Preliminary biomechanical evaluation of prophylactic vertebral reinforcement adjacent to vertebroplasty under cyclic loading

Background ContextPercutaneous vertebroplasty has become a favored treatment option for reducing pain in osteoporotic patients with vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). Short-term results are promising, although longer-term complications may arise from accelerated failure of the adjacent vertebral body.PurposeTo provide a preliminary biomechanical assessment of prophylactic vertebral reinforcement adjacent to vertebroplasty using a three-vertebra cadaveric segment under dynamic loads that represent increasing activity demands. In addition, the effects of reducing the elastic modulus of the cement used in the intact vertebrae were also assessed.Study Design/SettingThree-vertebra cadaveric segments were used to evaluate vertebroplasty with adjacent vertebral reinforcement as an intervention for VCFs.MethodsNine human three-vertebra segments (T12–L2) were prepared and a compression fracture was generated in the superior vertebrae. Vertebroplasty was performed on the fractured T12 vertebra. Subsequently, the adjacent intact L1 vertebra was prophylactically augmented with cement of differing elastic moduli (100–12.5% modulus of the base cement value). After subfailure quasi-static compression tests before and after augmentation, these specimens were subjected to an incrementally increasing dynamic load profile in proportion to patient body weight (BW) to assess the fatigue properties of the construct. Quantitative computed tomography assessments were conducted at several stages in the experimental process to evaluate the vertebral condition and quantify the gross dimensions of the segment.ResultsNo significant difference in construct stiffness was found pre– or postaugmentation (t=1.4, p=.19). Displacement plots recorded during dynamic loading showed little evidence of fracture under normal physiological loads or moderate activity (1–2.5× BW). A third of the specimens continued to endure increasing load demands and were confirmed to have no fracture after testing. In six specimens, however, greater loads induced 11 fractures: 7 in the augmented vertebra (2×T12, 5×L5) and 4 in the adjacent L2 vertebra. A strong correlation was observed between the subsidence in the segmental unit and the incidence of fracture after testing (r_Spearman's=?0.88, p=.002). Altering the modulus of cement in the intact vertebra had no effect on level of segmental compromise.ConclusionsThese preliminary findings suggest that under normal physiological loads associated with moderate physical activity, prophylactic augmentation adjacent to vertebroplasty showed little evidence of inducing fractures, although loads representing more strenuous activities may generate adjacent and peri-augmentation compromise. Reducing the elastic modulus of the cement in the adjacent intact vertebrae appeared to have no significant effect on the incidence or location of the induced fracture or the overall height loss of the vertebral segment.     

骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折椎体强化术后不同椎体高度对相邻椎体应力影响的有限元分析

目的运用有限元分析骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折椎体强化手术后,不同椎体高度对相邻椎体应力的影响。方法运用四例T12椎体经皮椎体后凸成形术(percutaneous kyphoplasty,PKP)患者术后CT影像资料,构建Genant半定量方法分级后,T_(12)椎体高度为0～3级,T_(11)～L_1节段三维有限元模型各一例。运用有限元分析方法,模拟施加垂直、屈曲、左侧屈、右侧屈四个不同状态的载荷后,观察椎体强化术后不同椎体高度相邻椎体的应力。结果 T_(12)椎体强化术后呈现T_(12)椎体高度丢失越严重,T_(11)椎体承受载荷越大的趋势,各种状态最大载荷均出现在T_(12)椎体高度为3级时,各级椎体高度之间载荷大小差异没有统计学意义(P0.05)。L_1椎体垂直和右侧屈状态压力呈现T12椎体高度丢失越严重,椎体承受载荷越大的趋势,而且T_(12)椎体高度为3级时垂直和右侧屈承受最大载荷,各级之间载荷大小差异没有统计学意义(P0.05)。总体呈现为骨折椎体高度丢失越多,相邻椎体应力越大的趋势。结论为了减少相邻椎体的应力,在进行椎体强化手术过程中应当尽可能恢复骨折椎体的椎体高度     

Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element study

Infiltrating osteoporotic cancellous bone with bone cement (vertebroplasty) is a novel surgical procedure to stabilize and prevent osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Short-term clinical and biomechanical results are encouraging; however, so far no reports on long-term results have been published. Our clinical observations suggest that vertebroplasty may induce subsequent fractures in the vertebrae adjacent to the ones augmented. At this point, there is only a limited understanding of what causes these fractures. We have previously hypothesized that adjacent fractures may result from a shift in stiffness and load following rigid augmentation. The purpose of this study is to determine the load shift in a lumbar motion segment following vertebroplasty. A finite-element (FE) model of a lumbar motion segment (L4-L5) was used to quantify and compare the pre- and post-augmentation stiffness and loading (load shift) of the intervertebral (IV) disc adjacent to the augmented vertebra in response to quasi-static compression. The results showed that the rigid cement augmentation underneath the endplates acted as an upright pillar that severely reduced the inward bulge of the endplates of the augmented vertebra. The bulge of the augmented endplate was reduced to 7% of its value before the augmentation, resulting in a stiffening of the IV joint by approximately 17%, and of the whole motion segment by approximately 11%. The IV pressure accordingly increased by approximately 19%, and the inward bulge of the endplate adjacent to the one augmented (L4 inferior) increased considerably, by approximately 17%. This increase of up to 17% in the inward bulge of the endplate adjacent to the one augmented may be the cause of the adjacent fractures.     

Sandwich Vertebral Fracture in the Study of Adjacent-level Fracture After Vertebral Cement Augmentation

The literature is inconclusive on the development of adjacent-level vertebral fracture after initial cement augmentation. A preliminary hypotheses is that cement injection exaggerates force transmission to the adjacent vertebral bodies, thereby predisposing those levels to future fractures. A sandwich vertebra is an intact vertebral body located between 2 previously cemented vertebrae. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the risk of adjacent-level fracture increased due to load shift after a cement injection procedure. The authors retrospectively investigated the rate of adjacent-level fracture after sandwiching compared with conservative treatment and determined the potential causative factors of sandwich vertebral fracture. Age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, follow-up period, and location of sandwich level (T10-L2 or nonT10-L2 junction) were assessed. Surgical variables, including surgical procedure (vertebroplasty or balloon kyphoplasty), surgical approach (through uni- or bilateral pedicle), volume of cement injected into the painful vertebrae, cement leakage into the intervertebral disk, cumulative number of treated levels, and pre- and postoperative kyphotic angulation of the sandwich region, were also analyzed. Nine of 42 sandwiched levels developed fatigue fractures, whereas 11 of 71 patients treated with conservative therapy sustained new vertebral fractures adjacent to the treated levels. Only preoperative kyphotic angulation was the variable positively associated with sandwich vertebral fracture at follow-up (P=.021). Although subjected to double load shifts, the sandwich vertebra was not prone to structural failure. Thus, cement augmentation protocol does not increase the incidence of adjacent vertebral fracture.     

Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty

Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are routine treatments for compression fractures of vertebral bodies. A wedge-shaped compression fracture shifts the centre of gravity of the upper body anteriorly and generally, this shift can be compensated in the spine and in the hips. However, it is still unclear how a wedge-shaped compression fracture of a vertebra increases forces in the trunk muscle and the intradiscal pressure in the adjacent discs. A nonlinear finite element model of the lumbar spine was used to estimate the force in the trunk muscle, the intradiscal pressure and the stresses in the endplates in the intact spine, and after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty treatment. In this study, kyphoplasty represents a treatment with nearly full fracture reduction and vertebroplasty one without restoration of kyphotic angle although in reality kyphoplasty does not guarantee fracture reduction. If no compensation of upper body shift is assumed, the force in the erector spine increases by about 200% for the vertebroplasty but by only 55% for the kyphoplasty compared to the intact spine. Intradiscal pressure increases by about 60 and 20% for the vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, respectively. In contrast, with shift compensation of the upper body, the increase in muscle force is much lower and increase in intradiscal pressure is only about 20 and 7.5% for the vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, respectively. Augmentation of the vertebral body with bone cement has a much smaller effect on intradiscal pressure. The increase in that case is only about 2.4% for the intact as well as for the fractured vertebra. Moreover, the effect of upper body shift after a wedge-shaped vertebral body fracture on intradiscal pressure and thus on spinal load is much more pronounced than that of stiffness increase due to cement infiltration. Maximum von Mises stress in the endplates of all lumbar vertebrae is also higher after kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Cement augmentation has only a minor effect on endplate stresses in the unfractured vertebrae. The advantages of kyphoplasty found in this study will be apparent only if nearly full fracture reduction is achieved. Otherwise, differences between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty become small or vanish. Our results suggest that vertebral body fractures in the adjacent vertebrae after vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty are not induced by the elevated stiffness of the treated vertebra, but instead the anterior shift of the upper body is the dominating factor.     

Changes of the adjacent discs and vertebrae in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures treated with or without bone cement augmentation

BACKGROUND CONTEXTAlthough vertebral augmentation with bone cement has been commonly used to treat symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, relatively little is known about the impact of augmentation on the adjacent spinal components.PURPOSETo determine the imaging effects of vertebral augmentation on the adjacent discs, the augmented vertebra, and the involved spinal segment.STUDY DESIGNRetrospective radiographic study.PATIENT SAMPLEPatients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures who underwent vertebral augmentation or nonoperative treatments.OUTCOME MEASURESOn baseline and follow-up mid-sagittal T2W magnetic resonance images, quantitative measurements of disc degeneration, including disc height, bulging, and signal, vertebral height, wedge angle, and segmental kyphotic angle were acquired.METHODSLumbar spine magnetic resonance images of patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures at a local hospital in Eastern China between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed. Student's t-tests and χ² tests were used to examine the differences of baseline and changes over time between vertebrae underwent vertebral augmentation and those did not. Paired t-tests were used to examine the differences between baseline and follow-up to study the changes of adjacent disc degeneration, creep deformity of the vertebra and progression of segmental kyphosis.RESULTSThere were 112 acute vertebral compression fractures (72 treated with kyphoplasty and 40 with nonoperative treatments) in 101 subjects. At final follow-up (mean 21.5 months), the cranial disc of the augmented vertebra decreased in height (p<.001), and both cranial and caudal discs decreased in signal intensity (p≤.02). The discs in the nonoperative group did not undergo such degenerative changes. For the fractured vertebra, vertebral height significantly decreased (p<.01 for both) and vertebral wedge angle significantly increased (p≤.01 for both), regardless of augmentation treatment or not. Segmental kyphotic angle significantly increased in vertebral fractures that underwent vertebral augmentation (p<.001), but not in those underwent nonoperative treatments.CONCLUSIONSPatients that underwent vertebral augmentation had more advanced disc degeneration at adjacent disc levels as compared to those without augmentation. The fractured vertebral body height decreased and the wedge angle increased, regardless of vertebral augmentation treatment or not. Vertebral augmentation may be associated with increased creep deformity of the adjacent vertebra and the progression of segmental kyphosis.     

Restoring geometric and loading alignment of the thoracic spine with a vertebral compression fracture: effects of balloon (bone tamp) inflation and spinal extension.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: In patients with osteoporosis, changes in spinal alignment after a vertebral compression fracture (VCF) are believed to increase the risk of fracture of the adjacent vertebrae. The alterations in spinal biomechanics as a result of osteoporotic VCF and the effects of deformity correction on the loads in the adjacent vertebral bodies are not fully understood. PURPOSE: To measure 1) the effect of thoracic VCFs on kyphosis (geometric alignment) and the shift of the physiologic compressive load path (loading alignment), 2) the effect of fracture reduction by balloon (bone tamp) inflation in restoring normal geometric and loading alignment and 3) the effect of spinal extension alone on fracture reduction and restoration of normal geometric and loading alignment. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A biomechanical study using six fresh human thoracic specimens, each consisting of three adjacent vertebrae with all soft tissues and bony structures intact. METHODS: In order to reliably create fracture, cancellous bone in the middle vertebral body was disrupted by inflation of bone tamps. After removal of the bone tamps, the specimen was compressed using bilateral loading cables until a fracture was observed with anterior vertebral body height loss of >/=25%. Fracture reduction was performed under a compressive preload of 250 N first under the application of extension moments, and then using inflatable bone tamps. The vertebral body heights, kyphotic deformity of the fractured vertebra and adjacent segments and location of compressive load (cable) path in the fractured and adjacent vertebral bodies were measured on video-fluoroscopic images. RESULTS: The VCF caused anterior wall height loss of 37+/-15%, middle-height loss of 34+/-16%, segmental kyphosis increase of 14+/-7.0 degrees and vertebral kyphosis increase of 13+/-5.5 degrees (p<.05). The compressive load path shifted anteriorly by about 20% of anteroposterior end plate width in the fractured and adjacent vertebrae (p=.008). Bone tamp inflation restored the anterior wall height to 91+/-8.9%, middle-height to 91+/-14% and segmental kyphosis to within 5.6+/-5.9 degrees of prefracture values. The compressive load path returned posteriorly relative to the postfracture location in all three vertebrae (p=.004): the load path remained anterior to the prefracture location by about 9% to 11% of the anteroposterior end plate width. With application of extension moment (6.3+/-2.2 Nm) until segmental kyphosis and compressive load path were fully restored, anterior vertebral body heights were improved to 85+/-8.6% of prefracture values. However, the middle vertebral body height was not restored and vertebral kyphotic deformity remained significantly larger than the prefracture values (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The anterior shift of the compressive load path in vertebral bodies adjacent to VCF can induce additional flexion moments on these vertebrae. This eccentric loading may contribute to the increased risk of new fractures in osteoporotic vertebrae adjacent to an uncorrected VCF deformity. Bone tamp inflation under a physiologic preload significantly reduced the VCF deformity (anterior and middle vertebral body heights, segmental and vertebral kyphosis) and returned the compressive load path posteriorly, approaching the prefracture alignment. Application of extension moments also was effective in restoring the prefracture geometric and loading alignment of adjacent segments, but the middle height of the fractured vertebra and vertebral kyphotic deformity were not restored with spinal extension alone.     

Distribution of anterior cortical shear strain after a thoracic wedge compression fracture.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a common clinical problem and may follow trauma or be pathological. Osteoporosis increases susceptibility to fracture by reducing bone mass and weakening bone architecture. Approximately 2.5 million osteoporotic fractures occur worldwide annually, usually involving the vertebrae, wrist and hip. In the United States 700,000 VCFs occur annually, causing significant morbidity, mortality and economic burden. An initial VCF often leads to subsequent VCFs. The strain distribution along the anterior cortex, the major load-bearing pathway in flexion, may be predictive of impending VCF. Regions of high strain distribution are likely to experience secondary fracture. PURPOSE: To investigate the distribution of anterior cortical strain at, above and below an experimentally created index VCF to determine the vertebral body at risk of secondary fracture. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro experimental study using cadaveric thoracic spinal segments. METHODS: Seventeen thoracic spines underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to assess bone mineral density and were divided into T1-T3 (Subsegment 1), T4-T6 (Subsegment 2), T7-T9 (Subsegment 3) and T10-T12 (Subsegment 4). Rectangular rosette strain gauges were applied to the anterior cortices of the vertebrae of each subsegment (vertebrae in each specimen were denoted V1-superior, V2-intermediate and V3-inferior). V1 and V3 were partially embedded into polyester resin blocks, which were used to mount the specimens in a materials testing machine. Nondestructive predefect testing was performed in compression at 125 N and 250 N, followed by flexion at 1.25 Nm and 2.5 Nm. To ensure fracture reproducibility, V2 of each specimen had a trabecular defect created to a volume of 21.3+/-4.4% of the V2 centrum. Postdefect nondestructive compression and flexion were then performed in a manner similar to the predefect tests, followed by destructive testing in flexion. Anterior cortical shear strain on V1, V2 and V3, applied moments and applied flexion angle were all measured and analyzed. RESULTS: A VCF occurred in 55 of the 59 subsegments. Fifty-one VCF (93%) were seen in V2 and 4 VCF (7%) were seen in V1. After the creation of the trabecular defect, the shear strain on V2 increased, but a comparison of the postdefect with the predefect nondestructive tests showed no significant differences. The pre- and postdefect shear strain distribution in compression and flexion was V1strain>V3strain>V2strain. Shear strain at failure was highest on V2, and in all subsegments there were significant differences between V2 and V3 (p<.05). In all subsegments there were no significant differences between V2 and V1 (p>.05) at failure with the exception of Subsegment 1 where V2 and V1 were significantly different (p<.05). The predominant strain pattern at failure was (V2strain>V1strain>V3strain V2strain>V3strain). Using shear strain as the codeterminant of peak moment with bending stiffness and applied angle at failure, the strain on V1 was the greatest predictor (p=.0084; R2=0.78). These findings suggest that the events leading to a secondary fracture probably start before the index VCF occurs and continue with loading beyond the index VCF. CONCLUSION: Anterior cortical strain is concentrated at the apex of a thoracic kyphotic curve. The vertebral body immediately above the index VCF has the next highest amount of strain and therefore the highest risk of secondary fracture.     

Effect of augmentation on the mechanics of vertebral wedge fractures

STUDY DESIGN: The effect of cement augmentation of wedge-fractured vertebral bodies on spine segment compliance was studied in 16 cadaver specimens. OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess the mechanical effects of cement augmentation of vertebral wedge fractures. 2) To determine whether a new reduction/injection procedure has the same mechanical effects as the established direct injection procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although wedge fractures cause pain and disability in hundreds of thousands of people, few effective treatments are available. Clinical studies have shown that cement augmentation, a new procedure, effectively relieves pain and restores mobility in patients suffering from weak or fractured vertebrae. However, only a few studies have examined the mechanics of vertebral augmentation. METHODS: A wedge fracture was created in the middle vertebra of 16 three-vertebra cadaver spine segments. Neutral and full-load compliance of each fractured spine segment in flexion/extension and lateral bending were assessed by measuring the relative rotation of the vertebral bodies in response to applied moments. Eight of the fractured vertebral bodies were then augmented using direct injection, while the remaining eight fractured vertebral bodies were augmented using a combined reduction/injection procedure. Compliance of the augmented segments was then assessed. RESULTS: Augmentation significantly reduced the neutral compliance (reduction of 25% +/- 23%) (mean +/- standard deviation) and the full-load compliance (reduction of 23% +/- 20%) in flexion/extension (P < 0.005). Augmentation also significantly reduced the neutral compliance (reduction of 34% +/- 20%) and the full-load compliance (reduction of 26% +/- 17%) in lateral bending (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the two procedures for compliance reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation of wedge fractures using both direct injection and reduction/injection reduces spine segment compliance significantly.     

Evolution of bone mineral density after percutaneous kyphoplasty in fresh osteoporotic vertebral body fractures and adjacent vertebrae along with sagittal spine alignment

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective controlled cohort study of 27 adult osteoporotic patients who underwent kyphoplasty for fresh osteoporotic spinal fractures. OBJECTIVES: To define the evolution of vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) at kyphoplasty and adjacent levels along with sagittal spinal alignment to contribute to the etiology of adjacent vertebral fractures after augmentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Osteoporotic compression fractures can be effectively treated with methylmethacrylate vertebral augmentation. However, to the authors' knowledge the effect of vertebral augmentation on the vertebral endplate BMD of the augmented and adjacent nonaugmented levels has not as yet been described. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive selected patients (9 men, 18 women), with an average age of 72+/-9 years underwent 1, 2, or 3-level percutaneous kyphoplasty for painful fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures at the thoracolumbar spine. All patients were radiologically examined with plain roentgenograms, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Lateral dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in the augmented and on the adjacent vertebrae (1 level above and below kyphoplasty) was used to measure BMD preoperatively to the last postoperative observation in the subchondral bone of the vertebral endplates. Anthropometric data, sagittal global balance (plumbline), and segmental spine reconstruction (vertebral body height, Gardner kyphotic angle) were recorded and analyzed. The patients were followed for at least 2 years. RESULTS: Kyphoplasty was performed between T12 and L5. A total of 48 vertebral bodies were augmented. Thirteen patients received 1 level and the remaining 14 received 2 or 3-level kyphoplasty. No significant changes in the sagittal spinal balance were shown postoperatively. Gardner kyphotic angle and posterior vertebral body height improved postoperatively, however, insignificantly. Significant [analysis of variance (ANOVA), P=0.008] increase of anterior vertebral body height in the fractured vertebra was achieved postoperatively without subsequent loss of correction. BMD increased significantly in the lower endplate of the augmented vertebra (ANOVA, P=0.05). In 1-level augmentation, no BMD changes were shown at the adjacent vertebrae above and below kyphoplasty. On the contrary, in the multilevel augmentation, a statistically significant (ANOVA, P=0.05) decrease of the BMD was shown in the upper endplate of the adjacent level above kyphoplasty. During the 2-year follow-up, there were 5 (18%) new fractures at the T11-T12 area above the augmented vertebra. All of the fractures occurred in patients who received 2 and 3-level kyphoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: The observed 2-year evolution of vertebral endplate BMD, after kyphoplasty under stable global sagittal spinal balance, might contribute to the pathogenesis of new fractures in adjacent vertebra. However, other studies with control series and longer follow-up are necessary to show if these BMD changes are the result of vertebral augmentation or are merely natural history.     

Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation

Vertebroplasty, which is the percutaneous injection of bone cement into vertebral bodies has recently been used to treat painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Early clinical results have been encouraging, but very little is known about the consequences of augmentation with cement for the adjacent, non-augmented level. We therefore measured the overall failure, strength and structural stiffness of paired osteoporotic two-vertebra functional spine units (FSUs). One FSU of each pair was augmented with polymethylmethacrylate bone cement in the caudal vertebra, while the other served as an untreated control. Compared with the controls, the ultimate failure load for FSUs treated by injection of cement was lower. The geometric mean treated/untreated ratio of failure load was 0.81, with 95% confidence limits from 0.70 to 0.92, (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in overall FSU stiffness. For treated FSUs, there was a trend towards lower failure loads with increased filling with cement (r2 = 0.262, p = 0.13). The current practice of maximum filling with cement to restore the stiffness and strength of a vertebral body may provoke fractures in adjacent, non-augmented vertebrae. Further investigation is required to determine an optimal protocol for augmentation.     

Biomechanical comparison of vertebral augmentation with silicone and PMMA cement and two filling grades

Purpose

Vertebral augmentation with PMMA is a widely applied treatment of vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures. Subsequent fractures are a common complication, possibly due to the relatively high stiffness of PMMA in comparison with bone. Silicone as an augmentation material has biomechanical properties closer to those of bone and might, therefore, be an alternative. The study aimed to investigate the biomechanical differences, especially stiffness, of vertebral bodies with two augmentation materials and two filling grades.

Methods

Forty intact human osteoporotic vertebrae (T10–L5) were studied. Wedge fractures were produced in a standardized manner. For treatment, PMMA and silicone at two filling grades (16 and 35 % vertebral body fill) were assigned to four groups. Each specimen received 5,000 load cycles with a high load range of 20–65 % of fracture force, and stiffness was measured. Additional low-load stiffness measurements (100–500 N) were performed for intact and augmented vertebrae and after cyclic loading.

Results

Low-load stiffness testing after cyclic loading normalized to intact vertebrae showed increased stiffness with 35 and 16 % PMMA (115 and 110 %) and reduced stiffness with 35 and 16 % silicone (87 and 82 %). After cyclic loading (high load range), the stiffness normalized to the untreated vertebrae was 361 and 304 % with 35 and 16 % PMMA, and 243 and 222 % with 35 and 16 % silicone augmentation. For both high and low load ranges, the augmentation material had a significant effect on the stiffness of the augmented vertebra, while the filling grade did not significantly affect stiffness.

Conclusions

This study for the first time directly compared the stiffness of silicone-augmented and PMMA-augmented vertebral bodies. Silicone may be a viable option in the treatment of osteoporotic fractures and it has the biomechanical potential to reduce the risk of secondary fractures.     

老年性胸腰椎骨折复位固定骨水泥充填的探讨

目的探讨老年人脊柱压缩骨折复位后,注射骨水泥充填后的疗效。方法50例老年性脊柱压缩骨折患者行内固定撑开复位后,将伤椎经椎弓根注入骨水泥充填。结果术后摄片复查,骨折均复位满意,骨水泥充填良好,无神经受损表现。38例获随访,时间6～24（11.12±4.76）个月,均未见伤椎高度丢失和内固定断裂现象。结论老年人脊柱压缩骨折在行骨折椎体复位的同时,将伤椎注入骨水泥充填,缩短了伤椎的修复过程,增加了脊柱的强度和支撑力,可早期下床活动,防止长时间卧床的并发症。     

Vertebral endplate fractures: an indicator of the abnormal forces generated in the spine after vertebroplasty.

Vertebroplasty alters spinal biomechanics and may lead to incident vertebral fractures. The endplate localization of prevalent and incident fractures was evaluated in 86 patients. In the absence of vertebroplasty, superior endplate fractures predominate. After the procedure, inferior endplate fractures are disproportionately common in adjacent vertebrae immediately above the treated level, potentially supporting a causative relationship between vertebroplasty and incident fractures. INTRODUCTION: To determine retrospectively whether new-onset fractures after vertebroplasty tend to cluster in the endplate immediately adjacent to the cemented vertebra. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval and patient consent for use the use of medical records were obtained for this study. We performed a retrospective review of patients with new (incident) vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty. The median age for these patients was 72.5 years, and 58 (67.4%) were women. Fractures were diagnosed on the basis of MRI or bone scan and were catalogued based on their location within the vertebral body (superior endplate, inferior endplate, or holo-vertebral). Chi(2) and generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses were used to compare the distribution of fracture subtypes among pre-existing (prevalent) and incident fractures. RESULTS: The patients had 313 prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures and were treated at 137 vertebral levels. Among prevalent fractures, superior endplate fractures predominated (57% superior, 11% inferior; p < 0.0001). After vertebroplasty, 186 incident fractures developed in these 86 patients. Seventy-seven (41%) of these incident fractures occurred adjacent to treated vertebrae. Nonadjacent, incident fractures, like prevalent fractures, occurred predominantly along superior endplate. Incident fractures immediately above treated levels, however, localized disproportionately to the inferior endplate (30% superior, 57% inferior; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There are an increased number of inferior endplate fractures of the vertebral body immediately cephalad to the treated level.     

Altered disc pressure profile after an osteoporotic vertebral fracture is a risk factor for adjacent vertebral body fracture

This study investigated the effect of endplate deformity after an osteoporotic vertebral fracture in increasing the risk for adjacent vertebral fractures. Eight human lower thoracic or thoracolumbar specimens, each consisting of five vertebrae were used. To selectively fracture one of the endplates of the middle VB of each specimen a void was created under the target endplate and the specimen was flexed and compressed until failure. The fractured vertebra was subjected to spinal extension under 150 N preload that restored the anterior wall height and vertebral kyphosis, while the fractured endplate remained significantly depressed. The VB was filled with cement to stabilize the fracture, after complete evacuation of its trabecular content to ensure similar cement distribution under both the endplates. Specimens were tested in flexion-extension under 400 N preload while pressure in the discs and strain at the anterior wall of the adjacent vertebrae were recorded. Disc pressure in the intact specimens increased during flexion by 26 ± 14%. After cementation, disc pressure increased during flexion by 15 ± 11% in the discs with un-fractured endplates, while decreased by 19 ± 26.7% in the discs with the fractured endplates. During flexion, the compressive strain at the anterior wall of the vertebra next to the fractured endplate increased by 94 ± 23% compared to intact status (p < 0.05), while it did not significantly change at the vertebra next to the un-fractured endplate (18.2 ± 7.1%, p > 0.05). Subsequent flexion with compression to failure resulted in adjacent fracture close to the fractured endplate in six specimens and in a non-adjacent fracture in one specimen, while one specimen had no adjacent fractures. Depression of the fractured endplate alters the pressure profile of the damaged disc resulting in increased compressive loading of the anterior wall of adjacent vertebra that predisposes it to wedge fracture. This data suggests that correction of endplate deformity may play a role in reducing the risk of adjacent fractures.     

胸腰椎骨质疏松骨折行CPC灌注成形的力学实验

目的探讨磷酸钙骨水泥(calcium phosphate cement,CPC)注射椎体成形术后对胸腰椎骨质疏松骨折椎体的力学影响。方法建立前屈方向加载单椎体骨折模型,对胸腰椎骨质疏松骨折标本行CPC成形强化,骨折前、成形后分别行屈曲压缩力学实验。结果椎体内注射CPC能明显恢复骨质疏松骨折椎体的力学性质。骨质疏松性胸腰椎标本行CPC灌注成形可以恢复椎体的强度和刚度,分别增加16.92%(P<0.05)和22.31%(P<0.05)。结论椎体内注射CPC能明显恢复骨质疏松骨折椎体的力学性质。     

Vertebroplasty increases compression of adjacent IVDs and vertebrae in osteoporotic spines

Background contextApproximately 25% of vertebroplasty patients experience subsequent fractures within 1 year of treatment, and vertebrae adjacent to the cemented level are up to three times more likely to fracture than those further away. The increased risk of adjacent fractures postaugmentation raises concerns that treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures with vertebroplasty may negatively impact spine biomechanics.PurposeTo quantify the biomechanical effects of vertebroplasty on adjacent intervertebral discs (IVDs) and vertebral bodies (VBs).Study designA biomechanics study was conducted using cadaveric thoracolumbar spinal columns from elderly women (age range, 51–98 years).MethodsFive level motion segments (T11–L3) were assigned to a vertebroplasty treated or untreated control group (n=10/group) such that bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular architecture, and age were similar between groups. Compression fractures were created in the L1 vertebra of all specimens, and polymethylmethacrylate bone cement was injected into the fractured vertebra of vertebroplasty specimens. All spine segments underwent cyclic axial compression for 115,000 cycles. Microcomputed tomography imaging was performed before and after cyclic loading to quantify compression in adjacent VBs and IVDs.ResultsCyclic loading increased strains 3% on average in the vertebroplasty group when compared with controls after 115,000 cycles. This global strain manifested locally as approximately fourfold more compression in the superior VB (T12) and two- to fourfold higher axial and circumferential deformations in the superior IVD (T12–L1) of vertebroplasty-treated specimens when compared with untreated controls. Low BMD and high cement fill were significant factors that explained the increased strain in the vertebroplasty-treated group.ConclusionsThese data indicate that vertebroplasty alters spine biomechanics resulting in increased compression of adjacent VB and IVD in severely osteoporotic women and may be the basis for clinical reports of adjacent fractures after vertebroplasty.     

Mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty: influence of cement type, BMD, fracture severity, and disc degeneration

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures can be treated by injecting bone cement into the damaged vertebral body. "Vertebroplasty" is becoming popular but the procedure has yet to be optimised. This study compared the ability of two different types of cement to restore the spine's mechanical properties following fracture, and it examined how the mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty depends on bone mineral density (BMD), fracture severity, and disc degeneration. METHODS: A pair of thoracolumbar "motion-segments" (two adjacent vertebrae with intervening soft tissue) was obtained from each of 15 cadavers, aged 51-91 years. Specimens were loaded to induce vertebral fracture; then one of each pair underwent vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement, the other with another composite material (Cortoss). Specimens were creep loaded for 2 h to allow consolidation. At each stage of the experiment, motion segment stiffness in bending and compression was measured, and the distribution of compressive loading on the vertebrae was investigated by pulling a miniature pressure transducer through the intervertebral disc. Pressure measurements, repeated in flexed and extended postures, indicated the intradiscal pressure (IDP) and neural arch compressive load-bearing (F(N)). BMD was measured using DXA. Fracture severity was quantified from height loss. RESULTS: Vertebral fracture reduced motion segment stiffness in bending and compression, by 31% and 43% respectively (p<0.001). IDP fell by 43-62%, depending on posture (p<0.001), whereas F(N) increased from 14% to 37% of the applied load in flexion, and from 39% to 61% in extension (p<0.001). Vertebroplasty partially reversed all these effects, and the restoration of load-sharing was usually sustained after creep-consolidation. No differences were observed between PMMA and Cortoss. Pooled results from 30 specimens showed that low BMD was associated with increased fracture severity (in terms of height loss) and with greater changes in stiffness and load-sharing following fracture. Specimens with low BMD and more severe fractures also showed the greatest mechanical changes following vertebroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Low vertebral BMD leads to greater changes in stiffness and spinal load-sharing following fracture. Restoration of mechanical function following vertebroplasty is little influenced by cement type but may be greater in people with low BMD who suffer more severe fractures.     

Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Vertebral compression fractures can cause deformity, pain, and disability. Kyphoplasty involves percutaneous insertion of an inflatable balloon tamp into a fractured vertebra followed by injection of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. PMMA has several disadvantages such as potential thermal necrosis and monomer toxicity. Calcium sulfate cement (CSC) is nontoxic, osteoconductive, and bioabsorbable. PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical performance of CSC for kyphoplasty in cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral bodies. STUDY DESIGN: Destructive biomechanical tests using fresh cadaveric thoracolumbar vertebral bodies. METHODS: Thirty-three vertebral bodies (T9 to L4) from osteoporotic cadaveric spines were disarticulated, stripped of soft tissue, and measured for height and volume. Each vertebral body was compressed at 0.5 mm/s using a hinged plating system on a materials testing machine to create an anterior wedge fracture and reduce the anterior height by 25%. Pretreatment strength and stiffness were measured. Two KyphX inflatable balloon tamps were used to reexpand each vertebral body. After randomization, three groups were created: Group A-no cement; Group B-PMMA; Group C-calcium sulfate cement. Groups B and C were filled with the corresponding cement to 25% of the vertebral body volume. All vertebral bodies were then recompressed by 25% of the post-kyphoplasty anterior height to obtain posttreatment strength and stiffness. RESULTS: Treatment with PMMA restored vertebral strength to 127% of the intact level (4168.2 N+/-2288.7) and stiffness to 70% of the intact level (810.0 N/mm+/-380.6). Treatment with CSC restored strength to 108% of the intact level (3429.6 N+/-2440.7) and stiffness to 46% of the intact level (597.7 N/mm+/-317.5). CSC and PMMA were not significantly different for strength restoration (p=.4). Significantly greater strength restoration was obtained with either PMMA or CSC, compared with the control group (p=.003 and .03, respectively). Stiffness restoration tended to be greater with PMMA than for CSC, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=.1). Both cements had significantly greater stiffness when compared with the control group (p=.001 and p=.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Use of CSC for kyphoplasty yields similar vertebral body strength and stiffness as compared with PMMA. It may be a useful alternative bone cement for kyphoplasty. Further studies are required to assess the bioabsorption of CSCs after kyphoplasty in vivo.     

Long-term effects of vertebroplasty: adjacent vertebral fractures

In today's aging population, osteoporosis-related fractures are an ever-growing concern. Vertebroplasty, a promising yet cost-effective treatment for vertebral compression fractures, has an increasing role. The first vertebroplasty procedures were reported by Deramond and Galibert in France in 1987, and international interest grew with continued development of clinical techniques and augmentation materials in Europe and the United States. Initial publications and presentations at peer review meetings demonstrated 60-90% success rates in providing immediate and significant pain relief. The objective of this review is to assemble experimental and computational biomechanical research whose goal is determining and preventing the negative long-term effects ofvertebroplasty, with a specific focus on adjacent vertebral fractures. Biomechanical studies using isolated cancellous bone cylinders have shown that osteoporotic cancellous bone samples augmented by the rigid bone cement were at least 12 times stiffer and 35 times stronger than the untreated osteoporotic cancellous bone samples. The biomechanical efficacy of the procedure to repair the fractured vertebrae and prevent further collapse is determined using single-vertebra models. The strength or load-bearing capacity of a single vertebra is significantly increased following augmentation when compared to the intact strength. However, there is no dear result regarding the overall stiffness of the single vertebra, with studies reporting contradictorily that the stiffness increases, decreases, or does not significantly alter following augmentation. The effects of vertebroplasty on adjacent structures are studied via multisegment models, whose results plainly oppose the findings of the single-vertebra and intravertebral models. Here, augmentation was shown to decrease the overall segment strength by 19% when compared to the matched controls. As well, there is a significant increase in disc pressure compared to the pre-augmentation measurements. This translates to a high hydrostatic pressure adjacent to the augmented vertebra, representing the first evidence of increased loading. Computational finite element (FE) models have found that the rigid cement augmentation results in an increase in loading in the structures adjacent to the augmented vertebra. The mechanism of the increase of the loading is predicted to be the pillar effect of the rigid cement. The cement inhibits the normal endplate bulge into the augmented vertebra and thus pressurizes the adjacent disc, which subsequently increases the loading of the untreated vertebra. The mechanism for adjacent vertebral fractures is still unclear, but from experimental and computational studies, it appears that the change in mechanical loading following augmentation is responsible. The pillar effect of injected cement is hypothesized to decrease the endplate bulge in the augmented vertebra causing an increase in adjacent disc pressure that is communicated to the adjacent vertebra. To confirm the viability of the pillar effect as the responsible mechanism, endplate bulge and disc pressure should be directly measured before and after augmentation. Future studies should be concerned with quantifying the current and ideal mechanical response of the spine and subsequently developing cements that can achieve this optimum response.