首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 484 毫秒
1.
目的 探讨三角吻合技术在全腹腔镜下胃远端癌根治术中的可行性和临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析2012年11-12月间福建医科大学附属协和医院实施的18例全腹腔镜胃远端癌根治术并残胃十二指肠吻合(三角吻合)病例的临床资料.三角吻合是完全在腹腔镜下应用直线切割闭合器完成残胃和十二指肠后壁的功能性端端吻合,再利用直线切割闭合器闭合共同开口后,吻合口内部的缝钉线呈现为三角形.结果 18例患者均成功施行全腹腔镜下胃远端癌淋巴结清扫(D1+或D2)及三角吻合.手术时间(156.3±38.5) min,三角吻合耗时(24.6±11.2) min.肿瘤距上切缘(5.8±2.4) cm,距下切缘(4.1±2.7) cm,上、下切缘病理结果均未见癌残留.术中出血量(70.7±43.8) ml,淋巴结清扫数目(32.4±12.0)枚/例.术后首次下床活动时间(1.8±0.9)d,肛门排气时间(3.1±1.2)d,进食流质时间(3.6±1.7)d,术后住院时间(9.6±2.5)d.术后1例患者出现乳糜瘘伴腹腔感染;全组均未出现吻合口出血、吻合口狭窄或吻合口瘘等吻合口相关并发症.结论 三角吻合技术应用于全腹腔镜下胃远端癌根治术是安全可行的,近期疗效满意.  相似文献   

2.
目的 探讨三角吻合技术在全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术中应用的安全行、可行性和临床疗效.方法 对56例远端胃癌患者施行全腹腔镜下胃癌根治术并行残胃十二指肠三角吻合.结果 56例手术均获成功.手术时间(169.4±32.3) min;三角吻合时间(22.4 ±9.2) min;术中出血量(76.6±32.7)ml;淋巴结清扫总数(34.1±12.3)枚/例,进食流质时间(3.4±1.5)d,术后住院时间(8.4±2.6)d;全组切缘无肿瘤残留;全组均未出现吻合口出血、吻合口漏及吻合口狭窄或吻合口相关并发症.结论 三角吻合技术应用于全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术是安全可行的,近期效果满意,远期疗效需进一步观察研究.  相似文献   

3.
目的探讨腔镜用缝合器在腹腔镜下胃空肠吻合中应用的安全性与可行性。方法采用描述性病例系列研究方法, 回顾性分析2022年10月至2023年1月期间, 空军军医大学第二附属医院实施的5例腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术(Billroth Ⅱ+Braun吻合)中应用腔镜用缝合器缝合关闭胃空肠共同开口患者的病例资料。手术适应证为:(1)年龄为18~75岁;(2)术前病理确诊为胃腺癌;(3)术前临床分期为Ⅰ~Ⅲ期;(4)肿瘤位于胃中下1/3处, 可行根治性远端胃切除术;(5)既往无上腹部手术史(腹腔镜胆囊手术除外)。手术步骤如下:在进行胃-空肠吻合时, 先以腔镜下直线切割闭合器进行胃空肠侧侧吻合, 然后以腹腔用缝合器缝合关闭共同开口。在缝合关闭共同开口时, 采用自下而上、先内进内出后垂直褥式缝合的方法, 实现胃壁与空肠壁黏膜-黏膜、浆膜-浆膜完整内翻闭合;第一层缝合结束后, 再自上而下行浆肌层缝合包埋胃空肠共同开口。结果 5例患者均顺利完成了腹腔镜下利用腔镜用缝合器关闭胃空肠共同开口。手术时间(308.6±22.6)min;胃空肠吻合时间(15.4±3.1)min;术中出血量(34.0±10.8)ml。均无...  相似文献   

4.
目的:探讨腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术的安全性和可行性。方法:对28例胃癌患者进行腹腔镜辅助下胃癌根治术,其中根治性全胃切除术3例,近端胃大部切除术3例,远端胃大部切除术22例;淋巴结清除D1式7例,D2式21例。结果:28例均成功完成腹腔镜手术。平均手术时间:全胃切除(182.4±32.2)min,近端胃切除(162.7±27.5)min,远端胃切除(152.3±29.2)min。平均术中出血量:全胃切除(137.5±72.1)mL,近端胃切除(129.6±86.3)mL,远端胃切除(157.2±74.7)mL。清除淋巴结数平均(17.1±5.3)枚/例。术后平均胃肠功能恢复时间(3.2±0.5)d。术后无吻合口出血、吻合口瘘、吻合口梗阻、十二指肠残端瘘等并发症。术后住院时间平均(7.2±1.5)d。结论:腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术安全、可行;严格遵守肿瘤的手术原则,腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术能够保持肿瘤的根治性,同时能体现手术的微创性。  相似文献   

5.
腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术:附54例报告   总被引:4,自引:3,他引:1       下载免费PDF全文
目的 探讨腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术的安全性和可行性.方法 对54例胃癌患者进行腹腔镜辅助下胃癌根治术,其中根治性全胃切除术12例,近端胃大部切除术18例,远端胃大部切除术24例;淋巴结清扫D1式29例,D2式25例.结果 54例均成功完成腹腔镜手术.平均手术时间全胃切除(164.4±38.7)min,近端胃切除(142.4±35.2)min,远端胃切除(149.1±35.4)min.平均术中出血量全胃切除(164.6±80.1)mL,近端胃切除(149.5±94.7)mL,远端胃切除(152.5±87.7)mL.清扫淋巴结数平均(19.1±6.2)枚/例.术后平均胃肠功能恢复时间(3.5±0.7)h.术后发生吻合口出血2例,均经非手术治疗止血;无吻合口瘘、吻合口梗阻、十二指肠残端瘘等并发症.术后住院时间平均(9.2±1.7)d.结论 腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术安全、可行;只要严格遵守肿瘤的手术原则,腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术能够保持肿瘤的根治性,同时能体现手术的微创性.  相似文献   

6.
目的 探讨全腹腔镜下改良Overlap法食管空肠吻合的安全性及有效性。方法 回顾性分析2015年2-12月广东省人民医院普通外科收治的行腹腔镜胃癌根治术的11例胃上部癌病人的临床资料,术中均行改良Overlap法食管空肠吻合,即将线性吻合变为三角吻合,并使用器械吻合关闭共同开口。观察术中及术后情况。结果 所有病人均顺利完成手术,无中转开腹。食管空肠吻合时间为36(22~65)min;手术切口长度为5.5(5.0~7.0)cm;术后恢复进食全流质时间为4(3~5)d;术后住院时间为8(6~11)d。1例病人术后第2天出现吻合口出血,予胃镜下止血,其余病人均未出现并发症。术后5 d均行上消化道造影检查,未发现吻合口漏和吻合口狭窄。术后3个月复查消化道造影未见吻合口狭窄。结论 全腹腔镜下改良Overlap法食管空肠吻合操作简便,是一种安全可行的吻合方式。  相似文献   

7.
探讨完全腹腔镜下根治性全胃切除术治疗近端胃癌临床疗效。2014年3月—2016年2月对30例近端胃癌患者行完全腹腔镜下根治性全胃切除术,常规淋巴结清扫,直线切割闭合器离断胃食管、胃十二指肠并行食管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合,手工缝合吻合口共同开口。30例手术均顺利完成,手术时间160~250 min,岀血200~400 mL,清扫淋巴结11~30枚。术后无出血、无吻合口狭窄及十二指肠残端漏,2例发生吻合口瘘,保守治疗痊愈。完全腹腔镜下根治性全胃切除术治疗近端胃癌,应用直线切割闭合器行消化道重建,手工缝合吻合口共同开口,可减小腹部辅助切口,减轻患者痛苦,安全可行,近期疗效满意。  相似文献   

8.
目的探讨完全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术的技术可行性和应用安全性。方法回顾性分析2011年12月至2013年1月间在烟台毓璜顶医院接受完全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术的25例患者的临床资料,所有患者在胃癌切除后均通过直线切割缝合器于腹腔镜下完成Delta吻合重建或Roux.en.Y吻合重建。结果25例患者均在完全腹腔镜下成功完成远端胃切除和消化道重建,其中Delta吻合19例,Roux—en—Y吻合6例。Delta吻合时间(35.7±8.4)min,手术总耗时(256+23.6)min;Roux—en—Y吻合时间(46.4±12.1)min,手术总耗时(287+11.5)min。25例病例术中出血量(109.6±42.3)ml,术中应用腔内切割缝合器钉仓平均5.6枚/例。术后肛门排气时间(2.8±1.2)d,恢复流食时间(3.5±0.9)d。术后发生并发症3例(12.0%),分别为腹腔内出血、腹腔内感染和短期胃瘫各1例。结论腹腔镜远端胃癌根治性切除后,采用直线切割缝合器完成腹腔镜下消化道重建安全可行。  相似文献   

9.
34岁女性胃体腺癌患者,拟行全腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术。患者取平仰卧位,主刀位于患者左侧。腹腔镜下探查肿瘤位于胃体,无腹腔种植转移。游离大网膜及横结肠系膜前叶,向左达脾下极,向右达结肠肝曲。继续游离、夹闭、离断胃左右动静脉、胃网膜左右动静脉、胃短动脉、胃后动脉,清扫NO.1~NO.11,NO.12a,NO.12p,NO.14v组淋巴结。幽门远端3 cm离断十二指肠。腔镜下游离小肠系膜,距屈氏韧带20cm处切割闭合离断空肠,远端上提,使用overlap技术完成食道空肠的侧侧吻合,连续缝合关闭共同开口。据此吻合口远端40 cm处行近端空肠远端空肠的侧侧吻合,连续缝合关闭共同开口。检查吻合口对合良好。冲洗术野,腹腔镜下放置腹腔引流管。  相似文献   

10.
目的:探讨胃十二指肠三角吻合术应用于胃癌全腹腔镜下远端胃切除术的可行性。方法2013年7-11月间,上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院普通外科对22例胃癌患者应用直线形吻合器进行胃十二指肠三角吻合,完成全腹腔镜下远端胃切除术并D2淋巴结清扫,其中12例应用改良三角吻合术(闭合共同开口时将原十二指肠吻合线一并移去的术式),回顾性总结分析其临床资料。结果22例胃癌患者均于全腹腔镜下完成远端胃切除及胃十二指肠三角吻合,总手术时间(194.6±38.4) min,胃十二指肠三角吻合时间(19.1±14.1) min。术中应用直线形吻合器钉匣(5.8±0.8)个/例。术中出血量(49.5±24.0) ml,淋巴结清扫数目(32.8±12.4)枚/例,上、下切缘病理检查均未见癌残留。术后患者首次肛门排气时间(2.9±0.7) d,恢复饮水时间(4.8±1.1) d,进食半流质时间(6.6±1.2) d,术后住院时间(10.1±2.3) d。全组术后并发症发生率为9.1%(2/22),但均未出现吻合口瘘、梗阻和出血等吻合口相关并发症。结论胃十二指肠三角吻合术简易、安全、可行,是胃癌全腹腔镜下远端胃切除术消化道重建较为理想的术式。  相似文献   

11.
目的:探讨腹腔镜胃癌根治术中应用单层连续手工缝合法重建消化道的安全性及有效性。方法:收集2019年1月至2020年8月在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中应用单层连续手工缝合法重建消化道的32例患者的临床资料,分析手术方式、术中出血量、手术时间、消化道重建时间、住院时间及术后吻合口并发症等指标。结果:本组32例患者中20例行食管空肠吻合,其中包括3例近端胃切除术后双通道吻合;12例行胃空肠吻合。手术时间平均(293.13±33.71)min;消化道重建时间:食管空肠吻合时间平均(46.75±15.33)min,胃空肠吻合时间平均(37.08±14.05)min;术中出血量平均(149.38±93.74)mL,中位住院时间10 d。术后发生吻合口漏2例,经引流、营养支持治愈;随访2~22个月,胃镜或造影检查未发现吻合口狭窄。结论:单层连续手工吻合法安全、有效,同时因其优化了传统手工吻合、节省了费用,可作为器械吻合的有效替代方案。  相似文献   

12.
目的回顾分析完全腹腔镜远端胃大部切除术Delta吻合的安全性和有效性。方法2011年4月-2014年5月,15例患者因胃癌行完全腹腔镜根治性远端胃大部切除术并采用Delta吻合完成胃十二指肠吻合。统计手术时间、吻合口瘘、吻合口出血、狭窄等并发症;淋巴结清扫数目,病灶和近、远端切缘间距离,随访生存情况。结果15例手术没有中转开腹病例,平均手术时间(274.9±55.5)min,Delta吻合平均耗时(32.6±4.9)min。没有吻合El瘘,1例患者在术后第10天、辅助化疗第2天上消化道出血,经保守治疗治愈。1例患者术后3个月吻合口狭窄,经保守治疗缓解。平均每例清扫(23.0±7.8)枚淋巴结,无阳性切缘,肿瘤距近、远侧切缘平均距离分别为(5.8±2.6)cm和(3.8±2.1)cm。1、3年累积生存率分别为92%、83%。结论Delta吻合操作简便、安全可靠,是胃窦部和胃体下部胃癌完全腹腔镜手术可供选择的消化道重建方法。  相似文献   

13.
??Uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy??A clinical study of 51 cases MA Jun-jun??ZANG Lu?? HU Wei-guo??et al. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery??Rui-Jin Hospital??Shanghai Jiao-Tong University School of Medicine; Shanghai Minimal Invasive Surgery Center??Shanghai 200025??China
Corresponding author??ZANG Lu??E-mail??zanglu@yeah.net
Abstract Objective To investigate the safety, feasibility and short term outcome of totally laparoscopic uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis in the distal gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer. Methods The clinical data of 51 cases of total laparoscopic uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis in the distant gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer from September 2014 to December 2015 in Rui-Jin Hospital??Shanghai Jiao-Tong University School of Medicine were analyzed retrospectively. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, number of lymph nodes resected, incidence of complication, length of hospital stay and follow-up were observed. Results All of them underwent total laparoscopic uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis. All the procedures were performed successfully.There were neither conversions to open surgery??nor intraoperative complications in all 51 cases. The median time of the operation was 170 (135-210) min and the median time of anastomosis was 27(24-41) min. The blood loss was 60 (30-110) mL. The time to flatus and length of postoperative hospital stay were 2 (1-3) d and 8(7-12) d??respectively. One anastomotic bleeding occurred which was cured by conservative treatment. No major postoperative complication occurred??such as anastomotic leak??anastomotic stenosis and Roux stasis syndrome. After a short-term follow up [9(5-20)months]??no recanalization or reflux gastritis was encountered by endoscopy. Conclusion The totally laparoscopic uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis in distal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer is safe and feasible??with a very low rate of recanalization and reflux gastritis.  相似文献   

14.
As the laparoscopic operations for gastric cancer have increased, the intracorporeal reconstruction of the digestive tract has received attention because the procedure offers a good visual field regardless of the patient's figure. We performed laparoscopic gastrectomies with regional lymph node dissection on 586 gastric cancer patients between March 1998 and June 2006: 465 distal gastrectomies, 42 proximal gastrectomies, and 79 total gastrectomies. Intracorporeal anastomosis was carried out in 303, 36, and 69 of the above cases, respectively. The intracorporeal Billroth 1 reconstruction was performed in 226 out of the 303 cases who underwent distal gastrectomy and intracorporeal anastomosis. The "triangulating stapling technique" (TST) that uses laparoscopic linear stapling devices was adopted for 196 of these 226 cases; in the remaining 30, circular stapling devices for conventional open gastrectomy (CEEA) were used. In the initial 115 cases of distal gastrectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) was used, and then we shifted to totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) without HALS. In this paper, we concentrated on the techniques and results of intracorporeal Billroth 1 reconstruction by TST. Reducing postoperative wounds was possible TLDG by TST, compared with HALS and the extracorporeal anastomosis, that is, laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Complications from anastomosis resulted in leakage in 2 HALS-TST patients and in 1 TLDG-TST patient, and anastomotic stenosis and bleeding were observed in each 1 case of reconstruction that used CEEA. Intracorporeal Billroth 1 reconstruction by TST is a safe procedure that provides a good visual field regardless of the patient's figure and a feasible technique for reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomies.  相似文献   

15.
目的探讨使用不同的吻合器械行胃空肠吻合在腹腔镜下胃远端癌根治术中的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2006年6月至2011年9月间实施的205例腹腔镜下胃远端癌根治术并Billrot Ⅱ赋胃空肠吻合病例的临床资料。胃空肠吻合分别采用切割闭合器(102例)和圆形吻合器(103例)完成。应用Spssl7.0统计软件进行分析,两组术中和术后数据以x^-±s表示,采用t检验;两组并发症发生率组间比较采用χ^2检验或Fisher确切概率法。结果205例患者均成功施行腹腔镜下胃远端癌淋巴结清扫及胃空肠吻合。切割闭合器组和圆形吻合器组术后并发症总发生率分别为10.8%(11/102)和12.6(13/103)(χ^2=0.683,P〉0.05),两组在肠梗阻、腹腔内出血、吻合口梗阻、吻合口漏、吻合口出血、胃排空障碍、反流性食管炎、后期倾倒综合征并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义;两组患者总手术时间分别为(240.3±89.2)min和(245.5±82.1)min;术中出血量分别为(158.2±28.4)ml和(156.6±30.4)ml;术后下床时间分别为(1.8±1.6)d和(1.8±1.4)d;肛门恢复通气时间分别为(2.8±1.4)d和(2.9±1.3)d;进半流食时间分别为(3.6±0.8)d和(3.6±1.2)d;术后住院时间分别为(7.9±2.3)d和(8.0±2.1)d;住院费用分别为(35153.2±10163.0)元和(33103.0±10125.1)元,两组差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论腹腔镜下胃远端癌根治术采用切割闭合器和圆形吻合器行胃空肠吻合手术,两种吻合方式具有相同的安全性和相似的疗效。  相似文献   

16.
The development of more sophisticated instruments has enabled advanced laparoscopic surgery. We recently devised a totally laparoscopic method of performing Billroth-I hand-sewn anastomosis and established this technique in an animal training model. This report presents the case of a 50-year-old man in whom totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy was successfully performed for gastric cancer, using the hand-sewn Billroth-I anastomotic technique. The patient was admitted with gastric cancer in the angle of the stomach and underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection. After the resected specimen was extracted through the small incision, a Billroth-I anastomosis was performed laparoscopically by the hand-sewn technique using the Albert-Leinbert method. The patient was discharged on the seventh postoperative day without any intra- or postoperative complications. Laparoscopic hand-sewn anastomosis was performed safely and allowed for quick recovery and good cosmesis in this patient. Received: February 4, 2002 / Accepted: September 3, 2002 Reprint requests to: S. Takiguchi  相似文献   

17.
完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术的比较   总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3  
目的 研究缝合重建完全腹腔镜下胃癌根治术与腹腔镜辅助下胃癌根治术的优缺点,探讨在完全腹腔镜下缝合重建吻合方式的安全性与可行性.方法 回顾性分析2009年7月至2010年7月在第四军医大学西京消化病医院完全腹腔镜下缝合重建胃癌D2根治术与腹腔镜辅助胃癌D2根治术49例患者的临床资料,手术均由同一位经验丰富的普通外科医师完成.结果 完全腹腔镜胃癌根治21例中行远端胃切除15例,全胃切除6例,均采用镜下手工缝合胃肠吻合和空肠-空肠吻合,应用25mm管型吻合器完成食管空肠吻合;腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治28例中行远端胃切除21例,全胃切除7例.完全腹腔镜组与腹腔镜辅助组平均手术时间分别为(279±65)min、(232±40)min(P<0.05),平均肿瘤下切缘为(3.1±0.9)cm、(2.9±0.9)cm(P>0.05),平均上切缘为(5.7±1.5)cm、(5.1±1.4)cm(P>0.05),两组切缘均无癌残留.完全腹腔镜组术后无需用镇痛药,腹腔镜辅助组平均使用镇痛药1.8 d;完全腹腔镜组术后通气时间为3 d,腹腔镜辅助组为4.8 d;完全腹腔镜组术后发生早期并发症2例,其中1例腹腔感染,1例肺部感染.腹腔镜辅助组2例,其中1例切口感染,1例肺部感染.术后中位随访时间4个月,两组均无吻合口瘘与狭窄发生.结论 完全腹腔镜下缝合重建的胃癌D2根治术具有可以接受的手术时间和早期并发症的发生率,可在有选择的患者中由经验丰富的外科医师应用.
Abstract:
Objectives To compare total laparoscopic gastrectomy with intracorporeal hand-sewn Gl reconstruction and laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods Between July 2009 and July 2010, 21 patients of gastric cancer underwent total laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy with intracorporeal hand-sewn reconstruction and 28 did laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases. All patients were operated on by an experienced surgeon. Patient demographics, TNM stage, location of tumor, the intraoperative and postoperative details of the two groups were compared. Results In the 21 patients undergoing total laparoscopic gastrectomy, there were 15 of distal gastrectomy and 6 of total gastrectomy, compared with 21 and 7 in laparoscopy-assisted group. In total laparoscopic group, intracorporeal hand-sewn technique was used for gastro-jejunal and jejuno-jejunal (J-J)anastomosis, and 25 mm circular stapler was used for esophago-jejunal anastomosis. The operation time was significant longer in total laparoscopic group than in laparoscopy-assisted group of (279 ± 65 ) min vs.(232 ±40) min (P < 0.05 ). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in proximal margin [(5.7 ± 1.5 )cm vs. (5.1 ± 1.4) cm, P > 0.05] and distal margin [( 3.1 ± 0.9 )cm vs. ( 2.9 ±0.9) cm,P >0.05]. The iv narcotic use in laparoscopy-assisted group was 1.8 d but it was not used in total laparoscopic group. The first passing flatus was on day 3 in total laparoscopic group compared with 4.8 d in laparoscopy-assisted group. Both groups had 2 postoperative early complications, one intra-abdominal infection and one lung infection in total laparoscopic group compared with one wound infection and one lung infection in laparoscopy-assisted group. There was no anastomosis-related complications after 4 months of follow-up. Conclusions The operation time and postoperative early complication was acceptable for selected patients treated by total laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy with intracorporeal hand-sewn GI tract reconstruction in hands of experienced laparoscopic surgeon.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号