持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

Objective To observe the cost-effectiveness of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CS Ⅱ) and multi-point daily insulin injections (MDI) in controlling blood sugar in the newly hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. Methods Retrospective analysis on 86 cases taking CS Ⅱ and 103 cases using MDI on a 'blood sugar control program' among the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. The period for observation was 2 weeks, using cost-effectiveness analysis methods to evaluate the two treatment programs. Results After two weeks of treatment, the effectiveness in the control of blood sugar in CS Ⅱ group was similar to the MDI group, with no significant difference(P<0.05) and the adverse reactions were similar. Costs in the CS Ⅱ program (Yuan/person) was less than in the MDI program (1478.34 vs. 1620.46), with significant differences (P< 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 15.07 in the CS Ⅱ group, and 16.34 in the MDI group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). In order to further reduce the cost of CS Ⅱ group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/ △E)ofthe MDI group was 129.20. Conclusion Costs-effective of the CS Ⅱ program was better than the MDI one in treating the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that CS Ⅱ program might be a better choice for hospitals to carry on an intensive insulin therapy program.     

谁让宝宝流落他乡——宫外孕

在正常情况下,大约每80次怀孕中就有1次是宫外孕。宫外孕的危险性在于它引起的大出血,如不及时治疗就会危及生命。孕育会改变一个女人,它将一个柔媚单纯的女孩变成了一个善感多情的女人。缤纷青春,徜徉在爱之河里,我从来就没有想过到甜蜜的爱里还会有伤痛;经历了分娩的苦与痛、泪与笑,我从一个莽撞的女孩变成了一个对生命充满敬畏的谨慎女人。生命是一个极其美丽的奥秘,女人啊,一定要学会善待自己。     

舒洛地特对糖尿病大鼠尿白蛋白排泄率及肾脏转化生长因子-β1表达的影响

目的 探讨舒洛地特对链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病大鼠尿白蛋白排泄率及肾脏转化生长因子-β1 mRNA和蛋白表达的影响.方法 33只健康8周龄雄性SD大鼠采用随机数字表法分为健康对照组(n=11)、糖尿病组(n=11)及舒洛地特干预组(n=11).糖尿病组和舒洛地特干预组空腹10 h后一次性腹腔内注射链脲佐菌素溶液(65 mg/kg),健康对照组注射等量生理盐水.72 h后尾静脉空腹血糖>16.7 mmol/L且持续3 d视为造模成功,其中糖尿病组成模大鼠9只,舒洛地特干预组成模大鼠10只.舒洛地特干预组给予10 mg·kg-1·d-1舒洛地特灌胃,糖尿病组和健康对照组给予等量生理盐水灌胃,共12周.用药结束后次晨测定24 h尿白蛋白排泄率,留取肾脏组织作转化生长因子-β1免疫组织化学染色,应用逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)测定其mRNA表达水平.采用单因素方差分析及SNK或LSD检验进行统计学分析.结果 24 h尿白蛋白排泄率糖尿病组平均为363μg/min,舒洛地特干预组为151μg/min,健康对照组为26 μg/min,差异有统计学意义(F=93.93,P<0.01).糖尿病组肾脏组织转化生长因子-β1 mRNA的表达量为3.11±0.84,舒洛地特干预组为0.99±0.27,健康对照组为0.44±0.13,差异有统计学意义(F=80.43,P<0.01).肾脏组织转化生长因子-β1蛋白免疫组织化学染色在糖尿病组着色深且广泛,舒洛地特干预组较糖尿病组染色浅,与健康对照组相近.结论 舒洛地特可降低尿白蛋白排泄率,下调肾脏组织转化生长因子-β1 mRNA及蛋白的表达,从而发挥肾脏保护作用.     

保胆取石术式选择临床研究

目的:比较目前常用保胆取石术式的优缺点。方法:将2009年7月至2012年7月符合保胆条件的胆囊结石患者150例随机分为3组(每组50例),分别接受腹腔镜辅助体外胆道镜保胆取石术(组1),完全腹腔镜下保胆取石术(组2)或传统胆道镜保胆取石术(组3)。术后予牛磺熊去氧胆酸胶囊口服半年,定期随访。比较各组手术时间,术后并发症发生率,住院时间,住院费用和结石复发率。结果:3组均无结石复发。组1所有患者术后均恢复良好,其手术时间和并发症发生率较之组2显著减少,住院时间较之组3显著缩短(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜辅助体外胆道镜保胆取石术相对于其他两种术式具有手术时间短,术后恢复快,并发症发生率低的优点,值得临床推广。牛磺熊去氧胆酸胶囊可有效预防结石复发。     

舒洛地特对糖尿病大鼠肾脏结构及功能的影响

目的 探讨舒洛地特对链脲佐菌素(STZ)诱导的糖尿病大鼠尿白蛋白排泄率(UAER)及肾脏结构的影响.方法 33只雄性SD大鼠随机分成正常对照组、糖尿病组及舒洛地特组,每组11只.糖尿病组和舒洛地特组在空腹10h后按65mg/kg一次性腹腔内注射STZ溶液,正常对照组注射等量生理盐水,72h后尾静脉血糖≥16.7mmol/L及尿糖≥且持续3d为造模成功.其中,糖尿病组成模9只,舒洛地特组成模10只.造模成功后,舒洛地特组给予10mg/(kg·d)舒洛地特灌胃,糖尿病组和正常对照组给予等量的生理盐水灌胃,疗程12周.用药结束后次晨测24h UAER,并在光镜、电镜下观察各组大鼠肾脏组织结构的病理变化.结果 糖尿病组的24h UAER明显高于正常对照组.舒洛地特组24h UAER高于对照组,但明显低于糖尿病组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).与对照组相比,在光镜和电镜下,糖尿病组大鼠肾脏组织表现出明显的病理结构改变,舒洛地特组肾脏病理改变则明显减轻.结论 舒洛地特可降低糖尿病大鼠UAER,明显减轻糖尿病大鼠的肾脏病理损害,从而起到肾脏保护作用.     

明星妈妈也为难:顺产PK剖腹产

十月怀胎,一朝分娩。瓜熟蒂落本是人类繁衍过程中的一个正常生理过程,是人类的一种本能行为。产妇和婴儿都具有潜力主动参与并完成分娩过程。从受精卵开始胎儿在母体内经历280天的生长发育逐渐成熟,而孕妇的身体结构也逐渐地发生变化,变得更有利于分娩。万事俱备之时,准妈妈们却在"东风"的选择上产生了迟疑。小S在怀第一胎的时候就宣布采用剖腹产,因为她觉得,肚子上留疤总比产道松弛好。接下来孙俪、马伊琍等明星都选择了剖腹产生下婴儿。一时间,便有议论纷纷,认为她们不够勇敢,或者没有完全体现出母亲的伟大。说归说,剖腹产的采用率依然没有下降。相对于经过几千年历史检验的自然顺产,剖腹产该拿什么抗衡呢?     

持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

Objective To observe the cost-effectiveness of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CS Ⅱ) and multi-point daily insulin injections (MDI) in controlling blood sugar in the newly hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. Methods Retrospective analysis on 86 cases taking CS Ⅱ and 103 cases using MDI on a 'blood sugar control program' among the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. The period for observation was 2 weeks, using cost-effectiveness analysis methods to evaluate the two treatment programs. Results After two weeks of treatment, the effectiveness in the control of blood sugar in CS Ⅱ group was similar to the MDI group, with no significant difference(P<0.05) and the adverse reactions were similar. Costs in the CS Ⅱ program (Yuan/person) was less than in the MDI program (1478.34 vs. 1620.46), with significant differences (P< 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 15.07 in the CS Ⅱ group, and 16.34 in the MDI group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). In order to further reduce the cost of CS Ⅱ group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/ △E)ofthe MDI group was 129.20. Conclusion Costs-effective of the CS Ⅱ program was better than the MDI one in treating the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that CS Ⅱ program might be a better choice for hospitals to carry on an intensive insulin therapy program.     

持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

Objective To observe the cost-effectiveness of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CS Ⅱ) and multi-point daily insulin injections (MDI) in controlling blood sugar in the newly hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. Methods Retrospective analysis on 86 cases taking CS Ⅱ and 103 cases using MDI on a 'blood sugar control program' among the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. The period for observation was 2 weeks, using cost-effectiveness analysis methods to evaluate the two treatment programs. Results After two weeks of treatment, the effectiveness in the control of blood sugar in CS Ⅱ group was similar to the MDI group, with no significant difference(P<0.05) and the adverse reactions were similar. Costs in the CS Ⅱ program (Yuan/person) was less than in the MDI program (1478.34 vs. 1620.46), with significant differences (P< 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 15.07 in the CS Ⅱ group, and 16.34 in the MDI group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). In order to further reduce the cost of CS Ⅱ group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/ △E)ofthe MDI group was 129.20. Conclusion Costs-effective of the CS Ⅱ program was better than the MDI one in treating the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that CS Ⅱ program might be a better choice for hospitals to carry on an intensive insulin therapy program.     

持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

Objective To observe the cost-effectiveness of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CS Ⅱ) and multi-point daily insulin injections (MDI) in controlling blood sugar in the newly hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. Methods Retrospective analysis on 86 cases taking CS Ⅱ and 103 cases using MDI on a 'blood sugar control program' among the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. The period for observation was 2 weeks, using cost-effectiveness analysis methods to evaluate the two treatment programs. Results After two weeks of treatment, the effectiveness in the control of blood sugar in CS Ⅱ group was similar to the MDI group, with no significant difference(P<0.05) and the adverse reactions were similar. Costs in the CS Ⅱ program (Yuan/person) was less than in the MDI program (1478.34 vs. 1620.46), with significant differences (P< 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 15.07 in the CS Ⅱ group, and 16.34 in the MDI group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). In order to further reduce the cost of CS Ⅱ group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/ △E)ofthe MDI group was 129.20. Conclusion Costs-effective of the CS Ⅱ program was better than the MDI one in treating the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that CS Ⅱ program might be a better choice for hospitals to carry on an intensive insulin therapy program.     

持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

Objective To observe the cost-effectiveness of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CS Ⅱ) and multi-point daily insulin injections (MDI) in controlling blood sugar in the newly hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. Methods Retrospective analysis on 86 cases taking CS Ⅱ and 103 cases using MDI on a 'blood sugar control program' among the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. The period for observation was 2 weeks, using cost-effectiveness analysis methods to evaluate the two treatment programs. Results After two weeks of treatment, the effectiveness in the control of blood sugar in CS Ⅱ group was similar to the MDI group, with no significant difference(P<0.05) and the adverse reactions were similar. Costs in the CS Ⅱ program (Yuan/person) was less than in the MDI program (1478.34 vs. 1620.46), with significant differences (P< 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 15.07 in the CS Ⅱ group, and 16.34 in the MDI group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). In order to further reduce the cost of CS Ⅱ group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/ △E)ofthe MDI group was 129.20. Conclusion Costs-effective of the CS Ⅱ program was better than the MDI one in treating the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that CS Ⅱ program might be a better choice for hospitals to carry on an intensive insulin therapy program.