新型冠状病毒肺炎患者焦虑抑郁及影响因素调查

目的了解新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的焦虑抑郁状况及其影响因素,为采取针对性心理护理干预提供参考。方法采用焦虑自评量表及抑郁自评量表,对148例新型冠状病毒肺炎患者进行调查。结果焦虑发生率为21.63%,抑郁发生率为50.00%;多元线性回归分析显示:有无胸闷/心慌的感觉、与世隔绝的感觉、容易激动/感到烦恼、担心家人病情/被传染、担心能否治愈是新型冠状病毒肺炎患者发生焦虑的影响因素(P0.05,P0.01)。睡眠、与世隔绝的感觉、担心家人病情/被传染、担心能否治愈是患者发生抑郁的影响因素(均P0.01)。结论新型冠状病毒肺炎患者存在一定的焦虑与抑郁,临床应启动针对性心理护理干预,缓解患者焦虑、抑郁情绪。     

新型冠状病毒肺炎流行期武汉某社区居民心理状况及影响因素研究

目的了解新型冠状病毒肺炎流行期社区居民的心理状况及其影响因素,为实施针对性心理干预提供参考。方法采用便利抽样法抽取武汉市某社区居民333人,应用患者健康问卷和广泛性焦虑量表进行调查。结果社区居民抑郁评分为(6.89±2.12)分,焦虑评分(7.10±2.14)分。社区居民中201人(60.36%)同时存在抑郁、焦虑情绪。多因素分析显示,性别、文化程度、有亲人为医护人员是影响社区居民抑郁、焦虑情绪的因素(P0.05,P0.01)。结论新型冠状病毒肺炎流行期,社区居民存在不同程度的抑郁、焦虑情绪,应针对影响因素对社区居民加强心理疏导,提高其心理健康水平。     

新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间一线护士心理健康状况调查

目的探讨突发新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间护士心理健康状况,为采取针对性措施促进护士心理健康提供参考。方法在突发新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间,采用心理健康状况量表、社会支持及应对方式量表对175名一线护士进行调查。结果护士躯体化、焦虑得分显著高于常模(均P0.01)。护士心理健康与社会支持、应对方式具有显著相关性(均P0.01)。结论突发新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间临床护士躯体化与焦虑评分较高,发挥社会支持、应对方式的正向作用有利于改善护士的心理健康状态。     

新型冠状病毒肺炎抗疫一线护士工作心理负荷及影响因素调查

目的了解新型冠状病毒肺炎抗疫一线护士的工作心理负荷现状及影响因素,为促进护士身心健康提供参考。方法采用NASA任务负荷指数量表、广泛性焦虑量表及患者健康问卷抑郁量表对246名护士进行调查。结果护士工作心理负荷总分(81.25±12.74)分,45.12%的护士存在中度以上焦虑,47.56%存在中度以上抑郁;每日工作时长、焦虑、抑郁及参与救援前是否接受过心理培训是护士工作心理负荷的影响因素(P0.05,P0.01)。结论新型冠状病毒肺炎抗疫一线护士的工作心理负荷较高;应通过保证人力资源调配,提供救援前心理培训,减轻焦虑抑郁水平,以减轻护士的工作心理负荷、保证护理质量。     

新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间剖宫产产妇围术期心理状况调查

正随着新型冠状病毒肺炎(coronavirus disease 2019,COVID-19)疫情的发展,国内出现了疑似或确诊新冠肺炎的孕产妇。由于孕产妇妊娠期间处于特殊免疫耐受状态,是新型冠状病毒的易感人群,并可能转化为重症患者,且发热通常伴有胎心率增快,导致胎儿宫内缺氧[1-2],由此可能导致产妇产生焦虑抑郁的情绪。因此,新冠肺炎疫情期间孕产妇围术期的心理问题需要得到临床医师关注。本文旨在比较温州地区COVID-19疫情爆发及缓解期间医院内剖宫产手术孕产妇围术期的心理状况。     

新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期一线医护人员焦虑的混合研究

目的探讨新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期武汉市抗疫一线医护人员焦虑现状及影响因素,为维护医护人员心理健康提供参考。方法采用量性研究与质性研究相结合的方法,对武汉市110名抗疫一线医护人员采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)以问卷星形式进行调查;对其中3名医生及7名护士进行半结构式深入访谈。结果医护人员焦虑得分(47.62±13.20)分,其中轻度焦虑24人(21.82%),中度焦虑16人(14.54%),重度焦虑3人(2.73%)。不同性别、职业医护人员焦虑得分比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05,P0.01)。访谈提炼3个主题,即工作压力大、缺乏安全感、对新环境不适应。结论新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期武汉市抗疫一线医护人员存在一定程度的焦虑,尤其是女性、护士群体。应关注抗疫一线医护人员的心理健康,建立心理疏导机制和提供人文关怀等,以缓解医护人员焦虑情绪。     

中医情志护理联合呼吸训练对新型冠状病毒肺炎患者焦虑抑郁的影响

目的探讨中医情志护理联合呼吸训练对方舱医院新型冠状病毒肺炎患者焦虑、抑郁的影响。方法将200例方舱医院女性新型冠状病毒肺炎患者分为观察组与对照组各100例。对照组采用常规护理,观察组在此基础上给予中医情志护理联合呼吸训练。干预前后采用焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表进行评价。结果干预后观察组焦虑、抑郁评分显著低于对照组(均P0.01)。结论实施中医情志护理联合呼吸训练干预,可有效改善新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的焦虑、抑郁症状。     

新型冠状病毒肺炎防治一线护理人员焦虑抑郁及影响因素分析

目的了解新型冠状病毒肺炎防治一线护理人员的焦虑、抑郁水平,探讨其影响因素。方法采用一般资料调查表、焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表、心理弹性量表、社会支持量表对发热门诊、急诊室、隔离病房的310名一线护士进行问卷调查。结果一线护士的焦虑、抑郁总均分分别为(48.79±14.08)、(50.39±15.00)分;多元线性回归分析发现,年龄、工作年限、参与防治所在地、有无感控人员全程指导、防护物资是否充足、心理弹性是一线护士焦虑、抑郁的影响因素(均P0.01);此外,抑郁还受学历及社会支持的影响(均P0.01)。结论新型冠状病毒肺炎防治一线护士存在不同程度的焦虑、抑郁情绪,提高心理弹性及社会支持可预防和缓解护士负面情绪。     

震后灾区再生育孕产妇的心理状况调查

目的对地震中失去子女的再生育孕产妇进行焦虑、抑郁心理状况调查,并采取针对性的护理措施。方法采用焦虑自评量表和抑郁自评量表对60例灾区再生育孕产妇的心理状况进行调查。结果灾区再生育孕产妇焦虑、抑郁发生率分别为68.33%、11.67%;年龄大、高危妊娠者焦虑发生率显著高于年轻、足月正常妊娠孕产妇(均P<0.01)。结论灾后再生育孕产妇焦虑、抑郁发生率较高,高龄、高危妊娠孕产妇应成为干预的重点。     

新型冠状病毒肺炎患者重度焦虑抑郁影响因素的质性研究

目的探讨新型冠状病毒肺炎患者重度焦虑抑郁情绪的影响因素,为其心理护理和管理提供参考。方法采用现象学研究方法对18例有重度焦虑和抑郁症状(PHQ-4≥9分)的新型冠状病毒肺炎患者,进行有关重度焦虑抑郁症状影响因素的半结构式深入访谈,访谈资料采用Colaizzi七步分析法进行分析。结果共提炼出个人因素(担心疾病预后、疾病认知不足、人际沟通障碍),家庭因素(家庭支持不足、家庭重大变故、家庭角色缺失)和环境因素(医院封闭式环境、病区负性事件)3个主题和8个亚主题。结论新型冠状病毒肺炎患者重度焦虑抑郁症状受多种因素影响,护理人员应引导患者正确认识疾病,营造病区人文关怀氛围,构建医护患家协同照护模式。     

汛情疫情重叠期间一线护理人员心理状况的混合研究

目的了解郑州市汛情疫情期间救援防控一线护理人员的心理状况,为针对性干预提供参考。方法采用一般资料调查表、广泛性焦虑障碍量表、心理困扰量表、心理资本量表对参与汛情疫情救援防控的206名护士进行调查;同时选取其中10名进行一对一深入访谈,了解其心理感受。结果 206名护士焦虑总分为5(4,7)分,心理困扰总分24.27±6.58,心理资本总分79.84±13.62;心理资本与心理困扰呈负相关(r=-0.678,P<0.01),焦虑与心理困扰呈正相关(r=0.602,P<0.01);最小子女年龄、工作年限、救援经历、心理资本及焦虑是护理人员心理困扰的影响因素(调整R²=0.618,P<0.05,P<0.01)。质性研究提炼出缺乏经验、知识储备不足,工作负荷大,对亲人的担忧,缺乏心理疏导、社会支持具有积极影响5个主题。结论参与汛情疫情救援防控的一线护士存在不同程度的心理困扰,受多种因素影响;医院管理者应加以重视,加强灾害专题培训、完善心理辅导方案,以提升护士灾害应对能力与心理健康水平。     

Mental health, anxiety, and depression in patients with cerebral aneurysms

OBJECT: Aneurysm disease and its treatment can have an adverse impact on mental health, yet the affects of cerebral aneurysms on general mental health, anxiety, and depression are poorly understood. METHODS: Patients with cerebral aneurysms who were seen at a neurosurgery clinic underwent a structured interview, completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short Form Health Survey (providing a mental component summary [MCS] score for general mental health), and were assigned functional status scores based on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Rankin Scale, and Barthel Index. Rank-order methods were used to assess the relationship between mental health, aneurysm characteristics and history, and functional status. Data were collected in 166 patients (71% women) with a mean age of 53.7 years. Depression was present in 8% of the study population and an anxiety disorder in 17%. Patients with both an unsecured aneurysm and a history of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) tended toward higher anxiety scores (p = 0.086). Higher depression scores were associated with a decreased functional status on the GOS (p = 0.015) and Rankin Scale (p = 0.010). The mean +/- standard deviation adjusted MCS score (37.9 +/- 7.1) was significantly less than that of the US population (p < 0.001). Lower MCS scores were associated with a decreased functional status on the GOS (p = 0.052), Rankin Scale (p < 0.001), and Barthel Index (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cerebral aneurysms have increased levels of anxiety and depression and poor general mental health. Those who have experienced an SAH and harbor an unsecured cerebral aneurysm demonstrate increased levels of anxiety. A lower functional status in patients with aneurysms is associated with depression and decreased general mental health.     

The relevance of anxiety,depression, and coping in patients after liver transplantation

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of anxiety, depression, and coping on quality of life in patients after liver transplantation. Patients were asked to fill out a postal survey. Two hundred thirty-six of 375 patients (63%) who entered the study returned the questionnaires, and 186 of these patients could be included in the assessment. Anxiety and depression were surveyed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; health-related quality of life, using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey; and coping strategies, using the Freiburg Questionnaire on Coping With Illness. In terms of physical and mental dimensions of health-related quality of life, psychosocial factors are far more relevant in liver transplant recipients than purely somatic factors, such as the number of posttransplantation complications or length of hospital stay. Through multiple regression analysis, we were able to account for 51% of the variance in the physical dimension of health-related quality of life and 58% of the variance in the mental dimension. Physical factors of depression, age, and employment and mental factors of anxiety and depression were significant for predicting health-related quality of life after liver transplantation. Depressive coping, anxiety, and depression, as well as aspects of the social environment, contribute considerably to determine well-being and health-related quality of life of patients after liver transplantation. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:63-71.)     

Anxiety in children: A review on how to address it in the perioperative setting post-pandemic

In this paper, we review the psychological burden of SARS-CoV-2 on children and how health care workers can play a role in mitigating its mental health impact during anesthetic procedures. We evaluate the societal changes that have affected children over 2 years of the pandemic and the subsequent soaring rates of anxiety and depression reported. Unfortunately, the perioperative setting is a stressful experience at baseline and the addition of COVID-19 has only exacerbated the situation. Anxiety and depression are often linked to maladaptive behavior post-surgery, including increased rates of emergence delirium. Providers can utilize techniques based on developmental milestones, Certified Child Life Specialists, parental presence during induction, and medications to reduce anxiety. As health care workers, we need to recognize and address these concerns as untreated mental health issues can leave long-term consequences for children.     

Mental Disorders and Their Association With Disability Among Internally Displaced Persons and Returnees in Georgia

There remains limited evidence on comorbidity of mental disorders among conflict‐affected civilians, particularly internally displaced persons (IDPs) and former IDPs who have returned to their home areas (returnees). The study aim was to compare patterns of mental disorders and their influence on disability between IDPs and returnees in the Republic of Georgia. A cross‐sectional household survey was conducted with adult IDPs from the conflicts in the 1990s, the 2008 conflict, and returnees. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and disability were measured using cut scores on Trauma Screening Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire 9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7, and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Among the 3,025 respondents, the probable prevalence of PTSD, depression, anxiety, and comorbidity (>1 condition) was 23.3%, 14.0%, 10.4%, 12.4%, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients (p < .001) were .40 (PTSD with depression), .38 (PTSD with anxiety), and .52 (depression with anxiety). Characteristics associated with mental disorders in regression analyses included displacement (particularly longer‐term), cumulative trauma exposure, female gender, older age, poor community conditions, and bad household economic situation; coefficients ranged from 1.50 to 3.79. PTSD, depression, anxiety, and comorbidity were associated with increases in disability of 6.4%, 9.7%, 6.3%, and 15.9%, respectively. A high burden of psychiatric symptoms and disability persist among conflict‐affected persons in Georgia.     

Mental health and well-being of anaesthetists during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review

The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed substantial burdens on clinicians and there is a need to better understand the impact on mental health and well-being. This scoping review investigates the prevalence of mental health concerns in anaesthetists, risk and protective factors for mental well-being, and anaesthetists' pandemic-related concerns and support. We searched online databases for articles published between January 2020 and May 2022, using search terms related to: anaesthesia; burnout, well-being, mental health or stress; and COVID-19. We identified 20 articles comprising 19 different populations of anaesthetists (n = 8680) from 14 countries. Studies identified the prevalence of the following condition in anaesthetists: burnout (14–59%); stress (50–71%); anxiety (11–74%); depression (12–67%); post-traumatic stress (17–25%); psychological distress (52%); and insomnia (17–61%). Significant risk factors for poorer mental health included: direct COVID-19-related issues (fear of self and family exposure to infection; requirement for quarantine); practitioner health factors (insomnia; comorbidities); psychosocial factors (loneliness; isolation; perceived lack of support at home and work); demographic factors (female gender; non-white ethnicity; LGBTQIA+); and workplace factors (redeployment outside area of clinical practice; increased work effort; personal protective equipment shortages). Protective factors identified included: job satisfaction; perceived organisational justice; older age; and male sex. Anaesthetists' self-reported concerns related to: personal protective equipment; resource allocation; fear of infection; fear of financial loss; increased workload; and effective communication of protocols for patient treatment. Support from family, colleagues and hospital management was identified as an important coping mechanism. Findings from this review may support the design of interventions to enhance anaesthetists' psychological health during pandemic conditions and beyond. Future research should include consistent psychological outcome measures and rigorous experimental design beyond cross-sectional studies.     

Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed the Daily Practices and Psychological State of Orthopaedic Residents?

BackgroundThe coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has been an unprecedented time for healthcare and has substantially changed resource availability in surgeons’ work practices and routines. Many orthopaedic departments suspended elective surgery, and some re-deployed orthopaedic residents to stressful nonorthopaedic tasks; long hours were commonplace. Stress-reaction symptoms such as anxiety and depression have been reported in about 10% of healthcare workers during previous infectious-diseases outbreaks (including the Ebola virus), but little is known about the psychological needs of residents faced with this global disaster.Questions/purposes(1) Have anxiety and depression symptoms among orthopaedic residents worsened from the period before to the period after the lockdown in Italy? (2) Are there differences in anxiety and depression symptoms between residents who worked in a COVID-19 department and those who did not?MethodsThe Italian Association of Orthopaedic and Traumatology Residents is comprised of 365 members who were recruited through the organization’s mailing list; they were asked to respond to a survey about their health and well-being at the beginning and end of the first COVID-19 Italian lockdown (March 9, 2020 to May 3, 2020). For the survey’s development, 10 orthopaedic surgery residents at the Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro were preliminarily asked to answer the surveys, and both face validity and content validity were tested. The test-retest reliability was 0.9. Impact on and future concerns about family life and daily work practice, as well as sleep disorders, were investigated. Anxiety and depression were assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which includes 14 questions (seven for anxiety, HADS-A; and seven for depression, HADS-D) on a Likert scale (0-3); thus, a patient can have a score between 0 and 21 for either the HADS-A or HADS-D, with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood of anxiety or depression. Previously reported minimum clinically important differences ranged from 1.5 to 1.7. For each scale, total scores of ≤ 7 , 8 to 10, and ≥ 11 were taken to represent normal, borderline, or abnormal level of anxiety or depression, respectively. Overall, 75% (272 of 365) of residents completed the survey at both the beginning and end of the lockdown; 72% (196 of 272) were men, the mean ± SD age was 30 ± 3 years, 72% (197 of 272) worked in a hospital setting with patients who were COVID-19-positive, 20% (55 of 272) served in a COVID-19 department, and 5% (7 of 139) tested positive for COVID-19 by nasal-pharyngeal swab. Overall, 9% (24 of 272) of residents had family members who contracted COVID-19, and 3% (8 of 272) had a relative who died. Because of the risk of possible COVID-19 exposure, 18% (48 of 272) of residents needed to temporarily change their household given that social distancing was considered the best way to slow the spread of COVID-19.ResultsAt the end of the lockdown, orthopaedic residents exhibited signs of worsening anxiety and depression as measured by the overall HADS score (median 9 [IQR 5 to 14] versus median 11 [IQR 6 to 17.8], respectively; median difference -1 [95% CI -1.5 to -0.5]; effect size [r] = -0.24; p < 0.001) as well as in the depression subscale (median 4 [IQR 2 to 7] versus median 5.5 [IQR 3 to 8], respectively; median difference -1 [95% CI -1.5 to -0.5]; r = -0.36; p < 0.001). We found no difference in the development of anxiety or depression between residents who worked in a COVID-19 department and those who did not, as demonstrated by comparing the change in HADS scores between these groups (median 1 [IQR -3 to 4] versus median 1 [IQR -2 to 4] in HADS change score over time; median difference 0 [95% CI -1 to 2]; r = -0.03; p = 0.61).ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected the daily practice of orthopaedic residents and has had important, far-reaching consequences on their health and well-being, including social implications. Residents showed higher anxiety and depression symptoms at the end of the lockdown. No differences were found in changes of anxiety and depression, over time, for residents who worked in a COVID-19 department compared with those who did not. The evaluation of anxiety and depression through standardized questionnaires could help to identify residents at risk of higher psychological distress who could be referred to regular psychological counseling as a possible prevention strategy during stressful times. Future studies should confirm the long-term effects of these findings.Level of EvidenceLevel II, prognostic study.     

Differences in physical and mental health-related quality of life outcomes 3 years after bariatric surgery: a group-based trajectory analysis

BackgroundWhile bariatric surgery has proven to be effective to achieve significant weight loss and short-term improvements in both physical and mental (HRQoL), little is known about the factors associated with long-term decline in mental HRQoL after bariatric surgery.ObjectiveTo examine differences in physical and mental HRQoL trajectories in a bariatric patient population 3 years after bariatric surgery and examine associated sociodemographic, weight, and mental health factors.SettingA Canadian academic bariatric care center.MethodsA group-based trajectory model was used to examine physical and mental HRQoL trajectories 3 years after bariatric surgery. In a prospective cohort bariatric sample (n = 2270), demographic factors, body mass index, binge eating symptoms, anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and physical and mental HRQoL (Short-form health survey-36 (SF-36)), were measured at baseline, 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years respectively. The effect of time-varying covariates (body mass index, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) were investigated to examine effects on physical and mental HRQoL trajectories.ResultsFive distinct trajectories described changes in (n = 1939 of 2270) individuals’ physical HRQoL outcomes (SF-36–physical health component summary score) and five other trajectories described changes in mental HRQoL (SF-36–mental health component summary score) outcomes from baseline to 3 years postsurgery. The group-based distribution for the 5 physical HRQoL trajectories were as follows: (1) low baseline-stable low (5.8%); (2) low baseline-moderate rise (12%); (3) low baseline-stable high (41.1%); (4) high baseline-stable high (33.2%); and (5) moderate baseline-decline (7.9%). The 5 mental HRQoL trajectories were as follows: (1) low baseline-slow decline (10%); (2) low baseline-stable high (25%); (3) high baseline-unstable rise (12%); (4) high baseline-stable high (48.9%); and (5) high baseline-transient decline (4.1%). Compared with physical HRQoL, mental HRQoL trajectories were not associated with changes in body mass index, yet strongly correlated with changes in binge eating symptoms, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Patient Health Questionnaire measures at all time points.ConclusionThis study demonstrates distinct patterns in physical and mental HRQoL trajectories after bariatric surgery. The decline in mental HRQoL trajectories was more heterogeneous and associated with several psychosocial predictors that may be useful to guide risk prediction of long-term physical and mental HRQoL outcomes postbariatric surgery.     

Répercussions psychologiques du confinement et de l’épidémie à COVID-19 chez les patients et soignants en hémodialyse en France

IntroductionThe health crisis linked to the COVID-19 epidemic has required lockdown measures in France and changes in practices in dialysis centers. The objective was to assess the depressive and anxiety symptoms during lockdown in hemodialysis patients and their caregivers.MethodsWe sent, during lockdown period, between April and May 2020, self-questionnaires to voluntary subjects (patients and caregivers), treated by hemodialysis or who worked in hemodialysis in one of the 14 participating centers in France. We analyzed their perception of dialysis sessions (beneficial or worrying), their stress level (VAS rated from 0 to 10), their anxiety and depressive symptoms (Hospital anxiety and depression scale). Factors associated with stress, anxiety and depression were analyzed with multiple linear regression models.Results669 patients and 325 caregivers agreed to participate. 70 % of participants found it beneficial to come to dialysis during confinement. The proportions of subjects with a stress level ≥ 6 linked to the epidemic, confinement, fear of contracting COVID-19 and fear of infecting a loved one were respectively 23.9%, 26.2%, 33.4% and 42%. 39.2% presented with certain (13.7%) or doubtful (19.2%) anxious symptoms. 21.2% presented a certain (7.9%) or doubtful (13.3%) depressive symptomatology. Age, gender, history of psychological disorders and perception of dialysis sessions were associated with levels of stress, anxiety and depression.ConclusionDuring the lockdown period, in France, the majority of hemodialysis patients and caregivers found it beneficial to come to dialysis. One in three subjects had anxiety symptoms and one in five subjects had depressive symptoms.     

急性心肌梗死患者焦虑抑郁状况及预测因素分析

目的了解急性心肌梗死患者急性期的焦虑抑郁状况及其预测因素,以期为护理人员采取预防性的心理护理措施提供依据。方法对136例急性心肌梗死患者在其发病的第5~7天采用综合医院焦虑抑郁量表和SF-12生活质量量表进行问卷调查。结果急性心肌梗死患者中焦虑症状阳性者72例(52.94%),抑郁症状阳性者22例(16.18%)。患者既往的生理职能、锻炼情况和精神健康是患者焦虑水平的影响因素(P<0.05,P<0.01);既往的活力、社会功能和吸烟史是患者抑郁水平的影响因素(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论急性心肌梗死患者发病前的生活质量和生活方式会影响其急性期焦虑抑郁的发生,护理人员应加强评估并提供针对性的措施,预防和缓解患者的不良心理状况。