以宫腔积液为首发症状的胃型宫颈腺癌1例报道并文献复习

宫腔积液指宫腔内液体积存(积水、积血或积脓),是绝经后女性常见体征之一,常于超声检查时发现。持续宫腔积液患者,需宫腔镜检查寻找病因。本文报道1例以宫腔积液为首发症状,经宫腔镜检查确诊为胃型宫颈腺癌的患者。通过病例回顾并文献复习,以期为更多绝经后宫腔积液及宫颈病变的诊断提供参考,避免漏诊及误诊。1病例资料患者67岁,女,主因"绝经18年,不规则阴道出血2月"于2020年5月就诊于首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院妇科微创中心。     

“万方医学网”《中外女性健康研究》学术分析报告

2017年至2019年,《中外女性健康研究》各年期刊发文及下载统计如左可视化图表所示,本期刊发表的论文数量基本稳定,下载次数呈上升趋势。这表明,本期刊学术质量及影响力正在逐步提升。2017年至2019年,本期刊各年篇均参考文献统计如右可视化图表。从图表趋势可知,《中外女性健康研究》期刊篇均参考文献数量逐年上升,表明本刊出版的学术论文质量逐年提升。     

基于心肺运动试验的个体化运动方案在女性更年期代谢综合征患者中的应用

目的探讨基于心肺运动试验(Cardiopulmonary exercise test, CPET)的个体化运动方案在女性更年期代谢综合征(Metabolic syndrome, MS)患者中的应用效果。方法选取2020年6月—2021年6月来该院就诊的100例女性更年期MS患者,按照随机数字表法分为观察组(50例)、对照组(50例)。对照组患者接受常规药物治疗,观察组患者在对照组基础上联合基于CPET的个体化运动方案治疗。两组患者均连续治疗12周,比较两组患者治疗前后人体参数指标、代谢指标、炎症细胞因子等变化。结果治疗前两组患者体质量、体质指数(Body mass index, BMI)、腰围、体脂百分比、内脏脂肪面积、收缩压、舒张压、空腹血糖(Fasting plasma glucose, FPG)、糖化血红蛋白(Glycated hemoglobin, HbA1c)、三酰甘油(Triglycerides, TG)、总胆固醇(Total cholesterol, TC)、低密度脂蛋白(Low-density lipoprotein, LDL)、高密度脂蛋白(High density lipoprotein, HDL)、血清超敏C-反应蛋白(High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, hs-CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子α(Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha, TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(Interleukin 6,IL-6)、峰值公斤摄氧量(Peak oxygen uptake, PeakVO₂)、心率恢复(Heart rate recovery, HRR)、运动后收缩压恢复(Recovery of systolic blood pressure, SBPR)、代谢当量(Metabolic equivalent, Met)等指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);治疗12周后对照组患者上述各指标均无显著变化(P>0.05),观察组患者BMI、腰围、体脂百分比、内脏脂肪面积、收缩压、舒张压、FPG、HbA1c、TG、TC、LDL、血清hs-CRP、TNF-α、IL-6及SBPR较治疗前均显著降低(P<0.05),HDL、PeakVO₂、HRR、Met较治疗前显著增加(P<0.05),且与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);治疗期间,观察组患者降压药、降糖药、降脂药等减药情况均显著高于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者不良反应发生情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论基于CPET的个体化运动方案治疗女性更年期MS患者效果满意,能够有效改善患者人体参数和代谢指标,降低炎性反应和心血管事件发生风险,减轻药物依赖,具有重要临床应用价值。     

育龄期女性癌症患者生育力保存决策的研究进展

对育龄期女性癌症患者生育力保存决策现状及影响因素进行综述。影响因素包括社会人口学因素、信息支持、社会支持、生育力保存风险、经济负担、癌症类型、情绪状态、伦理因素、时间压力、文化宗教等。以期为开展决策支持干预提供依据，缓解患者不良情绪，减少决策冲突。     

血管内介入与单纯药物治疗老年重度颅内前循环动脉狭窄的疗效观察

目的 研究血管内介入与单纯药物运用于老年重度颅内前循环动脉狭窄中的价值。方法 选取我院收治的老年重度颅内前循环动脉狭窄76例，随机分为研究组和对照组，各38例。研究组实施血管内介入治疗，对照组使用单纯药物，测定两组治疗前后的血浆黏度、纤维蛋白、全血高切黏度、全血低切黏度、血细胞比容指标，评价两组治疗前后的神经行为认知(NCSE)、神经功能缺损(NIHSS)、日常生活能力(ADL)评分，统计两组并发症发生情况，比较两组治疗结果。结果 两组治疗前的血流动力学指标比较无差异(P>0.05),治疗后，研究组血浆黏度、纤维蛋白、全血高切黏度、全血低切黏度、血细胞比容均高出对照组(P<0.05);治疗后，研究组NCSE评分、ADL评分高出对照组，但NIHSS评分低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 血管内介入在老年重度颅内前循环动脉狭窄中效果显著，可促进血流动力学指标改善，改善神经功能与认知能力，并提升日常生活能力，并发症少，安全性高。     

居家个性化护理,助脑梗死患者早日康复

脑梗死也叫作缺血性脑卒中,是中老年人群中常见的一种脑血管疾病,死亡率、致残率均较高。脑梗死急性期须治疗1~2周,出院后也须长期服药预防复发,从康复角度来讲,也须进行3~6个月的康复治疗。许多老年患者在治疗的过程中会产生恐惧、焦虑等情绪,对治疗配合度、治疗效果均有着一定的影响。因此,脑梗死护理在治疗过程中起着非常重要的作用,患者需要接受个性化的身心护理来配合治疗。     

经鼻高流量氧气湿化治疗老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重合并呼吸衰竭的可行性研究

ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of transnasal heated humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) with respiratory failure in elderly patients. MethodsA total of 176 elderly patients with AECOPD complicated with respiratory failure who were hospitalized at Peking University Shougang Hospital from December 2016 to January 2022 were enrolled, including 82 patients in an HFNC group and 94 patients in an NPPV group. After treatment, pulse oxygen saturation (SPO₂), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂), oxygenation index (OI), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), comfort score, discharge rate, rate of endotracheal intubation, rate of transfer to intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality were compared between the two groups. The independent sample t-test was used for comparison between the two groups. Statistical data are expressed in percentage or number of cases and the χ² test was used for their comparisons. ResultsThe SPO₂ values at 30 min, 1 h, and 6 h were significantly higher in the HFNC group than in the NPPV group (t=-2.049,-2.618, and -3.314, P=0.043, 0.010, and 0.001, respectively). SPO₂ before discharge was significantly lower than that of the NPPV group (t=2.162, P=0.033), but OI at each time point and before discharge had no statistical significance (P＞0.05). MAP at 6 h was significantly higher in the HFNC group than in the NPPV group (t=-2.209, P=0.029), but within the normal range. HRs at 2 h and 3 h in the HFNC group were significantly higher than those of the NPPV group (t=-2.199 and -2.336, P=0.030 and 0.021, respectively). There were no significant differences in RR, HR, or MAP between the two groups at other time points and before discharge (P＞0.05). There was no significant difference in PaCO2 between the two groups (P＞0.05). Comfort score in the HFNC group was significantly higher than that of the NPPV group (t=-46.807, P＜0.001). There were no significant differences in discharge rate, ICU transfer rate, endotracheal intubation rate, and mortality between the two groups (P＞0.05). ConclusionHFNC is as effective as NPPV in treating elderly patients with AECOPD complicated with type Ⅰ or mild type Ⅱ respiratory failure, and HFNC is more comfortable than NPPV.