保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术17例临床分析

目的 探讨保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术在治疗胰腺远端肿瘤的疗效.方法 回顾性分析2011年1月至2014年2月施行的17例保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术患者的资料.结果 6例患者未能成功保脾,开腹与腹腔镜手术各3例;11例患者成功行保留脾脏胰体尾切除术,其中6例行开腹手术（1例术中行脾动脉修复,1例行Warshaw法保脾）;5例行腹腔镜手术成功保脾（1例中转开腹）.保脾成功组中腹腔镜与开腹手术后发生胰漏各2例,均经保守治疗痊愈.患者均获得随访,随访时间2个月到3年,均无脾血管栓塞、脾梗死、肿瘤复发.结论 保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术是安全可靠的,值得临床进一步推广.     

��ǻ���������������������е�Ӧ�ü�����

胰腺囊性肿瘤生物学行为多样。手术是治疗胰腺囊腺瘤惟一有效方法。目前,腹腔镜治疗胰腺囊性肿瘤术式包括胰腺囊肿剜除术、腹腔镜下保留脾或不保留脾的胰体尾切除术、腹腔镜胰腺节段切除、胰腺假性囊肿引流术及腹腔镜下胰十二指肠切除术或全胰切除术。腹腔镜治疗胰腺囊性肿瘤具有创伤小、并发症少、术后恢复快等优点,是未来胰腺囊性肿瘤治疗的主要方式。     

不同胰体尾切除手术方式在胰腺良性疾病治疗中的应用

胰腺体尾部良性肿瘤的手术方式包括保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术(spleen-preserving distal pancre-atectomy,SPDP)和联合脾脏切除的胰体尾切除术.SPDP较之切除脾脏的胰体尾切除术发生术后感染、腹腔内脓肿以及脾切除术后凶险性感染、血小板增多症等风险明显降低.而胰腺肿瘤与脾脏的解剖关系是决...     

腹腔镜下保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术在临床的应用

目的探讨腹腔镜下保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析我院2012年1月至2015年3月间胰腺手术病例资料。根据手术方式,将患者分为腹腔镜胰体尾联合脾脏切除组(切脾组)和腹腔镜下保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术组(保脾组),记录手术相关资料(包括手术时间、术中出血量、肿瘤病理类型、肿瘤直径),术后恢复情况(包括胃管留置时间、禁食时间、生长抑素应用时间、住院时间等)以及术后并发症情况,并进行对比分析。结果保脾组和切脾组两组患者性别、年龄、肿瘤大小、手术时间、胃管留置时间和术后禁食时间均无统计学差异(P0.05);保脾组术中出血量和住院时间明显低于切脾组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜下保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术是一种适用于胰腺良性或交界性肿瘤的安全有效的手术方式。     

胰体尾良性疾病行保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术九例

我院自1995年至1999年,有9例胰体尾部良性病变施行保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术.男6例,女3例;年龄25～54岁,平均38岁.其中,胰腺囊腺瘤3例,非功能性胰岛细胞瘤3例,多发性胰岛素瘤1例,胰腺假性囊肿1例,胰体尾外伤1例.3例行保留脾动、静脉的保脾术,6例为切除脾动、静脉的保脾术. 手术方法:上腹正中切口,必要时拐向脐左或脐右,打开胃结肠韧带,在胃网膜左右动脉交界处切断,从弓内游离胃大弯,保留2～3条胃短血管,充分显露胰体尾和脾门.探查肿瘤,并取少许组织送快速病理,如为良性肿瘤,则准备行保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术.如肿瘤位于胰体部,首先探查肠系膜上静脉及门静脉,在肿瘤右侧切断胰体,胰头侧残端套索缝合包埋,胰体侧缝扎牵引.游离脾动、静脉,将两血管从肿瘤上分离,如分离顺利行保留脾动、静脉的保脾术.如不能将其分离则在胃短血管右侧胃网膜左动脉右侧切断脾动、静脉,保留血管弓,以保证脾脏的血供.如肿瘤位于胰尾部,切开胰体、尾部上下腹膜,游离胰尾部,将脾血管在脾门处上下游离,游离成功则行保留脾动、静脉的保脾术,否则同上方法行切断脾动静脉的保脾术.     

腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺囊性疾病6例报告

目的总结腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术的临床经验与手术技巧。方法自2003年11月至2006年7月，我们对6例胰腺囊性疾病患者施行保留脾血管的腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术。结果本组6例均在腹腔镜下完成，其中1例合并右肾上腺肿瘤切除，1例合并子宫肌瘤切除、左卵巢畸胎瘤切除，1例合并子宫肌瘤切除，1例合并胆囊切除。手术时间140～265min，出血350～600ml。术后住院时间4—9d，无胰漏发生。随访1—31个月，症状消失，未见复发。病理诊断：潴留性囊肿2例，浆液性囊腺瘤2例，黏液性囊腺瘤2例。结论对于胰体尾部良性病变，应首选保留脾血管的腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术，施行保留脾血管的腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术是安全可行的。     

保留脾和脾动、静脉胰体尾切除术（附五例报告）

目的 探讨保留脾和脾动、静脉的胰体尾切除术的手术适应证与安全性.方法 回顾性分析我院1997年11月至2008年3月行保留脾和脾动、静脉的胰体尾切除术的5例临床资料.胰腺囊腺瘤2例,胰腺囊腺癌1例,胰腺实性假乳头状瘤1例,胰腺外伤1例,采取先暴露脾动脉,切断胰腺,近心端胰断面间断缝合,提起胰腺远断端,于脾静脉鞘内分离结扎切断其与胰体尾间的分支,结果 5例安全地实施保留脾和脾动、静脉的胰体尾切除术,术后无一例胰瘘发生.结论 保留脾和脾动、静脉的胰体尾切除术难度较大,但对于胰体尾良性、交界性肿瘤和未侵犯脾血管的恶性肿瘤是较好的选择.     

腹腔镜下保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术临床应用:附5例报告

目的:探讨腹腔镜下,对胰体尾部良性肿瘤进行保留脾脏胰体尾切除术的可行性与安全性评估。方法:2008年2月至2010年6月对5例胰体尾良性肿瘤病人施行腹腔镜下保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术。结果:5例病人手术均顺利完成,平均手术时间为204(115～295)min,术中平均出血量310(200～450)mL,术后平均住院时间14(10～21)d。术后1例病人发生胰漏,延迟拔管后治愈出院。术后病理诊断为胰体尾浆液性囊腺瘤3例,黏液性囊腺瘤1例,胰岛细胞瘤1例。结论:对胰体尾部的良性病变行腹腔镜下保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术是微创、安全的,具有恢复快、并发症少等优点,值得推广。     

脾血管优先技术在腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术中的应用

[摘 要] 目的 探讨脾血管优先技术在腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术中的应用。方法 回顾性分析2011年6月至2017年12月浙江省人民医院和浙江省长兴县人民医院采用腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术治疗的58例胰体尾良性或交界性占位病变患者的临床资料。结果 中转开腹2例;余56例均顺利完成手术,其中保留脾动、静脉的保脾胰体尾切除术（Kimura法）53例,离断脾血管、保留胃短血管的保脾胰体尾切除术（Warshaw法）3例。手术时间65～220（160±30）min,出血量30～500（100±25）mL,术后住院时间5～21（8±5）d。术后并发生化瘘15例,B级胰瘘2例,C级胰瘘1例,腹腔出血1例,腹腔脓肿2例,肺部感染2例。术后病理诊断为胰腺内分泌肿瘤8例,胰腺导管内乳头状黏液瘤10例,胰腺实性假乳头状瘤12例,黏液性囊腺瘤10例,浆液性囊腺瘤13例,慢性胰腺炎肿块5例。结论 脾血管优先技术具有简便、安全的特点,有助于主动选择术式和规划手术路径,提高腹腔镜胰尾切除术的安全性和保脾成功率。     

保脾和切脾的胰体尾良性和交界性肿瘤切除术临床疗效比较

目的比较保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术与胰体尾联合脾切除术治疗胰腺良性和交界性肿瘤的临床疗效。方法接受腹腔镜手术治疗的胰体尾良性肿瘤(包括交界性肿瘤)病人37例,将37例病人分为两组,保脾组11例,采用保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术;切脾组26例,采用胰体尾联合脾切除术。比较两组病人的术后并发症及远期疗效。结果保脾组和切脾组手术时间分别为(165.34±12.25)分钟和(170.72±14.37)分钟,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);失血量分别为(108.52±13.11)ml和(186.25±17.43)ml,住院时间分别为(10.16±2.11)天和(12.78±2.78)天,奥曲肽使用量分别为(11.45±3.75)mg和(16.75±5.75)mg,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后两组病人病理类型构成和肿瘤大小比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。两组病人均进行为期3年的术后随访,保脾组3年无病生存率为100%,切脾组为88.46%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论保留脾脏的腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺良性和交界性肿瘤,安全、有效。     

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy

Distal pancreatectomy with spleen preservation may be the preferred procedure for certain benign tumors and cystic lesions of the pancreatic body or tail. Alternatively, laparoscopic removal including either distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy or splenic-preservation with ligation of the splenic vessels have also been described. We describe, herein, our method to perform spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy that preserves the splenic vessels and hence splenic function. The described technique of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy has been used in two patients with favorable results. Both patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic conservation for an oligocystic serous cystadenoma and serous cystadenoma. Operative time was 3–6 hours with total blood loss of less than 200 cc in both cases. The length of stay in the hospital was 4–8 days and both patients returned to work within 3 weeks. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy should be considered for younger patientswith select body or tail lesions that are not candidates for less extensive procedures.     

保留脾脏的胰体尾部良性肿瘤切除

目的探讨保留脾脏胰体尾切除的可行性和安全性以及并发症预防。方法回顾性分析总结2009年1月至2011年12月行保留脾脏胰体尾切除术5例资料,其中保留脾脏血管的开腹保脾胰体尾切除3例,切断(或切除)脾脏血管的保脾胰体尾切除术1例,腔镜下保脾胰体尾部切除术1例。结果本组无手术死亡,术后均未发生胰瘘、脾梗死、脾脓肿及脾出血等。随访3～6月,无并发症发生。结论胰体尾部良性肿瘤,应首选保留脾脏的胰体尾切除方法,手术安全,效果好,且避免了脾脏的不必要切除。     

Open and Laparoscopic Spleen-preserving,Splenic Vessel-preserving Distal Pancreatectomy: Indications and Outcomes

Background  Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy has been described lately in order to reduce the risks associated with splenectomy. The aim of this study is to report a series of open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies with splenic vessel preservation. Methods  From June 2001 to April 2007, 11 spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomies were performed, utilizing open and laparoscopic techniques. The main variables recorded were demographics, intra- and postoperative complications, and final pathology results. Results  All 11 spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomies were performed successfully. Laparoscopic resection was possible in seven patients. Postoperative morbidity consisted of one pancreatic fluid collection. The overall incidence of pancreatic leak was 18%. The final pathology revealed serous cystadenoma in 36% of the cases, neuroendocrine tumor in two cases, three mucinous cystadenomas, one carcinoid tumor, and one intrapancreatic spleen. With a median follow-up of 26 months, no splenic vein thrombosis was detected. Conclusions  Open or laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation is a feasible and safe procedure. In selected cases of cystic lesions and low grade neoplasms, distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation is possible. Presented at: 2007 American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association. April 19–22, 2007, Las Vegas, NV, USA.     

腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术治疗体会

目的探讨腹腔镜下胰腺远端切除术的手术适应证、安全性和可行性。方法选择2005年2月-10月住院的连续10例胰体尾占位患者,年龄(43．4±14．7)岁,男1例,女9例。9例术前诊断为囊性占位,肿瘤最大径平均4．0 cm(2．6～8．5cm);1例术前诊断为胰体尾病变伴肝转移,胰腺内分泌肿瘤可能性大。其中7例行保留脾脏胰腺远端切除术,3例行胰腺远端+脾切除术。结果10例手术均完全在腹腔镜下完成。手术时间(228±26)min,术中出血量(173±100)ml。术后胰瘘1例(10％),充分引流1个月后自行愈合;1例患者术后1个月复查发现胰腺断端旁有假性囊肿形成,直径约2 cm,观察1个月后囊肿消失。其余8例无并发症发生。术后平均住院13．5 d(12～16 d)。10例患者术后血糖均正常。10例随访2～22个月(中位数8个月),9例囊性病变患者均无复发,1例内分泌癌随访1年,肝脏转移病灶无明显变化,原发部位无肿瘤复发。结论对于病变位于胰体尾的良性肿瘤或疾病,选择腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术是安全、可行的。     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with minilaparotomy for distal pancreatic cystadenoma

Two patients with cystic tumors of the pancreas treated by laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy are presented. The first patient was a 34-year-old woman with a 6-cm cystadenoma of the tail of the pancreas treated with a complete laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. After mobilization of the distal pancreas and spleen, the pancreas was transected proximally together with the splenic artery and vein using an endoscopic linear stapler. The second patient was a 71-year-old woman with a 6-cm cystadenoma of the body of the pancreas, treated by hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with minilaparotomy because the tumor was adjacent to the portal vein and celiac axis. Using an upper median minilaparotomy, dissection of the gastrocolic ligament, division of the splenic artery, and transection and closure of the pancreas were performed. Division of the splenic vein and mobilization of the distal pancreas and spleen were performed via a hand-assisted laparoscopic approach. There were no postoperative complications (such as pancreatic fistulas) in either patient, and the postoperative courses were uneventful. The patients returned to normal activity within 1 week after the operation. Complete laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy are preferable to conventional open surgery for benign tumors of the pancreas because of their less-invasive nature. Additionally, in tumors of the body of the pancreas, hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy might have the advantages of laparotomy and laparoscopy in terms of handling the splenic artery and vein just below the minilaparotomy site, suggesting an easier and safer procedure than complete laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Therefore, hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy can be recommended as a useful alternative to complete laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for selected patients with benign tumors of the body and tail of the pancreas.     

腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术26例

目的探讨腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术的安全性、可行性。方法2005年9月～2008年6月,对26例胰腺体尾部肿物行腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术。术前25例诊断为胰腺体尾部良性肿物,1例不除外恶性,肿物中位直径5cm（1.2～10cm）。结果所有手术均在全腹腔镜下完成。15例行保留脾脏的胰体尾切除（10例保留脾动静脉,5例未保留脾动静脉）,10例行胰体尾加脾切除,1例既往行胰体尾及脾切除者行胰体部切除。手术中位时间268.5min（129～400min）,中位出血量100ml（50～800ml）,术后中位住院时间9d（6～21d）。无胰漏或脾梗死发生,2例包裹性积液,均保守治疗治愈,1例引流管口感染。26例中位随访时间15.5月（1～35个月）,均无复发。结论胰腺体尾部良性肿物行腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术安全、可行。     

Spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein for a large insulinoma

We report a successful spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for a large insulinoma with conservation of the splenic artery and vein. The patient was a 48-year-old man with syncope due to hypoglycemia. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography revealed a large 6-cm mass located in the tail of the pancreas. We adopted the laparoscopic approach to remove the tumor. After careful dissection and an accurate hemostasis between the pancreas and splenic vessels, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was carried out using a linear stapler. There were no perioperative complications. The patient was discharged uneventfully. He had no hypoglycemic episodes or abdominal symptoms during 8 months of follow-up. When performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons in conjunction with intraoperative ultrasonography, spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein is a technically feasible procedure for the treatment of benign lesions of the tail or body of the pancreas.     

��ǻ������Ƣ������Զ���г���Ѫ�ܴ���22������

??Vascular disposal in laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy??An analysis of 22 patients HUANG He-guang, CHEN Yan-chang, LU Feng-chun, et al. Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China
Corresponding author: HUANG He-guang, E-mail: hhuang2@aliyun.com
Abstract Objective To investigate experience with the techniques of vascular disposal in laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Methods The clinical data of 22 patients with benign or borderline pancreas pancreatic tumors performed a spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy from February 2010 to December 2013 in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Results Among 22 patients, splenic artery and vein were conserved in 16 patients, while neither in 2 patients. Splenic artery was ligated with conservation of splenic vein in 2 patients. And splenic vein was ligated with conservation of splenic artery in 2 patients. All distal pancreatectomies with spleen preservation were completed laparoscopically. And all patients remained a good blood supply to spleen at a follow-up of 3 months to 4 years. Conclusion Depending on the relationship between tumors and vessels, the spleen can be safely preserved laparoscopically using different vascular disposal methods in benign or borderline pancreatic tumors.     

保留脾脏的腹腔镜胰体尾切除术治疗经验

目的 总结腹腔镜保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术的经验。方法 2003年11月和2004年12月分别对2例胰体尾囊性占位患者施行保留脾脏的腹腔镜胰体尾切除术。结果 2例手术均顺利完成,手术时间分别为220min和190min,术中出血为450ml和350ml,术后住院时间为6d和5d,术后无胰漏等并发症发生。病理诊断2例均为胰腺浆液性囊腺瘤。分别随访18个月和5个月,术前症状均得到明显缓解,未见复发。结论 对胰体尾部良性病变行保留脾脏的腹腔镜胰体尾切除术是安全可行的,具有创伤轻、恢复快、并发症少等优点。     

保留脾脏胰体尾切除术的临床探讨

目的探讨保留脾脏胰体尾切除术的可行性和安全性。方法总结2006年2月—2010年8月1 6例胰体尾部良性和交界性病变实行了保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术的临床资料,其中15例为保留脾脏血管胰体尾切除,1例为切断脾血管保留脾脏胰体尾切除。结果术后发生胰瘘9例,切口感染1例,腹腔出血3例(其中1例为胰瘘后发生出血),胸腔积液2例。9例胰瘘者,8例经非手术治疗,3~7周痊愈,1例并发出血后行数字减影脾动脉栓塞止血,第17周痊愈。另2例腹腔出血者,1例经非手术治疗治愈,1例二次手术,见脾静脉分支出血,结扎止血。全组无死亡病例。结论胰体尾部良性和交界性肿瘤,可首先选择保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术,手术安全,疗效好。