无创产前检测进行染色体缺失或重复检测的临床应用价值

目的:探讨无创产前检测(NIPT)进行染色体缺失或重复检测的临床应用价值。方法:对传统产前筛查异常、既往有唐氏儿分娩史及高龄孕妇等3500例孕妇采集外周血,采用Illumina测序技术检测母体血浆胎儿游离DNA(cff DNA),分析胎儿性染色体及除21、13、18号染色体以外的其他常染色体信息,对NIPT阳性的孕妇进行遗传咨询,对其中自愿进行介入性产前诊断的,行染色体核型分析及染色体微阵列分析(CMA)进行验证。结果:3500例接受NIPT的病例中,检出32例常染色体异常(除外21、13、18号),其中有11例接受介入性产前诊断,染色体核型分析及CMA检测分别提示3例异常,符合率27.3%(3/11)。检出45例性染色体异常,其中有23例接受介入性产前诊断,染色体核型分析及CMA检测分别确诊12例异常,符合率52.2%(12/45)。结论:NIPT在预测胎儿性染色体异常及常染色体(除外21、13、18号)异常方面有一定的参考价值,但需要进行染色体核型分析和(或)CMA检测进行验证。     

染色体微阵列分析在无创产前筛查非整倍体高风险中的应用价值

目的:探讨染色体微阵列分析(CMA)技术在无创产前筛查(NIPT)提示非整倍体高风险胎儿的产前诊断中的应用价值。方法:241例NIPT提示胎儿染色体非整倍体高风险的孕妇,经羊膜腔或绒毛穿刺获取胎儿细胞,进行CMA分析。对于NIPT提示21-三体和性染色体非整倍体高风险的孕妇根据筛查原因(高龄筛查组、唐筛异常或超声软指标异常组、非高龄筛查组)进行组间NIPT阳性预测值的比较,并对CMA检测提示有染色体拷贝数变异(CNV)的病例进行致病性分析。结果:NIPT对于染色体非整倍体总的阳性预测值为76.3%。NIPT对于21-三体、18-三体、13-三体和性染色体非整倍体的阳性预测值分别为95.0%、88.8%、75.0%和53.3%。经CMA分析确认,在101例NIPT提示21-三体高风险病例中,以高龄筛查组阳性预测值最高(100.0%),3组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。在90例NIPT提示性染色体非整倍体高风险病例中,仍以高龄筛查组阳性预测值最高(61.9%),3组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。12例NIPT提示染色体非整倍体高风险经CMA检测存在CNV。结论:对于21-三体和性染色体非整倍体,不同人群中高龄组的NIPT阳性预测值最为显著,临床上对于此类人群,更要引起足够的重视,做好跟踪随访。CMA较传统的染色体核型分析能额外检出CNV,更能提高染色体结构异常的检出率。     

无创产前基因检测在胎儿性染色体疾病筛查中的应用

目的探讨无创产前基因检测(non-invasive prenatal genetic testing,NIPT)在胎儿性染色体疾病中的临床价值。方法统计深圳市第二人民医院2016年3月至2019年6月行NIPT的16119例单胎孕妇中提示21-三体、18-三体、13-三体、性染色体异常和其他染色体异常的阳性率;对比2016年3月至2019年6月NIPT示“胎儿性染色体异常”与本院染色体核型结果。结果①NIPT对21-三体,18-三体,13-三体,性染色体异常和其他染色体异常筛查的阳性率分别为0.42%(68/16119),0.10%(16/16119),0.07%(11/16119),0.38%(61/16119)和0.22%(36/16119)。②47例“NIPT示胎儿性染色体异常”者中,确诊为性染色体疾病者26例,阳性预测值55.32%。其中,NIPT对胎儿性染色体数目偏多的阳性预测值为91.30%(21/23),对胎儿性染色体数目偏少的阳性预测值20.0%(4/20),对胎儿性染色体数目异常的阳性预测值25.0%(1/4)。结论NIPT可作为胎儿性染色体疾病的筛查方法,但由于其对性染色体偏少和性染色体数目异常的假阳性率较高,检测阳性者仍需要做侵入性产前诊断确诊。     

Noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal sex chromosome abnormalities using the semiconductor sequencing platform (SSP) in Southern China

BackgroundNoninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely used to screen for fetal aneuploidies, including fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs). However, there is less information on the performance of NIPT in detecting SCAs.MethodsA cohort of 47,800 pregnancies was recruited to review the high-risk NIPT results for SCAs. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) was extracted and sequenced. All NIPT high-risk cases were recommended to undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis for karyotyping analysis and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA).ResultsA total of 238 high-risk cases were detected by NIPT, including 137 cases of 45,X, 27 cases of 47,XXX, and 74 cases of 47,XYY/47,XXY. Prenatal diagnosis, including karyotyping analysis and CMA, was available in 170 cases. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 30.00% for 45,X, 70.58% for 47,XXX, and 81.13% for 47,XYY/47,XXY. In addition, 13 cases of sex chromosome mosaicism and 9 cases of sex chromosome CNVs were incidentally found in this study.ConclusionOur study showed that NIPT was reliable for screening SCAs based on a large sample, and it performed better in predicting sex chromosome trisomies than monosomy X. Our study will provide an important reference for clinical genetic counseling and further processing of the results.     

Perinatal outcomes of prenatal cases testing positive for trisomy 9 by noninvasive prenatal testing

ObjectivesTo evaluate the performance of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of fetal trisomy 9 in prenatal screening and to investigate the prenatal appearances and genetic counseling of trisomy 9 fetuses.Materials and methodsThe ultrasonography information, laboratory detection and pregnancy outcome of 16 cases of single pregnancy with trisomy 9 identified by NIPT who received amniocentesis in our prenatal diagnosis center from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsAmong the 16 cases, 2 cases of trisomy 9, 3 cases of trisomy 9 mosaicism, 2 cases reporting of regions of homozygosity and 9 cases of false positive were diagnosed. Among the true positive cases, 4 cases showed abnormal ultrasonic finding: 3 cases terminated pregnancy and 1 case was lost to follow-up. Another 1 case was in utero fetal demise in the second trimester without structural abnormality, and 2 cases were normal live birth without developmental abnormalities. In the 9 cases with normal kayrotyping, 1 case had termination of pregnancy and 1 case with mental retardation and poor cognitive ability, other 7 had good pregnancy outcomes.ConclusionOur results may be helpful for the selection of prenatal diagnostic strategies and genetic counseling for pregnant women with trisomy 9 revealed by NIPT.     

Chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with high-risk prenatal indications: A retrospective study in China

ObjectiveThe present study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for fetuses with several indications of being at high risk for various conditions.Materials and methodsThis retrospective analysis included 1256 pregnancies that were prenatally evaluated due to high-risk indications using invasive CMA. The indications for invasive prenatal diagnosis mainly included ultrasound anomalies, high-risk for maternal serum screening (MSS), high-risk for non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPT), family history of genetic disorders or birth defects, and advanced maternal age (AMA). The rate of clinically significant genomic imbalances between the different groups was compared.ResultsThe overall prenatal diagnostic yield was 98 (7.8%) of 1256 pregnancies. Clinically significant genomic aberrations were identified in 2 (1.5%) of 132 patients with non-structural ultrasound anomalies, 36 (12.7%) of 283 with structural ultrasound anomalies, 2 (4.5%) of 44 at high-risk for MSS, 38 (26.6%) of 143 at high-risk for NIPT, 11 (3.8%) of 288 with a family history, and 7 (2.1%) of 328 with AMA. Submicroscopic findings were identified in 29 fetuses, 19 of whom showed structural ultrasound anomalies.ConclusionThe diagnostic yields of CMA for pregnancies with different indications greatly varied. CMA could serve as a first-tier test for structural anomalies, especially multiple anomalies, craniofacial dysplasia, urinary defects, and cardiac dysplasia. Our results have important implications for genetic counseling.     

A two-year experience of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at an urban tertiary medical center in South Korea

ObjectiveTo report our experience of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in a tertiary urban academic medical center in South Korea.Materials and methodsAn observational retrospective study of singleton and twin pregnancies that underwent prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy from July 2016 to April 2018 was conducted. Demographics of the study population electing NIPT versus those opting the integrated test were compared. We also assessed clinical significant factors influencing cfDNA fetal fraction in NIPT.ResultsAmong the 817 women who underwent serum screening tests during the study period, 490 women (60.0%) chose the integrated test while 327 women (40.0%) chose NIPT. Compared to the integrated test group, women in the NIPT group were older (mean age 34.7 ± 3.7 vs. 32.6 ± 3.4; p-value < 0.01), multiparous (47.1% vs. 39.8%; p-value = 0.046), and had higher rate of previous abortion history (28.4% vs. 21.6%; p-value = 0.033). A significant decrease in the number of invasive diagnostic tests was observed since the adoption of NIPT. The screen negative and positive rates of the integrated test group for fetal aneuploidy were 95.3% and 4.7%, respectively while those of the NIPT group were 95.9% and 1.2%, respectively. The rate of inadequate cfDNA fetal fraction was 3.0%. Low fetal fraction was associated with higher maternal age, body weight and BMI.ConclusionsThe implementation of NIPT has significantly affected the practice pattern of prenatal aneuploidy screening by replacing the integrated test and decreasing invasive diagnostic tests.     

Next-generation sequencing: a follow-up of 36,913 singleton pregnancies with noninvasive prenatal testing in central China

PurposeTo evaluate the noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results of 36,913 cases in Jiangxi province of central China and explore its application value in prenatal screening and diagnosis.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included 36,913 singleton pregnant women who underwent NIPT because of moderate-/high-risk pregnancy or voluntary requirements between January 2017 and December 2019 in our hospital. Chromosomal abnormalities such as trisomies 21, 18, and 13 (T21, T18, T13) and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) were judged by standard Z-score analysis. Positive NIPT results were confirmed by amniocentesis and karyotyping. Pregnancy outcomes were followed up via telephone interview.ResultsA total of 1.01% (371/36,913) positive cases were detected by NIPT, comprising 137, 46, 31, and 157 cases of T21, T18, T13, and SCAs, respectively. A total of 116 of T21, 27 of T18, 13 of T13, and 51 of SCAs were confirmed to be true positive; all normal cases that had been followed up were verified to be true negative. The NIPT sensitivity in T21, T18, T13, and SCAs was 100.00% individually, whereas the specificity was 99.94% (36,488/36,509), 99.95% (36,579/36,598), 99.95% (36,594/36,612), and 99.72% (36,472/36,574), respectively. Furthermore, the negative predictive values of T21, T18, T13, and SCAs were all 100%, while the positive predictive values were 84.67%, 58.70%, 41.94%, and 33.33%, respectively.ConclusionNIPT is highly sensitive and has a low false positive rate in testing clinically significant fetal aneuploidies of general reproductive women. However, this technique cannot substitute for amniocentesis and karyotyping, and detailed genetic counseling is also essential for the high-risk group of NIPT.     

不同产前筛查方案对胎儿染色体异常检出效率的比较

目的探讨不同产前筛查方案对胎儿染色体异常的检出效率。方法应用时间分辨免疫荧光法对24986例孕妇进行母体血清学二联筛查,根据风险值及后续的检查方案不同将人群分为高风险直接进行羊水穿刺组(A1组)、高风险行无创产前检测(non-invasive prenatal testing,NIPT)组(A2组)、临界风险进行超声软指标筛查组(B1组)及临界风险进行NIPT组(B2组)。并对各组妊娠结局进行随访后比较分析各组筛查方案对胎儿常见染色体异常检出效率的影响。结果(1)A1组390例直接经羊水穿刺确诊唐氏综合征(Downs’syndrome,DS)1例,爱德华综合征(Edwards’syndrome,ES)2例,其他染色体异常14例;A2组1001例NIPT检出高风险24例,经羊水穿刺确诊DS 9例,ES 2例,其他染色体异常6例,A2组漏诊1例ES及1例6号染色体小片段缺失(arr[hg19]6p12.2(21,816,542-22,431,031)×1)。血清学筛查高风险A1组、A2组筛查方案对胎儿染色体异常的检出率分别为100%、89%,差异有统计学意义。(2)B1组确诊DS 2例,其他染色体异常2例,漏诊DS 2例;B2组确诊DS 1例,ES 1例,其他染色体异常2例。B1、B2筛查方案对血清学筛查临界风险者胎儿染色体异常的检出率分别为60%、100%,差异有统计学意义。结论(1)当血清学筛查结果高风险时,选择NIPT可获得最优的卫生经济学评价及更高的工作效率;(2)当血清学筛查为临界风险时,首选NIPT,在经济落后地区,对不接受NIPT者推广孕18~20周时软指标筛查作为补充。     

Non-invasive prenatal testing: impact on invasive prenatal diagnosis at a mainland Chinese tertiary medical center

Objective: We describe the changes over a 4-year period in the number of diagnostic testing after the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

Methods: The rate of NIPT as an indication in women who received amniocentesis, and the number of amniocentesis required for detection of one case with major aneuploidy were compared between a 1-year baseline period before the introduction of NIPT, and the 3 years following NIPT introduction.

Results: A total of 7536 amniocentesis procedures were performed over the 4-year study period. During the baseline period of the year 2011, the number of invasive testing required for detection of one common trisomy was 57. During the first 2 years that NIPT was offered, NIPT averaged 1.7 percent of the total indications for amniocentesis, and the required number of invasive testing decreased to 30. With the increase of the percentage of NIPT during the 3rd year, the required number of invasive testing further decreased to 26.

Conclusion: After the clinical introduction of NIPT, invasive prenatal diagnostic testing had not decreased at a Chinese prenatal diagnostic unit, but a remarkably improved detection rate of major aneuploidies in diagnostic procedures was observed.     

From Down syndrome screening to noninvasive prenatal testing: 20 years' experience in Taiwan

Down syndrome is the most common autosomal chromosome aneuploidy. The prenatal Down syndrome screening protocol has been known in Taiwan for the past 20 years. The maternal serum double markers required for the screening test was first implemented into the general prenatal check-up back in 1994, where it had around a 60% detection rate at a 5% false positive rate. The first trimester combined test was started in 2005, and the maternal serum quadruple test was introduced in 2008 to replace the previous double test. The overall detection rate for the current screening strategies (first trimester combined or second trimester quadruple test) in Taiwan ranges between 80% and 85% at a fixed 5% false positive rate. Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the latest powerful fetal aneuploidy detection method and has become commercially available in Taiwan starting from 2013. The sensitivity and specificity for NIPT are very high (both over 99%) according to large worldwide studies. Our preliminary data for NIPT from 11 medical centers in Taiwan have also shown a 100% detection rate for Down syndrome and Edwards syndrome, respectively. Invasive chromosome studies such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling cannot be replaced by NIPT, and all prenatal screening and NIPT results require confirmation using invasive testing. This review discusses the Down syndrome screening method assessments and the progress of NIPT in Taiwan.     

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) detects variant of Turner syndrome not detectable by fluorescent in situ hybridization

Abstract

Introduction: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a reliable screening method for fetal aneuploidy detection of trisomy 18, 13, 21 along with few sex chromosome abnormalities monosomy X, XXX, XXY (Klinefelter), XYY (Jacob) syndromes and certain microdeletions which include cri-du-chat, DiGeorge, 1p36, Angelman, and Prader-Willi syndromes in comparison to the available screening methods. Prenatal screening of Turners syndrome is possible by ultrasound in certain conditions only. Recently benefits of early detection and treatment of Turners syndrome has been emphasized, enforcing on accurate and early screening prenatally.

Case details: The current case emphasizes on the reliability of NIPT testing which comes with an advantage of early screening. A 24-year-old primi gravida was referred for NIPT as she tested for high risk on biochemical screening. The Panorama? NIPT results showed low risk for trisomies, 21, 18, and 13 but high risk of monosomy X and was advised confirmatory amniocentesis. The fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) report revealed no numerical abnormality detected for any of the five chromosomes tested. On receiving this discordant report, the sample was rerun for NIPT, to rule out any laboratory-related issues. The result obtained on a rerun was consistent with the first report and showed monosomy X again. The karyotype report was available three weeks later and a rare variant of Turners syndrome was identified.

Discussion: Panorama? NIPT considers single nucleotide polymorphisms spread across the chromosomes for analysis, different variants of aneuploidy can be picked up in comparison to FISH, similar to the current case wherein it could not as it was a centromeric probe. Reported first case of X chromosome variant detected by NIPT confirmed by karyotyping, missed by FISH.     

Detection of fetal trisomy 9 mosaicism by noninvasive prenatal testing through maternal plasma DNA sequencing

Objective

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is widely used as a powerful screening tool to detect common aneuploidies. However, its application for detection of rare chromosomal abnormalities remains inconclusive.

Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the clinical and economic consequences of fetal trisomy 21 (T21) screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in high-risk pregnant women.

Methods: Using a decision-analytic model, we estimated the number of T21 cases detected, the number of invasive procedures performed, corresponding euploid fetal losses and total costs for three screening strategies: first trimester combined screening (FTS), integrated screening (INT) or NIPT, whereby NIPT was performed in high-risk patients (women 35 years or older or women with a positive conventional screening test). Modeling was based on a 4 million pregnant women cohort in the US.

Results: NIPT, at a base case price of $795, was more clinically effective and less costly (dominant) over both FTS and INT. NIPT detected 4823 T21 cases based on 5330 invasive procedures. FTS detected 3364 T21 cases based on 108?364 procedures and INT detected 3760 cases based on 108?760 procedures. NIPT detected 28% and 43% more T21 cases compared to INT and FTS, respectively, while reducing invasive procedures by >95% and reducing euploid fetal losses by >99%. Total costs were $3786M with FTS, $3919M with INT and $3403M with NIPT.

Conclusions: NIPT leads to improved T21 detection and reduction in euploid fetal loss at lower total healthcare expenditures.     

Causes of aberrant non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: A systematic review

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is performed worldwide to detect common chromosomal aneuploidies. The analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood for NIPT is highly accurate for the detection of the main fetal trisomies: 21,18, and 13. However, false-positive, false-negative, and non-reportable results can occur, and these can have biological causes. Understanding the causes of unexpected NIPT results is essential to enable clinicians and genetic counselors to counsel patients comprehensively and appropriately, both prior to testing as well as after receiving the test results. The classification of non-reportable results from cfDNA analysis is important in order to provide women with precise information. In addition to technical issues, there are biological reasons for discordant results, which can be either fetal or maternal in origin. Contributing fetal factors include insufficient or absent fetal fraction, fetoplacental mosaicism, and the presence of a vanishing twin. In some pregnant women that test positive for NIPT, multiple chromosome aneuploidy has been reported as a result of suspected malignancy, and cancer has been found. False-positive and false-negative results may be the result of placental biology and not a failure in the actual test platform. Explaining the placental origin of cfDNA provides the patient with a clear view of the abilities and limitations of cfDNA-based prenatal screening.     

Clinical and genetic study of three families with 15q11q13 duplications

ObjectiveTo report three families with chromosome 15q11q13 duplications.Case reportWe report the prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling of three 15q11q13 duplications.ConclusionChromosomal microdeletions and microduplications are difficult to be detected by conventional cytogenetics. With molecular genetic techniques including array-based methods, the number of reported cases has rapidly increased. An integration of prenatal ultrasound, NIPT, karyotype analysis, CMA and genetic counseling is helpful for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal microdeletions/microduplications.     

无创DNA检测在诊断高龄孕妇胎儿非整倍体中的应用

目的:探讨高龄妊娠胎儿染色体异常的风险以及无创DNA产前检测(NIPT)在诊断高龄孕妇胎儿非整倍体染色体病中的应用价值。方法:选择≥35岁的高龄孕妇2714例,按年龄分为35~39岁,≥40岁两组,采用NIPT高通量测序检测孕妇血浆游离DNA,并对检测结果提示21-三体、18-三体、13-三体及性染色体高风险者行羊膜腔穿刺术及胎儿染色体核型分析,对检测结果阴性者通过电话随访进行验证。计算NIPT检测的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及Youden指数。结果:2714例高龄孕妇NIPT检测结果提示胎儿非整倍体染色体异常高风险47例,6例高风险孕妇拒绝侵入性产前诊断,余41例高风险孕妇行羊膜腔穿刺术及羊水细胞染色体核型分析,结果显示21-三体19例,18-三体1例,13-三体2例,性染色体异常7例。与现有的金标准羊膜腔穿刺术核型分析相比较,NIPT对高龄孕妇除外性染色体异常的胎儿非整倍体染色体异常检出敏感度为100.00%,特异度为99.93%,阳性预测值为90.91%,阴性预测值为100.00%,Youden指数为0.99。进一步通过年龄分组发现,40岁及以上年龄组异常率显著高于35~39岁年龄组(P=0.011)。结论:高龄孕妇可通过NIPT快速、安全地筛查出胎儿非整倍体染色体异常,减少侵入性产前检测比例,降低胎儿出生缺陷率。     

Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis: report of first 6 months in clinical practice

Abstract

Objective: We studied the clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in prenatal diagnosis in a clinical setting in New York City.

Methods: Our center began offering CMA to pregnant women undergoing invasive diagnostic procedures for an abnormal structural finding on ultrasound, maternal age of 35 years or older, or elevated risk on aneuploidy screening, beginning March 2012. Our first six months experience is reported.

Results: Benign familial variants were the most common finding (16/22 fetuses). Variants of uncertain significance were frequent, especially when fathers were not available for testing (4/22 fetuses). Most patients undertook CMA as part of evaluation of an ultrasound anomaly (52%). One patient terminated a pregnancy based on an ultrasound finding in the setting of a benign familial variant on CMA, and a second terminated a pregnancy based on a copy number variant identified on CMA.

Conclusion: For CMA to be maximally useful in prenatal diagnosis, parental DNA samples as well as robust datasets to provide predictive phenotypic information are required. The most common reason for undertaking CMA was to evaluate an ultrasound anomaly, and benign familial variants were a common finding. Genetic services are required to provide pre- and post-test genetic counseling and help families interpret results.     

Questioning the costs and benefits of non-invasive prenatal testing

Abstract

Prenatal testing for Down syndrome through the use of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been increasingly implemented in clinical practice and a recent cost analysis suggests that NIPT is cost effective when compared to other screening modalities in high risk populations. However, this anaylsis makes many assumptions regarding uptake of testing and pregnancy termination, which cannot be applied to all populations in the United States. Additionally, this cost analysis, which hinges on fewer Down syndrome births, does not align with the goals of prenatal testing to support autonomous and value consistent decisions. NIPT is an expensive new technology and more careful analysis is needed to determine the impact of NIPT on outcomes and overall healthcare costs.     

1p deletion syndrome: A prenatal diagnosis characterized by an abnormal 1st trimester combined screening test,yet a normal NIPT result

Objective

To present a case with prenatal diagnosis and cytogenetic characterization of 1p36 deletion syndrome whose first trimester combined testing is abnormal but a normal NIPT result.