输尿管狭窄的应用解剖学研究

目的:探讨输尿管生理狭窄的数目、位置及狭窄的程度,为选择性CT分段扫描诊断输尿管结石提供解剖学依据.方法:解剖30例国人成人尸体60条输尿管(男40条,女20条),分段观测输尿管形态、狭窄的数目、位置和管腔内径.结果:各段输尿管形态多样,主要有四类.输尿管生理狭窄的程度依次为膀胱壁内段＞输尿管盆段＞输尿管髂血管段＞输尿管腹段.结论:输尿管生理狭窄的数目不恒定.生理狭窄的部位除膀胱壁内段外其余部位均不恒定,膀胱壁内段狭窄程度最大.     

分布式实时系统的一种转化设计方法

介绍了实时分布式系统的一种转化设计方法。系统的形式化需求规范用时段演算DC（Duration Calculus)描述,系统的设计用规范语言SL（Specification Language)表示。一组标准的转换规则可将系统从形式化需求规范转化为设计规范。系统设计的正确性可由转换过程本身得以保证。多用户多媒体通信系统的设计实例展示了转换设计方法的具体过程。     

京尼平苷对地鼠胆固醇结石形成的影响

目的观察京尼平苷预防给药对地鼠胆固醇结石形成的影响.方法用高脂肪高蛋白致石饲料造成地鼠胆固醇结石模型,阳性对照药物熊去氧胆酸80mg/kg和京尼平苷50,100mg/kgig,每天预防给药,给药30d后作胆囊内容物涂片检查观察地鼠的成石率,检测胆汁脂类成分计算胆汁成石指数.结果模型组的成石率为100%,成石指数(LI)大于1;京尼平苷50和100mg/kg组的成石率分别为40%(P＜0.05)和25%(P＜0.01),LI均小于1,熊去氧胆酸组的成石率与LI与京尼平苷100mg/kg组相近.结论京尼平苷对地鼠胆固醇结石的形成可能具有抑制作用.     

肾盂输尿管癌p53、nm23表达的临床意义

目的：揭示p53、nm23基因表达与肾盂输尿管癌生物学行为的关系。方法：采用免疫组化SABC法和原位杂交技术检测p53、nm23的表达。结果：肾盂输尿管癌p53、nm23阳性表达分别为51．1％（23／45）和46．7％（21／45）。p53阳性表达T2－T3为60％（21／35）,T1为20％（2／10）,P＜0．05;G2－G3为59．0％（23／39）,G1为0％（0／6）。nm23阳性表达T2－T3为48．6％（17／35）,T1为40％（4／10）,P＞0．05,G2－G3为48．7％（19／39）,G1为33．3％（2／6）,P＞0．05。p53阳性表达术后再发膀胱癌与阴性表达相比较P＞0．05。nm23阳性表达术后膀胱癌再发为61．9％（13／21）,阴性表达为20．9％（5／24）,P＜0．05。p53、nm23阳性表达生存率明显低于阴性表达,P＜0．05。结论：p53阳性表达与肾盂输尿管癌病理分期、分级有关,nm23阳性表达与术后再发膀胱癌有关。p53和nm23可能是判断肾盂输尿管癌预后的指标之一。     

British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) consensus document: management of bladder and ureteric injury

Injuries to the bladder and ureter are uncommon but usually require prompt urological management. Due to their infrequent nature, Urologists maybe unfamiliar with managing these acute problems and may not work in specialist centres with readily available expertise in open and abdominal surgery. We aim to provide advice in the form of a consensus statement led by the Female, Neurological and Urodynamic Urology (FNUU) Section of the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS), in consultation with BAUS members and consultants working in units throughout the UK, to create a comprehensive management pathway and a series of statements to aid clinicians.     

Stone extraction with loop ureteral catheter versus ureteroscopy in small distal ureteral stones—retrospective comparison of 547 consecutive patients

BackgroundTo evaluate whether stone extraction with a loop ureteral catheter (LUC) in distal ureteral stones is associated with a higher frequency of ureteral strictures compared to treatment with primary ureteroscopic stone removal (p-URS) or ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (l-URS).MethodsFive hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients were primarily endourologically treated for distal ureteral stones in our department between 2005 and 2019 and included in the study protocol. Data was retrospectively obtained from the patients’ charts and medical reports as well as from office-based urologists. Data analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney test or Student’s t-test as appropriate. A level of P<0.05 was assigned statistical significance.ResultsFour hundred and twelve patients were treated by URS (p-URS n=304, l-URS n=108) and another 135 by LUC stone extraction. Median follow-up was 41 [2–159] months. There was no difference between the groups concerning age, gender, proportion of patients with ureteral stenting, operating time, hospitalization or readmission rates. The number of ureteric strictures was small in all procedures [n=3 (1.0%) in p-URS, n=2 (1.9%) in l-URS and n=2 (1.5%) in LUC] and there was no difference between the groups concerning this serious complication (p-URS vs. LUC: P=0.6465; l-URS vs. LUC: P=0.9999).ConclusionsIn small distal stones, LUC stone extraction still is an alternative to URS procedures in stone management with comparable results concerning postinterventional ureteral strictures. In experienced hands, it still has its value in accurately selected patients.     

A “bridge” technique to replace the obstructed single-J stent in the patient with ileal conduit urinary diversion: a case report

The ureteroileal anastomotic stricture is a complication of ileal conduit urinary diversion. To prevent the hydronephrosis and protect the renal function, a single-J ureteral stent may be needed. However, the most common complication of these patients is single-J stent obstruction. To solve this problem, we describe an easy, useful and low-cost technique to replace the obstructed ureteral stent under radiographic guidance without intervention by flexible cystoscopy or percutaneous nephrostomy. The key steps of our procedure are to identify the location of the stricture, to place the super smooth guide wire into pinhole of the obstructed single-J stent and to get the super smooth guide wire and 5-Fr ureteral catheter across the stricture. Our case was a 40-year-old male patient who was diagnosed as pelvic lipomatosis and received ileal conduit urinary diversion 3 years ago. The left-side ureteroileal anastomotic stricture occurred 1 year after surgery. He refused to repair the stricture by open or other minimal invasive surgery. He regularly changed his ureteral stent with intervals of three months. As the stent was obstructed by the stone, the guide wire couldn’t be inserted through the primary ureteral stent. We used our “bridge” technique to solve his problem successfully. No bleeding and no urinary tract infection were observed after intervention. The urine from the ureteral stent was fluent. We think that this “bridge” technique may be a good choice for the replacement of the obstructed single-J stent in the patients of ileal conduit urinary diversion.     

Experience managing distal ureteral strictures with Boari flap-psoas hitch and comparison of open and laparoscopic procedures

BackgroundTo summarize our experience with the Boari flap-psoas hitch and compare the indications, perioperative data and outcomes between open and laparoscopic procedures.MethodsThis study retrospectively reviewed 35 patients with complex distal ureteral stricture between January 2015 and April 2019. All patients were treated with Boari flap-psoas hitch by either an open or a laparoscopic procedure. Selection criteria were based on the etiology, comorbidities, medical history, and patient preference.ResultsAll surgeries were performed successfully. The median operation time was 201 min (range, 120 to 300 min), and the median estimated blood loss was 50 mL (range, 20 to 400 mL). The median postoperative hospitalization was 9 days (range, 3 to 46 days). Nineteen patients were treated by the open procedure, and 16 were treated by the transperitoneal laparoscopic procedure. The surgical indication of open surgery was broader than that for laparoscopic surgery. For patients experiencing iatrogenic injury and ureterovesical reimplantation failure, no significant differences in sex, laterality, operative time, ASA score or postoperative hospitalization stay were observed between the two groups. The median estimated blood loss was lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (P=0.047). Patients in the open group had more surgical complications than patients in the laparoscopic group (P=0.049). The postoperative follow-up showed the radiological resolution of hydronephrosis in 33 patients.ConclusionsWith the appropriate surgical considerations, Boari flap-psoas hitch is a valid method to bridge distal ureteral defects. For select patients, laparoscopic surgery had advantages being a minimal invasive surgery with less estimated blood loss and fewer surgical complications.     

B超对先天性输尿管狭窄的诊断价值

目的：研究超声诊断在先天性输尿管狭窄中的临床价值。方法：对33例输尿管狭窄病例行B超检测,并与X线、手术结果进行对比。结果：B超对输尿管梗阻定位率为93.9%,疾病诊断的符合率81.8%。结论：B超对先天性输尿管狭窄的诊断有较大的优越性和很好的临床价值。