A systematic review and meta-analysis on the antibiotic resistance of Neisseria meningitidis in the last 20 years in the world

BackgroundNeisseria meningitidis is one of the most important causes of meningitis and pathogens-associated deaths in developing and developed countries. Effective anti-microbial agents are pivotal to treat and control N. meningitidis infections. The aim of the present study was to systematically review published studies on the antibiotic resistance of N. meningitidis in the last 20 years (2000–2020) in the world.MethodsPublished researches were identified through a literature search using reputable databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Finally, 24 studies were included for a random-effects model meta-analysis.ResultsThe overall resistance to most commonly used antibiotics such as ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and rifampin was low, ranging from 1 to 3.4%. However, non-sensitivity to penicillin, as the first-line antibiotic against N. meningitidis, was higher (27.2%). Altogether, the resistance to the first-line antibiotics (except penicillin) is still low indicating these drugs are effective against meningococcal meningitis. We also found a significant gap between MIC and disk diffusion for evaluating resistance to antibiotics in which disk diffusion overestimate the resistance rate.ConclusionsTo properly management and prevent the spread of N. miningitidis isolates resistant antibiotics, it is necessary to monitor the pattern of antibiotic susceptibility regionally and globally using the MIC methods.     

Cefepime resistance and associated risk factors among Escherichia coli strains isolated from clinical specimens

Cefepime is active against bacteria producing chromosomally and plasmid-mediated extended broad-spectrum β-lactamase enzymes. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for acquisition of cefepime resistance in Escherichia coli strains among hospitalized patients in a university hospital in Sanandaj, Iran. The study was a case-control investigation. A case patient was defined as a patient who had one isolate of a cefepime-resistant E. coli strain. A control patient was defined as a patient who had one isolate of a cefepime-sensitive E. coli strain. Cefepime resistance was determined by HiComb MIC tests (HIMEDIA, India). Out of the 255 total isolates, 73 (28.6%) were resistant to cefepime. The previous treatment of cefepime was a risk factor for acquisition of a cefepime-resistant isolate (OR = 6.32, 95% CI: 1.5-25.19, p < 0.007). The use of a ventilator was considered to be a risk for acquisition of a cefepime-resistant isolate (OR = 6.25, 95% CI: 1.86-21.02, p <0.002). The use of a catheter was also found to be a risk factor for acquisition of cefepime resistance (OR = 6.28, 95% CI: 1.86-21.02, p <0.001). There was a significant correlation between days of stay in hospital wards and cefepime resistance (p < 0.003). The main risk factors associated with cefepime resistance were previous treatment with cefepime, use of ventilator, use of catheter and days of stay in ward. More studies are needed to evaluate the role of these factors in order to control the spread of drug resistance.