一种预测子宫内膜病变患者内膜病理类型的临床模型＊

目的 开发并评估一种用于预测子宫内膜病变患者内膜病理类型的临床模型；方法 选取2019年11月至2021年11月因妇科B超发现子宫内膜病变并于山东中医药大学附属医院行宫腔镜下内膜活检的患者，结合其病史与最小绝对收缩和选择算子法（Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator，LASSO）筛选影响内膜病变的独立危险因素，列线图（nomogram）函数建立列线图模型，采用ROC曲线下方的面积大小（Area Under Curve， AUC）、C指数（C-index）、拟合优度（Hosmer-Lemeshow）检验、自举法（bootstrap）评估及验证模型，依据列线图对纳入患者进行风险赋分，绘制ROC曲线获取风险评分的截断值，从而划分高低风险的人群；结果 阴道流血、绝经、无流产史、并发高血压、B超内膜厚度增厚、内膜回声不正常，中医证型为虚实夹杂证是发生子宫内膜癌及癌前病变的独立危险因素，评估模型所得AUC值与C-index均>0.9，Hosmer-Lemeshow检验显示P>0.05，bootstrap内部验证法所得C-index亦高于0.9，均说明模型准确度、区分度及可信度良好，当患者的风险评分总和≥177分时，属于高风险人群；结论 本模型可以预测B超提示子宫内膜病变患者的内膜病理类型为癌前或恶变型的概率并识别高风险人群。     

Reliability of Cervicocephalic Proprioception Assessment: A Systematic Review

ObjectiveThe purpose of this systematic review was to determine the reliability and, where possible, the validity of cervicocephalic proprioceptive (CCP) tests in healthy adults and clinical populations.MethodsA systematic search, utilizing 7 databases from the earliest possible date to April 14, 2021, identified studies that measured reliability of CCP tests. Studies were screened for eligibility, and included studies were appraised using Quality Appraisal Tool for Studies of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) and Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 Tool (QUADAS-2) tools. Validity outcomes were assessed for included studies.ResultsOf 34 included studies, 29 investigated reliability for sense of position tests, 10 involved sense of movement tests, and 1 used a sense of force test. The head to neutral test was reliable and valid when 6 or more repetitions were performed within the test, discriminating between those with and without neck pain. Head tracking tests were reliable with 6 repetitions, and 1 study found discriminative validity in a whiplash population. Studies that found discriminative validity in sense of position reported mean joint position error generally >4.5° in the neck pain group and <4.5° in the asymptomatic group. No sense of force test was applied to a clinical population. Convergent validity analysis showed that these proprioceptive tests have low correlations with each other.ConclusionThe reliability and validity of CCP tests for sense of position and movement are dependent upon equipment and repetitions. Six repetitions are generally required for good reliability, and joint position error >4.5° is likely to indicate impairment in sense of position.