The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2022 Expert Consensus Document: The use of mechanical circulatory support in lung transplantation

ObjectiveThe use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in lung transplantation has been steadily increasing over the prior decade, with evolving strategies for incorporating support in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings. There is significant practice variability in the use of these techniques, however, and relatively limited data to help establish institutional protocols. The objective of the AATS Clinical Practice Standards Committee (CPSC) expert panel was to review the existing literature and establish recommendations about the use of MCS before, during, and after lung transplantation.MethodsThe AATS CPSC assembled an expert panel of 16 lung transplantation physicians who developed a consensus document of recommendations. The panel was broken into subgroups focused on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative support, and each subgroup performed a focused literature review. These subgroups formulated recommendation statements for each subtopic, which were evaluated by the entire group. The statements were then developed via discussion among the panel and refined until consensus was achieved on each statement.ResultsThe expert panel achieved consensus on 36 recommendations for how and when to use MCS in lung transplantation. These recommendations included the use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridging strategy in the preoperative setting, a preference for central veno-arterial ECMO over traditional cardiopulmonary bypass during the transplantation procedure, and the benefit of supporting selected patients with MCS postoperatively.ConclusionsAchieving optimal results in lung transplantation requires the use of a wide range of strategies. MCS provides an important mechanism for helping these critically ill patients through the peritransplantation period. Despite the complex nature of the decision making process in the treatment of these patients, the expert panel was able to achieve consensus on 36 recommendations. These recommendations should provide guidance for professionals involved in the care of end-stage lung disease patients considered for transplantation.     

Differential Diagnosis of Acute Diarrhea

Acute diarrhea is a condition of increased water stool content, stool volume, and number of bowel movements that lasts less than 14 days. Mild diarrhea is usually self-limiting; however, undertreated moderate to severe diarrhea may cause severe dehydration and lead to hypovolemic shock. In order to prevent severe dehydration and treat patients appropriately, it is crucial for health care providers to determine the right diagnosis of patients with acute diarrhea. This article focuses on pathophysiology, general patient presentation, diagnostic tests and differential diagnosis lists of acute diarrhea to discuss which diagnosis should be made based on patient presentation and objective data.     

慢阻肺急性加重期患者延迟就医与家庭动力学的相关性研究

目的研究慢阻肺急性加重期患者延迟就医与家庭动力学的相关性,希望能够为慢阻肺急性加重期患者拟定护理措施提供科学依据。方法选取2017年1月-2019年12月我院240例诊断为慢阻肺急性加重期的患者为研究对象。根据患者入院就医的时间进行分组,时间≥24h的延迟就医的患者为观察组,时间<24h的及时就医患者为对照组。结果两组患者在文化水平、家庭年收入、在职状态、医疗保险和婚姻状况和APACHEⅡ评分比较(P<0.05)。观察组患者疾病观念、个性化、系统逻辑和家庭氛围得分比对照组高(P<0.05)。Pearman的相关性分析结果显示:慢阻肺急性加重期患者延迟就医时间与各个层面分数以及家庭动力总分呈现负相关性(P<0.05)。应变量为延迟就医为应变量,患者的一般资料为自变量,经Logistic回归分析结果表明:延迟就医的影响因素为文化水平、家庭动力评分、职业状态、家庭收入、婚姻状况和APACHEⅡ评分。结论慢阻肺急性加重期患者家庭动力总分与疾病观念、个性化、系统逻辑和家庭氛围得分与延迟就医时间呈现负相关性,患者延迟就医的影响因素是家庭动力学评分。     

Therapeutic plasma exchange in pediatric patients with acute demyelinating syndromes of the central nervous system: A single-center experience

BackgroundTherapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an extracorporeal treatment that can be used in adult and pediatric patients with acute demyelinating syndromes of the central nervous system. In this study, the efficacy and safety of TPE was evaluated in 10 pediatric patients who underwent TPE that were unresponsive to corticosteroid treatment.MethodsRecords of 10 pediatric patients who underwent TPE in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) between May 2017 and June 2020 were used. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Gait Scale (GS), and Visual Outcome Scale (VOS) were applied to the patients before and after TPE.ResultsOf the 10 patients who underwent TPE, five were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS), three with transverse myelitis (TM), and two with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). The median age of the patients was 13.3 years (IQR 8-15), and the median day from symptom onset to onset of TPE was 12.5 days (IQR 7-28). A total of 104 TPE sessions were performed successfully. While no complications were encountered in three patients during the sessions, the most common complication was hypofibrinogenemia. The decrease in EDSS and GS scores was found to be consistent with the clinical response of the patients. There was no statistically significant decrease in the VOS.ConclusionsWith this study, we can say that TPE is a feasible, effective, and safe treatment modality in children with acute demyelinating syndromes of the central nervous system.     

CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B细胞比例预测肝移植术后急性细胞性排斥反应发生的临床研究

目的分析肝移植术后受者外周血CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi B细胞占单个核细胞比例变化情况及其与急性细胞性排斥反应(ACR)之间的关系。 方法回顾性分析2013年12月至2015年12月在浙江大学医学院附属第一医院接受心脏死亡器官捐献肝移植的80例成人受者临床资料，根据术后是否发生ACR，将受者分为ACR组(25例)和非ACR组(55例)。术前、术后各个时间点抽取参加研究者静脉血并分离外周血单个核细胞，加入异硫氰酸荧光素-单克隆鼠抗人CD19抗体、藻红蛋白-单克隆鼠抗人CD24抗体和别藻蓝蛋白-单克隆鼠抗人CD38抗体，流式细胞仪检测各组CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi B细胞百分比。采用t检验和单因素方差分析比较正态分布计量资料，采用χ²检验比较计数资料，采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果ACR组、非ACR组受者术前外周血平均CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi B细胞比例分别为(3.13±0.91)%、(3.49±0.83)%，差异无统计学意义(t＝1.636，P>0.05)。ACR组术后发生ACR前外周血平均CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi B细胞比例为(1.87±0.70)%。非ACR组受者术后3个月、6个月和1年外周血平均CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi B细胞比例分别为(1.64±0.52)%、(1.63±0.56)%和(2.04±1.24)%，术后3、6个月平均值均低于术前和术后1年，差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。ACR组受者发生ACR时外周血平均CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi B细胞比例为(0.8±0.5)%，低于发生ACR前的平均水平(t＝5.752，P<0.05)，且低于非ACR组术后3个月、6个月和1年的平均水平(P<0.05)。ACR组受者接受抗排斥反应治疗后，CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi B细胞比例也逐渐增加，ACR发生后7 d为(0.84±0.08)%，与ACR发生时相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；而发生30 d后达(1.65±0.18)%，与ACR发生时相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。当截断值为1.015%时，CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi B细胞比例预测ACR发生的敏感度和特异度分别为0.786和0.702，ROC曲线下面积为0.775(95%CI: 0.671~0.879，P<0.05)。 结论CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi B细胞比例下降与肝移植术后ACR反应发生有关，并可作为预测ACR发生的细胞标志物。