Online Health Information-Seeking Behavior Among Korean American Immigrants in Rural Alabama: Dose Discrimination Matter?

Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health - Little attention has been paid to online health information seeking (OHIS) among immigrants residing in rural areas. This study examines the intensity of...     

重症患者再喂养综合征危险因素的Meta分析

目的 分析重症患者营养支持期间发生再喂养综合征的危险因素，为早期识别及预防再喂养综合征提供参考。方法 检索中国知网、万方数据库、中华医学期刊全文数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普网、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Elsevier关于重症患者再喂养综合征危险因素的文献，检索时间为各数据库建库至2021年12月，采用RevMan5.3进行Meta分析。结果 纳入13篇文献，包括2 519例患者，其中病例组793例，对照组1 726例；Meta分析合并效应值显示年龄(WMD=4.69)、APACHEⅡ评分(WMD=2.50)、BMI(WMD=-0.94)、白蛋白水平(OR=4.61)、前白蛋白水平(WMD=-53.46)、基线血镁水平(WMD=-0.05)、基线血钾水平(WMD=0.18)、基线血磷水平(WMD=-0.07)是重症患者发生再喂养综合征的危险因素(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论 基于现有证据，重症患者再喂养综合征的危险因素包括年龄、APACHEⅡ评分、营养状况及电解质水平，医护人员需密切关注重症患者营养支持期间能量、蛋白质及电解...     

中药饮片保质期与有效期文献计量学分析

目的：对中药保质期或有效期进行系统的调研，探讨中药饮片设定保质期或有效期的依据及其必要性，为提高中药饮片质量、保障临床用药安全提供技术支撑，为药品监管部门制定有关法规提供科学依据。方法：以国家知识基础设施数据库（CNKI）为数据来源，采用文献计量学研究方法，选用检索词为“中药材”并“有效期”“饮片”并“有效期”，“饮片”并“保质期”“中药材”并“保质期”“中药材”并“效期”和“饮片”并“效期”，利用CNKI平台工具以及Excel统计工具进行统计分析。结果：经数据库检索、筛选，获取中药材、饮片保质期或有效期或效期的相关有效文献共85篇，其中关于中药、饮片保质期的相关文献26篇，中药、饮片有效期或效期的相关文献59篇；在59篇关于中药有效期的文献中，74.58%的文献对于中药是否应该制定有效期、如何制定有效期等展开了讨论，25.42%的文献为中药有效期研究的实验性文献。结论：本文从中药材、饮片保质期与有效期的现状，质量评价指标，研究方法，饮片分类、保质期制定的必要性，及其存在的问题和建议等方面进行了梳理和归纳，为中药饮片保质期制定，提供了详实的文献依据。     

精简易筋经四式治疗肩周炎临床观察

目的观察精简"易筋经四式"治疗肩周炎的临床疗效。方法选取2017年9月—2018年9月期间在北京市丰台区蒲黄榆社区卫生服务中心中医科就诊的40~65岁肩周炎患者60例,随机分为2组,每组30例。观察组习练精简"易筋经四式",对照组采用针刺治疗。结果研究后2组观察对象肩关节疼痛程度评分观察组显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究后肩关节功能活动评分观察组显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。研究后观察组患者满意度显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论通过该研究证实,习练精简"易筋经四式"对肩周炎患者具有显著的疗效,且患者易于接受,值得在社区广泛推广应用。     

Comparative Outcome Analysis of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Embolization of the False Lumen Versus Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Aortic Dissection

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) embolization for the treatment of aortic dissection.Materials and MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study conducted from February 2003 to June 2019, NBCA embolization of an aortic false lumen was attempted in 12 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 41–68 y) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed in 53 patients (median age, 59 y; range, 37–70 y) for aortic dissection with one or more indications of persisting pain, malperfusion, rupture or impending rupture, maximal aortic diameter ≥ 55 mm, and/or rapid aortic enlargement. The main exclusion criterion for embolization was the presence of fast blood flow in the aortic false lumen on aortography. The efficacy of NBCA embolization and TEVAR was compared by evaluating technical and clinical outcomes, repeat intervention–free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsTechnical success was achieved in 11 of the 12 patients treated with NBCA embolization (91.7%), and clinical success was achieved in 9 of these 11 (81.8%). No significant difference was found between embolization and TEVAR in clinical success rates (embolization, 81.8%; TEVAR, 84.9%; P = .409) or procedure-related complications (embolization, 1 patient [8.3%]; TEVAR, 4 patients [7.5%]; P = .701). In addition, embolization showed comparable 5-y RFS (embolization, 82.5% ± 9.3; TEVAR, 85.5% ± 4.8; P = .641) and 5-y OS (embolization, 100%; TEVAR, 95.4% ± 3.2; P = .744) rates to TEVAR.ConclusionsNBCA embolization of the false lumen in aortic dissection seems to be a safe and effective treatment modality for the closure of false lumen in selected patients.