尿石症住院患者1100例分析

目的了解近年来尿石症住院患者情况的变化。方法对1998年~2003年间的尿石症住院患者1100例进行分析。结果本组中,肾结石251例(22.8%)、输尿管结石742例(67.5%)、膀胱结石97例(8.8%)、尿道结石10例(0.9%)。上、下尿路结石的比例为9.28∶1。高钙尿患者27例(13.0%)、高钙血症91例(9.1%)、高尿酸血症167例(17.8%)。结石成分分析结果:草酸钙168例(62.7%);磷酸钙59例(22.0%);尿酸及尿酸盐25例(9.3%);磷酸镁铵10例(3.7%);碳酸盐5例(1.7%);胱氨酸1例(0.4%)。治疗:ESWL658例(59.8%)、肾切开取石术35例、肾切除术6例、输尿管切开取石术92例(占8.4%)、输尿管镜加气压弹道碎石52例(4.7%)、膀胱切开取石53例(其中前列腺摘除术加膀胱切开取石术26例);膀胱镜加气压弹道碎石20例;前列腺电切术加气压弹道碎石7例;膀胱镜加大力钳碎石术9例。尿道切开取石术1例;经尿道镜取石术2例;尿道镜加气压弹道碎石3例。结论本组尿石症患者以上尿路结石为主,含钙结石占绝大多数。尽管微创手术的普遍开展,ESWL仍不失为一种创伤小、效果好的治疗方法。     

输尿管镜下气压弹道碎石治疗输尿管结石失败原因探讨(附36例报告)

目的:探讨输尿管镜下气压弹道碎石(URSL)治疗输尿管结石失败原因及防治措施.方法:回顾分析36例气压弹道碎石治疗输尿管结石手术失败的临床资料.结果:17例手术中结石移位进入肾盂,无法碎石;8例因输尿管走行迂曲或输尿管狭窄置镜未成功;5例因局部出血或引流不畅导致视野不清终止手术;6例因输尿管穿孔而改开放手术.结论:结石移位、输尿管走行迂曲或狭窄、术中视野不清、输尿管穿孔是手术失败的主要原因.合理选择病例,保持液适当的灌注速度和压力,保持视野的清晰和在直视下推进输尿管镜是手术成功的关键.     

输尿管镜气压弹道碎石治疗输尿管结石(附108例报告)

目的探讨输尿管镜气压道弹碎石术治疗输尿管结石的临床疗效.方法在输尿管镜窥视下采用气压弹道碎石机对108例输尿管结石进行治疗.结果 103例原位碎石成功,总成功率95.3%,其中输尿管上段结石成功率为83.3%,中段结石为96.3%,下段结石为98.4%.平均碎石时间(4.5±2.2)min,术后1～3个月结石排净率100%.结论输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石具有安全、有效、容易操作等特点,是治疗输尿管结石的首选方法.     

Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: Impact of recent technical advances

Technical improvements, such as mechanical lithotripsy, stenting or nasobiliary drainage, and wire-guided cannulation, have reduced the risk of complications in endoscopic sphincterotomy. To determine the extent of this reduction in risk, we assessed the medical records of 1352 patients with common bile duct stones in whom the procedure was conducted. Complications examined were: acute cholangitis and pancreatitis. Stone clearance was achieved in 1256 patients (92.8%), with an overall morbidity rate of 7.7% and a mortality rate of 0.15%. One hundred and forty-two patients had stones with a diameter greater than 20mm; 97 of these patients did not undergo lithotripsy. Cholangitis occurred in 10 of these 97 patients (10.3%), whereas, in the 45 patients who underwent lithotripsy, there were no cases of cholangitis (P=0.02). Stone removal was not immediately accomplished or attempted in 396 patients. In 82 of these patients in whom a stent or a nasobiliary drain was placed in the common bile duct, the incidence of cholangitis was 1.2%, significantly less (P=0.045) than the incidence of 6.4% in the other 314 patients given no stenting or nasobiliary drain. To overcome difficult cannulation, precut sphincterotomy was conducted in 134 patients and wireguided sphincterotomy, a recently introduced procedure, was conducted in 55 patients. When the precutting technique was used, the incidence of acute pancreatitis was significantly higher (8/134; 6.0%) than that in the patients in whom the standard procedure was conducted, i.e., neither the precut technique nor wire-guided ES was used (23/1218; 1.9%) (P=0.008). There were no cases of pancreatitis in the 55 patients in whom wire-guided sphincterotomy was performed, although the difference was not statistically significant because of the small number of patients (P=0.06). Based on these findings, we conclude that improved technologies have led to a significant reduction of complications in endoscopic sphincterotomy.     

ELECTROHYDRAULIC LITHOTRIPSY: AN EFFECTIVE AND ECONOMICAL MODALITY OF ENDOSCOPIC URETERIC LITHOTRIPSY

Background : Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) has been available for endoscopic treatment of urinary calculi since 1960, but the large probe size and concerns regarding safety had previously restricted its use to the treatment of bladder calculi. However, recent refinements have made it particularly suitable for the treatment of ureteric calculi. Methods : The authors report their initial experience using EHL in conjunction with mini-ureteroscopy in the treatment of 94 ureteric calculi in 89 patients. The size of the calculi ranged from 3 to 19 mm in diameter, with a mean of 8.2 mm. The mean operating time was 29 min, ranging from 10 to 120 min. Results : A complete fragmentation rate of 91.5% of the calculi was achieved. There were no major complications and a low incidence of minor complications: haematuria (2.2%), urinary tract infection (3.4%) and postoperative ureteric colic (2.2%). There were four cases of minor ureteric perforations (4.5%); all were successfully treated using conservative measures. Conclusions : It is concluded that EHL is a safe and effective method of treating ureteric calculi.     

输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石185例

目的探讨输尿管镜气压弹道碎石治疗输尿管结石的效果。方法2004年2月～2005年3月，我们对185例输尿管结石（其中伴肾绞痛96例）采用输尿管镜取石或气压弹道碎石进行总结和分析。结果失败12例，其中6例改开放手术，6例术后3d行体外冲击波碎石。一次碎石成功率93．5％（173／185），其中上段结石为75．0％（24／32），中段为95．8％（46／48），下段为98．1％（103／105）。肾绞痛者成功率为100％（96／96）。术中输尿管损伤率2．9％（5／173），其中3例（1．7％）中转开放手术。术后肾绞痛1例。全组随访6～12个月，平均10．2月，无复发。结论输尿管镜气压弹道碎石安全有效，并发症少，是治疗输尿管中下段结石的首选方法，尤其对肾绞痛者疗效更好。     

肾盂切开气压弹道碎石治疗鹿角形肾结石(附46例报告)

目的 探讨肾盂切开气压弹道碎石治疗鹿角形肾结石的疗效。方法 对46例鹿角形肾结石采用肾盂切开气压弹道碎石，将结石分解成数块，再逐一取出。双侧肾结石采用一次分侧手术取石。结果 46例鹿角形肾结石均较顺利取出，无黏膜撕脱、出血等并发症。25例肾功不全者均显著改善。结论肾盂切开结合气压弹道碎石是治疗鹿角形肾结石较好方法；双侧肾结石多有梗阻致肾功能受损，应双侧一次取石，有利于双肾功能恢复。     

尿结石理化性质检测在体外冲击波碎石中的意义

对３２例的尿结石采用化学定量分析法进行化学成分分析，利用材料力学原理和方 法测定密度、硬度和抗压强度，并对其中１３例的尿结石作体外碎石试验。结果表明碎石所需 冲击次数与结石成分有关，尤其是草酸钙结石所需冲击次数明显增加；冲击次数与结石物理特 性有关，随结石硬度增加而增加。因此，检测尿结石理化性质在体外冲击波碎石中具有重要意 义。     

体外冲击波碎石术后石街的处理(附41例报告)

目的总结体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)术后石街的处理经验。方法回顾性分析2001年8月至2006年3月我院41例上尿路结石行ESWL术后形成石街患者的临床资料。结果9例石街采用逆行引流体位后自行排净,25例再次行ESWL术后石街排净,5例改行输尿管镜碎石术,2例行开放手术。结论采用患侧卧位的逆行引流体位,再次行ESWL术和输尿管镜碎石术等方法处理,能有效提高石街的排净率。     

Symptoms, diagnosis and endoscopic management of common bile duct stones

Symptomatic BDS commonly cause significant morbidity and attempt at stone removal should be attempted if possible. Complications of CBDS include biliary colic, jaundice, cholangitis and pancreatitis. Investigations aimed to predict the presence of stones within the bile duct include serum bilirubin, AST, ALP, common bile duct diameter and age as independent predictors of choledocholithiasis. TUS is a sensitive test in detecting bile duct dilatation but the sensitivity is reduced in its ability to detect choledocholithiasis. A NIH consensus statement found that ERC, MRC and EUS were comparable in their sensitivities, specificities and accuracy rates for detection of choledocholithiasis. ERC and stone removal using a balloon or basket is often performed following EST. EBD may be performed if patients have uncorrected coagulopathies but the risk of pancreatitis is higher than for EST (although the risk of bleeding complications is lower for EBD). ML is often required in difficult to remove CBDS and using this device, CBDS can be removed in 90–95% of cases. Other forms of lithotripsy including laser lithotripsy and EHL are confined to specialised centres and the evidence for their use is based on small studies. ESWL may clear stones from the bile duct in up to 93% of patients but frequently ERC and stone fragment removal is required post ESWL. The role of medical therapy in difficult to remove CBDS (or in CBDS in patients with severe co-morbid illness preventing ERC + stone removal) is still currently uncertain due to a lack of large randomised control trials.