F形空心钉与传统3枚平行钉治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较

目的:分析比较"F"形空心钉与传统倒三角3枚平行螺钉内固定治疗青壮年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。方法：2017年1月至2020年1月收治Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折患者38例，根据置入钉方式的不同将其分为两组，其中A组18例，采用"F"形空心钉固定，男12例，女6例，年龄37~55岁，受伤至手术时间1~3 d。B组20例，采用传统倒三角3枚平行拉力螺钉固定，男12例，女8例，年龄35~55岁，受伤至手术时间为1~3 d。比较两组患者骨折不愈合，股骨头坏死，股骨颈短缩，空心螺钉退出情况，髋关节功能Harris评分，疼痛视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale，VAS）。结果：所有患者获得随访，时间为15~31个月。两组患者在骨折不愈合，股骨颈短缩，股骨头坏死方面差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；两组患者在螺钉退出方面差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组患者术后12个月时髋关节Harris评分及VAS评分差异均无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论："F"形与传统倒三角3枚平行空心钉内固定治疗青壮年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折中短期疗效相似，但"F"形空心钉退钉率较低。     

Acetabular erosion following bipolar hemiarthroplasty: A role for the size of femoral head?

Introduction

Femoral neck fractures are the most frequent fractures in the elderly and hemiarthroplasty is the treatment of choice. The objective of this multicenter study is to identify predictive factors of acetabular erosion after bipolar hemiarthroplasty (surgery between 1997 and 2007) in a mobile independent population during a follow-up of ten years.

股神经阻滞联合无止血带技术在全膝关节置换术中的应用及效果

目的探讨股神经阻滞联合无止血带技术在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的应用,并分析其在减轻术后疼痛中的作用及对术后认知功能的影响。方法本院2016年1月至2018年1月行TKA患者251例,男117例,女134例,年龄18～80岁,BMI 16.9～31.7 kg/m~2,ASAⅠ—Ⅲ级,随机分为四组:止血带下膝关节置换+静脉镇痛组(PT1组,n=56);止血带下膝关节置换+股神经阻滞镇痛组(PT2组,n=63);无止血带下膝关节置换+静脉镇痛组(P1组,n=56);无止血带下膝关节置换+股神经阻滞镇痛组(P2组,n=76)。分别于术前1 d、术后1、2、3 d测量术侧大腿中上1/3处周长,并于同时点采集外周静脉血测定白细胞计数(WBC)、中性粒细胞百分比(NEUT%)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)浓度。分别于术前1 d、术后1、2、3、7 d和3个月评测患侧膝关节活动度(AROM),采用视觉模拟疼痛评分法(VAS)评估静息和活动时的疼痛VAS评分。分别于术前1 d、术后1、2、3 d采用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评估患者认知功能,记录术后3 d内认知功能损害发生情况和恶心呕吐(PONV)发生情况。结果术后1、2、3 d PT1组和PT2组大腿周长增加值明显大于P1组和P2组(P0.05)、CRP浓度明显低于P1组和P2组(P0.05)。术后1、2 d PT1和P1组AROM明显小于PT2组和P2组(P0.05),PT1组静息和活动时VAS评分明显高于PT2组、P1组和P2组(P0.05),且P1组活动时VAS评分明显高于PT2组和P2组(P0.05)。术后1 d PT1组和PT2组MoCA评分明显高于P1组和P2组(P0.05)。术后3 d内PT1组和PT2组认知功能损害总发生率明显低于P1组和P2组(P0.05),PT1组和P1组PONV的总发生率明显高于PT2组和P2组(P0.05)。结论持续股神经阻滞联合无止血带技术用于全膝关节置换术,患者术后大腿肿胀及疼痛程度较轻,利于膝关节功能锻炼,关节活动度恢复快,但术后全身炎症反应较重且术后早期认知功能损害发生率增加。     

Comparison of sartorius muscle-pedicle and circumflex iliac deep bone flap grafts in the treatment of early non-traumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head in young adults

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to retrospectively compare and evaluate the midterm curative effect of two different bone flap grafts in the treatment of early non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).MethodsA total of 180 patients (199 hips) with early non-traumatic ONFH received surgical treatment by sartorius muscle-pedicle bone flap graft (SMBF) (104 patients, 64 males and 40 females; mean age 34.67 ± 3.24 years) or circumflex iliac deep bone flap graft (CIDBF) (76 patients, 44 males and 32 females; mean age: 35.54 ± 3.37 years) from July 2004 to July 2009. The comparison between the groups was made with Harris score before and after surgery, length of incision, operative time, amount of bleeding, postoperative X-ray. Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) staging was performed.ResultsThe preoperative Harris hip score of two groups were 68.26 ± 1.26 and 69.35 ± 1.31, respectively. Patients' ARCO staging indicated 36 hips of stage IIa, 115 hips of stage IIb and 48 hips of stage IIc. The etiology of ONFH mainly including hormones (93 patients), alcohol (64 patients) and other (23 patients). The mean follow-up time of SMBF and CIDBF groups were (51.78 ± 2.35) and (52.73 ± 3.71) months, respectively. The time of removing sutures, operation time, amount of bleeding and length of incision in SMBF group were superior to those in the CIDBF group, and those differences between the SMBF and CIDBF groups were not significant (all p values > 0.28). The Harris score between the two groups was similar after operation and postoperative 12 month, and the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), whereas the difference of the postoperative 24 and 48 months was statistically significant (p ˂ 0.05). X-ray analysis showed improvement of osteonecrosis in both two groups after surgery, and as time went on, the total hip amount decreased, the replacement amount increased.ConclusionBoth bone flap grafts appear to be effective methods for treatment of early osteonecrosis of femoral head (ARCOⅡ), and the SMBF is a relatively simple technique and easy for mastering, and it is a reliable method for clinical application.Level of evidenceLevel III, Therapeutic Study.     

Ｇ型臂Ｘ线机在股骨颈骨折空心钉置入中的应用价值

目的:探讨G型臂X线机辅助经皮微创置钉在股骨颈骨折空心钉固定术中的应用价值。方法:回顾性收集64例采用经皮空心钉固定治疗的成人股骨颈骨折患者的资料。其中33例术中采用G型臂X线机透视下辅助置钉,为G臂组;31例术中采用C型臂X线机透视下辅助置钉,为C臂组。采用Harris评分评估髋关节功能情况,比较2组术中操作X线机次数、手术时间、术后住院时间、末次随访时疼痛视觉模拟评分及Harris评分。结果:2组手术均顺利完成,G臂组解剖复位31例,功能复位2例;C臂组解剖复位28例,功能复位3例。64例获得随访,平均随访(5.7±0.6)个月。G臂组术中操作X线机次数(t=6.287, P=0.000)、手术时间(t=6.482, P=0.000)少于C臂组(P0.05);2组术后住院时间(t=0.568,P=0.571)、末次随访时疼痛视觉模拟评分(t=0.530,P=0.597)及Harris评分(t=0.714,P=0.477)差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:股骨颈骨折空心钉固定术中采用G型臂X线机辅助置钉,具有中术操作X线机次数少、手术时间短的优点,可取得满意治疗效果。     

Outcome of non-surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures in the fragile elderly population

IntroductionWith the aging of the population the rate of fragility hip fractures increases. While medical recommendations are for hasten surgical treatment, for some older patients burdened with severe comorbidities, this might be risky.AimsTo compare the outcomes of patients treated non-surgically to those of the most fragile patients treated surgically.Patients and methodsA retrospective cohort study, of individuals aged ≥65 yearswho presented with fragility hip fractures between 01.01.2011-30.06.2016, to a primary trauma center. Patients treated surgically were stratified according to their age-adjusted Charlsons' comorbidity index (ACCI) score. Patients in the upper third of ACCI score, representing the more fragile population, were compared to patients treated non-surgically.Results847 patients presented with fragility fractures. 94 (11%) were treated non-surgically and 753 (89%) underwent surgery. Medical reasons were the leading cause for non-surgical treatment (61.7%). Surgically-treated patients were stratified according to their ACCI and 114 patients with ACCI > 9 were chosen for comparison. While both groups were comparable in terms of age, the non-surgical treatment group had more female patients (p. = 0.026) and a smaller proportion of independent walkers (p < 0.001). The ACCI was higher for the surgical treatment group (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was similar (14.9% and 18.1% for the operative and non-surgical groups respectively, P. = 0.575). However, one-year mortality was significantly higher for the non-surgical group (48.2% vs. 67.0%, P. = 0.005). The rates of in-hospital complications and 1-year readmissions were similar.ConclusionsOperative treatment for fragility hip fracture reduces long-term mortality rates even in the more fragile patients, compared to non-surgical treatment.