我国日间手术开展现状与前景展望

日间手术在国外已有上百年的发展历史，现已成为欧美国家重要手术模式。我国于20世纪初开始开展日间手术，但目前尚未普及，发展不平衡问题比较突出，存在认识不清、开展不规范、与医保支付对接不畅等问题。日间手术是一种使国家、医院和病人三方均受益的新型手术模式。近年来，国家相关管理部门积极引导，开展日间手术的医院明显增多，可以预见，我国日间手术即将进入快速发展的新阶段。因此，有条件的医院可以从简单、易操作的病种开始，落实临床路径，积累经验，再逐步稳妥展开。在保证质量的前提下，不断拓展日间手术范围，提高三、四级手术比例。同时，积极与医保支付政策对接，采取灵活的方式，获得医保的支持，更好地促进我国日间手术的快速发展。     

DRG支付方式改革下医院财务管理应对策略

通过探讨DRG支付方式改革下医院财务管理的应对策略,可以有效地降低医疗支付方式改革对医院财务管理的负面影响,促使医院财务管理在"危"与"机"的转换中抢抓机遇,促进医院财务管理提质增效。     

Egg-sharing in assisted conception: ethical and practical considerations

The present acute shortage of eggs for donation cannot be overcomeunless adequate guidelines are set to alleviate the anxietiesregarding payments, in cash or kind, to donors. The currentHuman Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) guidelinesdo not allow direct payment to donors but accept the provisionof lower cost or free in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatmentto women in recognition of oocyte donation to anonymous recipients.Egg-sharing achieved in this way enables two infertile couplesto benefit from a single surgical procedure. However, the practicalguidelines related to this approach are ill-defined at the presenttime leading to some justifiable uncertainty. A pilot studywas therefore undertaken in order to establish the place ofegg-sharing in an assisted conception programme. The currentHFEA guidelines on medical screening of patients, counselling,age and rigid anonymity between the donor and recipient werefollowed. The study involved 55 women (25 donors and 30 recipients)in 73 treatment cycles involving fresh and frozen-thawed embryos.Donors were previous IVF patients who, regardless of their abilityto pay, shared their eggs equally with matched anonymous recipients.They paid only for their consultations and tests right up tothe point of being matched with a recipient The sole recipientpaid the cost applicable in egg donation of a single egg collection,although both received embryo transfers. The results indicatethat although the recipients were older than the donors (41.4± 0.9 versus 31.6 ± 0.5 years), and there wasno difference in the mean number of eggs allocated, the percentagefertilization rates, or the mean number of embryos transferred,there were more births per patient amongst recipients than amongstdonors (30 versus 20%). We conclude that providing the donorsare selected carefully, this scheme whereby a sub-fertile donorhelps a sub-fertile recipient is a very constructive way ofsolving the problem of the shortage of eggs for donation. Thereare also the advantages of including a group of women who wouldotherwise be denied treatment Problems related to ‘patientcoercion’ can, in our view, be fully overcome by the applicationof strict common-sense safeguards. The ideal of pure altruismis not without its medical and moral risk. The success of egg-sharingdepends on shared interests and a degree of altruism betweenthe donor, the recipient and the centre. The current HFEA guidelinesshould be applauded for enabling a highly effective conceptof mutual help to develop.     

Cost of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Tertiary Medical Center

BackgroundRevision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) involves varying levels of case complexity and costs depending on the following: (1) number of components revised, (2) duration of operating room time, and (3) length of hospital stay. However, the cost associated with different types of aseptic TKA revisions, based on number and type of components revised, is not well described. We sought to determine differences in cost associated with different revision types, and to correlate this with average national hospital and surgeon reimbursement based on current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of aseptic revision TKAs performed at a single tertiary referral center from 2015 to 2018. Patient demographic data, operating room time, and direct surgery and total hospital costs obtained from an internal accounting database (Enterprise Performance Systems, Inc) were collected. Patients were stratified by the components revised (polyethylene liner only, tibia only, femur only, or both femur and tibia). We hypothesized that direct surgery and total hospital costs would increase as case complexity increased from poly exchange to single-component revisions and both-component revisions.ResultsIn total, 106 patients were included (19 poly exchanges, 10 tibia-only revisions, 13 femur-only revisions, and 64 both-component revisions). Operating room time was significantly lower for poly exchange than all other groups (P < .001). Direct surgery and total hospital costs were significantly lower for poly exchange than all other groups (P < .001), and were significantly lower for tibia-only and femur-only revisions compared to both-component revisions (P < .001). Average national surgeon reimbursement by Medicare decreased as a percentage of direct surgery cost as case complexity increased from poly exchange to tibia-only, femur-only, and both-component revisions. Total hospital cost per average Diagnosis Related Group weight was lowest for single-component revisions and highest for both-component revision.ConclusionThere are significant differences in cost associated with aseptic TKA revisions based on number and type of components revised. These differences may not be accurately reflected in reimbursement, and often represent a burden to those who treat complex revisions.     

The Hospital Frailty Risk Score is Not an Accurate Predictor of Treatment Costs for Total Joint Replacement Patients in a Medicare Bundled Payment Population

BackgroundMedically complex patients require more resources and experience higher costs within total joint arthroplasty (TJA) bundled payment models. While risk adjustment would be beneficial for such patients, no tool currently exists which can reliably identify these patients preoperatively. The purpose of this study is to determine if the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a valid predictor of high-TJA treatment costs.MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent primary TJA between 2015 and 2020 from a single large orthopedic practice. ICD-10 codes from an institutional database were used to calculate HFRS. Cost data including inpatient, postacute, and episode of care (EOC) costs were collected. Charlson comorbidity index, demographics, readmissions, and complications were analyzed.Results4936 patients had a calculable HFRS and those with intermediate and high scores experienced more frequent readmissions/complications after TJA, as well as higher EOC costs. However, HFRS did not reliably predict EOC costs, yielding a sensitivity of 49% and specificity of 66%. Multivariate analysis revealed that both patient age and sex are superior individual cost predictors when compared with HFRS. Secondary analyses indicated that HFRS more effectively predicts TJA complications and readmissions but is still nonideal for clinical applications.ConclusionHFRS has poor sensitivity as a predictor of high-EOC costs for TJA patients but has adequate specificity for predicting postoperative readmissions and complications. Further research is needed to develop a scale that can appropriately predict orthopedic cost outcomes.     

Emergency Department Observation Versus Readmission Following total Joint Arthroplasty: Can We Avoid the Bundle Buster?

BackgroundAs the Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) moves toward bundled payment plans for total joint arthroplasty (TJA), it becomes necessary to reduce factors that increase cost for an episode of care such as readmissions. The goal of this study is to evaluate the payment for observation stay versus readmission for patients who present to the emergency department.MethodsA retrospective review from 2014-2019 was conducted identifying all Medicare patients who had a primary, elective TJA and visited the ED within 90 days postoperatively. If a readmission was one midnight or less or had an equivalent diagnosis to an observation stay patient, it was characterized as a readmission that could have qualified as an observation stay. Using our institution’s average payment for Medicare readmissions and observations, actual and potential savings were calculated.ResultsSixty-nine out of 523 (13.2%) patients were placed under observation, while 454 (86.8%) patients were readmitted. Eighty-six out of 523 (18.9%) patients qualified for observation status. There was an actual savings of 11.8% by placing patients on observation status and readmission rate was decreased by 13.2%. Savings could have increased by a total of 27.7% and readmissions decreased by a total of 29.6% if all patients who qualified had been placed on observation status.ConclusionAt our institution, the implementation of observation stay has led to a savings of 11.8% and a potential total savings of 27.7%. The rate of readmissions was decreased by 13.2% and had the potential to decrease by a total of 29.6%.     

Understanding the financial impact of a diagnosis of young onset dementia on individuals and families in the United Kingdom: Results of an online survey

Although literature on postdiagnostic support for people affected by young onset dementia acknowledges financial concerns, this topic has remained underresearched. The aim of this study was to explore the financial impact of a diagnosis of young onset dementia on individuals and families. An online survey, comprising binary yes/no, multiple-response and open-ended questions, was codesigned with people living with young onset dementia. The survey was promoted via networks and online platforms. Data were collected from August to October 2019. Survey respondents across the United Kingdom (n = 55) who had received a diagnosis of young onset dementia were aged between 45 and 64, were at different stages of dementia and had been diagnosed with thirteen different types of dementia. Of the 55 respondents, 71% (n = 39) had received assistance from family members when completing the survey. The main financial impact of a diagnosis of young onset dementia resulted from premature loss of income and reduced and often deferred pension entitlements. In some cases, care-costs became unaffordable. Lack of clarity of processes and procedures around needs assessments, carers' assessments and financial assessments by different organisations resulted in some families having to ask for legal advice and, in some cases, involved lengthy appeal processes. Future research needs to involve Adult Social Care and Third Sector organisations to help codesign and test financial management interventions to support people affected by this progressive health condition.     

以价值为导向的医保支付制度实施路径

价值医疗权衡医疗成本与所获健康结果之间的关系,关注的是整体健康结果。医保支付制度需要以价值为导向,以经济为杠杆,引导服务提供方以最小的成本产生最优的医疗服务。微观上,对单家机构实施以疾病诊断相关分组和病种分值付费为主的多元支付制度;中观层面,探索捆绑支付、以结果为导向的多方风险共担机制;宏观上,实行医联体内的总额预付。通过探索适用于当前中国医疗服务特点的以价值为导向的医保支付制度,提高医疗机构内在动力,优化就诊结构,最终实现整体健康水平的提升。     

公费医疗门诊项目实行“按人头付费”的效果评价

1998年,上海市普陀区医疗保险办公室改革公费医疗支付方式,对门诊项目实行按人头付费。本文就改革实施一年来公费医疗费用发生情况作一分析,对按人头付费方式实施效果进行评估,得出以下结论:该支付方式较为有效地降低了医疗费用的增长幅度,减少了浪费;对促进医院加强内部管理,转变经营策略,重视医疗成本控制,提高卫生资源的利用效率起到了积极的作用。同时提出,要注意纠正个别医疗机构控制费用方法简单化的偏差,要考虑人群年龄结构因素对医疗费用的影响,适当调整付费标准,以避免医疗机构在承担费用支出方面出现畸轻畸重的问题。     

新型卫生投入政策研究

本文提出了一整套新型卫生投入政策方案，总目标是建立起“四级两块式”卫生投入政策，具体目标模式有：改革卫生投入方式，实行“五级浮动式”医疗价格体制，建立医疗价格政策性补贴，增加公共卫生投入，整合卫生资源。并进行可行性论证。