后的关系

目的探讨以受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)确定经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后高血小板聚集率(血小板低反应)与缺血性事件发生的关系。方法入选278例急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者于PCI术后及随访期1个月分别行二磷酸腺苷(ADP)诱导血小板聚集率(ADP-PG)检测,观察院内围术期心肌梗死及术后6个月随访期内主要不良心脏事件(MACE);行ROC曲线分析,以最佳预测值分为血小板正常反应和血小板低反应组,观察组间MACE发生情况。结果 ROC曲线提示术后ADP-PG≥47.5%为血小板低反应组(曲线下面积=0.66,95% CI:0.57～0.75,P<0.01),共有81例(29.1%)患者;院内及6个月随访期共发生MACE39例(14.0%),随访期MACE发生率在血小板正常反应组和低反应组分别为4.6%(9/197)和11.1%(9/81),OR=2.61,P=0.04,低反应组更容易出现MACE。围术期心肌梗死在两组间分别为6.6%(13/197)和14.8%(12/81),OR=2.46,P=0.03,血栓性事件在两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.03)。结论术后血小板低反应与PCI术后缺血性事件高发生率相关,监测ADP-PG对发现PCI术后高危人群有帮助。     

经右锁骨下静脉途径导管射频消融三尖瓣环下的室性心律失常

目的探讨经右锁骨下静脉途径结合应用长鞘(SR0)导管射频消融三尖瓣环下起源的室性心律失常有效性及安全性。方法 8例患者,根据心电图和/或动态心电图诊断为三尖瓣环附近起源室性早搏(PVC)/室性心动过速(VT),均接受心脏电生理检查及射频消融治疗。术前曾经或术中采取常规下腔静脉途径消融失败后,改经右锁骨下静脉途径并辅用长鞘SR0进行标测与消融。消融成功后,结合靶点位置分析心电图及消融结果。结果 8例消融均获成功。根据消融导管的X线影像特征、电解剖证实其起源于三尖瓣环下6～9点。12导联体表心电图的PVC/VT的QRS波均呈左束支传导阻滞伴电轴左偏图形,Ⅰ、aVL导联主波向上,Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF导联主波向下,2例肢体导联见切迹,QRS波时限174.75±13.44 ms,消融靶点局部V波较体表心电图QRS波提早27.5±3.16 ms。8例成功消融靶点图只见V波,6例有峰电位。随访2～12个月,1例PVC复发。结论在长鞘辅助下,经右锁骨下静脉途径能够安全、有效地消融治疗三尖瓣环下PVC/VT,是经股静脉途径消融失败的有效补充。     

Ensite非接触标测系统在室性心律失常患者射频消融中的应用

目的探讨Ensite系统标测室性心律失常的方法,并评价其指导射频消融的有效性和安全性。方法入选症状性室性期前收缩(室早)或室性心动过速(室速)患者98例,年龄(42±16)岁,其中男43例,女55例。经外周血管进非接触多极球囊导管至右心室或左心室三维重建心腔。心室激动时根据虚拟单极电位的等电位图,结合起搏和激动标测对起源点和突破口及优势传导通道进行消融。结果消融即时成功率95%(93/98)。起源于右心室流出道占96种,间隔部和游离壁各82、14种,起源于其他不典型部位21种,三尖瓣环8种。起源后传导突破呈快反应点爆发方式占78%(91/117),采用点消融覆盖相近的起源点和突破口;呈慢反应突破方式占22%(26/117),采用线性或片状消融策略。随访(6±3)个月,3例复发,1例经再次消融成功。结论 Ensite心内非接触式标测系统用于室性心律失常的三维标测有效安全。室速或室早自最早起源点后经优势传导通道向突破口传导有两种传导方式。     

Guidezilla~(TM)延长导管在冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变反向控制性前向与逆向内膜下寻径技术中的应用

目的探讨Guidezilla~(TM)延长导管在冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变(chronic total occlusion,CTO)行逆向经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时协助导丝通过闭塞病变与导丝体外化的可行性以及安全性。方法回顾性分析广东省人民医院119例CTO患者。其中,2015年1月至2015年10月入选80例未使用Guidezilla~(TM)延长导管的反向控制性前向与逆向内膜下寻径(controlled anterograde and retrograde sub-intimal tracking,CART)技术的患者(Non-Guidezilla组),2015年10月至2016年11月入选39例使用Guidezilla~(TM)延长导管的反向CART技术的患者(Guidezilla组)。结果本研究中反向CART技术总体成功率为84.0%(100/119)。Guidezilla组成功率(100%比76.2%,P0.05)高于Non-Guidezilla组,差异有统计学意义;两组患者平均J-CTO评分为2.67,Guidezilla组手术困难(35.9%比15.0%,P0.001)和非常困难(61.5%比32.5%,P0.001)的患者比例均高于Non-Guidezilla组,差异均有统计学意义;Guidezilla组二次手术率(25.6%比63.8%,P0.001)及开口/分叉病变比例(30.8%比62.5%,P=0.002)均低于Non-Guidezilla组,差异均有统计学意义;Guidezilla组闭塞近段刀割状(53.8%比32.5%,P=0.030)、闭塞段长度20 mm(89.7%比72.5%,P=0.035)及闭塞段弯曲45°(84.6%比63.8%,P=0.020)的比例均高于Non-Guidezilla组,差异均有统计学意义。结论对于长迂曲的复杂CTO患者,逆向导丝与微导管难以通过病变并进入正向指引时,Guidezilla~(TM)延长导管能提供安全有效的解决方案。     

无左心房和肺静脉三维重建的阵发性心房颤动导管消融术

Objective To investigate the differences between modeling and non-modeling left atrium in Carto XP system guided catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Methods Thirty-one cases of par-oxysmal atrial fibrillation treated by the same electrophysiologist with guidance of Carto XP during Jan to Dec in 2008 were enrolled. Catheter ablation was accomplished without left atrium and pulmonary veins modeling in 17 patients (non-modeling group) and with left atrium modeling in 14 patients (modeling group). The detailed ablation method was based on circumferential pulmonary veins isolation (CPVI). And linear ablation of tricus-pid valvular isthmus was selectively proceeded individually. The ablation endpoint was set to complete isolation of pulmonary vein potential from left atrium and no continuous fast atrial arrhythmia including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia could be induced. Comparisons for each step during procedure and the fol-low-up outcomes had been done. Results The male: female ratio of the 2 groups were 10:4 and 11 : 6 (P >0.05). The average age were (54.64 ± 15.58) and (59.41 ± 10.59) (P >0.05) ,the diseased courses were (5.05 ±10.4) years and (7.34±7.74)years(P >0.05),the left atrial sizes were (35.29±4.73) mm and (36.47 ±6.15)mm (P > 0.05), the total procedure time was (107.23±28.92) rain and (93.47 ±26.09) win (P>0.05). The X-ray exposure time was (21.09 ±6.49)min (modeling group) and (14.16±5.35)min (non-modeling group,P < 0.05). The CPVI time of fight pulmonary veins was (27.29±18.53) rain (model-ing group) and 18.00 ±4.51 min (non-modeling group, P < 0.05). The CPVI time of left pulmonary veins was (28.14 ±9.26) rain (modeling group) and (23.94±7.10) rain (non-modeling group, P < 0.05). The successful rates was 85.7% (modeling group) and 82.4% (non-modeling group, P > 0.05) over follow-up for 2 to 13 months. Conclusion Carto system guided catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation without modeling of left atrium and pulmonary veins could take less time in X-ray exposure and ablation steps, compa-ring with left atrium modeling one.