Diverting colostomy is an effective and reversible option for severe hemorrhagic radiation proctopathy

A total of 738 continual CRP patients were screened.After exclusion,14 patients in the colostomy group and 25 in the conservative group were included in the final analysis.Preoperative Hb was only 63 g/L±17.8 g/L in the colostomy group compared to 88.2 g/L±19.3 g/L(P<0.001)in the conservative group.All 14 patients in the former group achieved complete remission of bleeding,and the colostomy was successfully reversed in 13 of 14(93%),excepting one very old patient.The median duration of stoma was 16(range:9-53)mo.The Hb level increased gradually from 75 g/L at 3 mo,99 g/L at 6 mo,and 107 g/L at 9 mo to 111 g/L at 1 year and 117 g/L at 2 years after the stoma,but no bleeding cessation or significant increase in Hb levels was observed in the conservative group.Endoscopic telangiectasia and bleeding were greatly improved.Endoultrasound showed decreased vascularity,and magnetic resonance imaging revealed an increasing presarcal space and thickened rectal wall.Anorectal functions and quality of life were significantly improved after stoma reversal,when compared to those before stoma creation.CONCLUSION Diverting colostomy is a very effective method in the remission of refractory hemorrhagic CRP.Stoma can be reversed,and anorectal functions can be recovered after reversal.     

Perineal colostomy: an alternative to avoid permanent abdominal colostomy: operative technique,results and reflection

Background

The most common injury to indicate definitive stoma is rectal cancer. Despite advances in surgical treatment, the abdominoperineal resection is still the most effective operation in radical treatment of malignancies of the distal rectum invading the sphincter and anal canal. Even with all the effort that surgeons have to preserve anal sphincters, abdominoperineal amputation is still indicated, and a definitive abdominal colostomy is necessary. This surgery requires patients to live with a definitive abdominal colostomy, which is a condition that modify body image, is not without morbidity and has great impact on the quality of life.

Aim

To evaluate the technique of abdominoperineal amputation with perineal colostomy with irrigation as an alternative to permanent abdominal colostomy.

Method

Retrospective analysis of medical records of 55 patients underwent abdominoperineal resection of the rectum with perineal colostomy in the period 1989-2010.

Results

The mean age was 58 years, 40 % men and 60 % women. In 94.5% of patients the indication for surgery was for cancer of the rectum. In some patients were made three valves, other two valves and in the remaining no valve at all. Complications were: mucosal prolapse, necrosis of the lowered segment and stenosis.

Conclusion

The abdominoperineal amputation with perineal colostomy is a good therapeutic option in the armamentarium of the surgical treatment of rectal cancer.     

A Rare Stoma-Related Complication: Parastomal Evisceration

Defunctioning stoma is a commonly used colorectal surgical procedures. The stomal complications recorded are usually classified as early and late complications. Parastomal hernia is a common complication of stomal surgery. We present a very rare stoma-related complication developed after parastomal hernia and described parastomal evisceration.     

结肠造口患者术后不同时期自我护理状况的调查

Miles术是当前治疗低位直肠癌的主要手术方式,术后5年和10年的生存率分别为58.9%和49.9%[1],而早期直肠癌根治术后5年生存率达90%以上[2],这种手术能有效地延长患者的寿命,但却需要使用永久性的结肠造瘘,严重影响了患者术后的生活质量。患者护理造口的状况直接影响着患者的生活     

腹腔镜技术在外伤性结直肠穿孔治疗中的应用

目的：探讨腹腔镜技术在结直肠外伤穿孔患者治疗中的疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析河南省安阳地区医院2005年3月至2013年3月间收治的42例结直肠外伤穿孔患者的临床资料,其中22例接受开腹手术治疗（开腹组）,20例行腹腔镜治疗（腹腔镜组）。手术方式包括单纯穿孔修补术和穿孔肠段切除、近端结肠造瘘、远端封闭术。比较两组患者术后并发症发生率及术后恢复情况。结果腹腔镜组患者较开腹组手术时间缩短[（72±36） min比（128±52） min],术中出血量减少[（21．2±3．6） ml比（62．6±8．8） ml],术后排气时间[（1．7±0．6） d比（3．5±1．2） d]加快,术后住院时间缩短[（7．3±1．8） d比（13．6±3．9） d],术后并发症发生率降低[35．0％（7／20）比72．7％（16／22）],差异均有统计学意义（均P＜0．05）。结论腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠外伤穿孔具有手术时间短、创伤小、恢复快及并发症发生率低等优点。     

Methods for siting emergency stomas in the absence of a stoma therapist

Introduction

Stomas often have to be sited in emergencies by trainees who may have had little training in this. Emergency stomas and stomas where the site has not been marked preoperatively by a stoma therapist are more prone to complications. These complications may severely affect a patient’s quality of life. Advice in the literature on how to best site stomas is conflicting. We compared two easy anatomical methods of siting stomas to sites chosen by a stoma therapist and looked at how this site was affected by the patients’ body mass index (BMI).

Methods

Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery were seen either pre or postoperatively. Each patient’s BMI was recorded and the positions of three different potential stoma positions (site G: the gold standard, marked by a stoma therapist; site S: marked using a pair of scissors against the umbilicus; site H: halfway between the umbilicus and anterior superior iliac spine) were compared.

Results

The two fixed anatomical methods described (method S and method H) both gave poor results. The most common reason for poor siting was the proximity of a skin crease. There was a statistically significant correlation between the patient’s BMI and the laterality of the gold standard site.

Conclusions

The two simple anatomical methods described here do not provide a shortcut to effective siting. A more effective method may be calculating the laterality of the site using the patient’s BMI, and then moving up/down to avoid a skin crease and improve the patient’s view for changing the bag. This deserves further study.     

造口旁疝患者术前焦虑抑郁现状调查及其影响因素研究

目的 调查造口旁疝患者术前焦虑抑郁现状,并对相关因素进行分析。方法 选择在2012年1月至2014年1月在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院进行结肠造口旁疝手术患者130例为研究对象。在入院第一天采用Zung焦虑自评量表（self-rating anxietyscale,SAS）和抑郁自评量表（self-rating depression scale,SDS）进行调查,应用多因素Logistic回归分析进行相关因素分析。结果 130例造口旁疝患者抑郁平均指数为（O．59±0．13）,焦虑平均得分为（56±5）分,51例（39．23％）患者术前存在焦虑情绪,47例患者存在抑郁（36．15％）,45例患者同时存在焦虑抑郁情绪。对相关影响因素进行统计分析后发现,焦虑患者在性别、职业、医疗费用类型、病程和体质量指数方面差异有统计学意义。抑郁患者在性别、职业、医疗费用类型、病程和体质量指数方面差异有统计学意义。性别、职业、费用类别、病程、体质量指数与造口旁疝患者焦虑相关;性别、费用类别、病程与造口旁疝患者抑郁相关。结论 造口旁疝患者焦虑和抑郁评分均高于国内常模,患者存在焦虑、抑郁情绪并受到多种因素影响,在临床工作中,护理人员应及时干预,以促进患者身心健康。     

直肠癌腹腔镜Miles术经腹膜外与经腹膜途径结肠造瘘术疗效比较的Meta分析

目的:比较直肠癌腹腔镜Miles术经腹膜外与经腹膜途径结肠造瘘术的疗效。方法:检索多个国内外数据库,收集2017年8月以前公开发表的比较直肠癌腹腔镜Miles术经腹膜外与经腹膜途径结肠造瘘术疗效的临床研究。采用RevMan5.3软件对相关临床指标进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入15篇文献,1162例患者,其中经腹膜外途径造瘘组615例,经腹膜途径造瘘组547例。合并Meta分析结果显示,与经腹膜外途径造瘘组比较,经腹膜外途径造瘘组术后除造口水肿发生率升高外(OR=5.19,95%CI=2.15～12.53,P=0.0002),造口旁疝发生率(OR=0.10,95%CI=0.04～0.22,P0.00001),造口坏死发生率(OR=0.37,95%CI=0.16～0.86,P=0.02),造口脱垂发生率(OR=0.22,95%CI=0.09～0.57,P=0.002),内疝发生率(OR=0.23,95%CI=0.06～0.81,P=0.02),造口回缩发生率(OR=0.25,95%CI=0.07～0.81,P=0.02),造口皮肤黏膜分离发生率(OR=0.30,95%CI=0.12～0.76,P=0.01)均明显降低,且术后住院时间短(MD=-0.70,95%CI=-1.14～-0.27,P=0.002),更易获得排便感(OR=20.32,95%CI=9.05～45.62,P0.00001);两组之间术后造口感染、手术时间、造口时间、造口狭窄、肠梗阻、术后首次排气时间、术中出血量、造口出血及造口周围炎等指标差异均无统计学意义(均P0.05)。结论:直肠癌腹腔镜Miles术经腹膜外途径造瘘较经腹膜外途径造瘘具有更好的疗效。