Confounded association between proton pump inhibitor use and risk of biliary tract cancer: Result from three cohorts

Recent epidemiological studies suggested that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use was associated with an increased risk of biliary tract cancer (BTC), however, confounders were not adequately controlled. Our study aimed to evaluate PPI use and subsequent risk of BTC and its subtypes in three well-established cohorts. We conducted a pooled analysis of the subjects free of cancers in UK Biobank (n = 463 643), Nurses' Health Study (NHS, n = 80 235) and NHS II (n = 95 869). Propensity score weighted Cox models were used to estimate marginal HRs of PPIs use on BTC risk, accounting for potential confounders. We documented 284 BTC cases in UK Biobank (median follow-up: 7.6 years), and 91 cases in NHS and NHS II cohorts (median follow-up: 15.8 years). In UK biobank, PPI users had a 96% higher risk of BTC compared to nonusers in crude model (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.44-2.66), but the effect was attenuated to null after adjusting for potential confounders (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.60-1.49). PPI use was not associated with risk of BTC in the pooled analysis of three cohorts (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.60-1.43). We also observed no associations between PPI use with risk of intrahepatic (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.49-2.04), extrahepatic bile duct (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.52-2.27) and gallbladder cancers (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.26-1.66) in UK Biobank. In summary, regular use of PPIs was not associated with the risk of BTC and its subtypes.     

免疫抑制儿童感染新型冠状病毒Omicron变异株病毒清除时间的回顾性队列研究

背景：儿童新型冠状（新冠）病毒Omicron变异株流行期间，免疫抑制状态儿童新冠病毒清除时间定量分析研究较少。 目的：探讨新冠病毒Omicron株感染后免疫抑制和非免疫抑制儿童病毒清除的时间差别，为公共卫生政策制定和精准疫情防控措施提供临床数据。 设计：回顾性队列研究。 方法：以新冠病毒Omicron变异株感染住院患儿为队列人群，分为免疫抑制组和非免疫抑制组，免疫抑制分为绝对免疫抑制、相对免疫抑制和实施免疫抑制疗法，以免疫抑制组病例的性别、年龄和新冠病毒感染的分型与非免疫抑制组行1∶3匹配。以鼻咽拭子新冠病毒PCR检测拷贝数阈（Ct）值≥35为队列终点。 主要结局指标：新冠病毒清除时间。 结果：2022年4月12日至2022年5月12日在上海市新冠病毒感染定点收治医院符合本文共同纳入和排除标准的连续病例728例。免疫抑制组33例，其中绝对免疫抑制8例，相对免疫抑制23例，接受免疫抑制疗法2例（不包括绝对和相对免疫抑制患儿）。非免疫抑制组匹配后99例。2组临床症状、新冠病毒感染治疗和疫苗接种次数差异均无统计学意义。免疫抑制组和非免疫抑制组新冠病毒清除时间分别为（16.5±6.8）和（10.3±4.4）d，差异有统计学意义。免疫抑制组和非免疫抑制组新冠病毒感染轻型病例病毒清除时间分别为（14.0 ± 8.3）和（9.7 ± 3.1）d，普通型病例病毒清除时间分别为（18.3 ± 4.9）和（11.2 ± 5.9）d，差异均有统计学意义。2组单日病毒清除率在第9~14天时差异有统计学意义（P为0.005~0.039）。2组普通型病例单日病毒清除率在第10~15天时差异有统计学意义。免疫抑制组新冠病毒感染2周后核酸检测再次呈阳性3例（9%），临床分型均较前轻，3例均未接种新冠疫苗。 结论：Omicron株感染的免疫抑制患儿病毒清除时间较非免疫抑制患儿显著延长，主要反映在第9~14天，免疫抑制患儿病毒复阳风险高，提示需要更长的隔离时间和转阴后严格的病毒监测。     

4万余例沈阳地区妇女HPV感染情况分析北大核心

目的:分析我院2020年1月1日至2020年9月中旬近4万余例女性HPV感染情况,为HPV疫苗接种、宫颈病变预防、治疗、随访提供流行病学数据。方法:选取我院2020年1月1日至2020年9月中旬之间,于我院妇科门诊及病房、皮肤科门诊及体检中心的37 325接受HPV分型检测的患者的临床资料,分析检测结果。结果:HPV感染率为13.91%(5 193/37 325),单一感染率11.46%(4 276/37 325),阳性构成比82.34%(4 276/5 193),高危亚型感染以HPV16最多见,其次52、58,低危型以6最多见,其次为11、44,与5年前HPV感染情况分析中最常见的低危亚型为cp8304不同。不同年龄段感染率不同。结论:近年沈阳地区妇女HPV感染率为13.91%,较5年前感染率18.60%有所下降,以单一、高危亚型感染为主,多重感染并存为特征。     

Correction to: Expression profle of PU.1 in CD4+T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Clinical and Experimental Medicine - A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-021-00731-x     

牙支持3D导板辅助穿刺卵圆孔射频热凝治疗三叉神经痛的疗效分析

目的:探讨牙支持式3D打印导板辅助穿刺卵圆孔射频热凝治疗三叉神经痛术中术后的疗效分析.方法:对2019年1月～2021年5月收治的三叉神经痛患者40人,根据患者需要随机分成2组:A组(对照组),常规按照Hartel前入路法穿刺卵圆孔,进入卵圆孔后,耳-床线定位确定入颅深度后行射频治疗.B组(导板组),采用3D导板,给患者戴上导板固定后,完成穿刺,耳-床线定位确定入颅深度后行射频治疗.分析2组的术前疼痛评分(VAS)术后即刻及术后1月疼痛消失的有效率,手术时间,穿刺次数,并发症,穿刺的偏移程度.结果:与对照组A组比较在术后即刻有效率、术后1月随访有效率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05).在穿刺次数、穿刺偏移率、手术时间、并发症两组间比较有统计学差异(P<0.05).导板与牙齿紧密贴合率100％.结论:3D打印导板应用于穿刺卵圆孔具有明显的优势,可以减少患者创伤,减少X线辐射,减少穿刺偏移,术后疗效肯定,值得广泛应用.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases the 5-year overall survival of patients with resectable cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cervical cancer is a global health challenge in women. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a recent prospect for alternative cervical cancer treatments. This study investigated the efficacy of NACT against resectable cervical cancer based on the medium and long-term survival of patients with the disease. We searched through PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO and Cochrane Library for relevant reports published by June 2020. The primary outcomes were 3-year and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with resectable cervical cancer. Overall, 22 publications encompassing 5627 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We found NACT not to affect both 3-year PFS and OS as well as 5-year PFS of patients with resectable cervical cancer. However, NACT significantly improves the 5-year OS of patients with resectable cervical cancer (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.73–0.94, p = 0.013). Subgroup analysis (RCTs, non-RCTs, NACT + surgery + AT vs. surgery + AT, NACT + surgery + AT vs. CCRT/RT/CRT) further revealed NACT had no significant effect on 5-year PFS of patients with resectable cervical cancer, converse to the 5-year OS subgroup analysis, which validated the beneficial effect of NACT in patients with resectable cervical cancer. In addition, the effect of NACT was most significant in the non-RCTs subgroup (p = 0.012). NACT may improve the long-term prognosis of patients with resectable cervical cancer. However, further large-scale multicenter studies are needed to validate this finding.