Measurements of biliary tract motility havefocused on radiologic and pressure measurements toquantify biliary motility rather than measurements ofelectrical activity of the biliary tract. We previously reported the recording of biliary electricalsignals during ERCP and now report on the continueddevelopment and validation of a system to measurebiliary tract electrical activity as well as biliarymechanical activity. In 26 patients presenting with avariety of clinical indications, we recordedmeasurements of electrical activity from the common bileduct sphincter (16 patients), pancreatic duct sphincter(eight patients), and/or sphincter of Oddi (eightpatients). Electrical recordings were performed with aspecially modified ERCP catheter, using two circularelectrodes as well as a custom catheter that measured both electrical and mechanical activity.Electrical activity of the biliary tract wassuccessfully recorded in 25 of 26 patients (96%),including the common bile duct sphincter (16 patients,62%), pancreatic duct sphincter (eight patients, 31%) andsphincter of Oddi (eight patients, 31%). Along with theelectrical recordings, common bile duct sphinctermechanical activity was recorded in 12 patients (67%), pancreatic duct sphincter mechanical activityin six patients (33%), and sphincter of Oddi mechanicalactivity in six patients (33%). Frequency analysis ofelectrical signals revealed a mean frequency(cycles/min) of 4.7 ± 0.5 in the common bile ductsphincter, 4.1 ± 0.6 in the pancreatic ductsphincter, and 4.9 ± 0.7 in the sphincter ofOddi. Phasic mechanical frequency in cycles per minutewas recorded at a frequency of 4.8 ± 0.5 in common bileduct sphincter, 4.0 ± 0.6 in pancreatic ductsphincter, and 5.3 ± 0.9 in sphincter of Oddi.Tonic pressure (averaged 12.1 ± 1.5 mm Hg) incommon bile duct sphincter, 12.4 ± 1.4 mm Hg inpancreatic duct sphincter, and 15.0 ± 5.1 mm Hgin sphincter of Oddi. Analysis of wave form propagations(noted as percentage antegrade, retrograde, orindeterminant) revealed 50% antegrade, 23% retrograde, and 27%indeterminant). One patient was recorded on twooccasions via ERCP; the same patient had anintraoperative recording. All three recordings showedsimilarities. We conclude that measurements of biliary,pancreatic, and sphincter of Oddi electrical andmechanical activity are feasible and can be done as partof ERCP. There was good correlation between biliarytract electrical and mechanical events and differentwave form characteristics were noted for different partsof the biliary tree. Further studies are warranted toevaluate the potential usefulness of measurement of biliary tract electrical activity, and toconfirm its correlation with mechanical events in thepancreato-biliary tree. 相似文献
IntroductionStone extraction represents the most frequent indication for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) is a recent introduced approach consisting of an endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation following limited endoscopic sphyncterotomy (ES), which has been proven to be safe and effective for extraction of large common bile duct (CBD) stones. Peri-ampullary diverticula (PAD) are described in 10–20% of patients undergoing ERCP. Aim of our study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of EPLBD for the extraction of large biliary stones in patients with PAD.MethodsThe prospectively collected endoscopy databases of 4 Italian ERCP high-volume centers were reviewed retrospectively, and all consecutive patients with an instrumental diagnosis of large biliary stones and PAD, between September 2014 and October 2016, were included in this study.ResultsEighty-one patients (36 males, median age 75 years) were treated between September 2014 and October 2016. Deep biliary cannulation was reached in 78/80 patients. Successful extraction was achieved in 74/78 patients at the first attempt. AEs occurred in 8 patients (1 severe). Younger age, stone size and incomplete stone extraction were significantly associated with AEs.ConclusionsEPLBD is an effective and safe technique in patients with PAD and large biliary stones, which avoids the need of other techniques, thereby reducing the risks of adverse events. 相似文献
Background & Aims: Patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction are at high risk of developing pancreatitis after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. Impaired pancreatic drainage caused by pancreatic sphincter hypertension is the likely explanation for this increased risk. A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine if ductal drainage with pancreatic stenting protects against pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with pancreatic sphincter hypertension. Methods: Eligible patients with pancreatic sphincter hypertension were randomized to groups with pancreatic duct stents (n = 41) or no stents (n = 39) after biliary sphincterotomy. The primary measured outcome was pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Results: Pancreatic stenting significantly decreased the risk of pancreatitis from 26% to 7% (10 of 39 in the no stent group and 3 of 41 in the stent group; P = 0.03). Only 1 patient in the stent group developed pancreatitis after sphincterotomy, and 2 others developed pancreatitis at the time of stent extraction. Patients in the no stent group were 10 times more likely to develop pancreatitis immediately after sphincterotomy than those in the stent group (relative risk, 10.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.4–78.3). Conclusions: Pancreatic duct stenting protects significantly against post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with pancreatic sphincter hypertension undergoing biliary sphincterotomy. Stenting of the pancreatic duct should be strongly considered after biliary sphincterotomy for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction; pancreatic sphincter of Oddi manometry identifies which high-risk patients may benefit from pancreatic stenting.GASTROENTEROLOGY 1998;115:1518-1524 相似文献
A 47-year-old patient presented with jaundice. Laboratory examinations confirmed cholestasis. The patient had a long history of chronic pancreatitis. Subsequently, cholecystectomy and a duodenumpreserving resection of the pancreatic head (Frey's surgery) had been performed. Endoscopic retrograd holangiography was done. The endoscope was inserted the normal way to the untouched papilla vateri. After injection of contrast medium, only the side-to-side choledocho-jejunal anastomosis but not the common bile duct could be visualized because the catheter spontaneously slipped into the jejunum via the side-to-side choledocho-jejunal anastomosis.
After introducing a catheter percutaneously into the intrahepatic bile duct system, a long stenosis of the common bile duct could be visualized. It was possible to overcome the stenosis with a wire, but the wire also dislocated into the jejunum via the side-to-side choledocho-jejunal anastomosis and could not be placed through the papilla into the duodenum.
The problem was solved in a tricky way: A wire was introduced into the common bile duct via the papilla and placed into the duodenum. A loop was brought in percutaneously and was also placed in the jejunum. With the loop, the wire was grabbed and taken out percutaneously. Now a biliary metal stent could be positioned correctly over the wire to expand the stenosis.
After the procedure jaundice was cured quickly. The further course was uneventful with complete recovery. 相似文献