晚期鼻咽癌诱导化疗+同步放化疗与诱导化疗+放疗疗效比较

目的 比较诱导化疗+同步放化疗与诱导化疗+放疗在T3～4N0～1M0和T1～4N2～3M0期鼻咽癌患者的疗效.方法 对2002-2005年间收治的92分期为Ⅲ、Ⅳa期的400例鼻咽癌患者随机分为诱导化疗+同步放化疗组和诱导化疗+放疗组,其中对T3～4N0～1M0(197例)和T1～4N2～3M0(203例)期分别进行亚组分析.放疗采用常规分割方案,化疗采用氟尿嘧啶脱氧核苷+卡铂.结果 中位随访3.9年,随访率96.2%.T3～4N0～1M0期鼻咽癌患者诱导化疗+同步放化疗组(104例)和诱导化疗+放疗组(93例)的3年总生存率、无瘤生存率、无局部区域复发生存率、无远处转移生存率分别为84.0%和85.9%(χ2=0.08,P=0.780)、77.0%和72.0%(χ2=0.44,P=0.510)、89.5%和92.3%(χ2=0.65,P=0.420)、84.9%和77.0%(χ2=1.59,P=0.210);T1～4 N2～3 M0期(97例和106例)的分别为67.4%和82.2%(χ2=3.48,P=0.060)、61.5%和68.0%(χ2=1.86,P=0.170)、86.2%和87.0%(χ2=0.57,P=0.450)、66.2%和75.6%(χ2=2.07,P=0.150).急性毒副反应只有白细胞减少诱导化疗+同步放化疗比诱导化疗+放疗严重,其余相似.结论 采用诱导化疗+同步放化疗方案未能较诱导化疗+放疗进一步提高T3～4N0～1M0、T1～4N2～3M0期鼻咽癌总生存率.     

不同方案化疗结合调强放疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌临床病理回顾性分析

目的:探讨不同化疗方案结合调强放射治疗局部区域晚期鼻咽癌的相关毒副反应及疗效.方法:回顾性分析213例局部晚期鼻咽癌惠者,按与调强放疗结合的不同方式分为单纯放疗组61例、DDP同期放化疗组54例、DDP+5-FU(PF)方案诱导化疗联合DDP同期放化疗组66例、紫杉醇+Carboplatin(TC)方案诱导化疗联合DDP同期放化疗组32例.调强放射治疗采用同期整合加量技术治疗.比较各组患者的肿瘤控制情况和治疗毒副反应.结果:各组患者5年总生存率分别为82.4%、78.9%、84.0%、77.2%(P=0.950),无瘤生存率75.0% 、74.6%、82.3 %、74.0%(P=0.891),无局部复发率90.2%、96.2%、98.4%、90.4%(P=0.226),无远处转移率83.2%、77.8%、83.9%、83.7%(P=0.798).治疗相关毒副反应主要为骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应和放射性黏膜炎,前两者化疗组与单纯放疗组差异有统计学意义.影响预后的多因素分析结果显示,总生存率仅与N分期相关.结论:与单纯调强放射治疗相比,PF和TC诱导化疗、DDP单药同期化疗或者两者序贯联合均未能提高肿瘤局部区域控制率和生存率,胃肠道和骨髓毒副反应有所增加.     

鼻咽癌诱导化疗联合放疗或同期放化疗的疗效比较

[目的]比较诱导化疗+同期放化疗(ICRT)和诱导化疗+放疗(IRT)治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳa期鼻咽癌患者的疗效及毒副反应.[方法] 70例经病理组织学确诊为Ⅲ、Ⅳa期鼻咽癌初诊患者随机分为ICRT组(n=34)和IRT组(n=36).IRT组接受诱导化疗+放疗,ICRT组接受诱导化疗+同期放化疗.[结果]ICRT组和IRT组患者5年总生存率(70.6％vs 77.8％,x2=0.581,P=0.446),无瘤生存率(67.6％ vs 63.9％,x2=0.012,P=0.913),无局部区域复发生存率(91.2％vs 83.3％,x2=0.763,P=0.382),无远处转移生存率(76.5％vs 77.8％,x2=0.102,P=0.749)均无显著性差异.ICRT组外周血白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、呕吐和急性咽黏膜等反应重于IRT组(P＜0.05).[结论]与诱导化疗+放疗相比,诱导化疗+同期放化疗无明显提高Ⅲ、Ⅳ期鼻咽癌的疗效,且毒副反应较大.     

奈达铂和氟尿嘧啶化疗联合同步放疗治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳa期鼻咽癌临床分析

目的:评价奈达铂和氟尿嘧啶化疗联合同步放疗治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳa期鼻咽癌的局控率、生存率和毒副反应。方法:回顾性分析奈达铂 氟尿嘧啶化疗联合同步放疗治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳa期鼻咽癌30例的局控率、生存率和毒副反应,并与单纯放疗30例相比较。结果:CR率放化组为93.33%,单放组为73.33%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);1年无复发生存率和1年无远处转移生存率放化组分别为93.33%和86.67%,单放组分别为83.33%和73.33%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗毒副反应:放化组恶心呕吐高于单放组,主要是轻中度,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);放化组骨髓抑制较单放组明显(P<0.05),且放化组有1例在第3周期化疗后发生Ⅳ度血小板下降;放化组皮肤反应无明显加重(P>0.05),但Ⅲ、Ⅳ度口腔黏膜反应与单放组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:奈达铂 氟尿嘧啶同期放化疗治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳa期鼻咽癌近期疗效确切,毒副反应较低,患者耐受性良好。     

调强放疗结合诱导化疗或同期加辅助化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效比较

目的:比较诱导化疗加调强放疗和同期放化疗加辅助化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效。方法:收集2004年1 月至2008年12月中山大学肿瘤医院收治的经病理证实的局部晚期鼻咽癌240 例,其中采用顺铂+ 5-FU 诱导化疗加调强放疗（诱导组）117 例,采用顺铂、调强放疗同期放化疗加顺铂+ 5-FU 辅助化疗（同期组）123 例。应用Kaplan-Meier 和Log-rank 法计算和比较两组患者的生存率。结果:诱导组和同期组的5 年总生存率、无瘤生存率、无转移生存率、无鼻咽复发生存率和无颈部复发生存率分别为78.0% 和78.7% 、68.9% 和67.5% 、79.0% 和77.0% 、91.6% 和91.0% 、95.3% 和93.7% ,两组比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。 同期组Ⅲ、Ⅳ级恶心呕吐和白细胞减少的发生率明显高于诱导组。多因素分析结果显示N 分期和年龄是影响局部晚期鼻咽癌患者总生存的预后独立因素。结论:诱导化疗加调强放疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效达到同期放化疗加辅助化疗的水平,远处转移是局部晚期鼻咽癌治疗失败的主要原因。      

鼻咽癌后程三维适形放疗加时间调节化疗的临床前瞻性随机研究

目的观察鼻咽癌后程三维适形放疗加时间调节化疗与常规放化疗的疗效和副作用。方法将86例患者用信封法随机分为后程三维适形放疗加时间调节化疗组(CCR组)和常规放化疗组(RCR组)。两组均先进行2个周期顺铂+氟尿嘧啶+亚叶酸钙不同给药方法的诱导化疗,之后加不同方式的放疗。RCR组用药量同CCR组,鼻咽病灶放疗剂量均为70Gy7周。结果完全缓解率、有效率CCR组和RCR组分别为45.5%、95.5%和23.8%、71.4%。两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组1、3年生存率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。RCR组相对于CCR组口腔炎、恶心呕吐、腹泻更多见(P<0.05),骨髓毒性反应的差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论鼻咽癌后程三维适形放疗加时间调节化疗治疗较常规放化疗有较好效果,且副反应较低。     

诱导化疗序贯同期化放疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌

  目的  比较诱导化疗加同期化放疗(IC/CCRT)与单纯同期化放疗(CCRT)在治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌中的近期疗效及不良反应的发生率。  方法  2003年9月至2006年5月广西百色市人民医院肿瘤科接受治疗的200例鼻咽癌患者随机分为诱导化疗加同期化放疗组(IC/CCRT)和单纯同期化放疗组(CCRT)。两组患者接受相同的同期化放疗方案: 在放疗的第7、28、49天接受卡铂(AUC=6)化疗, 诱导化疗加同期放化疗组在同期化放疗前接受了诱导化疗: 2个疗程5-FU(750 mg/m2)+卡铂(AUC=6)。  结果  IC/CCRT组与CCRT组Ⅲ、Ⅳ级不良反应的发生率分别为24.5%和17.8%(P < 0.001), 两组3年总生存率分别为83.5%和79.4%(P=0.30), 两组方案的3年无瘤生存率、局部控制率和远处转移控制率比较差异均无统计学意义。  结论  与单纯同期化放疗相比, 诱导化疗加同期化放疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌, 患者的总生存率及无复发生存未明显提高, 但不良反应有所增加。      

放疗联合不同方式化疗治疗中晚期鼻咽癌的近期疗效观察

目的　对比观察诱导化疗联合后程加速超分割放疗 (诱导组 )和同时期化疗联合后程加速超分割放疗 (同期组 )治疗中晚期鼻咽癌的毒副反应、有效率及生存率。方法　 3 2例中晚期鼻咽癌应用羟基喜树碱 (HCTP)诱导化疗联合后程加速超分割放射治疗 ,48例类似病人应用DDP加 5 Fu化疗同期联合后程加速超分割放射治疗。结果　诱导组总有效率 10 0 % ,其中CR87.5 % (2 8/3 2 ) ,同期组总有效率 10 0 % ,其中CR85 .42 % (4 1/4 8) ,两组之间无显著性差别 (P =0 .79) ;但经CT检查证实鼻咽肿瘤完全消退率同期组达 75 .76% ,而诱导组仅 42 .1% ,同期组比诱导组高 (P =0 .0 3 ) ;1年生存率 :诱导组为 93 .8% (3 0 /3 2 ) ,同期组为 91.7% (4 4 /4 8) ,两组之间差别无显著性意义 (P =0 .93 )。但诱导组的毒副反应比同期组轻 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论　HCTP诱导化疗联合后程加速超分割放疗与DDP加 5 Fu化疗同期联合后程加速超分割放射治疗对中晚期鼻咽癌的疗效无差异 ,但前者毒副反应较轻。     

同步放化疗和单纯放疗治疗ⅡB～ⅢB期宫颈癌的疗效比较

背景与目的:同步放化疗已成为局部晚期宫颈癌的标准治疗模式,但对于放疗联合何种方案的化疗效果最佳,目前尚无一致意见.本研究中我们比较同步放化疗与单纯放疗,以及同步放化疗不同化疗方案的疗效及毒副反应.方法:2003年1月至2004年12月江西省妇幼保健院收治的符合人组标准的ⅡB～ⅢB期宫颈癌患者285例,按住院序号随机分为单纯放疗组142例,同步放化疗组143例.同步放化疗组又按化疗方案不同分为:BP(博来霉素 顺铂)方案同步放化疗51例,TP(紫杉醇 卡铂)方案同步放化疗47例,FP(氟尿嘧啶 顺铂)方案同步放化疗45例.比较单纯放疗组与同步放化疗组患者的3年生存率和不良反应,同时对同步放化疗三种不同化疗方案组的3年生存率及不良反应进行比较.结果:全组中位随访时间为42个月,单纯放疗组与同步放化疗组的3年生存率分别为65%和75%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.042).单纯放疗组Ⅲ～Ⅳ度急性毒副反应低于同步放化疗组(P<0.001),迟发性毒副反应两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.613).同步放化疗组BP方案、TP方案、FP方案的3年生存率分别为74%、80%和71%,三组间比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.792).三组Ⅲ～Ⅳ度急性及迟发性毒副反应发生率相似.结论:与单纯放疗相比,同步放化疗可明显提高ⅡB～ⅢB期宫颈癌患者的疗效.在同步放化疗三种不同的化疗方案中,紫杉醇联合卡铂方案组患者3年生存率略高于其他两种化疗方案,毒副反应可耐受,值得进一步研究.     

诱导化疗加放疗与同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效比较

[目的]比较诱导化疗加放疗与同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效.[方法]收集2007年1月至2009年12月中山大学附属肿瘤医院收治的经病理证实的局部晚期鼻咽癌258例,其中采用顺铂+5-Fu诱导化疗加调强放疗(诱导组)128例,采用顺铂同期放化疗(同期组)130例.应用Kaplan-Meier和Log-rank方法计算和比较两组患者的生存率,应用COX风险回归模型进行预后多因素分析.[结果]诱导组和同期组5年总生存率(83.1％ vs 83.0％)、无瘤生存率(80.9％ vs 79.1％)、无转移生存率(84.9％ vs 83.6％)、无复发生存率(95.0％ vs 92.8％)比较差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).同期组3、4级恶心呕吐的发生率明显高于诱导组(10％ vs 1.6％,P=0.004),体重下降的平均数也明显大于诱导组(P＜0.001).多因素分析结果显示N分期是影响局部晚期鼻咽癌总生存的独立因素.[结论]诱导化疗加调强放疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效与同期放化疗相近,但同期放化疗的消化道反应较重.远处转移是局部晚期鼻咽癌治疗失败的主要原因.     

A randomized trial of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

The aim of this randomized study was to compare the efficacy of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC+CCRT) versus induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (IC+RT) for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. From August 2002 to April 2005, 408 patients were randomly divided into two groups: an IC+CCRT group and an IC+RT group. Patients in both groups received the same induction chemotherapy: two cycles of floxuridine (FuDR)+carboplatin (FuDR, 750mg/m(2), d1-5; carboplatin, area under the curve [AUC]=6). The patients received radiotherapy 1week after they finished the induction chemotherapy. The patients in the IC+CCRT group also received carboplatin (AUC=6) on days 7, 28, and 49 of radiotherapy. Eight patients did not meet the inclusion criteria, and the remaining 400 cases were analyzed. Grade III or IV toxicity was found in 28.4% of the patients in the IC+CCRT group and 13.1% of those in the IC+RT group (P<.001). Five-year overall survival rates were 70.3% and 71.7% (P=0.734) in the IC+CCRT and IC+RT groups, respectively. No significant differences in failure-free survival, locoregional control, and distant control were found between the two groups. Compared with the IC+RT program, the IC+CCRT program used in the present study did not improve the overall survival and failure-free survival in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Using carboplatin in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy was not suitable for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.     

多西他赛加顺铂诱导化疗联合同期放化疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察

目的 评价TP方案诱导化疗联合同期放化疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的近期疗效和不良反应。方法 病理证实的局部晚期非小细胞肺癌86例,随机分成同期放化疗联合TP方案诱导化疗(ICCRT) 组和单纯同期放化疗(CCRT) 组。放疗均采用调强放疗。治疗结束后比较两组疗效、生存率和不良反应。结果 86例患者的随访率为100%。ICCRT组和CCRT组的有效率分别为80%和70%(χ²=1.26,P=0.261),1、2、3年总生存率分别为85%和65%、50%和40%、44%和33%(χ²=3.90,P=0.048),主要不良反应白细胞减少(43例和32例,χ²=3.48,P=0.062)、放射性食管炎(26例和20例,χ²=0.12,P=0.730)、血红蛋白减低(26例和16例,χ²=2.34,P=0.126)和放射性肺炎(13例和9例,χ²=0.37,P=0.541)。结论 ICCRT能明显提高局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的总生存率,且与CCRT相比并不增加局部不良反应。     

N晚期鼻咽癌调强放疗远期疗效评价

目的 评价N晚期鼻咽癌根治性调强放疗(IMRT)的远期疗效及IMRT联合不同化疗模式对N晚期鼻咽癌患者预后影响。
方法 回顾分析2001-2008年间收治的179例N晚期鼻咽癌患者临床资料,其中单纯IMRT 33例,放化疗146例(同期放化疗71例、诱导化疗加同期放化疗66例,同期放化疗加辅助化疗9例)。
结果 随访率96.5%,随访时间满5年者133例。全组5年总生存率为69.0%。单纯IMRT和放化疗的5年总生存率、无远处转移生存率、无复发生存率、无进展生存率分别为47.7%和73.7%(χ²=13.91,P=0.000)、49.2%和68.3%(χ²=4.97,P=0.026)、74.5%和92.4%(χ²=9.87,P=0.002)、37.5%和65.1%(χ²=11.65,P=0.001),放化疗中同期放化疗、诱导化疗加同期放化疗、同期放化疗加辅助化疗的生存率相似,但诱导化疗加同期放化疗的无远处转移生存率比单纯IMRT的高(χ²=4.65,P=0.031)。
结论 N晚期鼻咽癌患者单纯IMRT后远处转移率仍较高,诱导化疗加IMRT联合同期化疗也许是较为合理的治疗手段。     

Treatment of Stage IV(A-B) nasopharyngeal carcinoma by induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy and accelerated fractionation: impact of chemotherapy schemes

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2003, 75 Stage IV(A-B) NPC patients were treated with 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) (n = 41) or cisplatin plus gemcitabine (PG) (n = 34), followed by accelerated radiotherapy in concurrence with 2 cycles of cisplatin. In 18 (24%) patients, cisplatin was completely replaced by carboplatin in both concurrent cycles, mainly because of borderline renal functions. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 3.6 years. The 3-year locoregional failure-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival of the whole group were 80%, 68%, and 80% respectively. No significant difference was found between patients treated with either induction regimens. However, patients with only carboplatin in the 2 concurrent cycles had significantly inferior 3-year locoregional failure-free survival (56% vs. 86%, p = 0.014), progression-free survival (39% vs. 72%, p = 0.001), and overall survival (61% vs. 87%, p = 0.046) when compared with the rest of the group. In multivariate analysis, the complete replacement of cisplatin by carboplatin during concurrent chemoradiotherapy was still an independent adverse factor in locoregional failure-free survival (hazard ratio, 3.662; 95% CI, 1.145-11.765; p = 0.029) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 3.390; 95% CI, 1.443-7.937; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The more convenient PG regimen is as effective as the PF regimen as induction chemotherapy for patients with advanced NPC. Replacing cisplatin with carboplatin in the concurrent phase carries a poor prognosis.     

Role of chemoradiotherapy in intermediate prognosis nasopharyngeal carcinoma

To evaluate the long term impact of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared to radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients with T2N1M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) retrospectively. Three hundred and ninety-two patients with T2N1M0 NPC according to the AJCC 2002 stage classification system were analyzed. Among them, 211 patients were treated with RT alone and the rest of 181 patients were treated with CCRT. A planned dose of 70 Gy was delivered in 2.0 Gy per fraction over 7 weeks to the primary tumor with 6-MV photons or (60)Cobalt γ-ray. The chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin with a dose of 100mg/m(2) was delivered for 2-3 cycles. With a median follow-up of 66 months (range 2.4-117.1 months), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates was higher in CCRT group compared to RT alone group, though they failed to reach statistical significance (80.2% vs. 76.6%, P=0.778 and 70.5% vs. 64.2%, P=0.413, respectively). A significant improvement was detected in 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate in CCRT group than RT alone group (91.5% vs. 77.3%, P=0.008). Moreover, chemotherapy was the only independent prognostic factor for the 5-year RFS (P=0.007). Concurrent chemoradiotherapy appeared to improve the 5-year RFS rate for patients with T2N1M0 NPC. Large prospective, randomized clinical studies are needed to confirm its therapeutic gain.     

Positive effect of high RKIP expression on reduced distant metastasis by chemotherapy when combined with radiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective study

The purpose of this prospective study is to investigate the predictive and prognostic significance of the Raf kinase inhibitory protein (RKIP) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Immunohistochemical assays were performed to detect the RKIP protein expression of samples from 212 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. All patients were assigned randomly into the inductive chemotherapy plus radiation therapy (IC + RT) group, the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) group, the inductive chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC + CCRT) group, and the radiation therapy alone (RT) group. The patients in the IC + RT group were treated with IC using 2?C3 cycles of cisplatin (80 mg/m²) and fluorouracil (500 mg/m²), repeated every 3 weeks, followed by radiotherapy. Those in the CCRT group were treated with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m²) for 6?C7 cycles during radiotherapy. In the IC + CCRT group, the chemotherapy prior to radiation was similar to the cisplatin?Cfluorouracil regimen in the IC + RT group, whereas it cisplatin regimen was identical to that in the CCRT group. The results show that RKIP is an independent prognostic factor for 5-year distant metastasis?Cfree survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with high RKIP expression benefited more from reduced metastasis in the IC + RT and the IC + CCRT group, with improved OS and PFS in each treatment group compared with that among patients with low RKIP expression. In the high RKIP expression subgroup, chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy improved the DMFS when compared with the RT group, but this effect was not observed in the low RKIP expression subgroup. RKIP was predictive of distant metastasis with good sensitivity and specificity. Clinically, high RKIP expression inhibited distant metastasis in advanced NPC, and its detection might be used to predict distant metastasis with good sensitivity and specificity. The effect of chemotherapy on distant metastasis in combined chemoradiotherapy might be related to the RKIP expression level. Patients with high RKIP expression showed more improved OS and PFS than their low RKIP expression counterparts. Higher RKIP expression improves the DMFS of patients who receive inductive high-dose cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy, with or without concurrent cisplatin. Low RKIP expression is also a predictive marker for cancer progression and metastasis, which could be used to stratify patients with high risk of metastasis and death.     

鼻咽癌调强放疗时代诱导化疗后序贯放疗±同步化疗疗效与安全性的Meta分析

目的 Meta分析调强放疗时代鼻咽癌诱导化疗(IC)联合单纯放疗(RT)与诱导化疗联合同步放化疗(CCRT)的疗效和不良反应。方法 选择已经发表的回顾性或者随机对照临床研究,检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Web of Science数据库,以2010—2020年发表的研究为主要研究对象。选择的研究包括接受IC+CCRT或IC+RT治疗的鼻咽癌患者,使用STATA 12软件合并风险比(HR)、危险比(RR)及95%可信区间(CI),并应用随机或固定效应模型进行统计学分析。结果 共纳入了8项回顾性研究中的 2483例患者。IC+CCRT组与IC+RT组总生存相仿(HR=0.78,95%CI为 0.58~1.04, P=0.091);但IC+CCRT组的无远处转移生存(HR=0.56,95%CI为 0.42~0.74,P<0.001)及无进展生存期(HR=0.65,95%CI为 0.54~0.77,P<0.001)较IC+RT组提高。IC+CCRT组急性不良反应较IC+RT组明显增加。结论 鼻咽癌治疗中两种治疗模式总生存相当,而IC+CCRT组的无远处转移生存及无进展生存较优于IC+RT组,但不良反应发生率也相应增加。IC+CCRT或许可作为鼻咽癌患者的一种推荐治疗方式,但需要更多研究。