Correction to: Features of the gut prokaryotic virome of Japanese patients with Crohn’s disease

Journal of Gastroenterology -     

Combined administration of lauric acid and glucose improved cancer‐derived cardiac atrophy in a mouse cachexia model

Cancer‐derived myocardial damage is an important cause of death in cancer patients. However, the development of dietary interventions for treating such damage has not been advanced. Here, we investigated the effect of dietary intervention with lauric acid (LAA) and glucose, which was effective against skeletal muscle sarcopenia in a mouse cachexia model, on myocardial damage. Treatment of H9c2 rat cardiomyoblasts with lauric acid promoted mitochondrial respiration and increased ATP production by Seahorse flux analysis, but did not increase oxidative stress. Glycolysis was also promoted by LAA. In contrast, mitochondrial respiration and ATP production were suppressed, and oxidative stress was increased in an in vitro cachexia model in which cardiomyoblasts were treated with mouse cachexia ascites. Ascites‐treated H9c2 cells with concurrent treatment with LAA and high glucose showed that mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis were promoted more than that of the control, and ATP was restored to the level of the control. Oxidative stress was also reduced by the combined treatment. In the mouse cachexia model, myocardiac atrophy and decreased levels of a marker of muscle maturity, SDS‐soluble MYL1, were observed. When LAA in CE‐2 diet was orally administered alone, no significant rescue was observed in the cancer‐derived myocardial disorder. In contrast, combined oral administration of LAA and glucose recovered myocardial atrophy and MYL1 to levels observed in the control without increase in the cancer weight. Therefore, it is suggested that dietary intervention using a combination of LAA and glucose for cancer cachexia might improve cancer‐derived myocardial damage.     

Effects of α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists on the development and progression of urothelial cancer

We recently demonstrated that silodosin, a selective α₁-blocker often prescribed for the symptomatic treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), could inactivate a c-fos proto-oncogene regulator ELK1 in bladder cancer cells possessing a functional androgen receptor (AR). However, the clinical impact of α₁-blockers on the development and progression of bladder cancer remained poorly understood. In the present study, we investigated if α₁-blockers clinically used, including silodosin, tamsulosin, and naftopidil, could prevent the neoplastic/malignant transformation and cell growth, using non-neoplastic urothelial SVHUC sublines with carcinogen/MCA challenge and bladder cancer lines, respectively. Bladder cancers in men treated with silodosin, tamsulosin, or naftopidil for their BPH were then compared. Silodosin at 1-10 µM significantly inhibited the neoplastic transformation of MCA-SVHUC-AR cells, but not that of AR-negative MCA-SVHUC-control cells. In MCA-SVHUC-AR, silodosin significantly reduced the expression levels of oncogenes (c-fos/NF-κB1) and induced those of tumor suppressors (p27/PTEN). However, tamsulosin (up to 1 µM) or naftopidil (up to 10 µM) failed to significantly inhibit the neoplastic transformation of AR-positive or AR-negative urothelial cells. Similarly, cell proliferation/migration of AR-positive bladder cancer lines was considerably inhibited only by silodosin. Meanwhile, the incidence of bladder cancer in patients with silodosin [49/540 (9.1%)] was marginally lower, compared to those with tamsulosin [64/523 (12.2%); P=0.094] or tamsulosin or naftopidil [64+28/523+236 (12.1%); P=0.082]. There were no significant differences in tumor grade/stage among the 3 cohorts. Outcome analysis revealed lower risks for disease progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder tumors in the silodosin group than in the naftopidil group (P=0.011) or tamsulosin+naftopidil groups (P=0.035). Similarly, silodosin patients with muscle-invasive tumor had lower risks for disease progression, compared with tamsulosin (P=0.006) or tamsulosin+naftopidil (P=0.028) patients. Multivariate analysis further showed that silodosin treatment in those with non-muscle-invasive tumor was associated with improved progression-free survival, compared with naftopidil (hazard ratio=0.086; 95% confidence interval=0.008-0.905; P=0.041) or tamsulosin/naftopidil (hazard ratio=0.128; 95% confidence interval=0.016-1.036; P=0.054) treatment. Our in vitro studies thus indicate that both urothelial tumorigenesis and tumor growth are inhibited by silodosin, but not by tamsulosin or naftopidil. Clinical data further suggest that even pharmacological doses (e.g. 0.1 µM) of silodosin contribute to preventing bladder cancer progression.