It has long been known that toxins produced by
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) are stored in the bacterial cells in crystalline form. Here we describe the structure determination of the Cry3A toxin found naturally crystallized within Bt cells. When whole Bt cells were streamed into an X-ray free-electron laser beam we found that scattering from other cell components did not obscure diffraction from the crystals. The resolution limits of the best diffraction images collected from cells were the same as from isolated crystals. The integrity of the cells at the moment of diffraction is unclear; however, given the short time (∼5 µs) between exiting the injector to intersecting with the X-ray beam, our result is a 2.9-Å-resolution structure of a crystalline protein as it exists in a living cell. The study suggests that authentic in vivo diffraction studies can produce atomic-level structural information.The advent of X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs) has made it possible to obtain atomic resolution macromolecular structures from crystals with sizes approximating only 1/60th of the volume of a single red blood cell. Brief, intense pulses of coherent X-rays, focused on a spot of 3-μm diameter, have produced 1.9-Å-resolution diffraction data from a stream of lysozyme crystals, each crystal no bigger than 3 μm
3 (
1). A stream of crystals, not just one crystal, is required to collect the many tens of thousands of diffraction patterns that compose a complete data set. No single crystal can contribute more than one diffraction pattern because the XFEL beam is so intense and the crystals so small that the crystals are typically vaporized after a single pulse. Impressively, a photosystem I crystal no bigger than 10 unit cells (300 nm) on an edge produced observable subsidiary diffraction peaks between Bragg reflections, details which would be unobservable from conventionally sized crystals (
2). With this new ability to collect diffraction patterns from crystals of unprecedentedly small dimensions, it is conceivable that high-resolution diffraction data could be collected from crystals in vivo. The structure obtained in this manner would be unaltered from that occurring naturally in a living cell, free from distortion that might otherwise potentially arise from nonphysiological conditions imposed by recrystallization. A practical advantage would also be gained by eliminating the need for a protein purification step, whether the in vivo grown crystals were naturally, or heterologously expressed (
3).The nascent field of serial femtosecond crystallography (SFX) has published results on nine different macromolecular systems since its inception in 2009 (,
9). The crystals for this study were
not grown in artificial crystallization chambers as has been the protocol of conventional macromolecular crystallography since the 1950s. Instead, crystals were grown in cells. Specifically, they were grown in Sf9 insect cells, heterologously expressing
Trypanosoma brucei cathepsin B. These in vivo-grown crystals were used for the XFEL diffraction experiment. To this end, the cells were lysed and the crystals were extracted before injecting them in the XFEL beam for data collection. This last purification step seems to be the only major departure from our goal of obtaining high-resolution structural information from crystal inclusions in vivo, without requiring the crystal to be extracted from the cell that assembled it. Here we attempt to go one step further than previous studies—to record diffraction from crystals within living cells.
Table 1.
SFX publications from XFEL sources to date
Publication date | System | Product | Resolution (Å) | Title of publication | Authors | Reference |
Feb 2011* | Photosystem I | Structure | 8.7 | Femtosecond X-ray protein nanocrystallography | Chapman et al. | 2 |
Dec 2011* | Lysozyme | Structure | 8.7 | Radiation damage in protein serial femtosecond crystallography using an X-ray free-electron laser | Lomb et al. | 4 |
Jan 2012* | Photosystem I-Ferredoxin | Data | 11 | Time-resolved protein nanocrystallography using an X-ray free-electron laser | Aquila et al. | 5 |
Jan 2012* | Cathepsin B | Data | 7.5 | In vivo protein crystallization opens new routes in structural biology | Koopman et al. | 3 |
Jan 2012* | Photosynthetic Reaction Center | Structure | 7.4 | Lipidic phase membrane protein serial femtosecond crystallography | Johansson et al. | 6 |
Jun 2012 | Photosystem II | Structure | 6.6 | Room temperature femtosecond X-ray diffraction of photosystem II microcrystals | Kern et al. | 7 |
Jul 2012 | Lysozyme | Structure | 1.9 | High-resolution protein structure determination by serial femtosecond crystallography | Boutet et al. | 1 |
Nov 2012 | Thermolysin | Data | 4.0 | Nanoflow electrospinning serial femtosecond crystallography | Sierra et al. | 8 |
Jan 2013 | Cathepsin B | Structure | 2.1 | Natively inhibited Trypsanosoma brucei cathepsin B structure determined by using an X-ray laser | Redecke et al. | 9 |
Apr 2013 | Photosystem II | Structure | 5.7 | Simultaneous femtosecond X-ray spectroscopy and diffraction of photosystem II at room temperature | Kern et al. | 10 |
May 2013 | Lysozyme | Structure | 3.2 | Anomalous signal from S atoms in protein crystallographic data from an X-ray free-electron laser | Barends et al. | 11 |
Sept 2013 | Ribosome | Data | <6 | Serial femtosecond X-ray diffraction of 30S ribosomal subunit microcrystals in liquid suspension at ambient temperature using an X-ray free-electron laser | Demirci et al. | 12 |
Dec 2013 | Photosynthetic Reaction Center | Structure | 3.5 | Structure of a photosynthetic reaction center determined by serial femtosecond crystallography | Johansson et al. | 13 |
Dec 2013 | Serotonin receptor | Structure | 2.8 | Serial femtosecond crystallography of G protein-coupled receptors | Liu et al. | 14 |
Jan 2014 | Lysozyme + Gd | Structure | 2.1 | De novo protein crystal structure determination from XFEL data | Barends et al. | 15 |
This study | Cry3A toxin, isolated crystals and whole cells | Structure | 2.8, 2.9 | 2.9 Å-Resolution protein crystal structure obtained from injecting bacterial cells into an X-ray free-electron laser beam | Sawaya et al. | This study |
Open in a separate window*The available XFEL energy was limited to 2 keV (6.2 Å wavelength) when these experiments were conducted.Our target for in vivo crystal structure determination is the insecticidal Cry3A toxin from
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The bacterium naturally produces crystals of toxin during sporulation (
16). Presumably, the capacity for in vivo crystallization evolved in Bt as a mechanism to store the toxin in a concentrated, space-efficient manner. Since the 1920s, farmers have used the crystalline insecticidal proteins to control insect pests; its production as a natural pesticide is now a commercial enterprise. Attempts to structurally characterize the toxins date back to more than 40 y ago with the first report of diffraction from isolated crystals that were packed together in powder form to obtain a measurable signal; X-ray sources available at the time were relatively weak (
17). More than 20 y later, the structure was determined at 2.5-Å resolution by single crystal diffraction using a synchrotron X-ray source (
18). However, to achieve this result, the authors dissolved the naturally occurring microcrystals and recrystallized the toxin using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method. To date, more than a dozen Bt toxin structures have been reported from various strains [Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID codes 1cby, 1ciy, 1i5p, 1ji6, 1w99, 2d42, 2c9k, 2rci, 3eb7, 2ztb, 3ron, 4d8m, 4ato, 4ary, and 4arx], but none using naturally occurring crystals, and all of the crystals had lost their native context.In pursuit of in vivo diffraction, we took advantage of the Bt subsp.
israelensis strain 4Q7/pPFT3As to produce the largest in vivo crystals achievable. This strain contains the plasmid pPFT3As, which increases expression of Cry3A by 12.7-fold over wild type by using strong promoters and an mRNA stabilizing sequence (
19). The level of Cry3A production is such that the cell essentially distorts to take on the shape of the enclosed crystal. The calculated average crystal volume is 0.7 µm
3 (
19), almost accounting for the volume of the cell. To explore the possibilities for in situ data collection of in vivo microcrystals, we injected both the crystals in cells and crystals that we isolated from cells in the XFEL beam and collected SFX diffraction data. Our experiments revealed that the cell wall and other cellular components are not an obstacle to achieving 2.9-Å-resolution diffraction, and analogous studies in other systems might be similarly successful.
相似文献