舒芬太尼在肾母细胞瘤患儿术后镇痛中的应用效果及对患儿免疫功能的影响

目的探讨舒芬太尼在肾母细胞瘤患儿术后镇痛中的应用效果及对患儿免疫功能的影响。方法采用随机数字表法将42例肾母细胞瘤患儿分为低剂量、中剂量和高剂量组,每组14例,低剂量组、中剂量组、高剂量组患儿术后舒芬太尼镇痛剂量分别为1.0、2.5、4.0μg/kg。术后6、24、48 h,采用中文版儿童疼痛行为量表(FLACC)评估三组患儿的镇痛效果,以及不良反应发生情况;麻醉前和术后1、24、72 h,检测三组患儿免疫功能指标,包括免疫球蛋白(Ig)G、IgA、IgM。结果术后6、24、48 h,中剂量组、高剂量组患儿FLACC评分均低于低剂量组患儿,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。术后1、24、72 h,低剂量组患儿IgG、IgA、IgM水平均低于本组麻醉前,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05);术后1、24 h,中剂量组和高剂量组患儿IgG、IgA、IgM水平均低于本组麻醉前,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05),但术后72 h,中剂量组和高剂量组患儿IgG、IgA、IgM水平与麻醉前比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。低剂量组患儿未发生不良反应,中剂量组患儿发生恶心1例,高剂量组患儿发生恶心5例、呕吐3例。结论2.5μg/kg的舒芬太尼在肾母细胞瘤患儿术后镇痛中效果明显,且对患儿的免疫系统发挥一定的保护作用,可以减轻患儿术后免疫功能抑制。     

Direct cadiac electorphysiologic effects of sufentanil and vecuronium in isolated guinea-pig hearts

Sufentanil and vecuronium are commonly used simultaneously in anaesthesia. Bradycardia and asystole have been described immediately after the administration of these two compounds. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the direct cardiac effects of sufentanil and vecuronium in all parts of the cardiac pacemaker and conduction system.
The electrophysiological effects of sufentanil and vecuronium were studied in isolated spontaneously beating guinea-pig hearts perfused by the method of Langendorff. At a concentration of 0.1 μmol/1 sufentanil a significant reduction of the spontaneous sinus rate, prolongation of atrioventricular, intraventricular and His' bundle conduction could be observed. The highest concentration of 10 μmol/1 of sufentanil led to an overall slowing of conduction velocity and to an profound slowing of spontaneous sinus rate. AV nodal as well as atrial and ventricular refractoriness were markedly prolonged at this high concentration of sufentanil. In contrast, during perfusion with vecuronium at a concentration of 0.1 μmol/1 up to 10 μmol/1 no significant effects on cardiac conduction and pacemaker activity could be observed.
In conclusion, the electrophysiological effects of sufentanil are comparable to that of unspecific calcium antagonists. Therefore, especially in patients with a preexisting damage of the cardiac conduction system, the indirect effect of the combination of sufentanil and vecuronium which is predominantly responsible for bradycardia and asystole may be worsened by the direct effects of sufentanil.     

Addition of sufentanil to bupivacaine in caudal block effect on stress responses in children

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present randomized study was to determine the effect of adding sufentanil to bupivacaine, compared with bupivacaine alone in caudal block, on the surgical stress response in children. METHODS: The children were premedicated with midazolam 0.5 mg/kg. All children received induction with nitrous oxide and sevoflurane. Anesthesia was maintained with the same volatile agents in the both groups. The children were randomly allocated to two groups. Group I received bupivacaine alone (n = 17) and group II received bupivacaine + sufentanil (n = 16). Caudal block was performed with 0.25% bupivacaine 2 mg/kg (group I) or 0.25% bupivacaine 2 mg/kg with sufentanil 0.5 microg/kg (group II) after induction of anesthesia. Blood samples were obtained after induction of anesthesia (T(0)) to measure baseline concentrations of cortisol, prolactin, glucose and insulin. Additional samples were obtained 30 min after the start of surgery (T(1)), and 60 min after the end of surgery (T(2)). RESULTS: All of the basal values (T(0)) were within the normal ranges of the authors' laboratory for children of this age group and there were no differences between the groups (P > 0.05). In both groups, glucose concentration increased at T(1), compared with T(0) and T(2) (P < 0.05). The glucose concentration was unchanged at T(2) compared with T(0) in both group (P > 0.05). In both groups, prolactin concentration increased at T(1), compared with T(0) and decreased at T(2), compared with T(1) (P < 0.05). Cortisol decreased at T(1) and T(2), compared with T(0) in both groups. (P < 0.05). Insulin concentration remained unchanged at T(0) and T(2), but increased slightly at T(1) in both groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in plasma prolactin, cortisol, glucose and insulin levels between the two groups at T(1) and T(2) (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There is no advantage in adding 0.5 microg/kg sufentanil to bupivacaine over bupivacaine alone in the caudal block, with regard to the surgical stress response in children.     

阿片类药物用于抑制气管内插管副反应时合理给药时机优于药物种类和剂量的选择

已经证明芬太尼能很好地抑制气管插管的心血管副反应。舒芬太尼是芬太尼的N-4噻吩基衍生物,与阿片受体的亲和力较芬太尼强,镇痛作用是芬太尼的10倍,而且作用持续时间也更长。瑞芬太尼是一种新型μ阿片受体激动剂,具有起效迅速、作用时间短、镇痛作用与芬太尼近似、恢复迅速、无     

舒芬太尼用于全凭静脉麻醉40例研究

目的：探讨舒芬太尼全凭静脉复合麻醉时对听觉诱发电位指数、血流动力学和术后复苏的影响.方法：40例美国标准协会（ASA）Ⅰ～Ⅱ级病人择期行胆囊切除手术,随机分为Ⅰ组（舒芬太尼组）和Ⅱ组（芬太尼组）,记录两组病人麻醉期间各时间点的听觉诱发电位指数（AEPI）值、收缩压、舒张压、心率和SpO2.结果：Ⅱ组插管后1 min、2 min的收缩压较Ⅰ组升高,而插管后1 min的心率较Ⅰ组降低（P＜0.05）;Ⅰ组插管后1 min、2 min和3 min时的AEPI值低于Ⅱ组（P＜0.05）;Ⅰ组拔管后至定向力恢复的时间较Ⅱ组长（P＜0.05）;Ⅰ组丙泊酚的用量较Ⅱ组少（P＜0.05）.结论：等效剂量的舒芬太尼较芬太尼的全凭静脉复合麻醉可以使病人达到更为合适的麻醉深度,并能使血流动力学更加稳定,同时可减少丙泊酚用量.     

舒芬太尼用于腹部手术患者自控静脉镇痛的临床观察

目的探讨腹部手术病人自控舒芬太尼静脉镇痛的临床效果及安全性。方法选择气管内插管全身麻醉腹部手术患者计80例，ASA分级Ⅰ～Ⅱ级，年龄18～86岁，高中以上文化程度。随机分为两组，每组40例，一组为舒芬太尼镇痛组（S组），术后镇痛药物配方：舒芬太尼2μg／kg＋格拉司琼6mg加生理盐水至100ml；另一组为芬太尼镇痛组（F组），术后镇痛药物配方：芬太尼20μg／kg＋格拉司琼6mg加生理盐水至100ml。镇痛泵参数均设置为：负荷剂量4ml，背景输注速度1ml／h，自控剂量0．5ml，锁定时间15min。观察S组与F组的镇痛效果及不良反应。结果S组在各个时段静态和动态VAS评分均低于F组（P〈0．05）；S组镇静效果较F组评分略高，但两者差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）；S组不良反应发生率少于F组（P〈0．01）；两组患者均未见明显的呼吸抑制发生。术后随访两组患者对镇痛效果的总满意度均在90％以上。结论腹部手术病人自控舒芬太尼静脉镇痛，具有良好的镇痛和镇静作用及安全性，且心血管的稳定性好，不良反应低。     

舒芬太尼联合压力控制通气在气管异物取出术中的应用效果

目的 观察比较不同剂量舒芬太尼联合高频压力控制通气在婴幼儿气管异物取出术中的麻醉效果。方法 选择2018—2020年于本院行气管异物取出术的患儿90例,使用随机数字表法分3组,每组30例。3组分别给予不同剂量的舒芬太尼:A组0.1 μg/kg,B组0.3 μg/kg,C组0.5 μg/kg。观察比较3组患儿在麻醉诱导前(T0期)、麻醉诱导后(T1期)、插入硬支气管镜(T2期)、异物取出后(T3期)的生命体征变化;记录3组患儿手术相关指标,同时记录发生不良反应例数。结果 B组T2期生命体征更稳定,术中B组的体动次数(1.5±0.7)和C组的体动次数(1.2±0.6)低于A组的体动次数为(2.5±0.6),(P值均＜0.001),C组在T1期和T2期抑制患儿呼吸,血氧饱和度为(91.4±3.5)%和(88.3±2.7)%,均低于A组的(94.5±2.8)%和(92.7±2.2)%(P值均＜0.05),C组需要退出硬支气管镜以维持通气的次数为(1.6±0.6),高于A组的(1.0±0.3)(P＜0.001),而且苏醒时间为(25.4±5.2)min,长于A组(15.6±5.6)min(P＜0.001)。B组手术时间为(15.3±3.7)min,短于A组的(21.2±4.2)min(P值均＜0.001)。结论 婴幼儿气管异物取出术中,静脉注射0.3 μg/kg舒芬太尼联合高频压力控制通气麻醉效果较优。     

Low-dose sufentanil and lidocaine supplementation of general anaesthesia

This randomized double-blind study compared the effects of: (1) saline infusion (C); (2) sufentanil alone (1.0 micrograms.kg-1) (S); and (3) low-dose sufentanil (0.5 micrograms.kg-1) in combination with lidocaine (1.5 mg.kg-1) (LS): on the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation and on postoperative ventilation as monitored by respiratory inductive plethysmography in day-care surgical procedures of approximately 60 min duration. Thirty healthy, unpremedicated patients were studied. Thiopentone requirements were reduced by 40 and 28 per cent in the S and LS groups respectively compared with control (P less than 0.001). Both treatments suppressed HR and BP responses (P less than 0.005) to intubation. Postoperatively, PaCO2 was elevated (P less than 0.05) in group S. Dose-related respiratory depression was observed. The incidence of postoperative apnoea was significantly higher in both S and LS groups than compared with control (P less than 0.05). However, only patients in group S showed higher apnoea index and mean apnoea duration over the initial 10-20 min after surgery compared with control (P less than 0.005). In addition, group S showed slower respiratory frequency and prolonged expiratory time (P less than 0.005). In conclusion, an induction dose of sufentanil (1 microgram.kg-1) used in balanced anaesthesia of less than 70 min duration was associated with significant respiratory depression, particularly during the initial 10-20 min after surgery, whereas low-dose sufentanil (0.5 micrograms.kg-1) with lidocaine (1.5 mg.kg-1) had minimal postoperative respiratory depression and comparable attenuation of pressor responses to intubation.     

A comparison of the myocardial metabolic and haemodynamic changes produced by propofol-sufentanil and enflurane-sufentanil anaesthesia for patients having coronary artery bypass graft surgery

The purpose of this study was to compare propofol-sufentanil with enflurane-sufentanil anaesthesia for patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with respect to changes in (1) haemodynamic variables; (2) myocardial blood flow and metabolism; (3) serum cortisol, triglyceride, lipoprotein concentrations and liver function; and (4) recovery characteristics. Forty-seven patients with preserved ventricular function (ejection fraction greater than 40%, left ventricular end diastolic pressure less than or equal to 16 mmHg) were studied. Patients in Group A (n = 24) received sufentanil 0.2 microgram.kg-1 and propofol 1-2 mg.kg-1 for induction of anaesthesia which was maintained with a variable rate propofol (50-200 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) infusion and supplemental sufentanil (maximum total 5 micrograms.kg-1). Patients in Group B (n = 23) received sufentanil 5 micrograms.kg-1 for induction of anaesthesia which was maintained with enflurane and supplemental sufentanil (maximum total 7 micrograms.kg-1). Haemodynamic and myocardial metabolic profiles were determined at the awake-sedated, post-induction, post-intubation, first skin incision, post-sternotomy, and pre-cardiopulmonary bypass intervals. Induction of anaesthesia produced a larger reduction in systolic blood pressure in Group A (156 +/- 22 to 104 +/- 20 mmHg vs 152 +/- 26 to 124 +/- 24 mmHg; P less than 0.05). No statistical differences were detected at any other time or in any other variable including myocardial lactate production (n = 13 events in each group), time to tracheal extubation and time to discharge from the ICU. We concluded that, apart from hypotension on induction of anaesthesia, propofol-sufentanil anaesthesia produced anaesthetic conditions equivalent to enflurane-sufentanil anaesthesia for CABG surgery.     

不同剂量舒芬太尼在全麻诱导中对异丙酚TCI效应室浓度的影响

目的：研究不同剂量舒芬太尼在全麻诱导中对异丙酚TCI效应室浓度的影响。结果：45例年龄27岁-68岁，ASA（Ⅰ-Ⅱ）级择期行腹部手术的病人，随机分为三组：Ⅰ组（n=15）麻醉诱导时加用为芬太尼，Ⅱ组（n=15）则加用小剂量舒芬太尼（O．31μ／kg）；Ⅲ组（n=15）加用大剂量舒芬太尼（0．45μ／kg）。记录麻醉前（T0）、插管前即刻（T1）、插管后1min（T2）、3minB）、5min（T4）、10min（T5）各时点的平均动脉压（MAP）、心率（HR）及异丙酚效应室浓度（Ce）。同时记录脑电双频指数（BIS值）。结果：MAP在T2、T3、T4时点Ⅲ组较其它二组低（P〈0．05）；心率在T2、T3时点Ⅱ组明显高于Ⅰ组和Ⅲ组（P〈0．05）；异丙酚Ce在T2、T3、T4、T5时点Ⅲ组低于Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组（P〈0．05或0．01），而Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组间差别无统计学意义。结论：诱导用量为0.45μ／kg的舒芬太尼在腹部手术全麻诱导过程中不仅能保持稳定的血流动力学（MAP和HR），而且能降低异丙酚效应室浓度。