经桡动脉冠状动脉造影术的临床应用

目的　探讨经桡动脉径路冠状动脉造影术在诊断和治疗冠心病中的价值。方法　选择 2 0例经桡动脉径路冠状动脉造影患者观察其手术成功率、并发症等 ,并与股动脉径路作一比较。结果　桡动脉径路成功率 10 0 % ,未发现明显并发症。结论　经桡动脉径路冠状动脉造影术是安全可行且成功率高 ,是开展冠状动脉造影术的理想方法     

疑诊冠心病患者经桡动脉冠脉造影术510例分析

目的　探讨经桡动脉径路行冠脉造影的可行性和安全性。方法　 5 10例临床疑诊为冠心病的患者接受了经桡动脉径路冠脉造影术。结果　 5 0 3例获得成功 ,7例失败 ,其中 3例为穿刺失败 ,1例为桡动脉走行畸形 ,2例是由于无名动脉过于迂曲致导管操作极度困难而失败 ,1例为左锁骨下动脉闭塞。所有病例无严重并发症发生 ,只有 1例于术后发生桡动脉闭塞。结论　桡动脉径路行冠脉造影具有止血容易、病人术后无须长时间卧床和并发症少的优点 ,操作成功率高 ,临床应用安全     

5F TIG多功能导管在经桡动脉径路冠状动脉造影中的应用

目的探讨5F TIG多功能导管在经桡动脉径路冠状动脉造影中的应用价值。方法选择经桡动脉径路行冠状动脉造影患者112例,按其造影时首选5F Judkins型造影导管或5F TIG造影导管,分为Judkins组(n=60)和TIG组(n=52)。比较两组手术操作成功率、X线透视时间和手术操作时间,观察两组血管并发症情况。结果 TIG组冠脉造影成功率不低于Judkins组(P>0.05),平均X线透视时间和手术操作时间均少于Judkins组(P<0.01),并可显著减少桡动脉痉挛等局部血管并发症。结论 5F TIG造影导管可减少导管交换次数,节省耗材使用,具有缩短操作时间、有效避免或减少血管痉挛发生的优势,可作为经桡动脉径路冠状动脉造影术中器械的重要选择。     

经桡动脉行冠脉造影术后并发症的观察及护理体会

目的研究经桡动脉行冠脉造影术后并发症的观察及护理。方法本次研究选取的研究对象为2017年7月1日~2017年8月31日期间在我院经桡动脉行冠脉造影术治疗的患者,将60例患者计算机随机分为两组,30例/组。其中,一组患者实施常规护理(对照组),另一组加强护理干预(观察组)。对比两组经桡动脉行冠脉造影术患者的并发症发生情况、住院时间、肢体制动时间以及护理满意度。结果观察组经桡动脉行冠脉造影术患者的并发症发生率(6.67%)、护理满意度(96.67%)以及住院时间(3.05±1.27天)、肢体制动时间(2.36±0.42h)均优于对照组(P0.05)。结论在经桡动脉行冠脉造影术后对患者加强护理干预可有效减少并发症的发生,促进患者护理满意度的提高和身体恢复。     

三种不同路径行冠状动脉介入诊治的可行性和安全性的临床观察

目的 研宛经股动脉、桡动脉和尺动脉三种不同路径对冠状动脉介入的诊治方法,探讨经尺动脉径路行冠状动脉造影或介入治疗的可行性及安全性.方法 入选行冠状动脉造影及介入治疗的患者284倒,其中经尺动脉途径32例,经桡动脉途径168例,经股动脉途径91例,观察其手术成功率、失败原因和并发症.结果 冠状动脉介入诊治成功率,股动脉组100.0％,桡动脉组6.4％,尺动脉组96.9％.血管并发症发生率,股动脉组为(8.425±6.395)％,桡动脉组为(2.282±1.971)％,尺动脉组为(3.125±1.975)％.失败原因:3倒是因经桡动脉穿刺失败改尺动脉径路成功,3例桡动脉痉挛改尺动脉径路成功,1例尺动脉痉挛穿刺失败改股动脉穿刺成功.结论 经尺动脉路径行冠脉造影及介入治疗和经桡动脉径路一样是一种安全可行的介入诊疗路径.不仅可作为部分患者的首选穿刺血管,也可作为经桡动脉或股动脉途径的补充.     

经桡动脉冠状动脉造影术和介入治疗的临床应用

目的探讨经皮桡动脉冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的安全性和可行性。方法156例冠心病或拟诊冠心病患者术前均接受Allen’s试验检查,选择右侧桡动脉为穿刺径路,使用6F桡动脉专用鞘管,5F桡动脉造影导管和6F指引导管。结果桡动脉造影成功152例,成功率为97．43％;85例行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,手术成功率为98．82％。局部血肿,前臂张力性血肿及桡动脉闭塞各1例,无其他并发症。结论经皮桡动脉冠脉造影术和介入治疗安全、可行,经桡动脉穿刺局部并发症少,病人更乐意接受,值得推广。     

经桡动脉冠状动脉造影术和血管成形术的可行性和安全性分析

目的 探讨经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影术和血管成形术的可行性、安全性和成功率.方法 回顾我院1.495例经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影术和694例经桡动脉行冠状动脉血管成形术患者,并以406例经股动脉行冠状动脉血管成形术患者作为对照,记录患者基本情况和临床资料.结果 经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影术的成功率为95.3%,经桡动脉行冠状动脉血管成形术的成功率为97.3%.经桡动脉冠状动脉血管成形术组手术成功率与经股动脉组(96.7%)差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),但手术操作时间、X线照射时间较经股动脉组长(54.9±15.2 min比40.1±10.6 min,P＜0.05;20.2±8.3 min比15.1±6.5 min,P＜0.01)、造影剂用量较经股动脉组多(165.2±30.7 mL比143.5±25.1 mL,P＜0.01).大部分(94.5%)患者未出现任何并发症.结论 经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影术和血管成形术虽然手术操作时间和X线照射时间长,造影剂用量多,但手术成功率高、并发症少,具有临床可行性和安全性.     

经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影术的现状

冠状动脉造影术是确诊冠心病的诊断手段。与经股动脉径路相比,经桡动脉径路优点更为突出,可进一步降低并发症,缩短住院时间,使门诊冠状动脉造影成为现实。     

经桡动脉行冠脉介入诊疗的临床应用价值

目的探讨经桡动脉途径行冠脉造影及介入治疗方法的临床应用价值和并发症,并与经股动脉途径行相似病变治疗作比较。方法对本院2006年1月—2009年4月行冠脉造影术或介入治疗的384例患者临床资料分析,198例冠脉病变的冠心病患者经桡动脉途径行介入治疗(桡动脉组),186例冠心病患者经股动脉途径行介入治疗(股动脉组),对比手术成功率、手术操作时间、X线曝光时间、并发症发生率,并进行统计学处理。结果桡动脉组手术成功率为96.97%,股动脉组100%,两组相比差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。但术后与穿刺有关的并发症发生率,桡动脉组明显少于股动脉组(P0.05);术后卧床时间也明显短于股动脉组(P0.05)。而桡动脉组从穿刺开始至指引导管放置成功所需的时间长于经股动脉组(P0.05)。结论经桡动脉途径冠状动脉介入诊疗成功率高,患者术后体位、活动不受限制,经桡动脉途径行冠脉造影及介入治疗是安全、有效、可行的。     

经皮穿刺桡动脉冠状动脉造影术304例

目的探讨经桡动脉冠状动脉造影术的可行性、安全性和方法学.方法304例患者经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉造影术.结果291例获得成功,13例失败,6例桡动脉穿刺和插管未成功,4例导丝或导管在上肢动脉中前进受阻,3例因锁骨下动脉硬化和迂曲而不能插管至冠状动脉开口处.结论经皮穿刺桡动脉冠状动脉造影术是一种安全、可行的冠状动脉介入诊断新途径,具有止血容易、术后无须卧床休息、病人痛苦小和并发症少的优点.     

经左桡动脉路径对矮小患者行冠脉造影的可行性

探讨经左桡动脉路径对矮小患者行冠脉造影的可行性及安全性。方法：选择2009年2月至2013年2月在我院住院,经左桡动脉路径行冠脉造影的患者898例,分成矮小患者组（449例）和正常身高患者组（对照组,449例）,矮小定义为：男性身高≤160cm、女性身高≤150cm。矮小患者均为Allen试验阳性,使用5F或6F桡动脉专用穿刺鞘组穿刺左桡动脉,使用5FTIG造影导管或Judkins型造影导管行冠脉造影检查,对比两组冠脉造影完成率、导丝导管交换率、X线曝光时间、血管并发症。结果：矮小患者组和对照患者组经左桡动脉路径行冠脉造影完成率均为96.2%,超滑导丝更换率（9.6%比8.6%）、X线曝光时间[（3.6±2.7）min比（3.4±2.7）min]、并发症[桡动脉闭塞（0.4%比0.4%）,易控性前臂出血或血肿（2.7%比1.8%）]等差异均无显著性（P〉0.05）。结论：经左桡动脉路径对矮小患者行冠脉造影检查是安全可行的,值得临床推广。     

应用利多卡因外擦导管减少桡动脉痉挛的临床观察

目的:桡动脉痉挛是经桡动脉路径冠状动脉造影(CAG)和(或)介入治疗(PCI)的常见并发症之一。本研究旨在观察应用利多卡因外擦动脉鞘和造影导管,减少桡动脉痉挛的临床疗效。方法:将连续237例接受经桡动脉路径CAG/PCI的患者随机分为两组,分别于动脉鞘和造影/导引导管插入前应用2%利多卡因溶液(118例,利多卡因组)或0.9%氯化钠溶液(119例,对照组)外擦其表面。主要观察终点:严重桡动脉痉挛(导管推进或操作困难并伴前臂疼痛、桡动脉造影示管腔内径狭窄>70%)发生率。次要终点:前臂出血或血肿、患者不适程度以及操作成功率。结果:利多卡因组5例(4.2%)和对照组16例(13.4%)发生严重桡动脉痉挛(P=0.013);利多卡因组中无一例发生前臂出血或血肿,但对照组中3例前臂轻度出血(表现为造影剂外渗)和1例局部血肿形成,均经局部加压包扎后好转;利多卡因组因疼痛引起的重度不适减少;两组CAG/PCI均成功。结论:CAG/PCI时,应用2%利多卡因溶液外擦动脉鞘和造影/导引导管可能是一种减少严重桡动脉痉挛及其相关并发症的简易方法。     

老年女性患者经鼻烟壶桡动脉与经典桡动脉行冠状动脉诊疗的对比性研究

目的探讨老年女性患者经鼻烟壶处桡动脉行冠状动脉造影和PCI的可行性和安全性。方法选择行冠状动脉造影和(或)PCI的老年女性患者100例,根据穿刺部位不同随机分为鼻烟壶组50例(穿刺鼻烟壶部位)及经典组50例(穿刺常规桡动脉)。观察2组穿刺时间、穿刺成功率、手术时间、手术成功率、置入支架、穿刺部位出血、血肿、动脉瘤及桡动脉闭塞率等情况。结果 2组血管内径、穿刺时间、穿刺成功、手术成功、手术时间、置入支架、术后血肿、动脉瘤和动静脉瘘发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。鼻烟壶组桡动脉痉挛、闭塞和总并发症发生率较经典组明显降低(2%vs 8%,2%vs 10%,6%vs 20%,P<0.05)。结论老年女性患者经鼻烟壶桡动脉途径的桡动脉痉挛发生率及闭塞率更低,安全性好,可以作为常规桡动脉的替代途径应用于冠状动脉诊疗。     

The Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Transradial Coronary Procedures

Objectives To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transradial coronary procedures (TRCP). Methods The data of 83 cases who accepted transradial coronary angiography (CAG) and transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in our department were summarized. The success rates, proximal coronary complications, peripheral vascular complications, severe vagal reflex, mean operation time (MOT), mean recumbent time (MRT), mean hospital-staying time (MHT) were analyzed. The data were compared with that of 420 cases of transfemoral coronary procedures (TFCP) in the same period. Results Success rates and proximal coronary complications were similar in both groups. Severe vagal reflexes were less in TRCP group than in TFCP group. MOT was longer in TRCP group. MRT and MHT were shorter in TRCP group. 12( 14.5%) radial artery spasm, 3(3.6%) radial artery obstruction, 1 sudden respiratory arrest caused by jugular hematoma were observed in TRCP group. Conclusions The efficacy and safety of TRCP are definite. TRCP is more economical. For the purpose of properly evaluate the peripheral vascular complications of TRCP, it is necessary to pay special attention to radial artery occlusion, radial artery stenosis, and jugular hematoma.     

经桡动脉冠状动脉介入诊疗232例临床分析

目的 探讨经桡动脉冠脉介入诊疗的可行性及安全性.方法 选择符合冠脉造影指征且Allen's试验阳性患者232例,首选以右桡动脉途径行冠脉造影,对符合介入指征者158例行介入治疗.结果 造影成功221例,成功率95.3%,失败11例,其中7例为穿刺不成功(桡动脉痉挛),另外4例因动脉狭窄或迂曲(桡动脉迂曲1例、肱动脉狭窄...     

Isolated Single Coronary Artery Presenting as Acute Coronary Syndrome: Case Report and Review

Congenital single coronary artery is commonly associated with complex congenital heart diseases and manifests in infancy or childhood. But isolated single coronary artery is a rare congenital anomaly which can present as acute coronary syndrome in adults. The aim of the work is to discuss on isolated single coronary artery in two adults presenting as acute coronary syndrome. The first case underwent coronary angiography (CAG) through right radial route, but switched over to femoral for confirmation of diagnosis and due to radial spasm. An aortic root angiogram was done to rule out presence of any other coronary ostia. It revealed a single coronary artery originating from right sinus of valsalva. After giving rise to posterior descending artery branch at crux, it continued in the atrioventricular groove to the anterior basal surface of the heart and traversed as anterior descending artery. There was no atheromatous occlusive stenosis. This is R-I type single coronary artery as per Lipton classification. In the second case, angiography was completed through right radial route. It revealed a single coronary artery arising from right aortic sinus. Anterior descending and circumflex branch were originating from proximal common trunk of the single coronary artery and supplying the left side of the heart. The right coronary artery has diffuse atheromatous disease without significant stenosis in any major branch. This is R-III C type as per Lipton classification. A coronary anomaly of both origin and course is very rare. It may be encountered in adults evaluated for atherosclerotic coronary heart disease. Knowledge and understanding of anatomical types of this congenital anomaly will reduce time, anxiety, complications during CAG and cardiac surgery.     

冠脉造影桡动脉穿刺部位与血管并发症的关系

目的:探讨提高冠脉造影桡动脉穿刺成功率及减少并发症的部位。方法:共640例进行经桡动脉冠脉造影的患者,被随机分为两组:(1)穿刺点距腕横纹近端2~3cm组(A组,320例);(2)穿刺点距腕横纹近端4~5 cm组(B组,320例)。比较两组的成功率、平均穿刺操作时间、桡动脉痉挛及穿刺并发症发生率。结果:B组一次性穿刺成功率较A组显著提高(92.5%∶77.8%,P0.01)。B组平均穿刺时间较A组明显缩短[(2.5±0.6)min∶4.6±1.2)min,P0.01]。两组前臂血肿的发生率无明显差异,但B组桡动脉痉挛(3.75%∶8.13%)、桡动脉闭塞(0.93%∶5.0%)的比例均明显小于A组(P均0.05)。结论:距腕横纹4~5 cm进行首次桡动脉穿刺可以提高一次性穿刺成功率,节约手术时间,减少桡动脉痉挛和桡动脉闭塞的发生率。     

经桡动脉PCI治疗急性心肌梗死106例的临床观察

目的：探讨急诊经桡动脉PCI治疗急性心肌梗死（AMI）的安全性和可行性。方法：106例AMI患者行急诊经桡动脉PCI治疗,观察经桡动脉途径的成功率和并发症。结果：桡动脉穿刺成功率为99．1％;造影成功率为100％;PCI成功率为99．0G,皮下瘀斑的发生率为3．8％;桡动脉痉挛的发生率为1．0％;前臂血肿的发生率为2．9G;桡动脉闭塞的发生率为1．O％;平均手术时间55±18min;平均术后住院天数5．7±1．6d。结论：急诊经桡动脉PCI治疗AMI安全、可行,经桡动脉穿刺局部并发症少,患者更乐意接受,值得推广。     

Distal radial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: A state‐of‐the‐art review

Since its introduction by Lucien Campeau three decades ago, percutaneous radial artery approach at the forearm has been shown to provide advantages over the femoral approach and has become the standard approach for coronary angiography and intervention. Though infrequent, vascular complications still remain, mainly radial artery occlusion. Therefore, a more distal radial approach at the snuffbox or at the dorsum of hand has been suggested, initially by anethesiologists for perioperative patient monitoring, and more recently by Babunashvili et al. for retrograde radial artery recanalization of radial artery occlusion and then for coronary angiography and intervention. This distal radial approach has been advocated to reduce the risk of radial artery occlusion at the forearm (which precludes reintervention through the same access site) and bleeding and vascular access site complications, as well as to improve operator and patient comfort, especially when using left radial approach. This review describes in detail the anatomy of the radial artery at the wrist and the hand, the history of distal radial access, the rationale underlying use of this technique, the results published by experienced operators, the technique, the limitations, and potential role of this approach. This journey from the very proximal to the very distal part of the radial artery was indeed initiated and conceptualized by Lucien Campeau himself.     

经桡动脉和股动脉途径行冠状动脉介入术的对比研究

目的 研究比较经桡动脉和股动脉两种途径行冠状动脉造影 (coronary angiography,CAG) 和介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)的优缺点.方法 择期行CAG和PCI病人804例,按途径分为桡动脉组294例 (包括1例股动脉途径CAG失败而改为桡动脉途径),股动脉组530例(包括19例桡动脉途径CAG失败而改为股动脉途径).比较两组CAG和PCI的手术操作成功率和并发症.结果 CAG手术成功率:桡动脉组92.9%,股动脉组99.4%,差异有统计学意义.PCI手术成功率:桡动脉组92.6%,股动脉组96.5%,差异无统计学意义.但桡动脉组有6例病人改从股动脉途径完成PCI.外周血管并发症:桡动脉组2.7%,股动脉8.7%,差异有统计学意义.结论 桡动脉途径与传统的股动脉途径相比能减少外周血管并发症,但手术操作的难度有所增加.