血小板GPⅡb/Ⅲa 受体抑制剂(A辅剂)在血栓弹力图血小板聚集功能检测中的应用

目的评估以功能性纤维蛋白原(功纤杯)检测结果为标准的血栓弹力图(TEG)血小板聚集功能检测中在巴曲酶杯(A杯)内加入血小板GPⅡb/Ⅲa受体抑制剂(A辅剂)对检测结果的影响。方法从2019年12月~2020年5月在本院神经内科、心内科、综合科和康复科就诊、做TEG血小板聚集功能检测的患者中收集100(人)份全血标本,根据TEG测得的A杯血块强度(MA)值(mm)将血标本分为MA<25组(n=50)和MA≥25组(n=50),2组再各细分为A杯组(各自为n=50)、A辅剂组(在A杯中加入A辅剂)(各自为n=50)、功纤杯组(各自为n=50)3个亚组,各亚组均检测2次;比较各亚组间的血小板二磷酸腺苷(ADP)与花生四烯酸(AA)途径抑制率的线性相关(R2)、血小板抑制率的差异,以及3个亚组间ADP与AA途径药物疗效判读结果的一致性。结果 1)MA<25 mm组,血小板ADP及AA途径抑制率(%)A杯、A辅剂与功纤杯3个亚组分别为32.00±17.44 vs 30.19±17.44 vs 30.07±16.18,24.3±33.53 vs 22.53±30.9 vs 22.37±31.2(均为R2>0.975);2)MA≥25 mm组,血小板ADP及AA途径抑制率(%)A杯、A辅剂与功纤杯3个亚组分别为34.34±33.59 vs 18.45±24.42 vs 18.01±24.33,23.19±39.33 vs 8.48±21.75 vs 8.31±21.7(其中A杯组与A辅剂组比较均为R2<0.8,A辅剂组与功纤杯组均为R2>0.975);3)以功纤杯组检测结果为标准,A杯组与A辅剂组间ADP和AA途径药物疗效判读正确率分别为82%(41/50)vs 100%(50/50)、84%(42/50)vs 100%(50/50)(P<0.05),而A辅剂组与功纤杯组之间2种途径药物疗效判读结果一致(P>0.05)。结论在TEG的血小板聚集功能检测中A杯内添加A辅剂可以有效抑制A杯中非特异激活的血小板,真实反映纤维蛋白原的功能,故提高了其血小板抑制率检测结果的准确性。     

Colony stimulating factors in the nervous system

Although traditionally seen as regulators of hematopoiesis, colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) have emerged as important players in the nervous system, both in health and disease. This review summarizes the cellular sources, patterns of expression and physiological roles of the macrophage (CSF-1, IL-34), granulocyte-macrophage (GM-CSF) and granulocyte (G-CSF) colony stimulating factors within the nervous system, with a particular focus on their actions on microglia. CSF-1 and IL-34, via the CSF-1R, are required for the development, proliferation and maintenance of essentially all CNS microglia in a temporal and regional specific manner. In contrast, in steady state, GM-CSF and G-CSF are mainly involved in regulation of microglial function. The alterations in expression of these growth factors and their receptors, that have been reported in several neurological diseases, are described and the outcomes of their therapeutic targeting in mouse models and humans are discussed.     

长效干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者疗效及其对静息能量消耗和营养状态的影响*

目的 探讨应用长效α-干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者疗效及静息能量消耗和营养状态的变化。方法 2017年4月～2019年4月我院收治的CHC患者48例,采用随机数字表法分为观察组24例和对照组24例,分别给予聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a(peg-IFNα-2a)和利巴韦林治疗或干扰素α-2a(IFNα-2a)联合利巴韦林治疗48 w。测量静息能量消耗(REE)和预测静息能量消耗(pREE),常规检测血清前白蛋白(PA)和白蛋白(ALB)水平,计算体质指数(BMI)。结果 在治疗48 w结束和随访6 m时,观察组完全应答率分别为62.5%和54.2%,显著高于对照组的37.5%和29.2%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);在观察组,用药前REE和pREE分别为(1504.6±481.5)kcal/d和(1432.3±229.3)kcal/d,在治疗结束时显著增加至(1822.1±546.7)kcal/d和(1241.8±208.6)kcal/d,对照组用药前REE和pREE分别为(1505.2±482.1)kcal/d和(1433.5±231.2)kcal/d,在治疗结束时,显著增加至(1824.4±547.6)kcal/d和(1243.1±208.8)kcal/d, 但两组之间REE和pREE变化无显著性差异(P>0.05);治疗前,观察组BMI及血清PA和ALB水平分别为(19.2±2.0)kg/m²、(161.5±45.2)mg/L和(38.4±4.2)g/L,在治疗结束时分别降为(17.1±1.5)kg/m²、(135.8±40.2)mg/L和(34.2±3.2)g/L,治疗前对照组BMI及血清PA和ALB水平分别为(19.3±2.1)kg/m²、(161.3±45.0)mg/L和(38.5±4.4)g/L,在治疗结束时分别降为(17.2±1.5)kg/m²、(136.3±40.2)mg/L和(34.2±3.1)g/L,但两组之间这些指标的变化无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 相对于IFNα-2a与利巴韦林联合,应用peg-IFNα-2a与利巴韦林联合治疗CHC患者能够获得更好的治疗效果,但无论何种治疗方案,均增加了能量消耗,降低了体质量和血清白蛋白水平,提示标准方案抗病毒治疗的不良反应还是值得重视的。     

Physical activity as a proxy to ameliorate inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes and periodontal disease at high cardiovascular risk

While the beneficial impact of physical activity has been ascertained in a variety of pathological scenarios, including diabetes and low-grade systemic inflammation, its potential remains still putative for periodontal health. Periodontal disease has been associated with inflammatory systemic alterations, which share a common denominator with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Physical exercise, along with nutritional counseling, is a cornerstone in the treatment and prevention of type 2 diabetes, also able to reduce the prevalence of periodontal disease and cardiovascular risk. In addition, considering the higher incidence of periodontitis in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to healthy controls, the fascinating research question would be whether physical activity could relieve the inflammatory pressure exerted by the combination of these two diseases. This multi-disciplinary viewpoint discusses available literature in order to argument the hypothesis of a “three–way relationship” linking diabetes, periodontitis, and physical activity.     

中国非小细胞肺癌免疫检查点抑制剂治疗专家共识（2020年版）

非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）是肺癌最常见的病理类型。晚期NSCLC的系统性抗肿瘤治疗经历了化疗、靶向治疗及免疫治疗的变革，患者总体生存时间不断延长。免疫检查点抑制剂（immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICIs），尤其是程序性死亡分子-1（programmed cell death protein 1, PD-1）/程序性死亡分子配体-1（programmed death-ligand 1, PD-L1）抗体已成为表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）/间变性淋巴瘤激酶（anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ALK）阴性晚期NSCLC一线及二线的标准治疗和局部晚期NSCLC同步放化疗后标准治疗，并在辅助/新辅助治疗中显示出可喜的结果，改变了NSCLC整体治疗格局。随着越来越多的ICIs在国内获批肺癌适应证，中国临床肿瘤学会（Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, CSCO）NSCLC专家委员会牵头，组织该领域的专家，结合2019年版专家共识，参考最新国内外文献、临床研究数据及系统评价，在专家共同讨论的基础上，达成统一意见并制定、更新本共识，为国内同行更好地应用ICIs治疗NSCLC提供参考意见。     

免疫检查点抑制剂治疗少见突变非小细胞肺癌疗效的研究进展

驱动基因的发现及针对驱动基因的靶向治疗已显著提高了肺癌患者的生存质量和时间，但目前对于BRAF、HER2、MET、RET等少见驱动基因改变肺癌患者的靶向药物的选择仍然较少。近年来免疫检查点抑制剂在肺癌治疗中取得了一定的疗效，但因为少见驱动基因突变的肺癌患者本身样本量少，开展大规模临床随机对照试验尚存在一定的困难，目前此类患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的疗效情况仍不明确。本文将对目前已掌握的免疫检查点抑制剂治疗BRAF、HER2、MET、RET等少见驱动基因改变肺癌患者的临床研究结果进行综述，以期在一定程度上为临床工作提供一些依据和参考。     

miR-124a和miR-449a对非小细胞肺癌的诊断价值

目的探讨微小RNA-124a(miR-124a)和微小RNA-449a(miR-449a)对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的诊断价值。方法选取行手术切除肿瘤的NSCLC患者90例(NSCLC组),出院随访36个月,根据术后复发情况分为复发组(56例)和未复发组(34例)。另选取肺部良性结节患者60例(良性结节组)、健康体检者80名(正常对照组)。收集所有对象的基本资料,同时检测血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、miR-124a和miR-449a水平。采用Spearman相关分析评估各项指标的相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估各项指标诊断NSCLC的效能。结果NSCLC组血清NSE水平高于正常对照组和良性结节组(P<0.05),血清miR-124a和miR-449a水平低于正常对照组和良性结节组(P<0.05)。正常对照组与良性结节组之间血清NSE、miR-124a和miR-449a水平差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与未复发组比较,复发组血清NSE水平升高(P<0.05),血清miR-124a和miR-449a水平降低(P<0.05);2个组之间年龄、性别、体质量指数(BMI)、吸烟情况、肿瘤直径、病理类型和TNM分期之间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,NSE、miR-124a和miR-449a单项诊断NSCLC的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.660、0.703、0.759。NSE+miR-124a+miR-449a联合检测诊断NSCLC的AUC(0.895)和敏感性(96.25%)均最高,miR-124a+miR-449a联合检测诊断NSCLC的特异性最高(90.31%)。结论miR-124a和miR-449a或可作为NSCLC的辅助诊断指标。     

Variable immunogenicity of a vivax malaria blood-stage vaccine candidate

Relapsing malaria caused by Plasmodium vivax is a neglected tropical disease and an important cause of malaria worldwide. Vaccines to prevent clinical disease and mosquito transmission of vivax malaria are needed to overcome the distinct challenges of this important public health problem. In this vaccine immunogenicity study in mice, we examined key variables of responses to a P. vivax Duffy binding protein vaccine, a leading candidate to prevent the disease-causing blood-stages. Significant sex-dependent differences were observed in B cell (CD80+) and T cell (CD8+) central memory subsets, resulting in significant differences in functional immunogenicity and durability of anti-DBP protective efficacy. These significant sex-dependent differences in inbred mice were in the CD73+CD80+ memory B cell, H2KhiCD38hi/lo, and effector memory subsets. This study highlights sex and immune genes as critical variables that can impact host responses to P. vivax antigens and must be taken into consideration when designing clinical vaccine studies.