Screening for Inhibition of Vibrio cholerae VipA-VipB Interaction Identifies Small-Molecule Compounds Active against Type VI Secretion

The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is the most prevalent bacterial secretion system and an important virulence mechanism utilized by Gram-negative bacteria, either to target eukaryotic cells or to combat other microbes. The components show much variability, but some appear essential for the function, and two homologues, denoted VipA and VipB in Vibrio cholerae, have been identified in all T6SSs described so far. Secretion is dependent on binding of an α-helical region of VipA to VipB, and in the absence of this binding, both components are degraded within minutes and secretion is ceased. The aim of the study was to investigate if this interaction could be blocked, and we hypothesized that such inhibition would lead to abrogation of T6S. A library of 9,600 small-molecule compounds was screened for their ability to block the binding of VipA-VipB in a bacterial two-hybrid system (B2H). After excluding compounds that showed cytotoxicity toward eukaryotic cells, that inhibited growth of Vibrio, or that inhibited an unrelated B2H interaction, 34 compounds were further investigated for effects on the T6SS-dependent secretion of hemolysin-coregulated protein (Hcp) or of phospholipase A₁ activity. Two compounds, KS100 and KS200, showed intermediate or strong effects in both assays. Analogues were obtained, and compounds with potent inhibitory effects in the assays and desirable physicochemical properties as predicted by in silico analysis were identified. Since the compounds specifically target a virulence mechanism without affecting bacterial replication, they have the potential to mitigate the virulence with minimal risk for development of resistance.     

Expression of CD105 and CD34 receptors controls BMP‐induced in vitro mineralization of mouse adipose‐derived stem cells but does not predict their in vivo bone‐forming potential

Adipose‐derived stem cells (ADSCs) can be excellent alternative to bone marrow derived stem cells for enhancing fracture repair since ADSCs can be isolated comparatively in large numbers from discarded lipoaspirates. However, osteogenic potential of ADSCs in vivo is very controversial. We hypothesized that adipose‐derived stem cells (ADSCs) that respond maximally to bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) in vitro would possess maximum bone‐forming potential. Four purified populations of mouse ADSCs: CD105⁺CD34⁺, CD105^?CD34^?, CD105⁺CD34^? and CD105^?CD34⁺ were obtained using fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) and their BMP‐responsiveness was determined in vitro. CD105⁺CD34^? population showed the strongest response to BMPs in terms of robust increase in mineralization. Expression of CD105 correlated with high BMP‐responsive phenotype and larger cell size while expression of CD34 correlated with low BMP‐responsive phenotype and smaller cell size. CD105⁺CD34^? population displayed higher gene expression of Alk1 or Alk6 receptors in comparison with other populations. However, CD105⁺CD34^? ADSCs failed to induce ectopic bone formation in vivo after they were transplanted into syngeneic mice, indicating that in vitro BMP‐responsiveness is not a good indicator to predict in vivo bone forming potential of ADSCs. Therefore greater precautions should be executed during selection of competent ADSCs for bone repair. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:625–632, 2015.

     

Role of Components in the Formation of Self-microemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems

Components:In order to formulate a successful SMEDDS for maximum therapeutic effect, due consideration must be given to various factors such as physicochemical properties of the active moiety as well as excipients, potential for drug excipient interaction (in vitro and in vivo) and physiological factors that promote or inhibit the bioavailability. Further, other important factors such as regulatory status, solubilization capacity, miscibility, physical state of the excipients at room temperature, digestibility and compatibility with capsule shell, chemical stability and cost of the materials should also be considered during the formulation[15]. Such a rationale approach not only helps in reducing the time involved in the formulation development but also reduces the cost of its development[11].

Oil/lipid phase:

The function of oil phase in self-microemulsifying system is to solubilize the hydrophobic/lipophilic active moiety in order to improve both drug loading and bioavailability of the hydrophobic active moiety. Selection of oil plays a vital role in the formulation as it determines the amount of drug that can be solubilized in the system[16]. A lipid molecule with a large hydrophobic portion compared to hydrophilic portion is desirable as it maximizes the amount of drug that can be solubilized. Open in a separate windowLIST OF OILS USED IN FORMULATION OF SMEDDS

Long chain triglycerides:

Lipids that have fatty acid chains of 14-20 carbons are categorized as LCTs[17]. Fixed oils i.e., vegetable oils contain a mixture of glyceride esters of unsaturated long chain fatty acids. These are considered safe as they are commonly present in daily food and are easily digestible[15]. Large hydrophobic portion of triglycerides is responsible for their high solvent capacity for lipophilic moieties. Though it is difficult to microemulsify, some marketed formulations such as Neoral^® (composed of olive oil which, has shown superior oral bioavailability) and Topicaine^® gel (composed of Jojoba oil for transdermal application) have been successfully practicing the microemulsification of LCTs[18].

Medium chain triglycerides and related esters:

Lipids that have fatty acid chains of 6-12 carbons are categorized as MCTs[17]. MCTs are the most common choice of oil for SMEDDS as they are resistant to oxidation and possess high solvent capacity compared to LCT because of their high effective concentration of ester group. MCTs produced from the distillation of coconut oil are known as glyceryl tricaprylate and comprises of saturated C8 and C10 fatty acids in the liquid state[15]. Labrafac CM 10, a MCT, has shown superior solubility for fenofibrate and produced wider microemulsion region at all surfactant/co-surfactant combinations than Maisine 35, which, is a LCT[19]. Drug substance should possess minimum solubility of 50 mg/ml in LCTs for lymphatic absorption[20]. Upon digestion, products of short and medium chain triglycerides are directed towards portal vein whereas chylomicrons formed from LCTs triggers the lymphatic transport. Further, highly hydrophobic drug substances are easily soluble in vegetable oils and can easily be formulated as simple oil solutions which are readily emulsified in the gut. However, most conventional hydrophobic drug substances do not exhibit superior solubility in LCT such as vegetable oil[21,22].Moderately hydrophobic drug substances, on the other hand, cannot be formulated into simple oil solutions as their solubility is limited. In such cases, SMEDDS are promising alternative where the drug solubility in the oil will be enhanced due to microemulsification of oil by surfactants. It is well accepted that oils with long hydrocarbon chains (high molecular volume) such as soybean oil, castor oil are difficult to microemulsify compared to MCT (low molecular volume) such as capmul MCM and Miglyol. However, solubilizing capacity of oil for lipophilic moiety increases with chain length (hydrophobic portion) of the oil. Hence the selection of oil is a compromise between the solubilizing potential and ability to facilitate the formation of microemulsion[23]. Malcolmson et al. studied the solubility of testosterone propionate in various oils for the formulation of O/W microemulsion and concluded that oils with larger molecular volume such as triglycerides show superior solubility than the corresponding micellar solution containing only surfactants without oil[24,25]. Enhancement of drug solubility in SMEDDS not only relies on the solubility of the drug in the oil but also on the surfactant(s). For instance, ethyl butyrate, small molecular volume oil, has shown higher solubility for testosterone propionate but its ME formulation has only improved the solubility slightly than the corresponding micellar solution. On the contrary, Miglyol 812 which is a larger molecular volume oil has shown improved solubilization in the ME formulation though the solubility of testosterone propionate is less in the individual components compared to ethyl butyrate[24].

Drug solubility in lipid:

Oil component alters the solubility of the drug in SMEDDS by penetrating into the hydrophobic portion of the surfactant monolayer. Extent of oil penetration varies and depends on the molecular volume, polarity, size and shape of the oil molecule. Overall drug solubility in SMEDDS is always higher than the solubility of drug in individual excipients that combine to form SMEDDS. However, such higher solubility considerably depends on the solubility of drug in oil phase, interfacial locus of the drug and drug-surfactant interactions at the interface[26]. In light scattering experiments, it was observed that oils with small molecular volume act like co-surfactants and penetrate into the surfactant monolayer. This forms thinner polyoxyethylene chains near the hydrophobic core of the micelle disrupting the main locus of the drug solubilization due to which, a higher solubility of drug is not observed. Large molecular volume oils, however, forms a distinct core and do not penetrate effectively into the surfactant monolayer. The locus of drug solubilization was found to be effected by the microstructure and solubility of the drug in the excipients. The locus of drug solubilization was found to be at the interface of micelle for phytosterols whereas the same for cholesterol was found to be between the hydrophobic head groups of surfactant molecules. This is attributed to altered side chain flexibility of phytosterol due to the additional substitution of alkyl side chain compared to cholesterol[27].In addition to molecular volume and polarity of the oil, drug solubility in oil is affected by physicochemical properties of drug molecule itself. Consideration of BCS classification and Lipinski''s rule of 5 for the selection of drug is only useful during initial screening stages. As per BCS classification, some of the acidic drugs are listed in Class II despite having good absorption and disposition as they do not satisfy the requirement of higher solubility at low pH values. Lipinski''s rule of 5, on the other hand, holds good only when the drug is not a substrate for the active transporter[4]. This suggests that aqueous solubility and log P alone are not sufficient to predict the solubility of drug in the oil. This further indicates that the solubility of any two drugs with similar log P would not be the same due to their different physicochemical properties.To demonstrate this, a study was conducted in our laboratory with two antihypertensive drugs having close partition coefficient (log P) values, different aqueous solubility and varying physicochemical properties. Candesartan cilexetil is hydrophobic and has log P value of 7.3, molecular weight 610.66 g/mol with a polar surface area 135.77 whereas, valsartan is slightly soluble in aqueous phase with log P value of 5.3, molecular weight 434.53 g/mol with a polar surface area 103.48 (clogP and polar surface area were calculated using chembiodraw ultra 11.0). Unlike candesartan cilexetil, valsartan exhibits pH dependent solubility[28].If only log P and aqueous solubility of these two drugs are considered, it is only natural to assume that candesartan cilexetil would be highly soluble in lipid phase whereas valsartan would be less soluble. A specific and sensitive HPLC-UV method was developed and validated to measure the super saturation solubility of these two drugs in various oils and the results showed a completely different solubility profiles. Solubility profile of these two drugs in different oil phase is given in fig. 2.Open in a separate windowFig. 2Solubility of active ingredients in various oils. Valsartan, candesartan cilexetil.Although log P and polar surface area of valsartan and candesartan cilexetil are closer, their solubility with triacetin, castor oil and capmul MCM C8 differs significantly. This may be attributed to the hydrogen bonding capacity and electrostatic interaction of both the scaffold with the oils. Nevertheless, valsartan is having aliphatic carboxylic group which is expected to be involved in hydrogen bond interaction with the hydrogen acceptor functionality of the triacetin as well as castor oil. We assume that the branched chain aliphatic ester moiety of triacetin, capmul MCM C8 and castor oil gets involved in the electrostatic repulsion with cilexetil part of candesartan. In case of valsartan, such electrostatic interactions are not possible. Furthermore, aliphatic ester chain of triacetin and castor oil may solvate the lipophilic chain of valsartan more favorably than candesartan in the absence of any electrostatic repulsion (proposed interaction is shown in fig. 3). However, significant difference was not observed with other oils such as olive oil, peanut oil, corn oil, miglyol 810, sunflower oil and soybean oil (data not shown).Open in a separate windowFig. 3Proposed interactions of valsartan and candesartan cilexetil with triacetin.     

Reporting of dose–volume specifications for “Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template–based interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy for gynecological cancers” according to International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements 58 with early clinical outcomes

PurposeThe study is an audit of reporting dose and volume specifications as per the ICRU 58 for MUPIT-based interstitial brachytherapy in gynecological cancers. Correlation between total reference air kerma (TRAK) and isodose surface was also evaluated to understand the intensity of treatment in interstitial brachytherapy.Methods and MaterialsForty-two patients underwent HDR MUPIT-based interstitial brachytherapy 20 Gy in five fractions after EBRT during 2017–2019. Treated volume, high and low-dose regions, mean central dose, Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), organ at risk doses, and TRAK values were computed.ResultsHigh-dose regions V150 mean was 12.4 cc and V200 was 4.58 cc; and low-dose region was 75.92 cc. The mean treated volume was 59.8 cc. The mean central dose was 3.7 Gy. DHI was 79%. The mean D2cm³ bladder and rectum were 2.9 Gy and 2.8 Gy. The mean TRAK was 0.16 cGy per fraction per hour at 1 m. TRAK values showed significant correlation with various isodose volumes (TRAK and V100: r = 0.943 p < 0.0005; and TRAK and V50: r = 0.953; p < 0.0005). A positive correlation was observed between TRAK and the number of needles (r = 0.746; p < 0.0005). At a median followup of 16 months, 4 of 42 patients (9.5%) had local recurrences.ConclusionsOur study shows compliance with ICRU 58 recommendations along with certain deviations. Local recurrence rate is acceptable. TRAK shows correlation with surface isodose in MUPIT-based brachytherapy and should to be evaluated in future studies.     

Influence of fellow eye on the diagnosis and classification of central serous chorioretinopathy

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology - To assess the influence of fellow eye information on diagnosis and classification of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) using...     

A novel technique to quantify the instantaneous mitral regurgitant rate

Background

The systolic variation of mitral regurgitation (MR) is a pitfall in its quantification. Current recommendations advocate using quantitative echocardiographic techniques that account for this systolic variation. While prior studies have qualitatively described patterns of systolic variation no study has quantified this variation.

Methods

This study includes 41 patients who underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) evaluation for the assessment of MR. Systole was divided into 3 equal parts: early, mid, and late. The MR jets were categorized as holosystolc, early, or late based on the portions of systole the jet was visible. The aortic flow and left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV) acquired by CMR were plotted against time. The instantaneous regurgitant rate was calculated for each third of systole as the difference between the LVSV and the aortic flow.

Results

The regurgitant rate varied widely with a 1.9-fold, 3.4-fold, and 1.6-fold difference between the lowest and highest rate in patients with early, late, and holosystolic jets respectively. There was overlap of peak regurgitant rates among patients with mild, moderate and severe MR. The greatest variation of regurgitant rate was seen among patients with mild MR.

Conclusion

CMR can quantify the systolic temporal variation of MR. There is significant variation of the mitral regurgitant rate even among patients with holosystolic MR jets. These findings highlight the need to use quantitative measures of MR severity that take into consideration the temporal variation of MR.     

Prophylactic dexamethasone for postoperative nausea and vomiting in pediatric strabismus surgery: a dose ranging and safety evaluation study

In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of different doses of prophylactic IV dexamethasone for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in 168 children (aged 2-15 yr) scheduled for strabismus surgery. Patients received IV dexamethasone 0.25 mg/kg (D 0.25), 0.5 mg/kg (D 0.5), 1.0 mg/kg (D 1), or saline (S) immediately after induction of general anesthesia. Patients were discharged 24 h after surgery. Nausea and vomiting were assessed at 0-2, 2-6, and 6-24 h after surgery. Blood glucose was measured preoperatively and at 4 h after study drug administration. Wound healing and infection were assessed after 1 wk. More patients in group S had vomiting at 0-2, 2-6, and 6-24 h (P = 0.001, P = 0.003, and P = 0.04, respectively) and required larger doses of rescue antiemetics compared with the dexamethasone groups. Fewer patients in the dexamethasone groups (6, 3, and 6 in D 0.25, D 0.5, and D 1, respectively) had severe PONV compared with group S (P = 0.001). No significant increase in postoperative blood glucose levels was observed and wound healing was satisfactory in all four groups. The results suggest that dexamethasone 0.25 mg/kg is more effective than saline and equally effective compared with larger doses for preventing PONV for pediatric strabismus surgery.