放射线联合p53基因及内皮抑素治疗小鼠前列腺癌皮下移植瘤

Objective To test the hypothesis that p53 gene therapy combined with endostatin can enhance tumor response to radiation therapy of RM-1 mouse xenograft prostate cancer and to investigate its mechanism. Methods A mouse prostate cancer model was established. Then mice with xenograft tumor were randomly divided into group A (control), B (radiation), C (radiation and rAdp53), D (radiation and rh-endostatin) and E (radiation and rAdp53 and rh-endostatin). On day 1, rAdp53 was injected intra-tumorously with 1 × 1010 vp per animal to group C and E. From day 1 to 14, rh-endostatin was given 15 mg/kg intraperitoneally daily to group D and E. On day 4 single fraction of 15 Gy was given to tumors in groups B, C, D and E. Normal saline was injected intra-tumorously or intraperitoneaUy accordingly as control. No treatment was done to group A. Tumor volume was measured daily. Samples were collected on Days 5, 10 and 15. Ki67, CD31, p53 and VEGF were detected by means of immunohistochemistry. Results (1) Radiation alone, radiation combined with intra-tumorous injection of Adp53 and/or intraperitoneal injection of rh-endostatin resulted in tumor growth arrest of RM-1 cells in vivo (P = 0.000). Radiation combined with both rAdp53 and rh-endostatin was the most effective treatment (P < 0.05). (2) All the four treatment groups had a decreased expression of mutant type P53 (P = 0.000). The expression of Ki67 in groups B and C were equal (P 0.05) and increasing (P = 0.000), respectively. Group D had a up-down-up curve (P < 0.05), but group E had a up-down one. On day 5 the expresion of VEGF in group E was the lowest (P < 0.05). An increased expression of MVD compared with the control was shown, and MVD in groups C, D and E were always higher than that in the control (P < 0.05). Conclusions The limitation of radiotherapy could be overcome by combination with beth p53 gene therapy and endostatin on the growth of mouse prostate cancer cell. Radiation, rAdp53 and endostatin have their own role but they can be interacted with each other.     

放射线联合p53基因及内皮抑素治疗小鼠前列腺癌皮下移植瘤

Objective To test the hypothesis that p53 gene therapy combined with endostatin can enhance tumor response to radiation therapy of RM-1 mouse xenograft prostate cancer and to investigate its mechanism. Methods A mouse prostate cancer model was established. Then mice with xenograft tumor were randomly divided into group A (control), B (radiation), C (radiation and rAdp53), D (radiation and rh-endostatin) and E (radiation and rAdp53 and rh-endostatin). On day 1, rAdp53 was injected intra-tumorously with 1 × 1010 vp per animal to group C and E. From day 1 to 14, rh-endostatin was given 15 mg/kg intraperitoneally daily to group D and E. On day 4 single fraction of 15 Gy was given to tumors in groups B, C, D and E. Normal saline was injected intra-tumorously or intraperitoneaUy accordingly as control. No treatment was done to group A. Tumor volume was measured daily. Samples were collected on Days 5, 10 and 15. Ki67, CD31, p53 and VEGF were detected by means of immunohistochemistry. Results (1) Radiation alone, radiation combined with intra-tumorous injection of Adp53 and/or intraperitoneal injection of rh-endostatin resulted in tumor growth arrest of RM-1 cells in vivo (P = 0.000). Radiation combined with both rAdp53 and rh-endostatin was the most effective treatment (P < 0.05). (2) All the four treatment groups had a decreased expression of mutant type P53 (P = 0.000). The expression of Ki67 in groups B and C were equal (P 0.05) and increasing (P = 0.000), respectively. Group D had a up-down-up curve (P < 0.05), but group E had a up-down one. On day 5 the expresion of VEGF in group E was the lowest (P < 0.05). An increased expression of MVD compared with the control was shown, and MVD in groups C, D and E were always higher than that in the control (P < 0.05). Conclusions The limitation of radiotherapy could be overcome by combination with beth p53 gene therapy and endostatin on the growth of mouse prostate cancer cell. Radiation, rAdp53 and endostatin have their own role but they can be interacted with each other.     

p53基因对食管癌细胞的作用

目的 观察野生型p53基因对不同放射敏感性食管癌细胞的作用，探索p53基因治疗与放射治疗联合应用的价值。方法 以人食管癌细胞株TE－13及经反复照射后改变了放射敏感性的细胞TE－13R50为实验对象，将载有人野生型p53cDNA并含巨细胞病毒（CMV)启动子的重组腺病毒（Ad5CMV-p53）感染上述两种细胞及肿瘤组织并加用放射，在体、离体实验比较观察Ad5CMV-p53对不同放射敏感性食管癌细胞的影响。结果 TE－13细胞及TE－13R50细胞的放射敏感性明显不同（D0值分别为1.38、2.48Gy）；当联合应用Ad5CMV-p53时明显增加了它们的放射敏感性，TE－13R50细胞的提高幅度较大，接近了亲代细胞的水平（D0值分别为0.97、1.14Gy）。放射合并瘤内注射Ad5CMV-p53与单纯放射相比，荷瘤裸鼠的肿瘤生长速度明显受到抑制，对TE－13R50细胞的作用更大。结论 Ad5CMV-p53可提高食管癌细胞的放射敏感性，在一定程度上消除了食管癌细胞的放射抗拒性。     

食管癌后程加速放射治疗前瞻性随机研究

关于食管癌患者后程加速放射治疗的近期疗效及３年生存率已报道过,现就全部病例随访５年（随访率１００％）的生存及局部控制情况简报如下。１　材料与方法经病理证实为鳞癌的１００例食管癌患者,均为首程放射治疗。男７４例,女２６例,平均年龄６０岁。颈段癌４例,胸上段癌３５例,胸中段癌５６例,胸下段癌５例。平均病变长度７１ｃｍ。随机分为２个组,常规组５０例,后程加速超分割组（后加速组）５０例。照射方法：采用４ＭＶ－Ｘ线或１０ＭＶ－Ｘ线照射,常规组每日１次,每次１８０～２００ｃＧｙ,５次／周,总量６０００ｃＧ…     

放射线联合p53基因及内皮抑素治疗小鼠前列腺癌皮下移植瘤

Objective To test the hypothesis that p53 gene therapy combined with endostatin can enhance tumor response to radiation therapy of RM-1 mouse xenograft prostate cancer and to investigate its mechanism. Methods A mouse prostate cancer model was established. Then mice with xenograft tumor were randomly divided into group A (control), B (radiation), C (radiation and rAdp53), D (radiation and rh-endostatin) and E (radiation and rAdp53 and rh-endostatin). On day 1, rAdp53 was injected intra-tumorously with 1 × 1010 vp per animal to group C and E. From day 1 to 14, rh-endostatin was given 15 mg/kg intraperitoneally daily to group D and E. On day 4 single fraction of 15 Gy was given to tumors in groups B, C, D and E. Normal saline was injected intra-tumorously or intraperitoneaUy accordingly as control. No treatment was done to group A. Tumor volume was measured daily. Samples were collected on Days 5, 10 and 15. Ki67, CD31, p53 and VEGF were detected by means of immunohistochemistry. Results (1) Radiation alone, radiation combined with intra-tumorous injection of Adp53 and/or intraperitoneal injection of rh-endostatin resulted in tumor growth arrest of RM-1 cells in vivo (P = 0.000). Radiation combined with both rAdp53 and rh-endostatin was the most effective treatment (P < 0.05). (2) All the four treatment groups had a decreased expression of mutant type P53 (P = 0.000). The expression of Ki67 in groups B and C were equal (P 0.05) and increasing (P = 0.000), respectively. Group D had a up-down-up curve (P < 0.05), but group E had a up-down one. On day 5 the expresion of VEGF in group E was the lowest (P < 0.05). An increased expression of MVD compared with the control was shown, and MVD in groups C, D and E were always higher than that in the control (P < 0.05). Conclusions The limitation of radiotherapy could be overcome by combination with beth p53 gene therapy and endostatin on the growth of mouse prostate cancer cell. Radiation, rAdp53 and endostatin have their own role but they can be interacted with each other.     

食管癌再程放疗的疗效观察

对食管癌放疗后局部复发或未控行再程放疗的评价不一。我科自1971年2月至1989年9月,收治资料完整的食管癌放疗后复发或未控行再程放疗者47例(治疗组),与同期未行再程放疗者41例(对照组),进行对比分析,试图提出对再程放疗的看法。     

顺铂和洛铂与放射联合对小鼠肺癌移植瘤生长的影响

目的 了解顺铂、洛铂给药后不同时间照射对小鼠肺癌移植瘤的放射增敏作用影响.方法 70只C57BL/6近交系Lewis肺癌移植小鼠随机分组,按10 mg药物/kg体重经尾静脉分别注射顺铂和洛铂,给药后在0.5、2.0、4.0、24.0、48.0、72.0、96.0 h分别将小鼠处死获取肿瘤组织标本,应用ICP-MS方法测定标本铂含量.80只荷瘤小鼠随机分为对照、单纯药物、单纯照射、药物联合照射组共10个组,注射药物后1、24 h或72 h对肿瘤局部进行照射,比较各组间肿瘤大小.结果 顺铂、洛铂在肿瘤组织浓度均在给药后迅速达到4.78、2.79 μg/g (t=3.82,P=0.005),4 h后分别降至3.39、0.99 μg/g (t=9.10,P=0.000),96 h时分别为1.41、0.23 μg/g (t=3.70,P=0.006).顺铂给药后1、24、72 h照射组之间肿瘤生长速度相似,但比对照组、单纯照射组、单纯顺铂组均明显变缓;在第15天时肿瘤相对体积分别为4.73、5.52、2.15(F=0.84,P=0.451),而对照组、单纯照射组、单纯顺铂组分别为16.63(F=10.50,P=0.000)、10.34(F=3.12,P=0.046)、12.80(F=8.06,P=0.001).洛铂给药后1、24、72 h照射组之间肿瘤生长速度也相似,但与对照组、单纯照射组、单纯洛铂组相比均明显变缓;在第15天时肿瘤相对体积分别为3.49、4.90、3.86(F=0.32,P=0.727),而对照组、单纯照射组、单纯洛铂组分别为16.63(F=15.21,P=0.000)、10.34(F=4.12,P=0.016)、14.28(F=10.67,P=0.000).顺铂和洛铂在1、24、72 h的放射增敏比分别为2.13、2.03、3.45和2.53、2.00、2.50.结论 顺铂一次给药后肿瘤内药物浓度至少能持续96 h,其放射增敏作用能持续较长时间;洛铂具有与顺铂相似的抗肿瘤效果及放射增敏作用.

Abstract：

Objective To learn the effect of different combination model between irradiation and cisplatin or lobaplatin on the radiosensitization of xenographt tumor in mice.Methods Seventy C57BL/6 mice with Lewis lung carcinoma were randomly divided into fourteen groups.Then a single intravenous bolus injection of 10 mg/kg either cisplatin or lobaplatin was given.Tumor tissues were collected at the indicated times of 0.5 h, 2.0 h, 4.0 h, 24.0 h, 48.0 h, 72.0 h, and 96.0 h.The platinum levels were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry.Eighty tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into 10 groups, including a blank control group, a irradiation group, two drug treatment groups and 6 combined treatment groups.The tumors were irradiated at 1 h, 24 h or 72 h after either cisplatin or lobaplatin injection.The tumor size of the groups was compared.Results The concentrations of cisplatin and lobaplatin in tumors rapidly reached 4.78 μg/g and 2.79 μg/g (t=3.82,P=0.005), respectively, then declined rapidly to 3.39 μg/g and 0.99 μg/g (t=9.10,P=0.000) at 4 h, 1.41 μg/g and 0.23 μg/g (t=3.70,P=0.006) at 96 h, respectively.The tumor growth among the three groups of irradiation at 1 h, 24 h or 72 h after cisplatin was similar, which was slower than the blank control group, the irradiation group and the cisplatin treatment group.At the 15th day, the relative volume of tumor in the three combined treatment groups were 4.73, 5.52 and 2.15(F=0.84,P=0.451), While was 16.63(F=10.50,P=0.000) in the blank control group, 10.34(F=3.12,P=0.046) in the irradiation group, and 12.80(F=8.06,P=0.001) in the cisplatin treatment group, respectively.The tumor growth among the three groups of irradiation at 1 h, 24 h or 72 h after lobaplatin was also similar, which was slower than the blank control group, the irradiation group and the lobaplatin treatment group.At the 15th day, the relative volume of tumor in the three combined treatment groups were 3.49, 4.90 and 3.86(F=0.32,P=0.727), While was 16.63(F=15.21,P=0.000) in the blank control group, 10.34(F=4.12,P=0.016) in the irradiation group, and 14.28(F=10.67,P=0.000) in the lobaplatin treatment group, respectively.The sensitizing enhancement ratio (SER) at 1 h, 24 h and 72 h after the injection were 2.13, 2.03 and 3.45 of cisplatin, and 2.53, 2.00 and 2.50 of lobaplatin, respectively.Conclusions After intravenous bolus injection, the cisplatin concentration in the tumor can be kept at least 96 hours, which results in a persistent radiosensitizing effect.Lobaplatin and cisplatin have similar anti-tumor and radiosensitizing effect.     

荷瘤小鼠静脉注射洛铂和顺铂后药物浓度的变化规律

目的研究洛铂和顺铂在小鼠血浆、肾脏和肿瘤内的药物浓度随时间变化的规律,为放疗增敏提供实验数据。方法 70只C57BL/6近交系Lewis肺癌荷瘤小鼠随机分组,按10mg药物/kg体重经尾静脉分别给小鼠注射药物（洛铂或顺铂）,给药后在0.5、2、4、24、48、72、96 h分别将小鼠处死获取血液和组织标本（肿瘤和肾脏）,应用ICP-MS方法测定标本铂含量。结果洛铂和顺铂的血浆药时曲线均符合三室模型,半衰期分别为51.139h和35.583h,洛铂在血浆中的清除速率大于顺铂[0.532L/（h.kg）对0.192 L/（h·kg）];洛铂和顺铂在肿瘤组织的浓度均在给药后迅速达到最大[（2.79±0.35）μg/g对（4.78±1.11）μg/g],然后迅速下降,在4 h后分别降至0.99±0.21μg/g和3.39±0.55μg/g,在96 h肿瘤中仍有药物存在,浓度分别为0.23±0.05μg/g和1.41±0.71μg/g。肿瘤药物浓度与血浆药物浓度呈对数相关,Rsq分别为0.948和0.837。结论洛铂和顺铂在小鼠体内静脉给药后半衰期长,肿瘤内药物浓度在给药后很快达到最大,在4 h降至平台期,96 h仍有药物存在,顺铂在肿瘤内的浓度高于洛铂;洛铂在小鼠体内的清除速率快于顺铂;可以通过检测血浆中的洛铂和顺铂浓度来估算肿瘤内的药物浓度。     

食管癌再程放疗的疗效观察

1971年2月至1989年9月我科收治食管癌放疗后复发或未控而行再程放疗者47例;选同时期复发或未控病例,未行再程放疗的41例为对照。两组共88例,1例失访按死亡计,随访率98.9％。 疗后治疗组与对照组比较,1年生存率分别为35.7％和5.3％(P<0.01,2年生存率分别为16％和