双半环直肠下端黏膜切除术治疗直肠前突(附15例临床分析)

目的:评价双半环直肠下端黏膜切除术治疗直肠前突的临床疗效及安全性.方法:采用两把PPH分别在直肠前、后壁齿线上3 cm处作半环,行直肠下端黏膜切除.结果:用双半环直肠下端黏膜切除术治疗15例直肠前突患者,均取得了良好的治疗效果.结论:双半环直肠下端黏膜切除术治疗直肠前突临床疗效显著,安全可靠.     

硬化注射治疗直肠前突的临床研究

目的：探讨硬化注射法治疗直肠前突的有效性。方法：将80例中度及中度以上的直肠前突患者随机分成两组，各40例。试验组行硬化注射法治疗，对照组行经阴道切开修补，并观察两组的治疗效果及并发症。结果：治疗后患者症状评分较治疗前降低，两组治疗效果相比无统计学差异。但治疗组在术中出血、术后疼痛等并发症方面则优于对照组。结论：硬化注射法是一种简便有效的治疗直肠前突的方法。     

Long-Term Results of Transanal Repair of Rectocele Using Linear Stapler

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the long-term outcomes of transanal rectocele repair using a linear stapler.METHODS: Between 1989 and 1999, 21 patients with symptomatic rectocele were enrolled for this study. Median age at time of presentation was 52 (range, 21–75) years. All patients underwent a transanal repair using a linear stapler. End evaluation to assess long-term results was performed after a median duration of follow-up of 58 (range, 12–118) months. Patients were asked about current problems with constipation, use of laxatives, incontinence, vaginal digitalization, presence of vaginal bulge, pain, bleeding, and sexual dysfunction.RESULTS: The postoperative course was uneventful in all cases. Sixteen (76 percent) patients had symptomatic relief. The operation reduced symptoms of obstructed defecation (21 vs. 5, preoperative vs. postoperative; P < 0.001) and the need of vaginal digitalization (21 vs. 6; P < 0.001). Only three patients (14 percent) showed no sign of improvement. Two patients (9 percent) had temporary improvement for three years before recurrence.CONCLUSIONS: Transanal repair of rectocele using a linear stapler is an easy, safe, and useful procedure for the correction of symptomatic rectocele. Successful long-term outcome can be achieved with this procedure.Reprints are not available.     

Stapled Mucosectomy for Rectocele Repair: A Preliminary Report

There is no optimum surgical method of repair for rectoceles; however, recent interest in the use of the circular hemorrhoidal stapler gun to treat rectoceles has stirred interest. We describe our early results using the circular hemorrhoidal stapler gun for repair of rectoceles. Seven patients (median age, 45 (range, 31–62) years; all females) have been treated. All seven patients presented with incomplete or difficult defecation, four patients required digital vaginal manipulation, and all patients had tried a variety of aperients to aid defecation. The procedure involved two pursestrings and one firing of the circular hemorrhoidal stapler gun. No perioperative complications were encountered. At a median of six (range, 1– 10) months follow-up, all patients were able to defecate without difficulty or manipulation. None of the patients required any medication to aid bowel evacuation after surgery. These promising early results support the use of stapled mucosectomy for the repair of rectoceles.     

经会阴直肠乙状结肠部分切除术治疗直肠脱垂临床研究

目的评价成人完全型直肠脱垂采用经会阴直肠乙状结肠部分切除术治疗直肠脱垂临床效果。方法对我科2006～2011年23例确诊为成人完全型直肠脱垂的患者采用经会阴直肠乙状结肠部分切除术治疗,收集临床资料做回顾性分析。结果 23例患者治疗效果满意,术后平均住院时间5d。术后随访8～48个月(平均36个月),20例无复发,3例轻度复发。结论采用经会阴直肠乙状结肠部分切除术治疗直肠脱垂临床效果比较满意。     

PPH与STARR术治疗出口梗阻性便秘手术前后排粪造影的分析比较

目的 比较痔上黏膜环切术（PPH）和经肛吻合器直肠切除术（STARR）两种经肛门术式治疗出口梗阻性便秘的形态学及功能学变化.方法 自2009年3月开始,选择ODC接受手术的住院患者,根据不同手术途径分为PPH组（n=36）和STARR组（n=42）,前瞻性行排粪造影、Longo评分、Wexner评分等评价,对两组患者手术前、术后1周、术后3个月、术后6个月情况行追踪观察并对两组情况进行比较.结果 两组患者术后个人感觉及排粪造影检查、Longo评分、Wexner评分都较术前有好转,在直肠前突程度小于3.6 cm时,两组术中出血情况、影响生活时间上,术后并发症,术后3个月主观感觉、Longo评分、Wexner评分以及术后排粪造影均无明显区别（P＞0.05）,在直肠前突程度大于3.6 cm时,STARR组在Longo及Wexner评分优于PPH组（P＜0.05）,其他各项指标相似（P＞0.05）.STARR组手术时间、住院时间明显长于PPH组（P＜0.05）,住院费用明显高于PPH组（P＜0.05）.STARR组术中切除宽度大于PPH组（P＜0.05）.PPH组在术后1周主观感觉明显比STARR组好（P＜0.05）.结论 PPH及STARR术都为治疗ODS的良好术式,PPH和STARR在直肠前突程度较小时（＜3.6 cm）手术效果相似,但住院时间、花费费用较STARR少,因此较轻度的直肠前突可选择PPH术作为首选手术方式.     

Symptomatic rectocele: what are the indications for repair?

Background

The surgical indications for symptomatic rectocele are undefined, and surgery has high recurrence rates. We implemented magnetic resonance imaging defecography (MRID) to determine if utilizing strict inclusion criteria for rectocele repair improves outcomes.

Methods

Patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) who underwent dynamic MRID were evaluated. Indications for surgical repair were defecation requiring manual assistance and the following MRID results: anterior defect >2 cm, incomplete evacuation, and the absence of perineal descent. Primary outcomes were the change in quality of life (QOL) scores and recurrence.

Results

From 2006 to 2013, 143 patients who presented with ODS underwent MRID. Seventeen patients met the criteria for repair. Recurrence was low (5.8%) with a median follow-up of 23 months, QOL scores improved from 57.3 to 76.5 (P = .041).

Conclusions

A minority of patients (12%) with ODS met the above criteria for rectocele repair. Patients who underwent repair had a significant improvement in QOL and low recurrence rate.     

TST加直肠黏膜下柱状药物注射术治疗直肠前突并发直肠黏膜内脱垂(附118例报告)

目的探讨TST加直肠黏膜下柱状药物注射术治疗直肠前突并发直肠黏膜内脱垂的临床疗效。方法分析总结118例直肠前突并发直肠黏膜内脱垂患者的临床资料,均行TST加直肠黏膜下柱状药物注射术治疗。结果 118例患者治愈97例(82.2%),显效17例(14.4%),好转4例(3.4%)。无1例切口出血、感染、直肠阴道瘘等并发症发生。结论 TST加直肠黏膜下柱状药物注射术治疗直肠前突并发直肠黏膜内脱垂,操作简便,创伤小,疗效满意,并发症少,住院时间和手术时间短,术后恢复快,值得推广使用。     

两种术式治疗直肠前突的临床分析

目的治疗直肠前突的2种术式:经阴道修补直肠前突、经肛门切开黏膜间断缝合修补直肠前突并内外括约肌部分切断术进行疗效分析。方法将我科先后收治36例直肠前突患者随机分为2组,其中A组17例,采用经肛门切开粘膜间断缝合修补直肠前突并内外括约肌部分切断术;B组19例采用经阴道修补直肠前突术,对临床资料进行分析总结。结果两种术式疗效有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经肛门切开粘膜间断缝合修补直肠前突并内外括约肌部分切断术治疗直肠前突近远期疗效好。     

MR Imaging in Posthysterectomy Vaginal Prolapse

In the diagnostic work-up of vaginal prolapse after hysterectomy cystoceles can be identified by sonography, whereas enteroceles and rectoceles can only be suspected in a routine clinical setting. The present pilot study was undertaken to investigate the diagnostic role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the differentiation of cysto-, entero- and rectoceles in women with posthysterectomy vaginal prolapse. Thirteen women (mean age 61, SD ± 7 years) with posthysterectomy vaginal prolapse underwent MRI (Gyroscan S 15, Philips). A median sagittal image series was obtained with a gradient-echo sequence, fast field echo, both at rest and during Valsalva maneuvers. MRI allowed the identification of cysto-, entero- and rectoceles, and differentiation between entero- and rectoceles in cases with inconclusive clinical findings. These findings make dissection more reliable and improve the outcome of hernia repair. No additional diagnostic information is obtained with MRI compared to ultrasound in the assessment of cystoceles.