Effects of long‐term use of HAART on oral health status of HIV‐infected subjects

J Oral Pathol Med (2010) 39 : 397–406 Background: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of long‐term use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on oral health status of HIV‐infected subjects. Methods: Oral examination and measurement of saliva flow rate of both unstimulated and wax‐stimulated whole saliva were performed in HIV‐infected subjects with and without HAART, and in non‐HIV individuals. The following data were recorded; duration and risk of HIV infection, type and duration of HAART, CD4 cell count, viral load, presence of orofacial pain, oral dryness, oral burning sensation, oral lesions, cervical caries, and periodontal pocket. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the effects of long‐term use of HAART on oral health status of HIV‐infected subjects. Results: One hundred and fifty‐seven HIV‐infected subjects – 99 on HAART (age range 23–57 years, mean 39 years) and 58 not on HAART (age range 20–59 years, mean 34 years) – and 50 non‐HIV controls (age range 19–59 years, mean 36 years) were enrolled. The most common HAART regimen was 2 NRTI + 2 NNRTI. HIV‐infected subjects without HAART showed greater risks of having orofacial pain, oral dryness, oral lesions, and periodontal pockets than those with short‐term HAART (P < 0.01). The subjects with long‐term HAART were found to have a greater risk of having oral lesions than those with short‐term HAART (P < 0.05). The unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates of the subjects with HAART were significantly lower than in those without HAART (P < 0.05). Conclusion: We conclude that long‐term HAART has adverse effects on oral health status of HIV‐infected subjects.     

Changes in oral cytokeratin expression in HIV-infected subjects with long-term use of HAART

Oral Diseases (2012) 18 , 793–801 Objectives: The objectives of this study were to determine (i) the expression of oral cytokeratins (CKs) among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐infected subjects compared with non‐HIV controls, (ii) the oral CK expression in the subjects with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) compared with those without HAART, and (iii) factors associated with the expression of oral CKs. Materials and methods: Oral tissues from buccal mucosa were obtained by punched biopsy in HIV‐infected subjects with and without HAART, and non‐HIV individuals. The samples were processed for immunohistochemical studies of CK1, CK13, CK14, CK16, and involucrin. The staining intensity was scored and recorded. Logistic regression analysis and multi‐way ANOVA test were performed. Results: The expression of CK13, CK14, and CK16 was found to be significantly different between HIV‐infected subjects and non‐HIV individuals (P < 0.05). The expression of those CKs was also significantly different between those who were and were not on HAART (P < 0.05). No significant difference between the groups was observed regarding CK1 and involucrin. Conclusions: Oral epithelial cell differentiation as marked by the CK expression is affected by HIV infection and use of HAART. CKs may be the useful biomarkers to identify HIV‐infected subjects who are at risk of malignant transformation of the oral mucosa because of HIV infection and HAART.     

Multifaceted intervention to implement indicators of quality of care for severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia

Objective

To assess the acceptability of implementing indicators of quality of care for severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia to health providers, and to evaluate the effect of a multifaceted intervention on adherence to these indicators.

Methods

A multifaceted approach was used to implement indicators of quality of care for severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia that were relevant to both district and referral hospitals. Healthcare providers at 9 hospitals in Southern Thailand rated the acceptability and priority of each indicator. In addition, medical records were reviewed before and after the intervention.

Results

More than 90% of the indicators were considered to be acceptable by the 145 health providers who participated in the study. After the intervention, adherence to most indicators was significantly increased. However, adherence after the intervention was lower than 80% for one-third of the indicators at district hospitals, compared with less than 10% of the indicators at referral hospitals. Common barriers to indicator implementation were lack of resources and skills, difficulty in making early and accurate diagnoses, and management.

Conclusion

The indicators for the quality of care for severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia were acceptable. Adherence to the indicators increased through a multifaceted intervention; however, the adherence varied considerably depending on the hospital referral level.