经鼻导管高流量吸氧与经鼻气道正压通气在重症毛细支气管炎呼吸支持中的应用价值比较

目的：比较经鼻导管高流量吸氧（HFNC）与经鼻气道正压通气（nCPAP）在重症毛细支气管炎呼吸支持中的应用价值，为临床治疗方案的选择提供参考。方法：选取2016年12月至2018年12月我院儿科收治的重症毛细支气管炎患儿90例，采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组各45例。两组患儿入院后均给予常规综合治疗以保证呼吸道通畅，在此基础上观察组采用HFNC治疗，对照组采用nCPAP治疗，比较两组患儿治疗前和治疗24 h后呼吸频率、经皮血氧饱和度（TcSO2）、呼吸窘迫评分体系（CSS）评分、动脉血氧分压（PaO2）等呼吸相关指标及治疗前后临床症状体征改善情况。结果：两组患儿治疗24 h后呼吸频率、CSS评分均降低，且观察组降低程度更大，TcSO2、PaO2于治疗24 h后升高，观察组升高幅度较对照组明显；治疗后两组患儿咳嗽及肺部湿啰音、肺部炎症情况均改善，观察组症状体征消失时间早于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：重症毛细支气管炎患儿采用HFNC治疗可明显改善通气功能和临床症状，治疗效果优于nCPAP治疗，可扩大样本量进一步观察。     

俯卧位机械通气治疗肺外源性ARDS和肺内源性ARDS的效果比较

目的探讨俯卧位机械通气在肺外源性ARDS和肺内源性ARDS患者中的治疗效果差异。方法选取2014年3月至2015年11月我院收治120例ARDS患者为研究对象,根据患者发病不同原因分为A组(肺内源性ARDS患者,60例)和B组(肺外源性ARDS患者,60例),比较两组患者俯卧位机械通气4 h后的血氧分压(PaO_2)、二氧化碳分压(PaCO_2)、氧合指数(PaO_2/FiO_2)、心率(HR)、平均动脉压及心指数。结果 B组患者的PaO_2、PaO_2/FiO_2均显著高于A组,PaCO_2显著低于A组(P<0.05)。两组患者HR、平均动脉压及心指数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论俯卧位机械通气在肺外源性ARDS的治疗效果较肺内源性ARDS更为显著,但对血流动力学无影响。     

氧合指数与急性呼吸衰竭行有创通气治疗患者预后的关系

目的探讨氧合指数与急性呼吸衰竭行有创通气治疗患者预后的关系。方法选取2008年1月至2012年10月山东省即墨市人民医院行有创通气治疗急性呼吸衰竭患者75例,其中死亡28例,设为死亡组,存活47例,设为存活组;比较两组患者行有创通气治疗前急性生理与慢性健康状况(APACHE)Ⅲ评分、多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)评分,治疗1、3、7 d后氧合指数(Pa O2/Fi O2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(Pa CO2)及p H值等血气分析指标水平。结果存活组和死亡组患者行有创通气治疗前急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅲ(APACHEⅢ)评分和多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)评分组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);存活组和死亡组患者治疗1 d后Pa O2/Fi O2、Pa CO2及p H水平组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者治疗3、7 d后Pa CO2和p H水平组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但死亡组患者治疗3、7 d后Pa O2/Fi O2水平明显低于存活组(P<0.05);存活组和死亡组在治疗后不同时间(1、3、7 d)的Pa O2/Fi O2和Pa CO2比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论氧合指数与急性呼吸衰竭行有创通气治疗患者预后关系密切,可作为临床评价重要参考指标之一。     

直丝弓矫治器和Begg矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类错[牙合]畸形疗效比较

目的:对比不同矫治器对错[牙合]畸形患者面高度及前后牙咬合关系的影响。方法:选取于笔者医院接受矫治的83例错[牙合]畸形患者,根据患者矫治器类型分为直丝弓组和Begg组,分别为42例和41例。比较并分析两组患者治疗前后牙咬合关系、硬组织、磨牙及面高度的变化情况。结果:矫治后,两组患者OJ-PPV、OB-PP、LMA-MPV、LMA-MPV均降低,Begg矫治组OJ-PPV水平显著高于直丝弓矫治组,OB-PP、LMA-MPV、LMA-MPV水平显著低于直丝弓矫治组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者LAFH、LAFH/TAFH、PFH/TAFH水平均升高,其中Begg矫治组患者LAFH水平显著低于直丝弓矫治组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者LMA-MP、LMC-MP水平均升高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);矫治前后,两组患者SNA、SNA、ANB水平均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:两种矫治器对错[牙合]畸形患者硬组织变化均无明显影响,其中Begg矫治对患者前后牙咬合关系改善作用更强,直丝弓对患者面高度的改善能力更强。     

经皮椎弓根钉Sextant内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折疗效观察

目的探讨微创经皮椎弓根钉Sextant内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析自2018-03—2019-07诊治的100例老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折,50例采用传统开放椎弓根钉内固定术治疗(开放组),50例采用经皮椎弓根螺钉Sextant内固定术治疗(微创组),比较2组术后并发症情况、末次随访时临床疗效、疼痛VAS评分、伤椎前缘高度、伤椎后凸角。结果100例均获得随访,随访时间13~25个月,平均17.8个月。微创组出现1例螺钉松动,1例伤椎塌陷;开放组出现3例螺钉松动,2例切口感染,2例伤椎塌陷,1例神经刺激症;微创组术后并发症情况较开放组优,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。末次随访时微创组临床疗效:显效27例、有效20例、无效3例;开放组:显效16例,有效23例,无效11例;微创组临床疗效较开放组优,差异有统计意义(P<0.05)。微创组疼痛VAS评分较开放组低,伤椎前缘高度较开放组高,伤椎后凸角较开放组小,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经皮椎弓根钉Sextant内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折可明显减轻患者术后疼痛,改善椎体前缘高度与后凸角,且并发症发生率低,值得临床推广应用。     

经鼻高流量氧气湿化治疗老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重合并呼吸衰竭的可行性研究

ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of transnasal heated humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) with respiratory failure in elderly patients. MethodsA total of 176 elderly patients with AECOPD complicated with respiratory failure who were hospitalized at Peking University Shougang Hospital from December 2016 to January 2022 were enrolled, including 82 patients in an HFNC group and 94 patients in an NPPV group. After treatment, pulse oxygen saturation (SPO₂), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO₂), oxygenation index (OI), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), comfort score, discharge rate, rate of endotracheal intubation, rate of transfer to intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality were compared between the two groups. The independent sample t-test was used for comparison between the two groups. Statistical data are expressed in percentage or number of cases and the χ² test was used for their comparisons. ResultsThe SPO₂ values at 30 min, 1 h, and 6 h were significantly higher in the HFNC group than in the NPPV group (t=-2.049,-2.618, and -3.314, P=0.043, 0.010, and 0.001, respectively). SPO₂ before discharge was significantly lower than that of the NPPV group (t=2.162, P=0.033), but OI at each time point and before discharge had no statistical significance (P＞0.05). MAP at 6 h was significantly higher in the HFNC group than in the NPPV group (t=-2.209, P=0.029), but within the normal range. HRs at 2 h and 3 h in the HFNC group were significantly higher than those of the NPPV group (t=-2.199 and -2.336, P=0.030 and 0.021, respectively). There were no significant differences in RR, HR, or MAP between the two groups at other time points and before discharge (P＞0.05). There was no significant difference in PaCO2 between the two groups (P＞0.05). Comfort score in the HFNC group was significantly higher than that of the NPPV group (t=-46.807, P＜0.001). There were no significant differences in discharge rate, ICU transfer rate, endotracheal intubation rate, and mortality between the two groups (P＞0.05). ConclusionHFNC is as effective as NPPV in treating elderly patients with AECOPD complicated with type Ⅰ or mild type Ⅱ respiratory failure, and HFNC is more comfortable than NPPV.